Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell

Annals of Botany

Volumn 103, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 551-560

  Chaves, M M ^a,b   Flexas, J ^c   Pinheiro, C ^b  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO DE TECNOLOGIA QUÍMICA E BIOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Drought; Gene expression; Mesophyll and biochemical limitations; Photosynthesis; Salt; Signalling; Stomatal; Stress

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

DROUGHT STRESS; GENE EXPRESSION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SALINITY; SIGNALING; STOMATA;

CYTOLOGY; DEHYDRATION; DROUGHT; DRUG EFFECT; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT; REVIEW; SALINITY;

DEHYDRATION; DROUGHTS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTS; SALINITY; SODIUM CHLORIDE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 59849088805     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn125     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Bogeat-Triboulot MB, Brosche M, Renaut J, Jouve L, Le Thiec D, Fayyaz P, et al. 2007. Gradual soil water depletion results in reversible changes of gene expression, protein profiles, ecophysiology, and growth performance in Populus euphratica, a poplar growing in arid regions. Plant Physiology 143: 876-892.
2. Bongi G, Loreto F. 1989. Gas-exchange properties of salt-stressed olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves. Plant Physiology 90: 1408-1416.
3. 2 and water vapour exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials. Plant Physiology 114: 185-191.
4. 3 non-halophytes. Plant Physiology 95: 628-635.
5. Buckley TN, Farquhar GD, Mott KA. 1997. Qualitative effects of patchy stomatal conductance distribution features on gas-exchange calculations. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 867-880.
6. 2] to estimate diffusional and non-diffusional limitations of photosynthetic capacity of salt-stressed olive saplings. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 585-594.
7. Chaves MM. 1991. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 1-16.
8. Chaves MM, Oliveira MM. 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2365-2384.
9. Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, et al. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field: photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany 89: 907-916.
10. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30: 239-264.
11. Cochard H, Venisse J-S, Barigah TS, Brunel N, Herbette S, Guilliot A, Tyree MT, Sakr S. 2007. Putative role of aquaporins in variable hydraulic conductance of leaves in response to light. Plant Physiology 143: 122-133.
12. 3 plants: Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Elastostema repens (Lour.) Hall F. Planta 177: 84-90.
13. Cramer GR, Ergül A, Grimplet J, Tillett RL, Tattersall EAR, Bohlman MC, et al. 2007. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Functional & Integrative Genomics 7: 111-134.
14. Delfine S, Alvino A, Villani MC, Loreto F. 1999. Restrictions to carbon dioxide conductance and photosynthesis in spinach leaves recovering from salt stress. Plant Physiology 119: 1101-1106.
15. Demmig-Adams B, Adams III WW. 1996. The role of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis. Trends in Plant science 1: 21-26.
16. Ennahli S, Earl HJ. 2005. Physiological limitations to photosynthetic carbon assimilation in cotton under water stress. Crop Science 45: 2374-2382.
17. Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33: 317-345.
18. Feild TS, Lee DW, Holbrook NM. 2001. Why leaves turn red in autumn: the role of anthocyanins in senescing leaves of red-osier dogwood. Plant Physiology 127: 566-574.
19. Flexas J, Bota J, Escalona JM, Sampol B, Medrano H. 2002. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Functional Plant Biology 29: 461-471.
20. 3 plants. Plant Biology 6: 269-279.
21. 2 in vivo. The Plant Journal 48: 427-439.
22. 2 concentration. New Phytologist 172: 73-82.
23. 2 concentration around leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 1284-1298.
24. 2: current knowledge and future prospects. Plant, Cell & Environment 31: 602-612.
25. Foyer CH, Noctor G. 2003. Redox sensing and signalling associated with reactive oxygen in chloroplasts, peroxisomes and mitochondria. Physiologia Plantarum 119: 355-364.
26. Gallé A, Haldimann P, Feller U. 2007. Photosynthetic performance and water relations in young pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) trees during drought stress and recovery. New Phytologist 174: 799-810.
