Phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection

Psychological Science

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 86-90

  Ferreira, Victor S ^a   Griffin, Zenzi M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0037264664     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01424     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baars, B.J. (1992). Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition. New York: Plenum.
2. Bates, E., Federmeier, K., Herron, D., Iyer. G., Jacobsen, T., Pechmann, T., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Wicha, N., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Kohnert, K., Gutierrez, G., Lu, C., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Tzeng, O., Andonova, E., Gerdjikova, I., Mehotcheva, T., Szekely, A., & Pleh, C. (2000). Introducing the CRL International picture-naming project. The Newsletter of the Center for Research in Language, 12, 4-14.
3. Brennan, S.E., & Clark, H.H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1482-1493.
4. Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W.D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 108-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
6. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 27, 1430-1450.
7. Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B.; Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
8. Cutting, J.C., & Ferreira, V.S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318-344.
9. Damian, M.F., & Martin, R.C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345-361.
10. Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
11. Dell, G.S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349.
12. Dell, G.S., & Kim, A.E. (in press). Speech errors and word-form encoding. In R.J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
13. Dell, G.S., & Reich, P.A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
14. Ferreira, V.S., & Cutting, J.C. (1997). Ninety-three pictures and 108 questions for the elicitalion of homophones. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 619-635.
15. Ferreira, V.S., & Dell, G.S. (2000). Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 296-340.
16. Ferreira, V.S., & Humphreys, K.R. (2001). Syntactic influences on lexical and morphological processing in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 52-80
17. Fromkin, V.A. (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
18. Griffin, Z.M. (2002). Recency effects for meaning and form in word selection. Brain and Language, 80, 465-487.
19. Griffin, Z.M., & Bock, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and levels of processing in spoken word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 313-338.
20. Jescheniak, J.-D., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
21. Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
22. Martin, N., Gagnon, D.A., Schwartz, M.F., Dell, G.S., & Saffran, E.M. (1996). Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 257-282.
23. Martin, N., Weisberg, R.W., & Saffran, E.M. (1989), Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 462-485.
24. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-131.
25. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
26. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
27. Swinney, D.A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
28. Winer, B.J., Brown, D.R., & Michels, K.M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.