Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1873-1892

  Vincent, Delphine ^a   Ergül, Ali ^b   Bohlman, Marlene C ^a   Tattersall, Elizabeth A R ^a   Tillett, Richard L ^a   Wheatley, Matthew D ^a   Woolsey, Rebekah ^a   Quilici, David R ^a   Joets, Johann ^c   Schlauch, Karen ^d   Schooley, David A ^a   Cushman, John C ^a   Cramer, Grant R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

2 DE; Grapevine; MALDI TOF TOF; Salinity; Shoot; Water deficit

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ACETONE; DESORPTION; LASER BEAM EFFECTS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEINS; STRESS ANALYSIS; WATER;

GRAPEVINE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; WATER DEFICIT;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

ISOPROTEIN; PROTEOME; SODIUM CHLORIDE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN; WATER;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; GRAPE; METABOLISM; PLANT; PROTEOMICS; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT SHOOTS; PROTEIN ISOFORMS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SODIUM CHLORIDE; VITIS; WATER;

EID: 34547403172     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm012     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Abbasi FM, Komatsu S. 2004. A proteomic approach to analyze salt-responsive proteins in rice leaf sheath. Proteomics 4, 2072-2081.
2. Adam-Blondon A-F, Roux C, Claux D, Butterlin G, Merdinoglu D, This P. 2004. Mapping 245 SSR markers on the Vitis vinifera genome: a tool for grape genetics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 1017-1027.
3. Agrawal GK, Rakwal R, Yonekura M, Kubo A, Saji H. 2002. Proteome analysis of differentially displayed proteins as a tool for investigating ozone stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Proteomics 2, 947-959.
4. Alburquerque JA, Esquivel MG, Teixeira AR, Ferreira RB. 2001. The catabolism of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from higher plants. A hypothesis. Plant Science 161, 55-65.
5. Ali GM, Komatsu S. 2006. Proteomic analysis of rice leaf sheath during drought stress. Journal of Proteome Research 5, 396-403.
6. Amme S, Maltros A, Schlesier B, Mock H-P. 2006. Proteome analysis of cold stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana using DIGE-technology. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1537-1546.
7. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-815.
8. Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH, Boursiquot JM, Walker MA, Meredith CP, Simon CJ. 2003. Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L. Genetic Research 81, 179-192.
9. Askari H, Edqvist J, Hajheidari M, Kafi M, Salekdeh GH. 2006. Effects of salinity levels on proteome of Suaeda aegyptiaca leaves. Proteomics 6, 2542-2554.
10. Bae MS, Cho EJ, Choi EY, Park OK. 2003. Analysis of the Arabidopsis nuclear proteome and its response to cold stress. The Plant Journal 36, 652-663.
11. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57, 289-300.
12. Benson EE, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA. 1994. Oxidative stress in recalcitrant tissue cultures of grapevine. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 16, 355-362.
13. Bettiga LJ. 2003. Chardonnay. Wine grape varieties in California. University of California.
14. Bowers J, Boursiquot JM, This P, Chu K, Johansson H, Meredith C. 1999. Historical genetics: the parentage of chardonnay, gamay, and other wine grapes of northeastern France. Science 285, 1562-1565.
15. Cagney G, Emili A. 2002. De novo peptide sequencing and quantitative profiling of complex protein mixtures using mass-coded abundance tagging. Nature Biotechnology 20, 163-170.
16. Carvalho LC, Esquivel MG, Martins I, Ricardo CP, Amancio S. 2005. Monitoring the stability of Rubisco in micropropagated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Journal of Plant Physiology 162, 365-374.
17. Castelan-Estrada M, Vivin P, Gaudillère JP. 2002. Allometric relationships to estimate seasonal above-ground vegetative and reproductive biomass of Vitis vinifera L. Annals of Botany 89, 401-408.
18. Castro AJ, Carapito C, Zorn N, Magné C, Leize E, Van Dorsselaer A, Clément C. 2005. Proteomic analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) tissues subjected to herbicide stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 2783-2795.
19. Che FY, Fricker LD. 2005. Quantitative peptidomics of mouse pituitary: comparison of different stable isotopic tags. Journal of Mass Spectrometry 40, 238-249.
