Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice

Language Variation and Change

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 135-178

  Tagliamonte, Sali A ^a   Baayen, R Harald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864458780     PISSN: 09543945     EISSN: 14698021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0954394512000129     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Adger, David. (2006). Combinatorial variability. Journal of Linguistics 42(3):503-530.
2. Adger, David, & Smith, Jennifer. (2005). Variation and the minimalist program. In L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 149-178.
3. -(2007). Language variability and syntactic theory. Berkeley: University of California Press
4. Anderwald, Lieselotte (2008). Negation in non-standard British English: Gaps, regularizations, and asymmetries. New York: Routledge.
5. Baayen, R. Harald. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. (2010). A real experiment is a factorial experiment? The Mental Lexicon 5:149-157.
7. Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J., & Bates, Douglas M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59:390-412.
8. Bates, Douglas M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 5:27-30.
9. Bates, Douglas, & Maechler, Martin. (2009). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=lme4. R package version 0.999375-32.
10. Belsley, David A., Kuh, Edwin, & Welsch, Roy E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley.
11. Biberauer, Theresa, & Richards, Marc. (2008). True optionality: When the grammar doesn 't mind. In Cedrix Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist Essays, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 35-67.
12. Bickerton, Derek. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7:457-492.
13. -(1973). On the nature of a creole continuum. Language 49:640-669.
14. Bock, Karthryn, & Miller, Carol A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 23:45-93.
15. Bock, Kathryn J., & Kroch, Anthony S. (1988). The isolability ofsyntactic processing. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tannenhaus (eds.), The isolability ofsyntacticprocessing: Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 157-196.
16. Börgars, Kersti, & Chapman, Carol. (1998). Agreement and pro-drop in some dialects of English. Linguistics 36:71-98.
17. Breiman, Leo, Friedman, Jerome H., Olshen, Richard, & Stone, Charles J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont: Wadsworth International Group.
18. Breiman, Leo. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning 45:5-32.
19. Britain, David. (2002). Diffusion, levelling, simplification and reallocation in past tense BE in the English Fens. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1):16-43.
20. Britain, David, & Sudbury, Andrea. (2002). There's sheep and there's penguins; Convergence, 'drift' and 'slant' in New Zealand and Falkland Island English. In Jones, M. C. & Esch, E. (eds.), Language change; The interplay of internal, external andextra-linguisticfactors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 211-240.
21. Cedergren, Henriette J., & Sankoff, David. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2):333-355.
22. Chambers, Jack K. (1998). Social embedding of changes in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 26:5-36.
23. -(2004). Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In B. Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialectgrammarfrom a cross- linguisticperspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 127-145.
24. Cheshire, Jenny. (1982). Variation in an English dialect: A sociolinguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Cheshire, Jenny, Edwards, Vivienne, & Whittle, Pamela. (1989). Urban British dialect grammar: The question of dialect levelling. English World-Wide 10(2):185-225.
26. Cheshire, Jenny. (2005). Syntactic variation and beyond: Gender and social variation in the use of discourse-new markers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(4):479-508.
27. Christian, Donna, Wolfram, Walt, & Dube, Nanjo. (1988). Variation and change in geographically isolated speech communities: Appalachian and Ozark English. Publication of the American Dialect Society 72.
28. Cornips, Leonie, & Corrigan, Karen P. (2005). Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. De Wolf, Gaelan Dodds. (1990). Social and regional differences in grammatical usage in Canadian English: Ottawa and Vancouver. American Speech 65:3-32.
30. Downes, William. (1984). Language and society. London: Fontana Press.
31. Eisikovits, Edina. (1991). Variation in subject-verb agreement in Inner Sydney English. In J. Cheshire (ed.), English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235-256.
32. Fasold, Ralph W. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
33. -(1969). Tense and the form be in Black English. Language 45(4):763-776.
34. Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
35. Gilmour, Arthur, Gogel, Beverly, Cullis, Brian, Welham, S. J., & Thompson, Robin. (2002). ASReml user guide, release 1.0. http://www.vsni.co.uk/ resources/documentation/asreml-2-user-guide.
