Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 141-170

  Marian, Viorica ^a   Blumenfeld, Henrike K ^a   Boukrina, Olga V ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilingualism; Eye tracking; Language production; Language recognition; Phonology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VOCABULARY;

EID: 40549130746     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-007-9064-9     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S. and Tanenhaus M.K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38: 419-439
2. Arnold H., Conture E. and Ohde R. (2005). Phonological neighborhood density in the picture naming of young children who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30: 125-148
3. Baayen H., Piepenbrock R. and Van Rijn H. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). University of Pennsylvania Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia
4. Best C.T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: Strange, W. (eds) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research., pp 171-204. York Press, Timonium
5. Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2005). Covert bilingual language activation through cognate word processing: An eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 286-291). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bradlow A.R. and Bent T. (2002). The clear-speech effect for non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 112: 272-284
7. Bradlow A.R. and Pisoni D.B. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener- and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 106: 2074-2085
8. Brody N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 168-214). Academic Press, San Diego
9. Brysbaert M., Van Dyck G. and Van de Poel M. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from masked phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25: 137-148
10. Ceci S.J. (1996). On Intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development (Expanded ed., pp. 69-90). Harvard University Press, Cambridge
11. Costa A., Caramazza A. and Sebastian-Galles N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26: 1283-1296
12. Costa A. and Sebastian-Galles N. (1998). Abstract phonological structure in language production: Evidence from Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24: 886-903
13. Dahan D. and Tanenhaus M.K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12: 453-459
14. Dijkstra T., Grainger J. and van Heuven W.J.B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41: 496-518
15. Dickushina O.J. (1965). English phonetics. Prosvesh'enie, Moscow
16. Doctor E.A. and Klein D. (1992). Phonological processing in bilingual word recognition. In: Harris, R.J. (eds) Cognitive processing in bilinguals, pp 237-252. Elsevier, Amsterdam
17. Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT). American Guidance Service, Circle Pines.
18. Ferrand L. and Grainger J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47A: 365-382
19. Garlock V.M., Walley A.C. and Metsala J.L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density in spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45: 468-492
20. Gordon J.K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structural contexts. Brain and Language, 82: 113-145
21. Gordon J.K. and Dell G.S. (2001). Phonological neighborhood effects: Evidence from aphasia and connectionist modeling. Brain and Language, 79: 21-23
22. Grainger J., Muneaux M., Farioli F. and Ziegler J.C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A: 981-998
23. Grosjean F. (1997). Processing mixed languages: Issues, findings and models. In: de Groot A.M.B., Kroll, J.F. (eds) Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives., pp 225-254. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum
24. Harley T.A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8: 191-219
25. Harley T.A. and Bown H.E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighborhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89: 151-174
26. Imai S., Walley A.C. and Flege J.E. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 117: 896-907
27. International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. James L.E. and Burke D.M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26: 1378-1392
29. Jared D. and Kroll J.F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words?. Journal of Memory and Language, 44: 2-31
30. Ju M. and Luce P.A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears. Psychological Science, 15(5): 314-318
31. Jusczyk P.W., Luce P.A. and Charles-Luce J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 630-645
32. Kaushanskaya M., Marian, V. (2006). Learning foreign words under dual-task conditions. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum
33. Kroll J.F. and Stewart E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 149-174
34. Kucera H. and Francis W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence
35. Lam A.S.L., Perfetti C.A. and Bell L. (1991). Automatic phonetic transfer in bidialectal reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12: 299-311
36. Luce P.A. and Pisoni D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19: 1-36
37. Marian V. (2007). Bilingual research methods. In: Altarriba, J. and Heredia, R.R. (eds) An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processses. Erlbaum, Mahwah
38. Marian V. and Spivey M. (2003). Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24: 173-193
39. Marian V. and Spivey M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6: 97-115
40. Marslen-Wilson W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25: 71-102
41. McClelland J.L. and Elman J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18: 1-86
42. Meyer A.S. and Bock J. K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory & Cognition, 20: 715-726
43. Metsala J.L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25: 47-56
44. Nas G. (1983). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence for a cooperation between visual and sound based codes during access to a common lexical store. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22: 526-534
45. Neisser U., Boodoo G., Bouchard T.J., Boykin A.W., Brody N., Ceci S.J., Halpern D.F., Loehlin J.C., Perloff R., Sternberg R.J. and Urbina S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51: 77-101
46. Newman R.S. and German D.J. (2002). Effects of lexical factors on lexical access among typical language-learning children and children with word-finding difficulties. Language and Speech, 45: 285-317
47. Perfetti C.A. and Bell L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30: 473-485
48. Roberts P. and Deslauriers L. (1999). Picture naming of cognate and noncognate nouns in bilingual aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32: 1-23
49. Schulpen B., Dijkstra T., Schriefers H.J. and Hasper M. (2003). Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26: 1155-1178
50. Sharoff, S. (2003). The frequency dictionary for Russian. [Computer software]. Retrieved November 16, 2003, from http://bokrcorpora.narod.ru/ frqlist/frqlist-en.html.
51. Silverberg S. and Samuel A.G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 381-398
52. Slowiaczek L.M. and Hamburger M. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18: 1239-1250
53. Slowiaczek L.M., McQueen J.M., Soltano E.G. and Lynch M. (2000). Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 43: 530-560
54. Slowiaczek L.M., Soltano E.G., Wieting S.J. and Bishop K.L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A: 233-262
55. Spinelli E., Segui J. and Radeau M. (2001). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16: 367-392
56. Spivey M. and Marian V. (1999). Cross-talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10: 281-284
57. Takayanagi S., Dirks D.D and Moshfegh A. (2002). Lexical talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 45: 585-597
58. Tanenhaus M., Magnuson J., Dahan D. and Chambers C. (2000). Eye movements and lexical access in spoken language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29: 557-580
59. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M. and Sedivy J.C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268: 1632-1634
60. Van Hell J.G. and Dijkstra T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 780-789
61. Van Orden G.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15: 181-198
62. Van Orden G.C., Johnston J.C. and Hale B.L.(1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14: 371-386
63. Van Wijnendaele I. and Brysbaert M. (2002). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Phonological priming from the second to the first language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28: 616-627
64. Vitevitch M.S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40: 211-228
65. Vitevitch M.S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. JEP: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28: 735-747
66. Vitevitch M.S. and Luce P.A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9: 325-328
67. Vitevitch M.S. and Sommers M.S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 31: 491-504
68. Weber A. and Cutler A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken- word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50: 1-25
69. Weber A., Paris G. (2004). The origin of the linguistic gender effect in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from non-native listening. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1446-1451). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
70. Yates M., Locker L. and Simpson G.B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11: 452-457
71. Ziegler J.C., Muneaux M. and Grainger J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48: 779-793
72. Zevin J.D. and Seidenberg M.S. (2002). Age of acquisition effect in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47: 1-29