27. Galmés J, Medrano H, Flexas J. 2007a. Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. New Phytologist 175: 81-93.
28. Galmés J, Flexas J, Savé R, Medrano H. 2007b. Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil 290: 139-155.
29. Galmés J, Pou A, Alsina MM, Tomàs M, Medrano H, Flexas J. 2007c. Aquaporin expression in response to different water stress intensities and recovery in Richter-110 Vitis sp.: relationship with ecophysiological status. Planta 226: 671-681.
30. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron-transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990: 87-92.
31. 2 diffusion inside leaf mesophyll of ligneous plants. In: Garab Ged. Photosynthesis: mechanisms and effects. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3961-3967.
32. 3 leaves. Plant Physiology 123: 201-213.
33. Grams TEE, Koziolek C, Lautner S, Matyssek R, Fromm J. 2007. Distinct roles of electric and hydraulic signals on the reaction of leaf gas exchange upon re-irrigation in Zea mays L. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 79-84.
34. Grzesiak MT, Grzesiak S, Skoczowski A. 2006. Changes of leaf water potential and gas exchange during and after drought in triticale and maize genotypes differing in drought tolerance. Photosynthetica 44: 561-568.
35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch. Accessed 25 October 2007.
36. Jia W, Davies WJ. 2007. Modification of leaf apoplastic pH in relation to stomatal sensitivity to root-sourced abscisic acid signals. Plant Physiology 143: 68-77.
37. Jones HG. 1973. Moderate-term water stresses and associated changes in some photosynthetic parameters in cotton. New Phytologist 72: 1095-1105.
38. Kilian J, Whitehead D, Horak J, Wanke D, Weinl S, Batistic O, et al. 2007. The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. The Plant Journal 50: 347-363.
39. Kirschbaum MUF. 1987. Water-stress in Eucalyptus pauciflora - comparison of effects on stomatal conductance with effects on the mesophyll capacity for photosynthesis, and investigation of a possible involvement of photoinhibition. Planta 171: 466-473.
40. Kirschbaum MUF. 1988. Recovery of photosynthesis from water stress in Eucalyptus pauciflora - a process in two stages. Plant, Cell & Environment 11: 685-694.
41. Lawlor DW, Cornic G. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 275-294.
42. 2 flux by three different methods. Plant Physiology 98: 1437-1443.
43. Ma SS, Gong QQ, Bohnert HJ. 2006. Dissecting salt stress pathways. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1097-1107.
44. Matsubara S, Gilmore AM, Osmond CB. 2001. Diurnal and acclimatory responses of violaxanthin and lutein epoxide in the Australian mistletoe Amyema miquelii. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 793-800.
45. 2 mole fraction (Ci) in Rosa rubiginosa leaves fed with abscisic acid by using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging: significance of Ci estimated from leaf gas exchange. Plant Physiology 116: 947-957.
46. Mittler R. 2006. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science 11: 15-19.
47. Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, Kimura K. 2005. Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 53: 205-214.
48. 2 diffusion inside dicotyledonous leaves can be substantial: quantification in different light intensities. Plant Physiology 145: 680-690.
49. Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 239-250.
50. Munns R. 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist 167: 645-663.
51. Munns R, James RA, Läuchli A. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1025-1043.
52. Ndimba BK, Chivasa S, Simon WJ, Slabas AR. 2005. Identification of Arabidopsis salt and osmotic stress responsive proteins using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 5: 4185-4196.
53. Neill SJ, Desikan R, Hancock JT. 2003. Nitric oxide signalling in plants. New Phytologist 159: 11-35.
54. Noctor G, Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Driscoll S, Novitskaya L, Foyer CH. 2002. Drought and oxidative load in the leaves of C-3 plants: a predominant role for photorespiration? Annals of Botany 89: 841-850.
55. Ort DR. 2001. When there is too much light. Plant Physiology 125: 29-32.
56. Parker R, Flowers TJ, Moore AL, Harpham NVJ. 2006. An accurate and reproducible method for proteome profiling of the effects of salt stress in the rice leaf lamina. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1109-1118.
