Coping with abiotic stress: Proteome changes for crop improvement

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 93, Issue , 2013, Pages 145-168

  Abreu, Isabel A ^a,c   Farinha, Ana Paula ^a,c   Negrão, Sónia ^a,c   Gonçalves, Nuno ^a,c   Fonseca, Cátia ^a,b,c   Rodrigues, Mafalda ^a,c   Batista, Rita ^a,b,c   Saibo, Nelson J M ^a,c   Oliveira, M Margarida ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTO DE TECNOLOGIA QUÍMICA E BIOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH DR RICARDO JORGE   (Portugal)

^c IBET   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Allergenicity; Oxidative stress; Photosynthesis and metabolism; Protein protection; Signal transduction

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE; ASCORBIC ACID; CALMODULIN; CARBONATE DEHYDRATASE; CATALASE; DEHYDROASCORBIC ACID REDUCTASE; FOOD ALLERGEN; FRUCTOSE BISPHOSPHATE ALDOLASE; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASE; GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE (NADP); MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; PHOSPHOGLYCERATE MUTASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PROTEIN 14 3 3; PROTEOME; RAB PROTEIN; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE ACTIVASE; STABLE ISOTOPE; SUPEROXIDE; SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABIOTIC STRESS; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; COPING BEHAVIOR; CROP; CROP IMPROVEMENT; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FOOD QUALITY; FOOD SAFETY; HALOPHYTE; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PATHOGENESIS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT CELL CULTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; XEROPHYTE;

ALLERGENICITY; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND METABOLISM; PROTEIN PROTECTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; FOOD SAFETY; FOOD SUPPLY; ISOTOPE LABELING; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84888030942     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.07.014     Document Type: Review

References (301)

1. Sasson A. The global food crisis - causes, prospects, solutions 2009, Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology, Rabat, Morocco.
2. Gregory P.J., George T.S. Feeding nine billion: the challenge to sustainable crop production. J Exp Bot 2011, 62:5233-5239.
3. FAO How to feed the world in 2050 http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf.
4. Tester M., Langridge P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 2010, 327:818-822.
5. Jorrín-Novo J.V., Maldonado A.M., Echevarría-Zomeño S., Valledor L., Castillejo M.A., Curto M., et al. Plant proteomics update (2007-2008): Second-generation proteomic techniques, an appropriate experimental design, and data analysis to fulfill MIAPE standards, increase plant proteome coverage and expand biological knowledge. J Proteomics 2009, 72:285-314.
6. Agrawal G.K., Job D., Zivy M., Agrawal V.P., Bradshaw R.A., Dunn M.J., et al. Time to articulate a vision for the future of plant proteomics - a global perspective: an initiative for establishing the International Plant Proteomics Organization (INPPO). Proteomics 2011, 11:1559-1568.
7. Hajheidari M., Eivazi A., Buchanan B.B., Wong J.H., Majidi I., Salekdeh G.H. Proteomics uncovers a role for redox in drought tolerance in wheat. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:1451-1460.
8. Ma H.Y., Song L.R., Shu Y.J., Wang S., Niu J., Wang Z.K., et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of different salt tolerant soybean genotypes. J Proteomics 2012, 75:1529-1546.
9. Salekdeh G.H., Siopongco J., Wade L.J., Ghareyazie B., Bennett J. A proteomic approach to analyzing drought- and salt-responsiveness in rice. Field Crop Res 2002, 76:199-219.
10. Witzel K., Weidner A., Surabhi G.K., Varshney R.K., Kunze G., Buck-Sorlin G.H., et al. Comparative analysis of the grain proteome fraction in barley genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance during germination. Plant Cell Environ 2010, 33:211-222.
11. Fatehi F., Hosseinzadeh A., Alizadeh H., Brimavandi T., Struik P.C. The proteome response of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive barley genotypes to long-term salinity stress. Mol Biol Rep 2012, 39:6387-6397.
12. Benešová M., Hola D., Fischer L., Jedelsky P.L., Hnilicka F., Wilhelmova N., et al. The physiology and proteomics of drought tolerance in maize: early stomatal closure as a cause of lower tolerance to short-term dehydration?. PLoS One 2012, 7.
13. Farinha A.P., Irar S., de Oliveira E., Oliveira M.M., Pages M. Novel clues on abiotic stress tolerance emerge from embryo proteome analyses of rice varieties with contrasting stress adaptation. Proteomics 2011, 11:2389-2405.
14. Peng Z.Y., Wang M.C., Li F., Lv H.J., Li C.L., Xia G.M. A proteomic study of the response to salinity and drought stress in an introgression strain of bread wheat. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:2676-2686.
15. Pang Q.Y., Chen S.X., Dai S.J., Chen Y.Z., Wang Y., Yan X.F. Comparative proteomics of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:2584-2599.
16. Sengupta S., Majumder A.L. Insight into the salt tolerance factors of a wild halophytic rice, Porteresia coarctata: a physiological and proteomic approach. Planta 2009, 229:911-929.
17. Das-Chatterjee A., Goswami L., Maitra S., Dastidar K.G., Ray S., Majumder A.L. Introgression of a novel salt-tolerant L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase from Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka (PcINO1) confers salt tolerance to evolutionary diverse organisms. FEBS Lett 2006, 580:3980-3988.
18. Majee M., Maitra S., Dastidar K.G., Pattnaik S., Chatterjee A., Hait N.C., et al. A novel salt-tolerant L-myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase from Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka, a halophytic wild rice - molecular cloning, bacterial overexpression, characterization, and functional introgression into tobacco-conferring salt tolerance phenotype. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:28539-28552.
19. Oliver M.J., Jain R., Balbuena T.S., Agrawal G., Gasulla F., Thelen J.J. Proteome analysis of leaves of the desiccation-tolerant grass, Sporobolus stapfianus, in response to dehydration. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1273-1284.
20. Gechev T.S., Dinakar C., Benina M., Toneva V., Bartels D. Molecular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in resurrection plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012, 69:3175-3186.
21. Hossain Z., Nouri M.Z., Komatsu S. Plant cell organelle proteomics in response to abiotic stress. J Proteome Res 2012, 11:37-48.
22. Dooki A.D., Mayer-Posner F.J., Askari H., Zaiee A.A., Salekdeh G.H. Proteomic responses of rice young panicles to salinity. Proteomics 2006, 6:6498-6507.
23. Imin N., Kerim T., Weinman J.J., Rolfe B.G. Low temperature treatment at the young microspore stage induces protein changes in rice anthers. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:274-292.
24. Cheng Y.W., Qi Y.C., Zhu Q., Chen X., Wang N., Zhao X., et al. New changes in the plasma-membrane-associated proteome of rice roots under salt stress. Proteomics 2009, 9:3100-3114.
25. Nouri M.Z., Komatsu S. Comparative analysis of soybean plasma membrane proteins under osmotic stress using gel-based and LC MS/MS-based proteomics approaches. Proteomics 2010, 10:1930-1945.
26. Rampitsch C., Bykova N.V. The beginnings of crop phosphoproteomics: exploring early warning systems of stress. Front Plant Sci 2012, 3:144.
27. Nakashima K., Ito Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol 2009, 149:88-95.
28. Abdallah C., Dumas-Gaudot E., Renaut J., Sergeant K. Gel-based and gel-free quantitative proteomics approaches at a glance. Int J Plant Genomics 2012, 10.1155/2012/494572,2012.
29. Ross P.L., Huang Y.N., Marchese J.N., Williamson B., Parker K., Hattan S., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
30. Wiese S., Reidegeld K.A., Meyer H.E., Warscheid B. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics 2007, 7:340-350.
31. Nanjo Y., Nouri M.Z., Komatsu S. Quantitative proteomic analyses of crop seedlings subjected to stress conditions: a commentary. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1263-1272.