20. Correia MJ, Pereira JS, Chaves MM, Rodrigues ML, Pacheco CA. 1995. ABA xylem concentration determines maximum daily leaf conductance of field-grown Vitis vinifera L. plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 511-521.
21. Cramer GR, Bowman DC. 1991. Kinetics of maize leaf elongation. I. Increased yield threshold limits short-term, steady-state elongation rates after exposure to salinity. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 1417-1426.
22. Cramer GR, Ergül A, Vincent D, et al. 2005. Integrative functional genomics of abiotically-stressed grapevine: a system for discovery of gene and plant functions. In: Qiu W, Kovacs LG, eds. Proceedings of the International Grape Genomics Symposium. St Louis, MO, 30-37.
23. Cui S, Huang F, Wang J, Ma X, Cheng Y, Lui J. 2005. A proteomic analysis of cold stress responses in rice seedlings. Proteomics 5, 3162-3172.
24. Damerval C, de Vienne D, Zivy M, Thiellement H. 1986. Technical improvements in two-dimensional electrophoresis increase the level of genetic variation detected in wheat-seedling proteins. Electrophoresis 7, 52-54.
25. Dietz KJ, Jacob S, Oelze ML, Laxa M, Tognetti V, de Miranda SM, Baier M, Finkemeier I. 2006. The function of peroxiredoxins in plant organelle redox metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1697-1709.
26. Dresios J, Derkatch IL, Liebman SW, Synetos D. 2000. Yeast ribosomal protein L24 affects the kinetics of protein synthesis and ribosomal protein L39 improves translational accuracy, while mutants lacking both remain viable. Biochemistry 39, 7236-7244.
27. Finnie C, Maeda K, Ostegaard O, Bak-Jensen KS, Larsen J, Svensson B. 2004. Aspects of the barley seed proteome during development and germination. Biochemical Society Transactions 32, 517-519.
28. 2 uptake when photosynthesis in grapevine leaves is inhibited following low night temperatures and/or water stress. Plant Physiology 121, 675-684.
29. Gaudillère JP, Van Leeuwen C, Ollat N. 2002. Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, an integrated indicator of vineyard status. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 757-763.
30. Gibeaut DM, Hulett J, Cramer GR, Seemann JR. 1997. Maximal biomass of Arabidopsis thaliana using a simple, low-maintenance hydroponic method and favorable environmental conditions. Plant Physiology 115, 317-319.
31. Goes da Silva F, Iandolino A, Al-Kayal F, et al. 2005. Characterizing the grape transcriptome: analysis of ESTs from multiple Vitis species and development of a compendium of gene expression during berry development. Plant Physiology 139, 574-597.
32. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296, 92-100.
33. Görg A, Postel W, Weser J, Gunther S, Strahler JR, Hanash SM, Somerlot L. 1987. Elimination of point streaking on silver stained two-dimensional gels by addition of iodoacetamide to the equilibration buffer. Electrophoresis 8, 122-124.
34. Görg A, Weiss W, Dunn MJ. 2004. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 4, 3665-3685.
35. Grant OM, Tronina L, Jones HG, Chaves MM. 2006. Exploring thermal imaging variables for the detection of stress responses in grapevine under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, in press.
36. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. 1999. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature Biotechnology 17, 994-999.
37. Hajduch M, Rakwal R, Agrawal GK, Yonekura M, Pretova A. 2001. High-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis separation of proteins from metal-stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves: drastic reductions/fragmentation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase and induction of stress-related proteins. Electrophoresis 22, 2824-2831.
38. Hajheidari M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Askari H, Heidari M, Sadeghian SY, Ober ES, Salekdeh GH. 2005. Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress. Proteomics 5, 950-960.
39. Halligan BD, Ruotti V, Jin W, Laffoon S, Twigger SN, Dratz EA. 2004. ProMoST (Protein Modification Screening Tool): a web-based tool for mapping protein modifications on two-dimensional gels. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 638-644.
40. Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. 2002. Pathogenesis-related (PR)-proteins identified as allergens. Biochemical Society Transactions 30, 930-935.
41. Houtza RL, Portis AR. 2003. The life of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Posttranslational facts and mysteries. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 414, 150-158.
