Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: Results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 84, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2002, Pages 90-98

  Stulberg, S David ^a   Loan, Peter ^a   Sarin, Vineet ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036394724     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200200002-00011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1997;205:5-11.
2. Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS 3rd, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1035-40.
3. Freeman MA, Todd RC, Bamert P, Day WH. ICLH arthroplasty of the knee: 1968-1977. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60:339-44.
4. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 1986;205:21-42.
5. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1985;192:13-22.
6. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754-65.
7. Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS. The total condylar prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:173-80.
8. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop. 1988;226:6-13.
9. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1995;321:106-10.
10. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop. 1987;216:151-8.
11. Feng EL, Stulberg SD, Wixson RL. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop. 1994;229:60-71.
12. Garg A, Walker PS. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer-graphics model. J Biomech. 1990;23:45-58.
13. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709-14.
14. Laskin RS. Total condylar knee replacement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:529-35.
15. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud H. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:419-26.
16. Piazza SJ, Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Stern SH. Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study. J Orthop Res. 1998;16:264-70.
17. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop. 1994;299:153-6.
18. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Radiolucency at the bonecement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surfacing preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:60-5.
19. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:980-6.
20. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty R, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994; 299:31-43.
21. Davies BL, Harris SJ, Lin WJ, Hibberd RD, Middleton R, Cobb JC. Active compliance in robotic surgery-the use of force control as a dynamic constraint. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 1997;211:285-92.
22. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1998;354:49-56.
23. Fadda M, Bertelli D, Martelli S, et al. Computer assisted planning for total knee arthroplasty. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery; 1997; Grenoble, France. New York: Springer; 1997, p 619-28.
24. Kienzle TC, Stulberg SD, Peshkin M, et al. A computer-assisted total knee replacement surgical system using a calibrated robot. In: Taylor RH, Lavallee S, Burdea GC, Mosges R, editors. Computer-integrated surgery: technology and clinical applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1996. p 409-16.
25. Leitner F, Picard F, Minfelde R, et al. Computer assisted knee surgical total replacement. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery; 1997; Grenoble, France. New York: Springer; 1997. p 630-8.
26. Matsen FA 3rd, Garbini JL, Sidles JA, Pratt B, Baumgarten D, Kalura R. Robotic assistance in orthopaedic surgery. A proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;296:178-86.
27. Picard F, Leitner F, Raoult O, Saragaglia D, Cinquin P. Clinical evaluation of computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; 1998; Pittsburgh, PA. p 239-49.
28. Picard F, Leitner F, Raoult O, et al. Early clinical results with the Orthopilot System [abstract]. Comput Aided Surg. 1999.
29. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D. Computer-assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Op Tech Orthop. 2000;10:25-39.
30. Jenny Y, Boerl C. Computer-assisted total knee prosthesis implantation without preoperative imaging: a comparison with classical instrumentation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; 2000: Pittsburgh, PA. p 97-98.
31. Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Kershally S. Computer integrated instrumentation in knee arthroplasty: a comparative study of conventional and computerized technique. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; 2000; Pittsburgh, PA. p 93-6.
32. Orthopilot® Users Meeting, Tuttlinger, Germany, 2000.
33. Böhler M, Messner M, Glos W, Riegler M. Computer navigated implantation of total knee prostheses-a radiological study. Acta Chir Austriaca. 2001; 33(Suppl 175):63.
34. Jenny JY, Boeri C. [Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses-a comparison with conventional instrumentation]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001;139:117-9. German
35. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. [Navigation in knee endopros thesis implantation-preliminary clinical experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001;139:109-16. German.
36. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:18-28. French.