32. Alvarez S., Berla B.M., Sheffield J., Cahoon R.E., Jez J.M. H Comprehensive analysis of the Brassica juncea root proteome in response to cadmium exposure by complementary proteomic approaches. Proteomics 2009, 9:2419-2431.
33. Zhao Z., Stanley B.A., Zhang W., Assmann S.M. ABA-regulated G protein signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells: a proteomic perspective. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:1637-1647.
34. Neilson K.A., Mariani M., Haynes P.A. Quantitative proteomic analysis of cold-responsive proteins in rice. Proteomics 2011, 11:1696-1706.
35. Klose J. Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis of mouse tissues. A novel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik 1975, 26:231-243.
36. O'Farrell P.H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 1975, 250:4007-4021.
37. Klose J. From 2-D electrophoresis to proteomics. Electrophoresis 2009, 30(Suppl. 1):S142-S149.
38. Unlü M., Morgan M.E., Minden J.S. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 1997, 18:2071-2077.
39. Lilley K.S., Friedman D.B. All about DIGE: quantification technology for differential-display 2D-gel proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 2004, 1:401-409.
40. Marouga R., David S., Hawkins E. The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Anal Bioanal Chem 2005, 382:669-678.
41. Liu D., Ford K.L., Roessner U., Natera S., Cassin A.M., Patterson J.H., et al. Rice suspension cultured cells are evaluated as a model system to study salt responsive networks in plants using a combined proteomic and metabolomic profiling approach. Proteomics 2013, 13:2046-2062.
42. Gao L., Yan X., Li X., Guo G., Hu Y., Ma W., et al. Proteome analysis of wheat leaf under salt stress by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE). Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1180-1191.
43. Wendelboe-Nelson C., Morris P.C. Proteins linked to drought tolerance revealed by DIGE analysis of drought resistant and susceptible barley varieties. Proteomics 2012, 12:3374-3385.
44. Song Y., Zhang C., Ge W., Zhang Y., Burlingame A.L., Guo Y. Identification of NaCl stress-responsive apoplastic proteins in rice shoot stems by 2D-DIGE. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1045-1067.
45. Grimaud F., Renaut J., Dumont E., Sergeant K., Lucau-Danila A., Blervacq A.S., et al. Exploring chloroplastic changes related to chilling and freezing tolerance during cold acclimation of pea (Pisum sativum L.). J Proteomics 2013, 80C:145-159.
46. Zadražnik T., Hollung K., Egge-Jacobsen W., Meglič V., Šuštar-Vozlič J. Differential proteomic analysis of drought stress response in leaves of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Proteomics 2013, 78:254-272.
47. Kaufmann K., Smaczniak C., de Vries S., Angenent G.C., Karlova R. Proteomics insights into plant signaling and development. Proteomics 2011, 11:744-755.
48. Matros A., Kaspar S., Witzel K., Mock H.P. Recent progress in liquid chromatography-based separation and label-free quantitative plant proteomics. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:963-974.
49. Silva J.C., Gorenstein M.V., Li G.Z., Vissers J.P., Geromanos S.J. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:144-156.
50. Bindschedler L.V., Cramer R. Quantitative plant proteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11:756-775.
51. Abdallah C., Dumas-Gaudot E., Renaut J., Sergeant K. Gel-based and gel-free quantitative proteomics approaches at a glance. Int J Plant Genomics 2012, 2012:494572.
52. Gruhler A., Schulze W.X., Matthiesen R., Mann M., Jensen O.N. Stable isotope labeling of Arabidopsis thaliana cells and quantitative proteomics by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1697-1709.
53. Mastrobuoni G., Irgang S., Pietzke M., Assmus H.E., Wenzel M., Schulze W.X., et al. Proteome dynamics and early salt stress response of the photosynthetic organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:215.
54. 15N-labeled standard to monitor proteome dynamics in time course experiments reveals new insights into the heat stress response of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011, 10. (M110.004739).
55. 15N-labeling proteomic analysis of expanding Arabidopsis leaves subjected to osmotic stress indicates importance of mitochondria in preserving plastid functions. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:1018-1029.
56. Ong S.E., Blagoev B., Kratchmarova I., Kristensen D.B., Steen H., Pandey A., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:376-386.
57. 15N-labeling experiments as a robust tool in detection of candidate proteins responding to biological treatment. Proteomics 2009, 9:1916-1924.
58. Smolka M.B., Zhou H., Purkayastha S., Aebersold R. Optimization of the isotope-coded affinity tag-labeling procedure for quantitative proteome analysis. Anal Biochem 2001, 297:25-31.
59. Schütz W., Hausmann N., Krug K., Hampp R., Macek B. Extending SILAC to proteomics of plant cell lines. Plant Cell 2011, 23:1701-1705.
60. Granier C., Aguirrezabal L., Chenu K., Cookson S.J., Dauzat M., Hamard P., et al. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytologist 2006, 169:623-635.
61. Thelen J., Peck S.C. Quantitative proteomics in plants: choices in abundance. Plant Cell 2007, 19:3339-3346.
62. Huttlin E.L., Hegeman A.D., Harms A.C., Sussman M.R. Comparison of full versus partial metabolic labeling for quantitative proteomics analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:860-881.
63. 15N-metabolic labeling for comparative plasma membrane proteomics in Arabidopsis cells. Proteomics 2007, 7:750-754.
64. 15N metabolic labeling mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2012, 11:476-486.
65. 15N-metabolic labeling for automated peptide identification in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proteomics 2007, 7:1279-1292.
66. Arsova B., Kierszniowska S., Schulze W.X. The use of heavy nitrogen in quantitative proteomics experiments in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2012, 17:102-112.
67. Bindschedler L.V., Mills D.J., Cramer R. Hydroponic isotope labeling of entire plants and high-performance mass spectrometry for quantitative plant proteomics. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 893:155-173.
68. Bindschedler L.V., Palmblad M., Cramer R. Hydroponic isotope labelling of entire plants (HILEP) for quantitative plant proteomics; an oxidative stress case study. Phytochemistry 2008, 69:1962-1972.
69. 15N stable isotope labeling in Arabidopsis (SILIA). Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1028-1039.
70. Schaff J.E., Mbeunkui F., Blackburn K., Bird D.M., Goshe M.B. SILIP: a novel stable isotope labeling method for in planta quantitative proteomic analysis. Plant J 2008, 56:840-854.
71. Amara I., Capellades M., Ludevid M.D., Pagès M., Goday A. Enhanced water stress tolerance of transgenic maize plants over-expressing LEA Rab28 gene. J Plant Physiol 2013, 170:864-873.
72. Zhou Y., Lam H.M., Zhang J. Inhibition of photosynthesis and energy dissipation induced by water and high light stresses in rice. J Exp Bot 2007, 58:1207-1217.
73. Christou A., Manganaris G.A., Papadopoulos I., Fotopoulos V. Hydrogen sulfide induces systemic tolerance to salinity and non-ionic osmotic stress in strawberry plants through modification of reactive species biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation of multiple defence pathways. J Exp Bot 2013, 64:1953-1966.
74. Kim D.W., Rakwal R., Agrawal G.K., Jung Y.H., Shibato J., Jwa N.S., et al. A hydroponic rice seedling culture model system for investigating proteome of salt stress in rice leaf. Electrophoresis 2005, 26:4521-4539.
75. Tanou G., Job C., Rajjou L., Arc E., Belghazi M., Diamantidis G., et al. Proteomics reveals the overlapping roles of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in the acclimation of citrus plants to salinity. Plant J 2009, 60:795-804.
76. Palmblad M., Mills D.J., Bindschedler L.V. Heat-shock response in Arabidopsis thaliana explored by multiplexed quantitative proteomics using differential metabolic labeling. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:780-785.