42. Huber SC, Hardin SC. 2004. Numerous posttranslational modifications provide opportunities for the intricate regulation of metabolic enzymes at multiple levels. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7, 318-322.
43. Imin N, Kerim T, Rolfe GB, Weinman JJ. 2004. Effect of early cold stress on the maturation of rice anthers. Proteomics 4, 1873-1882.
44. Jones HG, Stoll M, Santos T, de Sousa C, Chaves MM, Grant OM. 2002. Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 2249-2260.
45. Jorge I, Navarro RM, Lenz C, Ariza D, Jorrin J. 2006. Variation in the holm oak leaf proteome at different plant developmental stages, between provenances and in response to drought stress. Proteomics 6, S207-S214.
46. Kim D-W, Rakwal R, Agrawal GK, et al. 2005. A hydroponic rice seedling culture model system for investigating proteome of salt stress in rice leaf. Electrophoresis 26, 4521-4539.
47. Kim J, Kim HY. 2006. Functional analysis of a calcium-binding transcription factor involved in plant salt stress signaling. FEBS Letters 580, 5251-5256.
48. Kim SI, Kim JY, Kim EA, et al. 2003. Proteome analysis of hairy root from Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer using peptide fingerprinting, internal sequencing and expressed sequence tag data. Proteomics 3, 2379-2392.
49. Kim ST, Cho KS, Yu S, Kim SG, Hong JC, Han CD, Bae DW, Nam MH, Kang KY. 2003. Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins induced by rice blast fungus and elicitor in suspension-cultured rice cells. Proteomics 3, 2368-2378.
50. Kiribuchi K, Jikumaru Y, Kaku H, Minami E, Hasegawa M, Kodama O, Seto H, Okada K, Nojiri H, Yamane H. 2005. Involvement of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor RERJ1 in wounding and drought stress responses in rice plants. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 69, 1042-1044.
51. Koller A, Washburn MP, Lange BM, et al. 2002. Proteomic survey of metabolic pathways in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 11969-11974.
52. Lebon E, Pellegrino A, Tardieu F, Lecoeur J. 2004. Shoot development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is affected by the modular branching pattern of the stem and intra- and inter-shoot trophic competition. Annals of Botany 93, 263-274.
53. Lee S, Lee EJ, Yang EJ, Lee JE, Park AR, Song WH, Park OK. 2004. Proteomic identification of annexins, calcium-dependent membrane binding proteins that mediate osmotic stress and abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16, 1378-1391.
54. Lesniewska E, Adrian M, Klinguer A, Pugin A. 2004. Cell wall modification in grapevine cells in response to UV stress investigated by atomic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 100, 171-178.
55. Lovisolo C, Schubert A, Sorce C. 2002. Are xylem radial development and hydraulic conductivity in downwardly-growing grapevine shoots influenced by perturbed auxin metabolism? New Phytologist 156, 65-74.
56. Majoul T, Bancel E, Triboi E, Ben Hamida J, Branlard G. 2003. Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: characterization of heat-responsive proteins from total endosperm. Proteomics 3, 175-183.
57. Majoul T, Bancel E, Triboi E, Ben Hamida J, Branlard G. 2004. Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: characterization of heat-responsive proteins from non-prolamine fraction. Proteomics 4, 505-513.
58. Majoul T, Chahed K, Zamiti E, Ouelhazi L, Ghrir R. 2000. Analysis by two-dimensional electrophoresis of the effect of salt stress on the polypeptide patterns in roots of a salt-tolerant and a salt-sensitive cultivar of wheat. Electrophoresis 21, 2562-2565.
59. Maroco JP, Rodrigues ML, Lopes C, Chaves MM. 2002. Limitations to photosynthesis in grapevine under drought-metabolic and modelling approaches. Functional Plant Physiology 29, 1-9.
60. Masuda K, Haruyama S, Fujino K. 1999. Assembly and disassembly of the peripheral architecture of the plant cell nucleus during mitosis. Planta 210, 165-167.
61. Masuda K, Xu Z, Takahashi S, Ito A, Ono M, Nomura K, Inoue M. 1997. Peripheral framework of carrot cell nucleus contains a novel protein predicted to exhibit a long alpha-helical domain. Experimental Cell Research 232, 173-181.
