Sublexical and Lexical Representations in Speech Production: Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Onset Density

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 514-529

  Vitevitch, Michael S ^a   Armbrüster, Jonna ^a   Chu, Shinying ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMETRY; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 1542357697     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.514     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Baars, B. J. (1992). A dozen competing-plans techniques for inducing predictable slips in speech and action. In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 129-150). New York: Plenum Press.
2. Bond, Z. S. (1999). Slips of the ear: Errors in the perception of casual conversation. New York: Academic Press.
3. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
4. Clark, H. H. (1976). Discussion of Wike and Church's comments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 257-266.
5. Cohen, J. (1976). Random means random. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 261-262.
6. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
7. D'Amico, S., Bentrovato, S., Gasparini, M., Costabile, D., & Bates, E. (2002, July). Timed picture naming in Italian-speaking children and adults: Differences between nouns and verbs. Paper presented at the joint conference of the Ninth International Congress for the Study of Child Language and the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI.
8. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
9. Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.
10. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349.
11. Dell, G. S., Reed, K. D., Adams, D. R., & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1355-1367.
12. Fay, D., & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505-520.
13. Forsythe, A., Sheehy, N., & Sawey, M. (2003). Measuring icon complexity: An automated analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 334-342.
14. Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighbourhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, 113-145.
15. Gordon, J. K., & Dell, G. S. (2001). Phonological neighbourhood effects: Evidence from aphasia and connectionist modeling. Brain and Language, 79, 21-23.
16. Greenberg, J. H., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word, 20, 157-177.
17. Harley, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 291-309.
18. Harley, T. A., & Bown, H. E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-longue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 151-174.
19. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). Effects of word frequency and spellingto-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 166-183.
20. James, L. E., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1378-1392.
21. Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
22. Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630-645.
23. Keppel, G. (1976). Words as random variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 263-265.
24. Kiefer, M. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 29, 100-116.
25. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University.
26. Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119-131.
27. Laws, K. R., Leeson, V. C., & Gale, T. M. (2002). The effect of 'masking' on picture naming. Cortex, 38, 137-148.
28. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
29. Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269.
30. Levitt, A. G., & Healy, A. F. (1985). The roles of phoneme frequency, similarity, and availability in the experimental elicitation of speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 717-733.
31. Luce, P. A., & Large, N. R. (2001). Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 565-581.
32. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
33. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
34. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
35. Motley, M. T. (1986). On replicating the SLIP technique: A reply to Sinsabaugh and Fox. Communication Monographs, 53, 342-351.
36. Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1975). Encoding sensitivities to phonological markedness and transitional probability: Evidence from spoonerisms. Human Communication Research, 2, 351-361.
37. Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1976). Laboratory induction of verbal slips: A new method for psycholinguistic research. Communication Quarterly, 24, 28-34.
38. Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
40. Nusbaum, H. C., Pisoni, D. B., & Davis, C. K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on Speech Perception (Progress Report #10). Bloomington: Indiana University, Speech Research Laboratory.
41. Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273-281.
42. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy"; Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
43. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreetness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
44. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
45. Savin, H. B. (1963). Word-frequency effect and errors in the perception of speech. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 35, 200-206.
46. Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91-127.
47. Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 807-820.
48. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial order mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 295-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Sinsabaugh, B. A., & Fox, R. A. (1986). Reevaluating the SLIP paradigm: A research note. Communication Monographs, 53, 335-341.
50. Smith, J. E. K. (1976). The assuming-will-make-it-so fallacy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 262-263.
51. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
52. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage or regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition, 14, 17-26.
54. Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 44, 1321-1337.
55. Storkel, H. L., & Rogers, M. A. (2000). The effect of probabilistic phonotactics on lexical acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14, 407-425.
56. Takarae, Y., & Levin, D. T. (2001). Animals and artifacts may not be treated equally: Differentiating strong and weak forms of category-specific visual agnosia. Brain & Cognition, 45, 249-264.
57. Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40, 211-228.
58. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002a). Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighborhood density effects in slips of the ear. Language & Speech, 45, 407-434.
59. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002b). The influence of onset density on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 270-278.
60. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002e). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 735-747.
61. Vitevitch, M. S. (2003). The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 487-499.
62. Vitevitch, M. S., & Chu, S. (2003). Processing differences in a picturenaming task using homonymous nouns and verbs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
63. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
64. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.
65. Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Charles-Luce, J., & Kemmerer, D. (1997). Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech, 40, 47-62.
66. Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Auer, E. T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language, 68, 306-311.
67. Vitevitch, M. S., Pisoni, D. B., Kirk, K. I., Hay-McCutcheon, M., & Yount, S. (2002). Effects of phonotactic probabilities on the processing of spoken words and nonwords by adults with cochlear implants who were postlingually deafened. The Volta Review, 102, 283-302.
68. Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S. (2003). The facultative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31, 491-504.
69. Wheeldon, L. (2003). Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 81-109.
70. Wike, E. L., & Church, J. D. (1976). Comments on dark's "The languageas-fixed-effect-fallacy." Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 249-255.
71. Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huff, C. A., & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 1-26.