77. Mahdid M., Kameli A., Ehlert C., Simonneau T. Rapid changes in leaf elongation, ABA and water status during the recovery phase following application of water stress in two durum wheat varieties differing in drought tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 2011, 49:1077-1083.
78. Munns R., James R.A., Sirault X.R., Furbank R.T., Jones H. New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:3499-3507.
79. Fulda S., Mikkat S., Stegmann H., Horn R. Physiology and proteomics of drought stress acclimation in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Biol 2011, 13:632-642.
80. Ehlert C., Plassard C., Cookson S.J., Tardieu F., Simonneau T. Do pH changes in the leaf apoplast contribute to rapid inhibition of leaf elongation rate by water stress? Comparison of stress responses induced by polyethylene glycol and down-regulation of root hydraulic conductivity. Plant Cell Environ 2011, 34:1258-1266.
81. Balestrazzi A., Confalonieri M., Macovei A., Carbonera D. Seed imbibition in Medicago truncatula Gaertn.: expression profiles of DNA repair genes in relation to PEG-mediated stress. J Plant Physiol 2011, 168:706-713.
82. Lee K.S., Choi W.Y., Ko J.C., Kim T.S., Gregorio G.B. Salinity tolerance of japonica and indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) at the seedling stage. Planta 2003, 216:1043-1046.
83. Negrão S., Almadanim M.C., Pires I.S., Abreu I.A., Maroco J., Courtois B., et al. New allelic variants found in key rice salt-tolerance genes: an association study. Plant Biotechnol J 2013, 11:87-100.
84. Kaspar S., Peukert M., Svatos A., Matros A., Mock H. MALDI-imaging mass spectrometry - an emerging technique in plant biology. Proteomics 2011, 11:1840-1850.
85. Lee Y.J., Perdian D.C., Song Z., Yeung E.S., Nikolau B.J. Use of mass spectrometry for imaging metabolites in plants. Plant J 2012, 70:81-95.
86. Furbank R.T., Tester M. Phenomics-technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci 2011, 16:635-644.
87. Berger B., de Regt B., Tester M. Trait dissection of salinity tolerance with plant phenomics. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 913:399-413.
88. Luan S., Kudla J., Rodriguez-Concepcion M., Yalovsky S., Gruissem W. Calmodulins and calcineurin B-like proteins: calcium sensors for specific signal response coupling in plants 2002, S389-S400.
89. Bouché N., Yellin A., Snedden W.A., Fromm H. Plant-specific calmodulin-binding proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2005, 56:435-466.
90. Liu H.-T., Gao F., Li G.-L., Han J.-L., Liu D.-L., Sun D.-Y., et al. The calmodulin-binding protein kinase 3 is part of heat-shock signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2008, 55:760-773.
91. Zhang W., Zhou R.-G., Gao Y.-J., Zheng S.-Z., Xu P., Zhang S.-Q., et al. Molecular and genetic evidence for the key role of AtCaM3 in heat-shock signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2009, 149:1773-1784.
92. Doherty C.J.C., Van Buskirk H.A.H., Myers S.J.S., Thomashow M.F.M. Roles for Arabidopsis CAMTA transcription factors in cold-regulated gene expression and freezing tolerance. Plant Cell 2009, 21:972-984.
93. Magnan F., Ranty Bt, Charpenteau M, Sotta B, Galaud J-P, Aldon D Mutations in AtCML9, a calmodulin-like protein from Arabidopsis thaliana, alter plant responses to abiotic stress and abscisic acid. Plant J 2008, 56:575-589.
94. Wan D., Li R., Zou B., Zhang X., Cong J., Wang R., et al. Calmodulin-binding protein CBP60g is a positive regulator of both disease resistance and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 2012, 31:1269-1281.
95. Xi J., Qiu Y., Du L., Poovaiah B.W. Plant-specific trihelix transcription factor AtGT2L interacts with calcium/calmodulin and responds to cold and salt stresses. Plant Sci 2012, 185-186:274-280.
96. Yang L., Ji W., Zhu Y., Gao P., Li Y., Cai H., et al. GsCBRLK, a calcium/calmodulin-binding receptor-like kinase, is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to salt and ABA stress. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:2519-2533.
97. Xu G.-Y., Rocha P.S.C.F., Wang M.-L., Xu M.-L., Cui Y.-C., Li L.-Y., et al. A novel rice calmodulin-like gene, OsMSR2, enhances drought and salt tolerance and increases ABA sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Planta 2011, 234:47-59.
98. Qiu Y., Xi J., Du L., Poovaiah B.W. The function of calreticulin in plant immunity: new discoveries for an old protein. Plant Signal Behav 2012, 7:907-910.
99. Jiang Y., Yang B., Harris N.S., Deyholos M.K. Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. J Exp Bot 2007, 58:3591-3607.
100. Li X.J., Yang M.F., Chen H., Qu L.Q., Chen F., Shen S.H. Abscisic acid pretreatment enhances salt tolerance of rice seedlings: proteomic evidence. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804, 2010:929-940.
101. Sobhanian H., Razavizadeh R., Nanjo Y., Ehsanpour A.A., Jazii F.R., Motamed N., et al. Proteome analysis of soybean leaves, hypocotyls and roots under salt stress. Proteome Sci 2010, 8.
102. Zörb C., Schmitt S., Mühling K.H. Proteomic changes in maize roots after short-term adjustment to saline growth conditions. Proteomics 2010, 10:4441-4449.
103. Aghaei K.K., Ehsanpour A.A.A., Komatsu S.S. Proteome analysis of potato under salt stress. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4858-4868.
104. Qiu Y., Xi J., Du L., Roje S., Poovaiah B.W. A dual regulatory role of Arabidopsis calreticulin-2 in plant innate immunity. Plant J 2011, 69:489-500.
105. Jia X.Y., Xu C.Y., Jing R.L., Li R.Z., Mao X.G., Wang J.P., et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of wheat calreticulin (CRT) gene involved in drought-stressed responses. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:739-751.
106. Roberts M.R. 14-3-3 Proteins find new partners in plant cell signalling. Trends Plant Sci 2003, 8:218-223.
107. Denison F.C., Paul A.-L., Zupanska A.K., Ferl R.J. 14-3-3 proteins in plant physiology. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011, 22:720-727.
108. Oh M.-H., Huber J.L., Shen W., Athwal G.S., Wu X., Huber S.C. Overexpression of a directed mutant of 14-3-3 ω in Arabidopsis leaves affects phosphorylation and protein content of nitrate reductase. Botany 2009, 87:691-701.
109. Shin R., Jez J.M., Basra A., Zhang B., Schachtman D.P. 14-3-3 Proteins fine-tune plant nutrient metabolism. FEBS Lett 2011, 585:143-147.
110. Xu W., Shi W., Jia L., Liang J., Zhang J. TFT6 and TFT7, two different members of tomato 14-3-3 gene family, play distinct roles in plant adaption to low phosphorus stress. Plant Cell Environ 2012, 35:1393-1406.
111. Chattopadhyay A., Subba P., Pandey A., Bhushan D., Kumar R., Datta A., et al. Analysis of the grasspea proteome and identification of stress-responsive proteins upon exposure to high salinity, low temperature, and abscisic acid treatment. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1293-1307.
112. Jain S., Srivastava S., Sarin N.B., Kav N.N. Proteomics reveals elevated levels of PR 10 proteins in saline-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea) calli. Plant Physiol Biochem 2006, 44:253-259.
113. Ndimba B.K., Chivasa S., Simon W.J., Slabas A.R. Identification of Arabidopsis salt and osmotic stress responsive proteins using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2005, 5:4185-4196.