62. McCutchan J, Shackel KA. 1992. Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117, 607-611.
63. Méchin V, Balliau T, Chateau-Joubert S, Davanture M, Langella O, Negroni L, Prioul J-L, Thevenot C, Zivy M, Damerval C. 2004. A two-dimensional proteome map of maize endosperm. Phytochemistry 65, 1609-1618.
64. Méchin V, Consoli L, Le Guilloux M, Damerval C. 2003. An efficient solubilization buffer for plant proteins focused in immobilized pH gradients. Proteomics 3, 1299-1302.
65. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery MF, Van Breusegem B. 2004. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends in Plant Science 9, 490-498.
66. Möller M, Alchanatis V, Cohen Y, Meron M, Tsipris J, Naor A, Ostrovsky V, Sprintsin M, Cohen S. 2007. Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 827-838.
67. Nam MH, Heo EJ, Kim JY, Kim SI, Kwon KH, Seo JB, Kwon O, Yoo JS, Park YM. 2003. Proteome analysis of the responses of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer leaves to high light: use of electrospray ionization quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry and expressed sequence tag data. Proteomics 3, 2351-2367.
68. Neuhoff V, Arold N, Taube D, Ehrhardt W. 1988. Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis 9, 255-262.
69. Ogo Y, Itai RN, Nakanishi H, Inoue H, Kobayashi T, Suzuki M, Takahashi M, Mori S, Nishizawa NK. 2006. Isolation and characterization of IRO2, a novel iron-regulated bHLH transcription factor in graminaceous plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 2867-2878.
70. Okuda K, Nakamura T, Sugita M, Shimizu T, Shikanai T. 2006. A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is a site-recognition factor in chloroplast RNA editing. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 37661-37667.
71. Okushima Y, Koizumi N, Kusano T, Sano H. 2000. Secreted proteins of tobacco cultured BY2 cells: identification of a new member of pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Molecular Biology 42, 479-488.
72. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M. 2002. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 1, 376-386.
73. Ostergaard O, Finnie C, Laugesen S, Roepstorff P, Svennson B. 2004. Proteome analysis of barley seeds: identification of major proteins from two-dimensional gels (pI 4-7). Proteomics 4, 2437-2447.
74. Ouerghi Z, Remy R, Ouelhazi L, Ayadi A, Brulfert J. 2000. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of soluble leaf proteins, isolated from two wheat species (Triticum durum and Triticum aestivum) differing in sensitivity towards NaCl. Electrophoresis 21, 2487-2491.
75. Papadakis AK, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA. 1999. The generation of active oxygen species differs in tobacco and grapevine mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Physiology 121, 197-206.
76. Parker KC, Garrels JI, Hines W, Butler EM, McKee AH, Patterson D, Martin S. 1998. Identification of yeast proteins from two-dimensional gels: working out spot cross-contamination. Electrophoresis 19, 1920-1932.
77. Parker R, Flowers TJ, Moore AL, Harpham NVJ. 2006. An accurate and reproducible method for proteome profiling of the effects of salt stress in the rice leaf. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1109-1118.
78. Penarrubia L, Moreno J. 1990. Increased susceptibility of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase to proteolytic degradation caused by oxidative treatments. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 281, 319-323.
79. Phee BK, Cho JH, Park S, Jung JH, Lee YH, Jeon JS, Bhoo SH, Hahn TR. 2004. Proteomic analysis of the response of Arabidopsis chloroplast proteins to high light stress. Proteomics 4, 3560-3568.
80. Rabilloud T. 2002. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: old, old fashioned, but it still climbs up the mountains. Proteomics 2, 3-10.
81. 18O labeling by peptidyl-Lys metalloendopeptidase for comparative proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research 4, 507-514.
82. Renaut J, Lutts S, Hoffmann L, Hausman JF. 2004. Responses of poplar to chilling temperatures: proteomic and physiological aspects. Plant Biology (Stuttgart) 6, 81-90.
83. Requejo R, Tena M. 2005. Proteome analysis of maize roots reveals that oxidative stress is a main contributing factor to plant arsenic toxicity. Phytochemistry 66, 1519-1528.
