Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 117-124

  Belvedere, C ^a   Ensini, A ^a   Leardini, A ^a   Bianchi, L ^a   Catani, F ^a   Giannini, S ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computer aided surgery; Conventional total knee replacement; Femur Tibia resection plane definition; Knee surgical navigation

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; ARTHROPLASTY; BONE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); KNEE PROSTHESES; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

COMPUTER AIDED SURGERY; CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES; CONVENTIONAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; FEMUR/TIBIA RESECTION PLANE DEFINITION; FLEXION-EXTENSION; KNEE SURGICAL NAVIGATION; PLANE ALIGNMENT; PLANE DEFINITIONS; SURGICAL NAVIGATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

NAVIGATION SYSTEMS;

ARTHROTOMY; ARTICLE; BONE RESECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 34547560505     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.131     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 404: 7-13.
2. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 205: 5-11.
3. Figgie HE III, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS III, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 1035-1040.
4. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 321: 106-110.
5. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 709-714.
6. Laskin RS. Total condylar knee replacement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 529-535.
7. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8: 419-426.
8. Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67: 551-556.
9. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299: 31-43.
10. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 216: 151-158.
11. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 286: 40-47.
12. Ranawat CS. The patellofemoral joint in total condylar knee arthroplasty. Pros and cons based on five- to ten-year follow-up observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 205: 93-99.
13. Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty. Current clinical perspectives. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 276: 26-32.
14. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Scott NW. Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1994; 2: 239-246.
15. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 315-318.
16. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299: 153-156.
17. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 49-56.
18. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 416: 177-184.
19. Tria AJ Jr. Management of fixed deformities in total knee arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2004; 14: 33-50.
20. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; 125: 16-20.
21. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGraw RW. Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 698-705.
22. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 372-377.
23. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 830-835.
24. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84(A, suppl 2): 90-98.
25. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 635-640.
26. Minns RJ. Surgical instrument design for the accurate cutting of bone for implant fixation. Clin Mater 1992; 10: 207-212.
27. Mont MA, Urquhart MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA. Intramedullary goniometer can improve alignment in knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 332-336.
28. Hanson RJ, Norris MJ. Analysis of measurements based on the singular value decomposition. Siam J Sci Stat Comput 1981; 2: 363-373.
29. Catani F, Leardini A, Ensini A, et al. The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 775-782.