Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1439-1449

  Florian Jaeger, T ^a   Furth, Katrina ^b   Hilliard, Caitlin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

Bottom up feedback; Lexical production; Lexical selection; Phonological overlap; Unscripted sentence production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 84870913159     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027862     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arnold, J. E. (2008). Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 495-527. doi:10.1080/01690960801920099
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bock, K. (1987). An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 119-137. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90120-3
4. Butler, L. K., Jaeger, T. F., Bohnemeyer, J., & Furth, K. (2011). Learning to express visual contrasts in the production of referring expressions in Yucatec Maya. In K. van Deemter, A. Gatt, R. van Gompel, & E. Krahmer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Production of Referring Expressions (PRE-CogSci 2011): Bridging the Gap Between Computational, Empirical & Theoretical Approaches to Reference. Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from http://pre2011.uvt.nl/pdf/cogsci2011_butler_jaeger_bohnemeyer_furth.pdf
5. Butterworth, B., & Whittaker, S. (1980). Peggy Babcock's relatives. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Advances in Psychology: Vol. 1. Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 647-656). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
6. Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234-272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
7. Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1998). Abstract phonological structure in language production: Evidence from Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 886-903. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.886
8. Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 119-132. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00008-1
9. Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 195-209. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.001
10. de Diego Balaguer, R., Costa, A., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Juncadella, M., & Caramazza, A. (2004). Regular and irregular morphology and its relationship with agrammatism: Evidence from two Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. Brain and Language, 91(2), 212-222. doi:10.1016/j.bandl .2004.02.007
11. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283-321. doi:10.1037/0033295X.93.3.283
12. Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 9-37). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
13. Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., & Kittredge, A. K. (2008). Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 583608. doi:10.1080/01690960801920735
14. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42(1-3), 287-314. doi:10.1016/00100277(92)90046-K
15. Dell, G. S., Reed, K. D., Adams, D. R., & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1355-1367. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.26.6.1355
16. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 611-629. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90202-4
17. Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Ambiguity, accessibility, and a division of labor for communicative success. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 49, 209-246. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00006-6
18. Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7-8), 817-855. doi:10.1080/ 01690960600824112
19. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8(3), 191-219. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0803_1
20. Hilliard, C., Furth, K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2011). Phonological encoding in sentence production. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci11) (pp. 3070-3075). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
21. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434-446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
22. Janssen, N., Alario, F.-X., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A word-order constraint on phonological activation. Psychological Science, 19(3), 216220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02070.x
23. Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Grammatical and phonological influences on word order. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1262-1268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02429.x
24. Janssen, N., & López-Pérez, P. J. (2012). Word selection is biased against phonologically similar words. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1256-1274. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.24.5.1256
26. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A(2), 371-382. doi:10.1080/713755981
27. Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50(2), 194-231. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.08.002
28. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
29. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York, NY: SpringerVerlag.
30. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of the effect of context effects on language learning: Part 1. An account of basic finds. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
31. Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69-89. doi:10.1016/0749-596X (91)90011-8
32. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in pictureword interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1146-1160. doi:10.1037/02787393.17.6.1146
33. Miozzo, M. (2003). On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition, 87(2), 101-127. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00200-7
34. O'Seaghdha, P. G., & Marin, J. W. (2000). Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: Sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 57-73. doi:10.1037/00961523.26.1.57
35. Peterson, R. R., Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1989, August). A connectionist model of form-related priming effects. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Ann Arbor, MI.
36. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(3), 539-557. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.539
37. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107(3), 460-499. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.107.3.460
38. Rapp, D. N., & Samuel, A. G. (2002). A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 564-571. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.28.3.564
39. Roche, J. M., Dale, R., & Kreuz, R. J. (2012). Don't rush the navigator: Disambiguation strategies require cognitive flexibility. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249-284. doi:10.1016/S00100277(97)00027-9
41. Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 173200. doi:10.1080/016909699386338
42. Roelofs, A. (2004). Comprehension-based versus production-internal feedback in planning spoken words: A rejoinder to Rapp and Goldrick (2004). Psychological Review, 111(2), 579-580. doi:10.1037/0033-295X .111.2.579
43. Schnur, T. T., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Planning at the phonological level during sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 189-213. doi:10.1007/s10936-005-9011-6
44. Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 228-264. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
45. Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53(2), 91-127. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94) 90067-1
46. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serialordering mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 295-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word-onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processes of language (pp. 17-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (2004). Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(3), 675-686. doi:10.1037/0278-7393 .30.3.675
49. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Sullivan, M. P., & Riffel, B. (1999). The nature of phonological encoding during spoken word retrieval. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(1), 15-45. doi:10.1080/016909699386365
51. Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41(2), 101-175. doi:10.1006/cogp.2000.0739
52. Warker, J. A., & Dell, G. S. (2006). Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 387-398. doi:10.1037/0278-7393 .32.2.387
53. Wheeldon, L. (2003). Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(1), 81-109. doi:10.1080/01690960143000470