57. Passioura J. 2007. The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 113-117.
58. Pastori GM, Foyer CH. 2002. Common components, networks, and pathways of cross-tolerance to stress: the central role of 'redox' and abscisic acid-mediated controls. Plant Physiology 129: 460-468.
59. Pego JV, Kortstee AJ, Huijser C, Smeekens SCM. 2000. Photosynthesis, sugars and the regulation of gene expression. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 407-416.
60. Pérez-Pérez JG, Syvertsen JP, Botía P, García-Sánchez F. 2007. Leaf water relations and net gas exchange responses of salinized Carrizo citrange seedlings during drought stress and recovery. Annals of Botany 100: 335-345.
61. Pfannschmidt T. 2003. Chloroplast redox signals: how photosynthesis controls its own genes. Trends in Plant Science 8: 33-41.
62. Pfannschmidt T, Bräutigam K, Wagner R, et al. 2009. Potential regulation of gene expression in photosynthetic cells by redox and energy state: approaches towards better understanding. Annals of Botany 103: 599-607.
63. Pinheiro C, Chaves MM, Ricardo CP. 2001. Alterations in carbon and nitrogen metabolism induced bywater deficit in the stems and leaves of Lupinus albus L. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 1063-1070.
64. Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H, Khan MA, Katsura K, Ito Y, et al. 2003. Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA get-blot analyses. Plant Physiology 133: 1755-1767.
65. Renou J-L, Gerbaud A, Just D, André M. 1990. Differing substomatal and chloroplastic concentrations in water-stressed wheat. Planta 182: 415-419.
66. Rolland F, Baena-Gonzalez E, Sheen J. 2006. Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57: 675-709.
67. Sanchez DH, Siahpoosh MR, Roessner U, Udvardi M, Kopka J. 2007. Plant metabolomics reveals conserved and divergent metabolic responses to salinity. Physiologia Plantarum 132: 209-219.
68. Scartazza A, Lauteri M, Guido MC, Brugnoli E. 1998. Carbon isotope discrimination in leaf and stem sugars, water-use efficiency and mesophyll conductance during different developmental stages in rice subjected to drought. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25: 489-498.
69. Sharkey TD. 1990. Water stress effects on photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 24: 651-656.
70. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2007. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 221-227.
71. Sofo A, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Masia A. 2004. Effects of different irradiance levels on some antioxidant enzymes and on malondialdehyde content during rewatering in olive tree. Plant Science 166: 293-302.
72. Stitt M, Gibon Y, Lunn JE, Piques M. 2007. Multilevel genomics analysis of carbon signalling during low carbon availability: coordinating the supply and utilisation of carbon in a fluctuating environment. Functional Plant Biology 34: 526-549.
73. Terashima I. 1992. Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 31: 195-212.
74. Tezara W, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SD, Lawlor DW. 1999. Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 401: 914-917.
75. Tuberosa R, Salvi S. 2006. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends in Plant Science 11: 405-412.
76. Unesco Water Portal. 2007. http://www.unesco.org/water. Accessed 25 October 2007.
77. Vincent D, Ergül A, Bohlman MC, Tattersall EAR, Tillett RL, Wheatley MD, et al. 2007. Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 1873-1892.
78. Warren CR. 2006. Estimating the internal conductance to CO2 movement. Functional Plant Biology 33: 431-442.
79. Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 2002. ABA-based chemical signalling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 195-210.
80. Wong CE, Li Y, Labbe A, Guevara D, Nuin P, Whitty B, et al. 2006. Transcriptional profiling implicates novel interactions between abiotic stress and hormonal responses in Thellungiella, a close relative of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 140: 1437-1450.
81. Zhou J, Wang X, Jiao Y, Qin Y, Liu X, He K, et al. 2007. Global genome expression analysis of rice in response to drought and high-salinity stresses in shoot, flag leaf, and panicle. Plant Molecular Biology 63: 591-608.
82. Zimmermann P, Hennig L, Gruissem W. 2005. Gene expression analysis and network discovery using Genevestigator. Trends in Plant Science 10: 407-409.