When words compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words

Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 325-329

  Vitevitch, Michael S ^a   Luce, Paul A ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000362570     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00064     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Auer, E.T., & Luce, P.A. (1998). PARSYN: A processing model of neighborhood activation and phonotactics in spoken word recognition. Unpublished manuscript, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
2. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
3. Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 12, 226-234.
4. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W.E. Cooper & E.C.T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Foss, D.J., & Blank, M.A. (1980). Identifying the speech codes. Cognitive Psychology 12, 1-31.
6. Gaygen, D.E. (1997). The effects of probabilistic phonotactics on the segmentation of continuous speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
7. Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. (1951). Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Kučera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
9. Landauer, T.K., & Streeter, L.A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119-131.
10. Levelt, W.J.M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269.
11. Luce, P.A. (1986). A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 155-158.
12. Luce, P.A., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
13. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
14. McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The Trace model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
15. Newman, R.S., Sawusch, J.R., & Luce, P.A. (1996). Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 873-889.
16. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
17. Pisoni, D.B., & Luce, P.A. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition. Cognition, 25, 21-52.
18. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effect in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
19. Trask, R.L. (1996). A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. London: Routledge.
20. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., Knewasser, S., Tincoff, R., & Bowman, M. (1996, May). English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns. Paper presented at the Fifth Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Chicago.
21. Vitevitch, M.S. (1997). Phonotactics and spoken word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
22. Vitevitch, M.S., Luce, P.A., Charles-Luce, J., & Kemmerer, D. (1997). Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech, 40, 47-62.
23. Webster's Seventh Collegiate Dictionary. (1967). Los Angeles: Library Reproduction Service.