Producing inflected verbs : A picture naming study

Mental Lexicon

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 22-46

  Tabak, Wieke ^a   Schreuder, Robert ^a   Baayen, R Harald ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954122871     PISSN: 18711340     EISSN: 18711375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ml.5.1.02tab     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2007). Storage and computation in the mental lexicon. In G. Jarema, & G. Libben (Eds.), The Mental Lexicon: Core perspectives (pp. 81-104). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
4. Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496-512.
5. Baayen, R. H., Levelt, W., Schreuder, R., & Ernestus, M. (2008). Paradigmatic structure in speech production. Proceedings Chicago Linguistics Society 43, 1, 1-29.
6. Baayen, R. H., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2005). Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81, 666-698.
7. Balling, L., & Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: Evidence from Danish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1159-1190.
8. Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9. Bien, H., Levelt, W., & Baayen, R. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 17876-17881.
10. Blevins, J. P. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language, 79, 737-767.
11. Bloch, B. (1947). English verb inflection. Language, 23, 399-418.
12. Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
14. De Vaan, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2007). Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 1-23.
15. Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language, 79, 5-38.
16. Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics, 42, 873-903.
17. Ernestus, M., & Baayen, H. (2006). The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation. In L. M. Goldstein, D. H. Whalen, & C. T. Best (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 8 (pp. 27-49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. (2007). Paradigmatic effects in auditory word recognition: The case of alternating voice in Dutch. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 1-24.
19. Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21. MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40, 121-157.
22. Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology. An introduction to the theory of word structure. London: Cambridge University Press.
23. Milin, P., Filipovic Durdevic, D., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 50-64.
24. Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostic, A., & Baayen, R. (2009). Paradigms bit by bit: an informationtheoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. In J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition (pp. 214-252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Miller, G. A. (1990). Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 235-312.
26. Patterson, K., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge. Neuropsycologia, 39, 709-724.
27. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 153, 530-535.
28. Pinker, S. (1997). Words and rules in the human brain. Nature, 387, 547-548.
29. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
30. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism. Cognition, 28, 73-193.
31. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1994). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In S. Lima, R. Corrigan, & G. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 353-388). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 456-462.
33. Plunkett, K., & Juola, P. (1999). A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 463-490.
34. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21-69.
35. Ramscar, M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense doesn't require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 45-94.
36. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol.2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
37. Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 353-361.
38. Shane, S. A. (1973). Generative Phonology. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
39. Stemberger, J. P. (2002). Overtensing and the effect of regularity. Cognitive Science, 26, 737-766.
40. Stemberger, J. P. (2004). Phonological priming and irregular past. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 82-95.
41. Stemberger, J. P., & Middleton, C. (2003). Vowel dominance and morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 369-404.
42. Tabak, W., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Lexical statistics and lexical processing: semantic density, information complexity, sex, and irregularity in Dutch. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic evidence - Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 529-555). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
43. Tabak, W., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2010). Inflection is not "derivational": Evidence from word naming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
44. Ullman, M. (2004). Contributionss of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231-270.
45. Ullman, M. T., Estabrooke, I. V., Steinhauer, K., Brovetto, C., Pancheva, R., Ozawa, K., Mordecai, K., & Maki, P. (2002). Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. Brain and Language, 83, 141-143.
46. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(4), 735-747.
47. Vitevitch, M. S., & Stamer, M. K. (2006). The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 760-770.