84. Riaz S, Dangl GS, Edwards KJ, Meredith CP. 2004. A microsatellite marker based framework linkage map of Vitis vinifera L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108, 864-872.
85. Rivals E, Bruyere C, Toffano-Nioche C, Lecharny A. 2006. Formation of the Arabidopsis pentatricopeptide repeat family. Plant Physiology 141, 825-839.
86. Rose JK, Braam J, Fry SC, Nishitani K. 2002. The XTH family of enzymes involved in xyloglucan endotransglucosylation and endohydrolysis: current perspectives and a new unifying nomenclature. Plant and Cell Physiology 43, 1421-1435.
87. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, et al. 2004. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 3, 1154-1169.
88. Salekdeh GH, Siopongco J, Wade LJ, Ghareyazie B, Bennett J. 2002. Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics 2, 1131-1145.
89. Sarry JE, Kuhn L, Ducruix C, et al. 2006. The early responses of Arabidopsis thaliana cells to cadmium exposure explored by protein and metabolite profiling analyses. Proteomics 6, 2180-2198.
90. Sarry JE, Sommerer N, Sauvage FX, Bergoin A, Rossignol M, Albagnac G, Romieu C. 2004. Grape berry biochemistry revisited upon proteomic analysis of the mesocarp. Proteomics 4, 201-215.
91. Schmitz-Linneweber C, Williams-Carrier RE, Williams-Voelker PM, Kroeger TS, Vichas A, Barkan A. 2006. A pentatricopeptide repeat protein facilitates the trans-splicing of the maize chloroplast rps12 pre-mRNA. The Plant Cell 18, 2650-2663.
92. Schoof H, Zaccaria P, Gundlach H, Lemcke K, Rudd S, Kolesov G, Arnold R, Mewes HW, Mayer KF. 2002. MIPS Arabidopsis thaliana Database (MAtDB): an integrated biological knowledge resource based on the first complete plant genome. Nucleic Acids Research 30, 91-93.
93. Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P. 2000. Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1627-1634.
94. Tafforeau M, Verdus MC, Charlionet R, Cabin-Flaman A, Ripoll C. 2002. Two-dimensional electrophoresis investigation of short-term response of flax seedlings to a cold shock. Electrophoresis 23, 2534-2540.
95. Tesnières C, Robin J-P. 1992. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of the total polypeptides in ripe red grape berries. Electrophoresis 13, 93-96.
96. This P, Lacombe T, Thomas MR. 2006. Historical origins and genetic diversity of wine grapes. Trends in Genetics 22, 511-519.
97. Unlu M, Morgan ME, Minden JS. 1997. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 18, 2071-2077.
98. Valot B, Gianinazzi S, Dumas-Gaudot E. 2004. Sub-cellular proteomic analysis of a Medicago truncatula root microsomal fraction. Phytochemistry 65, 1721-1732.
99. Vincent D, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Cornic G, Negroni L, Zivy M. 2005. Water deficits affect caffeate O-methyltransferase, lignification, and related enzymes in maize leaves. A proteomic investigation. Plant Physiology 137, 949-960.
100. Vincent D, Wheatley MD, Cramer GR. 2006. Optimization of protein extraction and solubilization for mature grape berry clusters. Electrophoresis 27, 1853-1865.
101. Vivier MA, Pretorius IS. 2002. Genetically tailored grapevines for the wine industry. Trends in Biotechnology 20, 472-478.
102. Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A. 2004. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science 9, 244-252.
103. Watson BS, Lei Z, Dixon RA, Sumner LW. 2004. Proteomics of Medicago sativa cell walls. Phytochemistry 65, 1709-1720.
104. Wolpert JA. 2003. Cabernet Sauvignon. Wine grape varieties in California. University of California.
105. Wu Y, Jeong BR, Fry SC, Boyer JS. 2005. Change in XET activities, cell wall extensibility and hypocotyl elongation of soybean seedlings at low water potential. Planta 220, 593-601.
106. Yan S, Tang Z, Su W, Sun W. 2005. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics 5, 235-244.
107. Yuan YX, Zhang J, Wang DW, Ling HQ. 2005. AtbHLH29 of Arabidopsis thaliana is a functional ortholog of tomato FER involved in controlling iron acquisition in strategy I plants. Cell Research 15, 613-621.