114. Wang M.C., Peng Z.Y., Li C.L., Li F., Liu C., Xia G.M. Proteomic analysis on a high salt tolerance introgression strain of Triticum aestivum/Thinopyrum ponticum. Proteomics 2008, 8:1470-1489.
115. Aranjuelo I., Molero G., Erice G., Avice J.C., Nogues S. Plant physiology and proteomics reveals the leaf response to drought in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). J Exp Bot 2010, 62:111-123.
116. Malakshah S.S.N., Rezaei M.M.H., Heidari M.M., Salekdeh G.H.G. Proteomics reveals new salt responsive proteins associated with rice plasma membrane. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2007, 71:2144-2154.
117. Schoonheim P.J., Sinnige M.P., Casaretto J.A., Veiga H., Bunney T.D., Quatrano R.S., et al. 14-3-3 adaptor proteins are intermediates in ABA signal transduction during barley seed germination. Plant J 2006, 49:289-301.
118. Schoonheim P.J., Veiga H. Pereira DdC, Friso G, van Wijk KJ, de Boer AH. A comprehensive analysis of the 14-3-3 interactome in barley leaves using a complementary proteomics and two-hybrid approach. Plant Physiol 2007, 143:670-683.
119. Merlot S., Leonhardt N., Fenzi F., Valon C., Costa M., Piette L., et al. Constitutive activation of a plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase prevents abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure. EMBO J 2007, 26:3216-3226.
120. Yan J., He C., Wang J., Mao Z., Holaday S.A., Allen R.D., et al. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 protein GF14 lambda in cotton leads to a "stay-green" phenotype and improves stress tolerance under moderate drought conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 2004, 45:1007-1014.
121. Assmann S.M. Heterotrimeric and unconventional GTP binding proteins in plant cell signaling. Plant Cell 2002, 14:S355-S373.
122. Tuteja N., Sopory S.K. Plant signaling in stress: G-protein coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G-proteins and signal coupling via phospholipases. Plant Signal Behav 2008, 3:79-86.
123. Moshkov I.E., Novikova G.V. Superfamily of plant monomeric GTP-binding proteins: 2. Rab proteins are the regulators of vesicles trafficking and plant responses to stresses. Russ J Plant Physiol 2011, 55:119-129.
124. Mazel A., Leshem Y., Tiwari B.S., Levine A. Induction of salt and osmotic stress tolerance by overexpression of an intracellular vesicle trafficking protein AtRab7 (AtRabG3e). Plant Physiol 2004, 134:118-128.
125. Agarwal P.K., Agarwal P., Jain P., Jha B., Reddy M.K., Sopory S.K. Constitutive overexpression of a stress-inducible small GTP-binding protein PgRab7 from Pennisetum glaucum enhances abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep 2007, 27:105-115.
126. George S., Parida A. Over-expression of a Rab family GTPase from phreatophyte Prosopis juliflora confers tolerance to salt stress on transgenic tobacco. Mol Biol Rep 2010, 38:1669-1674.
127. Pitakrattananukool S., Kawakatsu T., Anuntalabhochai S., Takaiwa F. Overexpression of OsRab7B3, a small GTP-binding protein gene, enhances leaf senescence in transgenic rice. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2012, 76:1296-1302.
128. Sinha A.K.A., Jaggi M.M., Raghuram B.B., Tuteja N.N. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal Behav 2011, 6:196-203.
129. Ichimura K.K., Mizoguchi T.T., Yoshida R.R., Yuasa T.T., Shinozaki K.K. Various abiotic stresses rapidly activate Arabidopsis MAP kinases ATMPK4 and ATMPK6. Plant J 2000, 24:655-665.
130. Zhang L., Tian L.-H., Zhao J.-F., Song Y., Zhang C.-J., Guo Y. Identification of an apoplastic protein involved in the initial phase of salt stress response in rice root by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Plant Physiol 2009, 149:916-928.
131. Chaves M.M., Costa J.M., Saibo N.J.M. Recent advances in photosynthesis under drought and salinity. Plant responses to drought and salinity stress: developments in a post-genomic era 2011, 57:49-104.
132. Zhu J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2002, 53:247-273.
133. Saibo N.J.M., Lourenco T., Oliveira M.M. Transcription factors and regulation of photosynthetic and related metabolism under environmental stresses. Ann Bot 2009, 103:609-623.
134. Chaves M.M., Oliveira M.M. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 2004, 55:2365-2384.
135. Chaves M.M., Flexas J., Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 2009, 103:551-560.
136. 2 concentration. New Phytol 2006, 172:73-82.
137. Vanhove A.-C., Vermaelen W., Panis B., Swennen R., Carpentier S.C. Screening the banana biodiversity for drought tolerance: can an in vitro growth model and proteomics be used as a tool to discover tolerant varieties and understand homeostasis. Front Plant Sci 2012, 3:176.
138. Aranjuelo I., Molero G., Erice G., Avice J.C., Nogues S. Plant physiology and proteomics reveals the leaf response to drought in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). J Exp Bot 2011, 62:111-123.
139. Zhang H., Han B., Wang T., Chen S., Li H., Zhang Y., et al. Mechanisms of plant salt response: insights from proteomics. J Proteome Res 2012, 11:49-67.
140. Xu Y.H., Liu R., Yan L., Liu Z.Q., Jiang S.C., Shen Y.Y., et al. Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins are required for stomatal response to abscisic acid in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 2012, 63:1095-1106.
141. Rodriguez R.E., Lodeyro A., Poli H.O., Zurbriggen M., Peisker M., Palatnik J.F., et al. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing chloroplastic ferredoxin-NADP(H) reductase display normal rates of photosynthesis and increased tolerance to oxidative stress. Plant Physiol 2007, 143:639-649.
142. Cui S.X., Hu J., Guo S.L., Wang J., Cheng Y.L., Dang X.X., et al. Proteome analysis of Physcomitrella patens exposed to progressive dehydration and rehydration. J Exp Bot 2012, 63:711-726.
143. Warren C.R. Stand aside stomata, another actor deserves centre stage: the forgotten role of the internal conductance to CO(2) transfer. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:1475-1487.
144. Majeau N., Arnoldo M.A., Coleman J.R. Modification of carbonic anhydrase activity by antisense and over-expression constructs in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol Biol 1994, 25:377-385.
145. Yu S., Zhang X., Guan Q., Takano T., Liu S. Expression of a carbonic anhydrase gene is induced by environmental stresses in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biotechnol Lett 2007, 29:89-94.
146. Wang X.C., Fan P.X., Song H.M., Chen X.Y., Lil X.F., Li Y.X. Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in shoots of salicornia europaea under different salinity. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:3331-3345.
147. Kurek I., Chang T.K., Bertain S.M., Madrigal A., Liu L., Lassner M.W., et al. Enhanced thermostability of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase improves photosynthesis and growth rates under moderate heat stress. Plant Cell 2007, 19:3230-3241.
148. Feng L.L., Han Y.J., Liu G., An B.G., Yang J., Yang G.H., et al. Overexpression of sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase enhances photosynthesis and growth under salt stress in transgenic rice plants. Funct Plant Biol 2007, 34:822-834.
149. Feng L., Wang K., Li Y., Tan Y., Kong J., Li H., et al. Overexpression of SBPase enhances photosynthesis against high temperature stress in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell Rep 2007, 26:1635-1646.
150. Ifuku K., Yamamoto Y., Ono T.A., Ishihara S., Sato F. PsbP protein, but not PsbQ protein, is essential for the regulation and stabilization of photosystem II in higher plants. Plant Physiol 2005, 139:1175-1184.
151. Tezara W., Mitchell V.J., Driscoll S.D., Lawlor D.W. Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 1999, 401:914-917.
152. Bandehagh A., Salekdeh G.H., Toorchi M., Mohammadi A., Komatsu S. Comparative proteomic analysis of canola leaves under salinity stress. Proteomics 2011, 11:1965-1975.
