Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 68, Issue , 2014, Pages 33-58

  Sadat, Jasmin ^a,b   Martin, Clara D ^b,c,d   Costa, Albert ^b,e   Alario, F Xavier ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^d BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^e INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Lexical access; Mental lexicon; Neighborhood density; Phonological similarity; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADULT; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; HUMANS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888339568     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Alario F.-X., Ferrand L., Laganaro M., New B., Frauenfelder U.H., Seguí J. Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, 36(1):140-155.
2. Alario F.-X., Goslin J., Michel V., Laganaro M. The functional origin of the foreign accent evidence from the syllable-frequency effect in bilingual speakers. Psychological Science 2010, 21(1):15-20.
3. Alario F.-X., Schiller N.O., Domoto-Reilly K., Caramazza A. The role of phonological and orthographic information in lexical selection. Brain and Language 2003, 84(3):372-398.
4. Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15(5):802.
5. Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18(2):234.
6. Arbesman S., Strogatz S.H., Vitevitch M.S. Comparative analysis of networks of phonologically similar words in English and Spanish. Entropy 2010, 12(3):327-337.
7. Arnold H.S., Conture E.G., Ohde R.N. Phonological neighborhood density in the picture naming of young children who stutter: Preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2005, 30(2):125-148.
8. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R 2008, Cambridge University Press.
9. Baayen R.H. A real experiment is a factorial experiment?. The Mental Lexicon 2010, 5:149-157.
10. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59(4):390-412.
11. Baayen R.H., Milin P. Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research 2010, 3(2):12-28.
12. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM 1993, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA.
13. Badecker W., Miozzo M., Zanuttini R. The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition 1995, 57(2):193-216.
14. Balota D.A., Ferraro F.R. A dissociation of frequency and regularity effects in pronunciation performance across young adults, older adults, and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32. 573-573.
15. Balota D.A., Ferraro F.R. Lexical, sublexical, and implicit memory processes in healthy young and healthy older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology 1996, 10(1):82.
16. Barbón Gutiérrez A., Cuetos Vega F. Efectos de la edad de adquisición en tareas de categorización semántica. Psicológica: Revista De Metodología y Psicología Experimental 2006, 27(2):207-224.
17. Barr D.J., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H.J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 2013, 68(3):255-278.
18. Barry C., Morrison C.M., Ellis A.W. Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 1997, 50(3):560-585.
19. Bates E., D'Amico S., Jacobsen T., Szekely A., Andonova E., Devescovi A., et al. Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychon Bull Rev 2003, 10(2):344-380.
20. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B., 2011. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-39. http://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
21. Bates E., Liu H. Cued shadowing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1996, 11(6):577-581.
22. Baus C., Costa A., Carreiras M. Neighbourhood density and frequency effects in speech production: A case for interactivity. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23(6):866-888.
23. Belsley D.A. Demeaning conditioning diagnostics through centering. American Statistician 1984, 38:73-82.
24. Bernstein Ratner N., Newman R., Strekas A. Effects of word frequency and phonological neighborhood characteristics on confrontation naming in children who stutter and normally fluent peers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2009, 34(4):225-241.
25. Best W. A reverse length effect in dysphasic naming: When elephant is easier than ant. Cortex 1995, 31(4):637-652.
26. Bien H., Baayen R.H., Levelt W.J.M. Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs. Language and Cognitive Process 2011, 26(4-6):683-715.
27. Bien H., Levelt W.J.M., Baayen R.H. Frequency effects in compound production. PNAS 2005, 102(49):17876-17881.
28. Bles M., Jansma B. Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation. BMC Neuroscience 2008, 9(1):20.
29. Bock J.K. Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:395-421.
30. Bonin P., Peereman R., Malardier N., Méot A., Chalard M. A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35(1):158-167.
31. Box G.E.P., Cox D.R. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1964, 26(2):211-252.
32. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45:5-32.
