Meta-Analysis of Navigation vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1177-1182

  Hetaimish, Bandar M ^a   Khan, M Moin ^a   Simunovic, Nicole ^a   Al Harbi, Hatem H ^b   Bhandari, Mohit ^a   Zalzal, Paul K ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b The General Directorate of Armed Forces Health Services   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Malalignment; Randomized controlled trial; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EUROPE; FEMUR; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; NAVIGATED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; RISK FACTORS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84863409483     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Moreland J.R. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 226:49.
2. Wasielewski R.C., Galante J.O., Leighty R., et al. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994, 299:31.
3. Figgie H., Goldberg V., Figgie M., et al. The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1989, 71:1031.
4. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73:709.
5. Insall J.N. Choices and compromises in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 226:43.
6. Delp S.L., Stulberg S.D., Davies B., et al. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 354:49.
7. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85-B:830.
8. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:261.
9. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:8.
10. Detsky A.S., Naylor C.D., O'Rourke K., et al. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:255.
11. Bhandari M., Richards R., Sprague S., et al. The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84:388.
12. Dunbar M.J., Robertsson O., Ryd L., et al. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:339.
13. Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Bjorner J.B., et al. User's manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey (2nd ed.) 2007, QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI. Second Edition.
14. Bach C.M., Nogler M., Steingruber I.E., et al. Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res 2002, 399:184.
15. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986, 7:177.
16. Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med 2002, 21:1539.
17. Stulberg D.S., Picard F., Saragaglia D. Computer-assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Oper Tech Ortho 2000, 10:25.
18. Mielke R.K., Clemens U., Jens J.H., et al. Navigation in der Knieendo-prothetik-vorläufigeklinische Erfahrungen und prospektivvergleichende Studiegegenüberkonventioneller Implantationstechnik. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001, 139:109. German.
19. Saragaglia D., Picard F., Chaussard C., et al. Mise en place des prothèsestotales du genouassistée par ordinateur: comparaison avec la technique conventionelle. Résultatsd'une etude prospective randomisée de 50 cas. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001, 87:18. French.
20. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:830.
21. Oberst M., Bertsch C., Würstlin S., et al. CT-Analyse der Beinachsenachkonventioneller vs. navigierter Knieendoprothese. Erste Ergebnisseeinerkontrol-lierten, prospektiven und randomisierten Studie. Unfallchirurg 2003, 106:941. German.
22. Hart R., Janeèek M., Chaker A., et al. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 2003, 27:366.
23. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:372.
24. Bäthis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:682.
25. Victor J., Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:131.
26. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:618.
27. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer- navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:282.
28. Böhling U., Schamberger H., Grittner U., et al. Computerised and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2005, 6:69.
29. Mullaji A., Kanna R., Marawar S., et al. Comparison of limb and component alignment using computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:953.
30. Oberst M., Bertsch C., Konrad G., et al. CT analysis after navigated versus conventional implantation of TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008, 128:561.
31. Martin A., Wohlgenannt O., Prenn M., et al. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 460:178.
32. Kim Y., Kim J., Yoon S. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:471.
33. Lutzner J., Krummenauer F., Wolf C., et al. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1039.
34. Luring C., Beckmann J., Haibock P., et al. Minimal Invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:928.
35. Dutton A., Yeo S., Yang K., et al. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2.
36. Weng Y., Hsu R., Hsu W. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:668.
37. Martin A., Sheinkop M., Langhenry M., et al. Accuracy of side-cutting implantation instruments for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009, 17:374.
38. Choong P., Dowsey M., Stoney J. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:560.
39. Lewallen D.G., Bryan R.S., Peterson L.F. Polycentric total knee arthroplasty. A ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984, 66:1211.
40. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299:153.
41. Khan M., et al. Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 27:271.