153. Lu W., Tang X., Huo Y., Xu R., Qi S., Huang J., et al. Identification and characterization of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase genes in Arabidopsis reveal a gene family with diverse responses to abiotic stresses. Gene 2012, 503:65-74.
154. Jeong M.J., Park S.C., Byun M.O. Improvement of salt tolerance in transgenic potato plants by glyceraldehyde-3 phosphate dehydrogenase gene transfer. Mol Cells 2001, 12:185-189.
155. Li X.J., Yang M.F., Zhu Y., Liang Y., Shen S.H. Proteomic analysis of salt stress responses in rice shoot. J Plant Biol 2011, 54:384-395.
156. Zhao Z., Assmann S.M. The glycolytic enzyme, phosphoglycerate mutase, has critical roles in stomatal movement, vegetative growth, and pollen production in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 2011, 62:5179-5189.
157. Gallardo F., Galvez S., Gadal P., Canovas F.M. Changes in Nadp(+)-linked isocitrate dehydrogenase during tomato fruit ripening - characterization of the predominant cytosolic enzyme from green and ripe pericarp. Planta 1995, 196:148-154.
158. Liu Y.H., Shi Y.S., Song Y.C., Wang T.Y., Li Y. Characterization of a stress-induced NADP-isocitrate dehydrogenase gene in maize confers salt yolerance in Arabidopsis. J Plant Biol 2010, 53:107-112.
159. Boveris A., Chance B. Mitochondrial generation of hydrogen-peroxide - general properties and effect of hyperbaric-oxygen. Biochem J 1973, 134:707-716.
160. Edreva A. Generation and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts: a submolecular approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2005, 106:119-133.
161. del Rio L.A., Sandalio L.M., Corpas F.J., Romero-Puertas M.C., Palma J.M. Peroxisomes as a cellular source of ROS signal molecules. Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling 2009, 95-111. Springer, New York. L.A. DelRio, A. Puppo (Eds.).
162. Mccord J.M., Fridovic I. Superoxide dismutase an enzymic function for erythrocuprein (Hemocuprein). J Biol Chem 1969, 244:6049.
163. Yost F.J., Fridovic I. Iron-containing superoxide dismutase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1973, 248:4905-4908.
164. Keele B.B., Mccord J.M., Fridovic I. Superoxide dismutase from Escherichia coli-B - a new manganese-containing enzyme. J Biol Chem 1970, 245:6176.
165. Youn H.D., Kim E.J., Roe J.H., Hah Y.C., Kang S.O. A novel nickel-containing superoxide dismutase from Streptomyces spp. Biochem J 1996, 318:889-896.
166. McKersie B.D., Bowley S.R., Jones K.S. Winter survival of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol 1999, 119:839-848.
167. McKersie B.D., Bowley S.R., Harjanto E., Leprince O. Water-deficit tolerance and field performance of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol 1996, 111:1177-1181.
168. McKersie B.D., Chen Y., de Beus M., Bowley S.R., Bowler C., Inze D., et al. Superoxide dismutase enhances tolerance of freezing stress in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiol 1993, 103:1155-1163.
169. Bowler C., Slooten L., Vandenbranden S., Derycke R., Botterman J., Sybesma C., et al. Manganese superoxide-dismutase can reduce cellular-damage mediated by oxygen radicals in transgenic plants. EMBO J 1991, 10:1723-1732.
170. Gupta A.S., Webb R.P., Holaday A.S., Allen R.D. Overexpression of superoxide sismutase protects plants from oxidative stress (induction of ascorbate peroxidase in superoxide dismutase-overexpressing plants). Plant Physiol 1993, 103:1067-1073.
171. Abbasi F.M., Komatsu S. A proteomic approach to analyze salt-responsive proteins in rice leaf sheath. Proteomics 2004, 4:2072-2081.
172. Ali G.M., Komatsu S. Proteomic analysis of rice leaf sheath during drought stress. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:396-403.
173. Caruso G., Cavaliere C., Guarino C., Gubbiotti R., Foglia P., Lagana A. Identification of changes in Triticum durum L. leaf proteome in response to salt stress by two-dimensional electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2008, 391:381-390.
174. Costa P., Bahrman N., Frigerio J.M., Kremer A., Plomion C. Water-deficit-responsive proteins in maritime pine. Plant Mol Biol 1998, 38:587-596.
175. Du C.X., Fan H.F., Guo S.R., Tezuka T., Li J. Proteomic analysis of cucumber seedling roots subjected to salt stress. Phytochemistry 2010, 71:1450-1459.
176. Ke Y.Q., Han G.Q., He H.Q., Li J.X. Differential regulation of proteins and phosphoproteins in rice under drought stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009, 379:133-138.
177. Parker R., Flowers T.J., Moore A.L., Harpham N.V.J. An accurate and reproducible method for proteome profiling of the effects of salt stress in the rice leaf lamina. J Exp Bot 2006, 57:1109-1118.
178. Salekdeh G.H., Siopongco J., Wade L.J., Ghareyazie B., Bennett J. Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics 2002, 2:1131-1145.
179. Zhu J.M., Alvarez S., Marsh E.L., LeNoble M.E., Cho I.J., Sivaguru M., et al. Cell wall proteome in the maize primary root elongation zone. II. Region-specific changes in water soluble and lightly ionically bound proteins under water deficit. Plant Physiol 2007, 145:1533-1548.
180. Lee D.G., Ahsan N., Lee S.H., Kang K.Y., Bahk J.D., Lee I.J., et al. A proteomic approach in analyzing heat-responsive proteins in rice leaves. Proteomics 2007, 7:3369-3383.
181. Ge P., Ma C., Wang S., Gao L., Li X., Guo G., et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of grain development in two spring wheat varieties under drought stress. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012, 402:1297-1313.
182. Kav N.N.V., Srivastava S., Goonewardene L., Blade S.F. Proteome-level changes in the roots of Pisum sativum in response to salinity. Ann Appl Biol 2004, 145:217-230.
183. Rasoulnia A., Bihamta M.R., Peyghambari S.A., Alizadeh H., Rahnama A. Proteomic response of barley leaves to salinity. Mol Biol Rep 2011, 38:5055-5063.
184. Noctor G., Foyer C.H. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Phys 1998, 49:249-279.
185. Foyer C.H., Noctor G. Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol 2011, 155:2-18.
186. Mishra N.P., Mishra R.K., Singhal G.S. Changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visible-light at different temperatures in the presence of protein-synthesis inhibitors. Plant Physiol 1993, 102:903-910.
187. Sugimoto M., Takeda K. Proteomic analysis of specific proteins in the root of salt-tolerant barley. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2009, 73:2762-2765.
188. Yoshimura K., Masuda A., Kuwano M., Yokota A., Akashi K. Programmed proteome response for drought avoidance/tolerance in the root of a C(3) xerophyte (wild watermelon) under water deficits. Plant Cell Physiol 2008, 49:226-241.
189. Hajheidari M., Abdollahian-Noghabi M., Askari H., Heidari M., Sadeghian S.Y., Ober E.S., et al. Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress. Proteomics 2005, 5:950-960.
190. Le Martret B., Poage M., Shiel K., Nugent G.D., Dix P.J. Tobacco chloroplast transformants expressing genes encoding dehydroascorbate reductase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione-S-transferase, exhibit altered anti-oxidant metabolism and improved abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Biotechnol J 2011, 9:661-673.
191. Gazanchian A., Hajheidari M., Sima N.K., Salekdeh G.H. Proteome response of Elymus elongatum to severe water stress and recovery. J Exp Bot 2007, 58:291-300.