33. Brennen T., Baguley T., Bright J., Bruce V. Resolving semantically induced tip-of-the-tongue states for proper nouns. Memory & Cognition 1990, 18(4):339-347.
34. Brown A.S. The tip of the tongue state 2012, Psychology Press, New York.
35. Brown R., McNeill D. The "tip of the tongue" phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1966, 5(4):325-337.
36. Burke D.M., MacKay D.G., Worthley J.S., Wade E. On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30(5):542-579.
37. Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cogn Neuropsychol 1997, 14(1):177-208.
38. Carreiras M., Perea M., Grainger J. Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23(4):857-871.
39. Cerella J. Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin 1985, 98(1):67.
40. Chen Q., Mirman D. Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review 2012, 119(2):417-430.
41. Costa A., Caramazza A., Sebastián-Gallés N. The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26(5):1283-1296.
42. Cuetos F., Ellis A.W., Alvarez B. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999, 31(4):650-658.
43. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D., Rothstein M., Snodgrass J.G. Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1997, 65(2):171-237.
44. Dalal D.K., Zickar M.J. Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. ORM 2012, 15:339-362.
45. Davis C.J., Perea M. BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods 2005, 37(4):665-671.
46. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 1986, 93(3):283-321.
47. Dell G.S. The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language 1988, 27(2):124-142.
48. Dell G.S., Gordon J.K. Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes?. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities 2003, Mouton de Gruyter, Germany. N. Schiller, A. Meyer (Eds.).
49. Dell G.S., Reich P.A. Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20(6):611-629.
50. Dufour S., Frauenfelder U.H. Phonological neighbourhood effects in French spoken-word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63(2):226-238.
51. Ellis A.W., Morrison C.M. Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24(2):515-523.
52. Ferreira V.S., Griffin Z.M. Phonological influences on lexical (mis) selection. Psychological Science 2003, 14(1):86-90.
53. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35(1):116-124.
54. Forster K.I., Shen D. No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22(3):696-713.
55. Frank, A. F., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Salverda, A. P. (2007). Frequency, neighborhood density, and phonological similarity effects in picture naming: An artificial lexicon study. In Proceedings 29 annual conference on Cognitive Science Society, 995-1000.
56. German D.J., Newman R.S. The impact of lexical factors on children's word-finding errors. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2004, 47(3):624.
57. Goldinger S.D., Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 1989, 28(5):501-518.
58. Goldrick M., Folk J.R., Rapp B. Mrs. Malaprop's neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 62(2):113-134.
59. Gordon J.K. Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language 2002, 82(2):113-145.
60. Gordon, J. K., & Kurczek, J. (2013). The aging neighborhood: Phonological density in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes.
61. Grainger J. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29(2):228-244.
62. Grainger J., O'Regan J.K., Jacobs A.M., Seguí J. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1989, 45(3):189-195.
63. Grainger J., O'Regan J.K., Jacobs A.M., Seguí J. Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1992, 51(1):49-56.
64. Grainger J., Seguí J. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1990, 47(2):191-198.
65. Gurka M.J., Edwards L.J., Muller K.E., Kupper L.L. Extending the Box-Cox transformation to the linear mixed model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 2006, 2:273-288.
66. Gurka M.J., Edwards L.J., Nylander-French L. Testing transformations for the linear mixed model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2007, 51:4297-4307.
67. Harley T.A. A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science 1984, 8(3):191-219.
68. Harley T.A. Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 8(3):291-309.
69. Harley T.A., Bown H.E. What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology 1998, 89(1):151-174.
70. Harrell, F. E., Jr., et al. (2010). Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 3.8-3. http://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
71. Heiberger, R. M. (2009). HH: Statistical analysis and data display: Heiberger and Holland. R package version 2.1-32. http://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=HH.
72. Hothorn T., Buehlmann P., Dudoit S., Molinaro A., Van Der Laan M. Survival ensembles. Biostatistics 2006, 7(3):355-373.
