Clearpond: Cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Marian, Viorica ^a   Bartolotti, James ^a   Chabal, Sarah ^a   Shook, Anthony ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CROSS LINGUISTIC EASY ACCESS RESOURCE FOR PHONOLOGICAL AND ORTHOGRAPHIC NEIGHBORHOOD DENSITIES; DATA BASE; DUTCH; ENGLISH LANGUAGE; FRENCH LANGUAGE; GERMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHONEME; PHONETICS; SPANISH;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84865189130     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043230     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Coltheart M, Davelaar E, Jonasson JT, Besner D, ((1977)) Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and Performance VI:: 535--555.
2. Luce PA, Pisoni D, Goldinger S (1990) Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. Cognitve Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. 122-147.
3. Davis CJ, Perea M, Acha J, ((2009)) Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35:: 1550--1570 doi:10.1037/a0014253.
4. Siakaluk PD, Sears CR, Lupker SJ, ((2002)) Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: The effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28:: 661--681 doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.3.661.
5. Andrews S, ((1989)) Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15:: 802--814 doi:10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.802.
6. Tsai J, Lee C, Lin Y, Tzeng O, Hung D (2006) Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Word Journal of the International Linguistic Association: 659-675.
7. Andrews S, ((1997)) The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4:: 439--461.
8. Davis CJ, Perea M, ((2005)) BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods 37:: 665--671 doi:10.3758/BF03192738.
9. Yates M, ((2005)) Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31:: 1385--1397 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1385.
10. Grainger J, Muneaux M, Farioli F, Ziegler JC, ((2005)) Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58:: 981--998 doi:10.1080/02724980443000386.
11. Baese-Berk M, Goldrick M, ((2009)) Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 24:: 527--554 doi:10.1080/01690960802299378.
12. Marian V, Blumenfeld HK, Boukrina OV, ((2008)) Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 37:: 141--170 doi:10.1007/s10936-007-9064-9.
13. Vitevitch MS, Rodríguez E, ((2005)) Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 3:: 64--73 doi:10.1080/14769670400027332.
14. Baus C, Costa A, Carreiras M, ((2008)) Neighbourhood density and frequency effects in speech production: A case for interactivity. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:: 866--888 doi:10.1080/01690960801962372.
15. Frauenfelder UH, Baayen RH, Hellwig FM, Schreuder R, ((1993)) Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language 32:: 781--804 doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1039.
16. Dell G (2003) Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In: Schiller N, Meyer AS, editors. Phonetics and Phonology in Language. New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 9-47.
17. Gahl S, Yao Y, Johnson K (2012) Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006.
18. Luce PA, Pisoni DB, ((1998)) Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19:: 1--36 doi:10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001.
19. Vitevitch MS, Stamer MK, ((2006)) The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 21:: 760--770 doi:10.1080/01690960500287196.
20. Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B, et al. ((2007)) The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods 39:: 445--459 doi:10.3758/BF03193014.
21. Duyck W, Desmet T, Verbeke LPC, Brysbaert M, ((2004)) WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36:: 488--499 doi:10.3758/BF03195595.
22. Davis CJ, ((2005)) N-watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods 37:: 65--70 doi:10.3758/BF03206399.
23. Perea M, Urkia M, Davis CJ, Agirre A, Laseka E, et al. ((2006)) E-Hitz: Word frequency list and a program for deriving psycholinguistic statistics in an agglutinative language (Basque). Behavior Research Methods 38:: 610--615.
24. Keuleers E, Brysbaert M, New B, ((2010)) SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods 42:: 643--650 doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.643.
25. Brysbaert M, New B, ((2009)) Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41:: 977--990 doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.
26. New B, Pallier C, Brysbaert M, Ferrand L, ((2004)) Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36:: 516--524.
27. Brysbaert M, Buchmeier M, Conrad M, Jacobs AM, Bölte J, et al. ((2011)) The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology 58:: 412--424 doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000123.
28. Cuetos F, Glez-Nosti M, Barbón A, Brysbaert M, Barbon A, ((2011)) SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicologica 32:: 133--143.
29. Goulden R, Nation P, Read J, ((1990)) How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics 11:: 341--363 doi:10.1093/applin/11.4.341.
30. Baayen RH, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM].
31. Weide RL (1998) CMU pronunciation dictionary, release 0.6.
32. Vitevitch MS (2012) What do foreign neighbors say about the mental lexicon? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition: 1-6. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000149.
33. Seymour PHK, Aro M, Erskine JM, ((2003)) Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94:: 143--174 doi:10.1348/000712603321661859.
34. Mejer L, Boateng S, Turchetti P (2010) More students study foreign languages in Europe but perceptions of skill levels differ significantly. Statistics in Focus 49.