192. Kwon S.Y., Choi S.M., Ahn Y.O., Lee H.S., Lee H.B., Park Y.M., et al. Enhanced stress-tolerance of transgenic tobacco plants expressing a human dehydroascorbate reductase gene. J Plant Physiol 2003, 160:347-353.
193. Chen Z., Gallie D.R. Increasing tolerance to ozone by elevating foliar ascorbic acid confers greater protection against ozone than increasing avoidance. Plant Physiol 2005, 138:1673-1689.
194. Eltayeb A.E., Kawano N., Badawi G.H., Kaminaka H., Sanekata T., Morishima I., et al. Enhanced tolerance to ozone and drought stresses in transgenic tobacco overexpressing dehydroascorbate reductase in cytosol. Physiol Plant 2006, 127:57-65.
195. Chen Z., Gallie D.R. The ascorbic acid redox state controls guard cell signaling and stomatal movement. Plant Cell 2004, 16:1143-1162.
196. Ushimaru T., Nakagawa T., Fujioka Y., Daicho K., Naito M., Yamauchi Y., et al. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the rice dehydroascorbate reductase gene are resistant to salt stress. J Plant Physiol 2006, 163:1179-1184.
197. Haroldsen V.M., Chi-Ham C.L., Kulkarni S., Lorence A., Bennett A.B. Constitutively expressed DHAR and MDHAR influence fruit, but not foliar ascorbate levels in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem 2011, 49:1244-1249.
198. Poage M., Le Martret B., Jansen M.A.K., Nugent G.D., Dix P.J. Modification of reactive oxygen species scavenging capacity of chloroplasts through plastid transformation. Plant Mol Biol 2011, 76:371-384.
199. Roxas V.P., Lodhi S.A., Garrett D.K., Mahan J.R., Allen R.D. Stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco seedlings that overexpress glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase. Plant Cell Physiol 2000, 41:1229-1234.
200. Katsuhara M., Otsuka T., Ezaki B. Salt stress-induced lipid peroxidation is reduced by glutathione S-transferase, but this reduction of lipid peroxides is not enough for a recovery of root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci 2005, 169:369-373.
201. Sappl P.G., Carroll A.J., Clifton R., Lister R., Whelan J., Millar A.H., et al. The Arabidopsis glutathione transferase gene family displays complex stress regulation and co-silencing multiple genes results in altered metabolic sensitivity to oxidative stress. Plant J 2009, 58:53-68.
202. Light G.G., Mahan J.R., Roxas V.P., Allen R.D. Transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings expressing a tobacco glutathione S-transferase fail to provide improved stress tolerance. Planta 2005, 222:346-354.
203. Chitteti B.R., Peng Z.H. Proteome and phosphoproteome differential expression under salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa) roots. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:1718-1727.
204. Kausar R., Arshad M., Shahzad A., Komatsu S. Proteomics analysis of sensitive and tolerant barley genotypes under drought stress. Amino Acids 2012, 44:345-359.
205. Ruan S.L., Ma H.S., Wang S.H., Fu Y.P., Xin Y., Liu W.Z., et al. Proteomic identification of OsCYP2, a rice cyclophilin that confers salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings when overexpressed. BMC Plant Biol 2011, 11.
206. Swami A.K., Alam S.I., Sengupta N., Sarin R. Differential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in Sorghum bicolor leaves. Environ Exp Bot 2011, 71:321-328.
207. Allen R.D., Webb R.P., Schake S.A. Use of transgenic plants to study antioxidant defenses. Free Radic Biol Med 1997, 23:473-479.
208. Polle A. Dissecting the superoxide dismutase-ascorbate-glutathione-pathway in chloroplasts by metabolic modeling. Computer simulations as a step towards flux analysis. Plant Physiol 2001, 126:445-462.
209. Lee S.H., Ahsan N., Lee K.W., Kim D.H., Lee D.G., Kwak S.S., et al. Simultaneous overexpression of both CuZn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in transgenic tall fescue plants confers increased tolerance to a wide range of abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol 2007, 164:1626-1638.
210. Koussevitzky S., Suzuki N., Huntington S., Armijo L., Sha W., Cortes D., et al. Ascorbate peroxidase 1 plays a key role in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to stresscombination. J Biol Chem 2008, 283:34197-34203.
211. Bhushan D., Pandey A., Choudhary M.K., Datta A., Chakraborty S., Chakraborty N. Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in chickpea extracellular matrix during dehydration stress. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1868-1884.
212. Chen S.B., Gollop N., Heuer B. Proteomic analysis of salt-stressed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings: effect of genotype and exogenous application of glycinebetaine. J Exp Bot 2009, 60:2005-2019.
213. Manaa A., Ben Ahmed H., Valot B., Bouchet J.P., Aschi-Smiti S., Causse M., et al. Salt and genotype impact on plant physiology and root proteome variations in tomato. J Exp Bot 2011, 62:2797-2813.
214. Boldt R., Scandalios J.G. Influence of UV-light on the expression of the Cat2 and Cat3 catalase genes in maize. Free Radic Biol Med 1997, 23:505-514.
215. Nover L., Bharti K., Doring P., Mishra S.K., Ganguli A., Scharf K.D. Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: how many heat stress transcription factors do we need?. Cell Stress Chaperones 2001, 6:177-189.
216. Charng Y.Y., Liu H.C., Liu N.Y., Chi W.T., Wang C.N., Chang S.H., et al. A heat-inducible transcription factor, HsfA2, is required for extension of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2007, 143:251-262.
217. Sakuma Y., Maruyama K., Qin F., Osakabe Y., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Dual function of an Arabidopsis transcription factor DREB2A in water-stress-responsive and heat-stress-responsive gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:18822-18827.
218. Schramm F., Larkindale J., Kiehlmann E., Ganguli A., Englich G., Vierling E., et al. A cascade of transcription factor DREB2A and heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 regulates the heat stress response of Arabidopsis. Plant J 2008, 53:264-274.
219. Yoshida T., Sakuma Y., Todaka D., Maruyama K., Qin F., Mizoi J., et al. Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis heat-shock transcription factor HsfA3 in the transcriptional cascade downstream of the DREB2A stress-regulatory system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008, 368:515-521.
220. Chauhan H., Khurana N., Agarwal P., Khurana P. Heat shock factors in rice (Oryza sativa L.): genome-wide expression analysis during reproductive development and abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genomics 2011, 286:171-187.
221. Aghaei K., Ehsanpour A.A., Shah A.H., Komatsu S. Proteome analysis of soybean hypocotyl and root under salt stress. Amino Acids 2009, 36:91-98.
222. Ferreira S., Hjerno K., Larsen M., Wingsle G., Larsen P., Fey S., et al. Proteome profiling of Populus euphratica Oliv. upon heat stress. Ann Bot 2006, 98:361-377.
223. Huang H., Moller I.M., Song S.Q. Proteomics of desiccation tolerance during development and germination of maize embryos. J Proteomics 2012, 75:1247-1262.
224. Kawasaki S., Miyake C., Kohchi T., Fujii S., Uchida M., Yokota A. Responses of wild watermelon to drought stress: accumulation of an ArgE homologue and citrulline in leaves during water deficits. Plant Cell Physiol 2000, 41:864-873.
225. Majoul T., Bancel E., Triboi E., Ben Hamida J., Branlard G. Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: characterization of heat-responsive proteins from non-prolamins fraction. Proteomics 2004, 4:505-513.
226. Skylas D.J., Cordwell S.J., Hains P.G., Larsen M.R., Basseal D.J., Walsh B.J., et al. Heat shock of wheat during grain filling: proteins associated with heat-tolerance. J Cereal Sci 2002, 35:175-188.
227. Vincent D., Ergul A., Bohlman M.C., Tattersall E.A., Tillett R.L., Wheatley M.D., et al. Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity. J Exp Bot 2007, 58:1873-1892.