73. Jaeger T.F. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. J Mem Lang 2008, 59(4):434-446.
74. Jaeger T.F., Furth K., Hilliard C. Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012, 38(5):1439-1449.
75. James L.E., Burke D.M. Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26(6):1378.
76. Jescheniak J.D., Levelt W.J.M. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20(4):824-843.
77. Kittredge A.K., Dell G.S., Verkuilen J., Schwartz M.F. Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25(4):463-492.
78. Lachman R., Shaffer J.P., Hennrikus D. Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time1. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1974, 13(6):613-625.
79. Laganaro, M., Chetelat-Mabillard, D., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2013). Facilitatory and interfering effects of neighborhood density on speech production: Evidence from aphasic errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology.
80. Landauer T.K., Streeter L.A. Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1973, 12(2):119-131.
81. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
82. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Science 1999, 22(1):1-38.
83. Luce, P. A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
84. Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 1998, 19(1):1-36.
85. Marian V., Bartolotti J., Chabal S., Shook A. CLEARPOND: Cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PLoS One 2012, 7(8):e43230.
86. Marian V., Blumenfeld H.K., Boukrina O.V. Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2008, 37(3):141-170.
87. Martin N., Gagnon D.A., Schwartz M.F., Dell G.S., Saffran E.M. Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes 1996, 11(3):257-282.
88. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18(1):1-86.
89. Meyer A.S., Bock K. The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation?. Memory & Cognition 1992, 20(6):715-726.
90. Miceli G., Capasso R., Caramazza A. Sublexical conversion procedures and the interaction of phonological and orthographic forms. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1999, 16(6):557-572.
91. Middleton E.L., Schwartz M.F. Density pervades: An analysis of phonological neighbourhood density effects in aphasic speakers with different types of naming impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2010, 27(5):401-427.
92. Mirman, D., Kittredge, A. K., & Dell, G. S. (2010). Effects of near and distant phonological neighbors on picture naming. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1447-1452).
93. Mitterer H., Ernestus M. The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition 2008, 109(1):168-173.
94. Morsella E., Miozzo M. Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28(3):555-563.
95. Munson B., Swenson C.L., Manthei S.C. Lexical and phonological organization in children: Evidence from repetition tasks. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2005, 48(1):108.
96. Navarrete E., Costa A. Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53(3):359-377.
97. New B., Pallier C., Ferrand L., Matos R. Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE™//A lexical database for contemporary French: LEXIQUE™. L'année Psychologique 2001, 101(3):447-462.
98. Newman R.S., Bernstein Ratner N. The role of selected lexical factors on confrontation naming accuracy, speed, and fluency in adults who do and do not stutter. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2007, 50(1):196.
99. Newman R.S., German D.J. Effects of lexical factors on lexical access among typical language-learning children and children with word-finding difficulties. Language and Speech 2002, 45(3):285-317.
100. Newman R.S., German D.J. Life span effects of lexical factors on oral naming. Language and Speech 2005, 48(2):123-156.
101. Nooteboom S.G. Listening to oneself: Monitoring speech production. Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech 2005, Psychology Press, Hove, UK. R. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, F. Wijnen (Eds.).
102. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 1994, 52(3):189-234.
103. O'Seaghdha P.G., Marin J.W. Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: Sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26(1):57-73.
104. Pérez M.Á. Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60(1):32-42.
105. Pérez M.Á., Navalón C. Normas españolas de 290 nuevos dibujos: Acuerdo en la denominación, concordancia de la imagen, familiaridad, complejidad visual y variabilidad de la imagen. Psicológica 2003, 002:215-241.
106. Pollatsek A., Perea M., Binder K.S. The effects of neighborhood size in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25(4):1142-1158.
107. Protopapas A. CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39(4):859.
108. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN:3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/.