36. Guy, Gregory R. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In W. Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 1-36.
37. -(1988). Advanced VARBRUL analysis. In K. Ferrara, B. Brown, K. Walters, & J. Baugh (eds.), Linguistic change and contact. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, Department of Linguistics. 124-136.
38. Harrell, Frank E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies. Berlin: Springer.
39. Hay, Jennifer, & Schreier, Danny. (2004). Reversing the trajectory of language change: Subject-verb agreement with be in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 16(3):209-235.
40. Hazen, Kirk. (1996). Dialect affinity and subject-verb concord: The Appalachian Outerbanks. SECOL Review 20:25-53.
41. Henry, Alison. (1995). Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. -(1998). Parameter setting within a socially realistic linguistics. Language in Society 27:1-21.
43. Hothorn, Torsten, Buehlmann, Peter, Dudoit, Sandrine, Molinaro, Annette, & Van Der Laan, Mark. (2006). Survival ensembles. Biostatistics 7:355-373.
44. Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, & Zeileis, Achim. (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15:651-674.
45. Jaeger, T Florian. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4):434-446.
46. Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:359-383.
47. Joseph, Brian D., & Janda, Richard D. (1986). The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization. In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology. New York: Academic Press. 193-210.
48. -(2003). The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Kay, Paul. (1978). Variable rules, community grammar, and linguistic change. In D. Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models andmethods. New York: Academic Press. 71-83.
50. Kay, Paul, & McDaniel, Chad. (1979). On the logic of variable rules. Language in Society 8:151-187.
51. Labov, William. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4):715-762.
52. -(1972a). Sociolinguisticpatterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
53. -(1972b). The social stratification of (r) in New York City. In W. Labov (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 43-69.
54. Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, & Lewis, John. (1968). A study of the Non-Standard English Negro and Puerto-Rican speakers in New York City. Report on Cooperative Research Project 3288. New York: Columbia University.
55. Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7 (2):171-183.
56. Meechan, Marjory, & Foley, Michelle. (1994). On resolving disagreement: Linguistic theory and variation-there's bridges. Language Variation and Change 6:63-85.
57. Milroy, James, & Milroy, Lesley. (1993). Real English: The grammar of English dialects in the British Isles. New York: Longman.
58. Milsark, Gary L. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3:1-31.
59. MLwiN. (2007). MLwiN 2.1. Bristol: University of Bristol, Centre for Multilevel Modeling. Available at:http://www.cmm.bristol.ac.uk/MLwiN/index. shtml.
60. Montgomery, Michael B. (1989). Exploring the roots of Appalachian English. English World-Wide 10:227-278.
61. Nelder, John. (1975). Announcement by the Working Party on Statistical Computing: GLIM (Generalized Linear Interactive Modelling Program). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 24(2):259-261.
62. Paolillo, John. (2002). Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
63. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environmentfor statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
64. Rand, David, & Sankoff, David. (1990). GoldVarb: A variable rule application for the Macintosh. Montreal: Centre de recherches mathématiques, Université de Montréal.
65. Rickford,John. (1975). Carrying the newwave into syntax: The case of black english bin. InR. Fasold & R. Shuy (eds.), Analyzing variation in language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
66. Rousseau, Pascale, & Sankoff, David. (1978). Advances in variable rule methodology. In D. Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 57-69.
67. Sankoff, David. (1978a). Linguistic variation: Models andmethods. New York: Academic Press.
68. -(1978). Probability and linguistic variation. Synthèse 37:217-238.
69. -(1982). Sociolinguistic method and linguistic theory. In L. Jonathan Cohen, J. Los, H. Pfeiffer & K. P. Podewski (eds.), Logic, methodology, philosophy ofscience VI. Amsterdam: North Holland. 677-689.
70. -(1985). Statistics in linguistics. In Encyclopaedia of the statistical sciences. New York: Wiley.