228. Wang W.X., Vinocur B., Shoseyov O., Altman A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 2004, 9:244-252.
229. Cho E.K., Choi Y.J. A nuclear-localized HSP70 confers thermoprotective activity and drought-stress tolerance on plants. Biotechnol Lett 2009, 31:597-606.
230. Montero-Barrientos M., Hermosa R., Cardoza R.E., Gutierrez S., Nicolas C., Monte E. Transgenic expression of the Trichoderma harzianum hsp70 gene increases Arabidopsis resistance to heat and other abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol 2010, 167:659-665.
231. Zhang J.X., Wang C., Yang C.Y., Wang J.Y., Chen L., Bao X.M., et al. The role of Arabidopsis AtFes1A in cytosolic Hsp70 stability and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant J 2010, 62:539-548.
232. Yokotani N., Ichikawa T., Kondou Y., Matsui M., Hirochika H., Iwabuchi M., et al. Expression of rice heat stress transcription factor OsHsfA2e enhances tolerance to environmental stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis. Planta 2008, 227:957-967.
233. Dure L., Greenway S.C., Galau G.A. Developmental biochemistry of cottonseed embryogenesis and germination - changing messenger ribonucleic-acid populations as shown by invitro and invivo protein-synthesis 14. Biochemistry-Us 1981, 20:4162-4168.
234. Galau G.A., Hughes D.W., Dure L. Abscisic-acid induction of cloned cotton late embryogenesis-abundant (Lea) messenger RNAs. Plant Mol Biol 1986, 7:155-170.
235. Gomez J., Sanchezmartinez D., Stiefel V., Rigau J., Puigdomenech P., Pages M. A gene induced by the plant hormone abscisic-acid in response to water-stress encodes a glycine-rich protein. Nature 1988, 334:262-264.
236. Mundy J., Chua N.H. Abscisic acid and water-stress induce the expression of a novel rice gene. EMBO J 1988, 7:2279-2286.
237. Hajela R.K., Horvath D.P., Gilmour S.J., Thomashow M.F. Molecular-cloning and expression of COR (cold-regulated) genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1990, 93:1246-1252.
238. Hunault G., Jaspard E. LEAPdb: a database for the late embryogenesis abundant proteins. BMC Genomics 2010, 11.
239. Goyal K., Pinelli C., Maslen S.L., Rastogi R.K., Stephens E., Tunnacliffe A. Dehydration-regulated processing of late embryogenesis abundant protein in a desiccation-tolerant nematode. FEBS Lett 2005, 579:4093-4098.
240. Grelet J., Benamar A., Teyssier E., Avelange-Macherel M.H., Grunwald D., Macherel D. Identification in pea seed mitochondria of a late-embryogenesis abundant protein able to protect enzymes from drying. Plant Physiol 2005, 137:157-167.
241. Chakrabortee S., Boschetti C., Walton L.J., Sarkar S., Rubinsztein D.C., Tunnacliffe A. Hydrophilic protein associated with desiccation tolerance exhibits broad protein stabilization function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:18073-18078.
242. RoyChoudhury A., Roy C., Sengupta D.N. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the heterologous lea gene Rab16A from rice during high salt and water deficit display enhanced tolerance to salinity stress. Plant Cell Rep 2007, 26:1839-1859.
243. Ganguly M., Datta K., Roychoudhury A., Gayen D., Sengupta D.N., Datta S.K. Overexpression of Rab16A gene in indica rice variety for generating enhanced salt tolerance. Plant Signal Behav 2012, 7:502-509.
244. Park B.J., Liu Z.C., Kanno A., Kameya T. Increased tolerance to salt- and water-deficit stress in transgenic lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) by constitutive expression of LEA. Plant Growth Regul 2005, 45:165-171.
245. Hu T.Z. OsLEA3, a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene from rice, confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress to transgenic rice. Russ J Plant Physiol 2008, 55:530-537.
246. Amara I., Odena A., Oliveira E., Moreno A., Masmoudi K., Pages M., et al. Insights into maize LEA proteins: from proteomics to functional approaches. Plant Cell Physiol 2012, 53:312-329.
247. Irar S., Brini F., Goday A., Masmoudi K., Pages M. Proteomic analysis of wheat embryos with 2-DE and liquid-phase chromatography (ProteomeLab PF-2D) - a wider perspective of the proteome. J Proteomics 2010, 73:1707-1721.
248. Okushima Y., Koizumi N., Kusano T., Sano H. Secreted proteins of tobacco cultured BY2 cells: identification of a new member of pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol Biol 2000, 42:479-488.
249. Sels J., Mathys J., De Coninck B.M., Cammue B.P., De Bolle M.F. Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins: a focus on PR peptides. Plant Physiol Biochem 2008, 46:941-950.
250. Van Loon L.C., Van Strien E.A. The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 1999, 55:85-97.
251. Ekramoddoullah A.K.M., Taylor D., Hawkins B.J. Characterization of a fall protein of sugar pine and detection of its homolog associated with frost hardiness of western white-pine needles. Can J Forest Res 1995, 25:1137-1147.
252. Pinto M.P., Ricardo C.P.P. Lupinus albus L pathogenesis-related proteins that show similarity to Pr-10 proteins. Plant Physiol 1995, 109:1345-1351.
253. Moons A., Prinsen E., Bauw G., Van Montagua M. Antagonistic effects of abscisic acid and jasmonates on salt stress-inducible transcripts in rice roots. Plant Cell 1997, 9:2243-2259.
254. Rakwal R., Agrawal G.K., Yonekura M. Separation of proteins from stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaf tissues by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: induction of pathogenesis-related and cellular protectant proteins by jasmonic acid, UV irradiation and copper chloride. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3472-3478.
255. Dubos C., Plomion C. Drought differentially affects expression of a PR-10 protein, in needles of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) seedlings. J Exp Bot 2001, 52:1143-1144.
256. Liu J.J., Ekramoddoullah A.K.M., Yu X.S. Differential expression of multiple PR10 proteins in western white pine following wounding, fungal infection and cold-hardening. Physiol Plant 2003, 119:544-553.
257. Hashimoto M., Kisseleva L., Sawa S., Furukawa T., Komatsu S., Koshiba T. A novel rice PR10 protein, RSOsPR10, specifically induced in roots by biotic and abiotic stresses, possibly via the jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Plant Cell Physiol 2004, 45:550-559.
258. Jain S., Srivastava S., Sarin N.B., Kav N.N.V. Proteomics reveals elevated levels of PR 10 proteins in saline-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea) calli. Plant Physiol Biochem 2006, 44:253-259.
259. Handschuh L., Femiak I., Kasperska A., Figlerowicz M., Sikorski M.M. Structural and functional characteristics of two novel members of pathogensis-related multigene family of class 10 from yellow lupine. Acta Biochim Pol 2007, 54:783-796.
260. El-Banna A., Hajirezaei M.R., Wissing J., Ali Z., Vaas L., Heine-Dobbernack E., et al. Over-expression of PR-10a leads to increased salt and osmotic tolerance in potato cell cultures. J Biotechnol 2010, 150:277-287.
261. Zhang R.P., Wang Y.C., Liu G.F., Li H.Y. Cloning and characterization of a pathogenesis-related gene (Thpr10) from Tamarix hispida. Acta Biol Cracov Bot 2010, 52:17-25.
262. Gomez-Gomez L., Rubio-Moraga A., Ahrazem O. Molecular cloning and characterisation of a pathogenesis-related protein CsPR10 from Crocus sativus. Plant Biol 2011, 13:297-303.
263. Lee O.R., Pulla R.K., Kim Y.J., Balusamy S.R.D., Yang D.C. Expression and stress tolerance of PR10 genes from Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. Mol Biol Rep 2012, 39:2365-2374.