109. Rapp B., Goldrick M. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review 2000, 107(3):460.
110. Rapp D.N., Samuel A.G. A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28(3):564.
111. Rodriguez-Gonzalez E. Processing of Spanish preterite regular and irregular verbs: The role of neighborhood density. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2012, 15(1):35-47.
112. Roelofs A. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review 2003, 110:88-125.
113. Runnqvist E., Strijkers K., Alario F.-X., Costa A. Cumulative semantic interference is blind to language: Implications for models of bilingual speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 2012, 66(4):850-869.
114. Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Magnuson, J. S., Alario, F.-X., & Costa, A. (2013). Breaking down the bilingual cost in speech production (submitted for publication).
115. Sadat J., Martin C.D., Alario F.-X., Costa A. Characterizing the bilingual disadvantage in noun phrase production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2012, 41(3):159-179.
116. Sears C.R., Hino Y., Lupker S.J. Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21(4):876-900.
117. Sevald C.A., Dell G.S. The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition 1994, 53(2):91-127.
118. Severens E., Van Lommel S., Ratinckx E., Hartsuiker R.J. Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica 2005, 119(2):159-187.
119. Slevc L.R., Ferreira V.S. Halting in single word production: A test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54(4):515-540.
120. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6(2):174-215.
121. Snodgrass J.G., Yuditsky T. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996, 28(4):516-536.
122. Spieler D.H., Balota D.A. Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 2000, 15(2):225.
123. Stemberger J.P. Neighbourhood effects on error rates in speech production. Brain and Language 2004, 90(1-3):413-422.
124. Storkel H.L. Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2004, 47(6):1454.
125. Strobl C., Boulesteix A.-L., Kneib T., Augustin T., Zeileis A. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(307).
126. Strobl C., Boulesteix A.-L., Zeileis A., Hothorn T. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(25).
127. Sullivan M.P., Riffel B. The nature of phonological encoding during spoken word retrieval. Language and Cognitive Processes 1999, 14(1):15-45.
128. Székely A., Bates E. Objective visual complexity as a variable in studies of picture naming. Center for Research in Language Newsletter 2000, 12:2.
129. Székely A., Jacobsen T., D'Amico S., Devescovi A., Andonova E., Herron D., et al. A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51(2):247-250.
130. Tabak W., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Producing inflected verbs: A picture naming study. The Mental Lexicon 2010, 5(1):22-46.
131. Tagliamonte S., Baayen R.H. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 2012, 24(2):135-178.
132. Taler V., Aaron G.P., Steinmetz L.G., Pisoni D.B. Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2010, 65B(5):551-560.
133. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern applied statistics with S 2002, Springer, New York. 4th ed.
134. Vitevitch M.S. The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech 1997, 40(3):211-228.
135. Vitevitch M.S. The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28(4):735-747.
136. Vitevitch, M. S., & Stamer, M. K. (2009). The influence of neighborhood density (and neighborhood frequency) in Spanish speech production: A follow-up report (Vol. 1),. University of Kansas, Spoken Language Laboratory Technical Report (pp. 1-6).
137. Vitevitch M.S., Armbruster J., Chu S. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30(2):514-529.
138. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A. When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science 1998, 9(4):325-329.
139. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40(3):374-408.
140. Vitevitch M.S., Rodríguez E. Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 2005, 3(1):64-73.
141. Vitevitch M.S., Sommers M.S. The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31(4):491-504.
142. Vitevitch M.S., Stamer M.K. The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 2006, 21(6):760-770.
143. Vitkovitch M., Tyrrell L. Sources of disagreement in object naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycholigy 1995, 48(4):822-848.
144. Wheeldon L. Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes 2003, 18(1):81-109.
145. Ziegler J.C., Muneaux M. Orthographic facilitation and phonological inhibition in spoken word recognition: A developmental study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14(1):75-80.
146. Ziegler J.C., Muneaux M., Grainger J. Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48(4):779-793.
147. Ziegler J., Perry C. No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition 1998, 68(2):B53-B62.