71. -(1988).Sociolinguisticsandsyntacticvariation. Linguistics: the CambridgeSurvey 4: 140-161.
72. Sankoff, David, & Laberge, Suzanne. (1978). The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In D. Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 239-250.
73. Sankoff, David, &Labov,William. (1979). On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 8:189-222.
74. Sankoff, David, & Rousseau, Pascale. (1979). Categorical contexts and variable rules. In S. Jacobson (ed.), Papers from the Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation, Stockholm, May 18-19, 1979. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. 7-22.
75. Sankoff, David, & Sankoff, Gillian. (1973). Sample survey methods and computer-assisted analysis in the study of grammatical variation. In R. Darnell (ed.), Canadian languages in their social context. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. 7-63.
76. Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Smith, Eric. (2005). Goldvarb X. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto. Available at: http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/ Goldvarb/GV-index.htm.
77. -(2012). Goldvarb Lion. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University ofToronto. Available at: http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/goldvarb.htm.
78. Sankoff, Gillian. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics. In U. Ammoon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier & P. Trudgill (eds.), International handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1003-1013.
79. Schilling-Estes, Natalie, & Wolfram, Walt. (1994). Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: Were/weren't leveling in a vernacular English variety. Language Variation and Change 6:273-302.
80. Schreier, Danny. (2002). Past be in Tristan da Cunha: The rise and fall of categoricality in language change. American Speech 77(1):70.
81. Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Kneib, Thomas, Augustin, Thomas, & Zeileis, Achim. (2008). Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9. Available at: http://www. biomedcentral.com/1471- 2105/9/307.
82. Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Zeileis, Achim, & Hothorn, Torsten. (2007). Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/25.
83. Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James, & Tutz, Gerhard. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4):323-348.
84. Tagliamonte, Sali A. (1998). Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10:153-191.
85. -(2001). Come/came variation in English dialects. American Speech 76:42-61.
86. -(2002a). Comparative sociolinguistics. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. 729-763.
87. -(2002b). Variation and change in the British relative marker system. In P. Poussa (ed.), Relativisation on the North Sea littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa. 147-165.
88. -(2003). "Every place has a different toll": Determinants of grammatical variation in cross- variety perspective. In G. Rhodenberg & B. Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 531-554.
89. -(2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. -(2009). There was universals; then there weren't: A comparative sociolinguistic perspective on "default singulars." In M. Fillpula, J. Klemola & H. Paulasto (eds.), Vernacular universals versus contact inducedchange. Oxford: Routledge. 103-129.
91. Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Roeder, Rebecca V. (2009). Variation in the English definite article: Sociohistorical linguistic in t'speech community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:435-471.
92. Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Smith, Jennifer. (1998). Analogical levelling in Samaná English: The case of was and were. Journal of English Linguistics 27:8-26.
93. -(2000). Old was; new ecology: Viewing English through the sociolinguistic filter. In S. Poplack (ed.), The English history of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 141-171.
94. -(2006). Layering, change and a twist of fate: Deontic modality in dialects of English. Diachronica 23:341-380.
95. Trudgill, Peter J. (1990). The dialects ofEngland. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. van de Velde, Hans, & van Hout, Roeland.
96. Van De Velde, Hans, & van Hout, Roeland(1998). Dangerous aggregations. a case study of Dutch (n) deletion. In C. Paradis (ed.), Papers in sociolinguistics. Quebec: Nuits Blanches. 137-147.
97. Venables, William N., & Ripley, Brian D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S-Plus. 4th ed. New York: Springer.
98. Walker, James A. (2007). "There's bears back there": Plural existentials and vernacular universals in (Quebec) English. English World-Wide 28(2):147-166.
99. West, Brady T., Welch, Katheleen B., & Galecki A. (2007). Linearmixedmodels:Apracticalguide using statistical software. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
100. Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
101. -(1993). Identifying and interpreting variables. In D. Preston (ed.), American dialect research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 193-221.
102. Wolfram, Walt, & Christian, Donna. (1976). Appalachian speech. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.