264. Agarwal P., Bhatt V., Singh R., Das M., Sopory S.K., Chikara J. Pathogenesis-related gene, JcPR-10a from Jatropha curcas exhibit RNase and antifungal activity. Mol Biotechnol 2013, 54:412-425.
265. Agrawal G.K., Rakwal R., Yonekura M., Kubo A., Saji H. Proteome analysis of differentially displayed proteins as a tool for investigating ozone stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Proteomics 2002, 2:947-959.
266. Srivastava S., Fristensky B., Kav N.N. Constitutive expression of a PR10 protein enhances the germination of Brassica napus under saline conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 2004, 45:1320-1324.
267. Hanafy M.S., El-Banna A., Schumacher H.M., Jacobsen H.J., Hassan F.S. Enhanced tolerance to drought and salt stresses in transgenic faba bean (Vicia faba L.) plants by heterologous expression of the PR10a gene from potato. Plant Cell Rep 2013, 32:663-674.
268. Breiteneder H., Radauer C. A classification of plant food allergens. Am Acad Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004, 113:821-830.
269. Beggs P.J., Walczyk N.E. Impacts of climate change on plant food allergens: a previously unrecognized threat to human health. Air Qual Atmos Health 2008, 1:119-123.
270. DaMatta F.M., Grandis A., Arenque B.C., Buckeridge M.S. Impacts of climate changes on crop physiology and food quality. Food Res Int 2009, 43:1814-1823.
271. Yahata E., Maruyama-Funatsuki W., Nishio Z., Yamamoto Y., Hanaoka A., Sugiyama H., et al. Relationship between the dough quality and content of specific glutenin proteins in wheat mill streams, and its application to making flour suitable for instant Chinese noodles. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2006, 70:788-797.
272. Matsui T., Li C.H., Osajima Y. Preparation and characterization of novel bioactive peptides responsible for angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition from wheat germ. J Pept Sci 1999, 5:289-297.
273. Megías C., del Mar Yust M., Pedroche J., Lquari H., Girón-Calle J., Alaiz M., et al. Purification of an ACE inhibitory peptide after hydrolysis of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) protein isolates. J Agric Food Chem 2004, 52:1928-1932.
274. Borel P., Lairon D., Senft M., Chautan M., Lafont H. Wheat bran and wheat germ: effect on digestion and intestinal absorption of dietary lipids in the rat. Am J Clin Nutr 1989, 49:1192-1202.
275. Sirtori C.R., Lovati M.R., Manzoni C., Castiglioni S., Duranti M., Magni C., et al. Proteins of white lupin seed, a naturally isoflavone-poor legume, reduce cholesterolemia in rats and increase LDL receptor activity in HepG2 cells. J Nutr 2004, 134:18-23.
276. Tsutsumi K., Kawauchi Y., Kondo Y., Inoue Y., Koshitani O., Kohri H. Water extract of defatted rice bran suppresses visceral fat accumulation in rats. J Agric Food Chem 2000, 48:1653-1656.
277. Li H.-M., Hu X., Guo P., Fu P., Xu L., Zhang X.-Z. Antioxidant properties and possible mode of action of corn protein peptides and zein peptides. J Food Biochem 2010, 34:44-60.
278. Park S.Y., Lee J.-S., Baek H.-H., Lee H.G. Purification and characterization of antioxidant peptides from soy protein hydrolisate. J Biochem 2010, 34:120-132.
279. Taub D.R., Miller B., Allen H. Effects of elevated CO2 on the protein concentration of food crops: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 2008, 14:565-575.
280. Högy P., Fangmeier A. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on grain quality of wheat. J Cereal Sci 2008, 48:580-591.
281. 2, drought and soil nitrogen effects on wheat grain quality. New Phytol 2001, 150:295-303.
282. Blumenthal J., Baltensperger D., Cassman K.G., Mason S., Pavlista A. Importance and effect of nitrogen on crop quality and health. Nitrogen in the environment: sources, problems, and management 2008, J.L. Hatfield, R.F. Follett (Eds.).
283. 2, nitrogen supply and tropospheric ozone on spring wheat-II. Nutrients (N, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn). Environ Pollut 1997, 96:43-59.
284. 2 enrichment (FACE) on the eating quality of rice. J Sci Food Agric 2005, 85:1861-1868.
285. Reid C.E., Gamble J.L. Aeroallergens, allergic disease, and climate change: impacts and adaptation. Ecohealth 2009, 6:458-470.
286. Ziello C., Sparks T.H., Estrella N., Belmonte J., Bergmann K.C., Bucher E., et al. Changes to airborne pollen counts across Europe. PLoS One 2012, 7:e34076.
287. 2 concentration. Funct Plant Biol 2005, 32:667-670.
288. Ahlholm J.U., Helander M.L., Savolaine N.J. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the allergenicity of birch (Betula pubescens ssp.zerepanovii [Orl.] Hamet-Ahti) pollen. Clin Exp Allergy 1998, 28:1384-1388.
289. Hänninen A.-R., Mikkola J.H., Kalkkinen N., Turjanmaa K., Ylitalo L., Reunala T., et al. Increased allergen production in turnip (Brassica rapa) by treatments activating defense mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999, 104:194-201.
290. Pühringer H., Moll D., Hoffmann-Sommergruber K., Watillon B., Katinger H., Machado MLdC The promoter of an apple Ypr10 gene, encoding the major allergen Mal d 1, is stress- and pathogen-inducible. Plant Sci 2000, 152:35-50.
291. Armentia A., Callejo A., Díaz-Perales A., Martín-Gil F.J., Salcedo G. Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones. Allergol Immunopathol 2003, 31:44-46.
292. Batista R., Martins I., Jeno P., Ricardo C.P., Oliveira M.M. A proteomic study to identify soya allergens-the human response to transgenic versus non-transgenic soya samples. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007, 144:29-38.
293. Fonseca C., Planchon S., Renaut J., Oliveira M.M., Batista R. Characterization of maize allergens - MON810 vs. its non-transgenic counterpart. J Proteomics 2012, 75:2027-2037.
294. Fasoli E., Pastorello E.A., Farioli L., Scibilia J., Aldini G., Carini M., et al. Searching for allergens in maize kernels via proteomic tools. J Proteomics 2009, 72:501-510.
295. Marzban G., Herndl A., Kolarich D., Maghuly F., Mansfeld A., Hemmer W., et al. Identification of four IgE-reactive proteins in raspberry (Rubus ideaeus L.). Mol Nutr Food Res 2008, 52:1497-1506.
296. Chassaigne H., Trégoat V., Nørgaard J.V., Maleki S.J., van Hengel A.J. Resolution and identification of major peanut allergens using a combination of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis, western blotting and Q-TOF mass spectrometry. J Proteomics 2009, 72:511-526.
297. Negrão S., Courtois B., Ahmadi N., Abreu I., Saibo N., Oliveira M.M. Recent updates on salinity stress in rice: from physiological to molecular responses. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2011, 30:329-377.
298. de Vienne D., Leonardi A., Damerval C., Zivy M. Genetics of proteome variation for QTL characterization: application to drought-stress responses in maize. J Exp Bot 1999, 50:303-309.
299. Dumont E., Fontaine V., Vuylsteker C., Sellier H., Bodele S., Voedts N., et al. Association of sugar content QTL and PQL with physiological traits relevant to frost damage resistance in pea under field and controlled conditions. Theor Appl Genet 2009, 118:1561-1571.
300. Grierson C.S., Barnes S.R., Chase M.W., Clarke M., Grierson D., Edwards K.J., et al. One hundred important questions facing plant science research. New Phytol 2011, 192:6-12.
301. Ehrhardt D.W., Frommer W.B. New technologiesfor 21st century plant science. Plant Cell 2012, 24:374-394.