A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 158-167

  Bonin, Patrick ^a,c   Peereman, Ronald ^b   Malardier, Nathalie ^a   Méot, Alain ^a   Chalard, Marylène ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ BLAISE PASCAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0038473978     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195507     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ALARIO, F.-X., & FERRAND, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531-552.
2. BADDELEY, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. London: Erlbaum.
3. BARRY, C., HIRSH, K. W., JOHNSTON, R. A., & WILLIAMS, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 350-375.
4. BARRY, C., MORRISON, C. M., & ELLIS, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560-585.
5. BERMAN, S., FRIEDMAN, D., HAMBERGER, M., & SNODGRASS, J. G. (1989). Developmental picture norms: Relationships between name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity for child and adult ratings of two sets of line drawings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 371-382.
6. BONIN, P., CHALARD, M., MÉOT, A., & FAYOL, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89-114.
7. BONIN, P., FAYOL, M., & CHALARD, M. (2001). Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 469-489.
8. BONIN, P., & MÉOT, A. (2002). Spelling to dictation in real time in adults: What are the determinants of spelling latencies? Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. BROADBOOKS, W. J., & ELMORE, P. B. (1987). A Monte Carlo study of the sampling distribution of the congruence coefficient. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 47, 1-11.
10. BROWN, G. D. A., & WATSON, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15, 208-216.
11. CARROLL, J. B., & WHITE, M. N. (1973a). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 pictureable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 563-576.
12. CARROLL, J. B., & WHITE, M. N. (1973b). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85-95.
13. CHALARD, M., BONIN, P., MÉOT, A., BOYER B., & FAYOL M. (in press). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with other variables used in psycholinguistic experiments, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997) and naming latencies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
14. COHEN, J., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
15. COLTHEART, V., LAXON, V. J., & KEATING, C. (1988). Effects of imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 1-12.
16. CONTENT, A., MOUSTY, P., & RADEAU, M. (1990). Brulex: Une base de données informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé [Brulex: A computerized database for written and spoken French]. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
17. CYCOWICZ, Y. M., FRIEDMAN, D., ROTHSTEIN, M., & SNODGRASS, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171-237.
18. DELL'ACQUA, R., LOTTO, L., & JOB, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 588-615.
19. ELLIS, A. W., & LAMBON RALPH, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1103-1123.
20. ELLIS, A. W., & MORRISON, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 515-523.
21. FERRAND, L. (1999). Why naming takes longer than reading? The special case of Arabic numbers. Acta Psychologica, 100, 253-266.
22. FEYEREISEN, P., VAN DER BORGHT, F., & SERON, X. (1988). The operativity effect in naming: A re-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 26, 401-415.
23. GERHAND, S., & BARRY, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 267-283.
24. GILHOOLY, K. J., & GILHOOLY, M. L. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks. Memory & Cognition, 7, 214-223.
25. GILHOOLY, K. J., & LOGIE, R. H. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition. Current Psychological Research, 1, 251-262.
26. GISSELBRECHT, D. (1988). Concreteness encoding through a dual task procedure: Arguments in favour of an automatic process. Acta Psychologica, 67, 145-155.
27. HARTJE, W., HANNEN, P., & WILLMES, K. (1986). Effects of visual complexity in tachistoscopic recognition of Kanji and Kana symbols by German participants. Neuropsychologia, 24, 297-300.
28. HIRSH, K. W., & FUNNELL, E. (1995). Those old, familiar things: Age of acquisition, familiarity and lexical access in progressive aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 23-32.
29. HODGSON, C., & ELLIS, A. W. (1998). Last in, first to go: Age of acquisition and naming in the elderly. Brain & Language, 64, 146-163.
30. e siècle (Centre de recherche pour un Trésor de la Langue Française, CNRS, Nancy). Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.
31. JOLICŒUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
32. LACHMAN, R. (1973). Uncertainty effects on time to access the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 199-208.
33. LACHMAN, R., SHAFFER, J. P., & HENRIKUS, D. (1974). Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 613-625.
34. LORCH, R. F., & MYERS, J. L. (1990). Regression analysis of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149-157.
35. MARTEIN, R. (1995). Norms for name and concept agreement, familiarity, visual complexity and image agreement on a set of 216 pictures. Psychologica Belgica, 35, 205-225.
36. MORRISON, C. M., CHAPPELL, T. D., & ELLIS, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 528-559.
37. MORRISON, C. M., & ELLIS, A. W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 167-180.
38. MORRISON, C. M., ELLIS, A. W., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 705-714.
39. NEW, B., PALLIER, C., FERRAND, L., & MATOS, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur Internet: LEXIQUE [A contemporary lexical database for French on the Internet: LEXIQUE]. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
40. PAIVIO, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76, 241-263.
41. PAIVIO, A., CLARK, J. M., DIGDON, N., & BONS, T. (1989). Referential processing: Reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging. Memory & Cognition, 17, 163-174.
42. PIND, J., JONSDOTTIR, H., TRYGGVADOTTIR, H. B., & JONSSON, F. (2000). Icelandic norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: Name and image agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 41-48.
43. SANFELIU, M. C., & FERNANDEZ, A. (1996). A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 537-555.
44. SHANNON, C. E. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. In C. E. Shannon & W. Weaver (Eds.), The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
45. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
46. SNODGRASS, J. G., & YUDITSKY, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.
47. VITKOVITCH, M., & TYRRELL, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 822-848.
48. YAMAZAKI, M., ELLIS, A. W., MORRISON, C. M., & LAMBON RALPH, M. A. (1997). Two age of acquisition effects in the reading of Japanese Kanji. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 407-421.