Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: A synthesis

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 779-795

  Maaß, Katja ^a   Artigue, Michèle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b bâtiment Sophie Germain   (France)

Author keywords

Design research; Dissemination; Implementation of inquiry based learning; Implementation strategies; Inquiry based learning; Professional development; Resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887354836     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adler, J., & Jaworksi, B. (2009). Public writing in the field of mathematics teacher education. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics-The 15th ICMI study (pp. 249-254). New York: Springer.
2. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P., Aldrich, N., & Tenenbaum, H. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1-18.
3. Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
4. Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualising inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
5. Baistow, K. (2000). Cross-national research: what can we learn from inter-country comparisons? Social Work in Europe, 7(3), 8-13.
6. Ball, D. L., & Even, R. (2009). Strengthening practice in and research on the professional education. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics-The 15th ICMI Study (pp. 255-260). New York: Springer.
7. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., Blum, W., & Neubrand, M. (2004). Mathematikunterricht aus Sicht der PISA-Schülerinnen und -Schüler und ihrer Lehrkräfte. In Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Ed.), PISA 2003 - Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs (pp. 314-354). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
8. Begg, A., Davis, B., & Bramald, R. (2003). Obstacles to the dissemination of mathematics education research. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 593-634). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Bishop, K., & Denleg, P. (2006). Science learning centres and governmental policy for continuing professional development (CPD) in England. Journal of In-service Education, 32(1), 85-102.
10. Boaler, J. (2008). Bridging the gap between research and practice: international examples of success. In M. Menghini, F. Furinghetti, L. Giarcardi, & F. Arzarella (Eds.), The first century of the International Commission on Mathematics Instruction (1908-2008): Reflecting and shaping the world of mathematics education. Roma: Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana foundata da Giovanni Treccani.
11. Bruder, R., & Prescott, A. (2013). Research evidence on the benefits of IBL. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
12. Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Improving educational research: towards a more useful influential and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3-14.
13. Chin, E.-T. & Lin, F.-L. (2013). A survey of the practice of a large scale implementation of inquiry-based Mathematics Teaching - from Taiwan's perspective. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
14. Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2012). Analyzing educational policies: A learning design perspective. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 487-521.
15. Cobb, P., Qing, Z., & Dean, C. (2009). Conducting design experiments to support teachers' learning: A reflection from the field. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165-199.
16. Dalton, J. H., Elias, M. J., & Wandersman, A. (2007). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities. Belmont: Thomson-Wadsworth.
17. Dorier, J. & Garcia, F. J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
18. Edelson, D. (2006). What we learn when we engage in design: implications for assessing design research. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 100-106). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
19. Engeln, K., Euler, M., & Maaß, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: a comparative baseline study of teachers' beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
20. Gräsel, C., & Parchmann, I. (2004). Implementationsforschung-oder der steinige Weg, Unterricht zu verändern. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 32(3), 196-214.
21. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learners' perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17-51). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
22. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). From texts to 'lived' resources. New York: Springer.
23. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Textbooks' design and digital resources. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (Vol. 1, pp. 327-337). Oxford.
24. Gunnarsdottir, G. H., & Palsdottir, G. (2010). The implementation of the intended curriculum in teaching materials: authors' perspective. In B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Palsdottir, B. Dahl, & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook on Nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 539-549). Greenwich: IAP Information Age Publishing.
25. Hart, L. C. (2002). A four-year follow-up study of teachers beliefs after participating in a teacher enhancement project. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 161-176). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
26. Joubert, M., & Sutherland, R. (2009). A perspective on the literature: CPC for teachers of mathematics. London: National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics.
27. Kelly, A. (2006). Quality criteria for design research: evidence and commitments. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 107-118). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
28. Krainer, K. (1998). Some considerations on problems and perspectives of mathematics teacher in-service education. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Perez (Eds.), The 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME 8). Selected Lectures (pp. 303-321). Sevilla: S. A. E. M. Thales.
29. Krainer, K. (2012). Education of mathematics teacher educators. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Heidelberg: Springer.
30. Krainer, K., & Zehetmeier, S. (2013). Inquiry-based learning for students, teachers, researchers, and representatives of educational administration and policy. Reflections on a nation-wide initiative fostering educational innovations. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
31. Lee, M. M., Chauvot, J., Plankis, B., Vowell, J., & Culpepper, S. (2011). Integrating to learn and learning to integrate: a case study of an online master's program on science-mathematics integration for middle school teachers. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 191-200.
32. Linn, M. (2003). Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727-758.
33. Lipowsky, F., & Rzejak, D. (2012). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer als Lerner - Wann gelingt der Rollen-tausch? Merkmale und Wirkungen wirksamer Lehrerfortbildungen. Schulpädagogik heute, 3(5), 1-17.
34. Maaß, K. (2009). What are teachers' beliefs about effective mathematics teaching? In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry, & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers' perspectives: National and cross-national studies (pp. 141-162). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
35. Maaß, K., & Doorman, M. (2013). A model for a widespread implementation of inquiry-based learning. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
36. Maaß, K., Garcia, F. J., Mousoulides, N., & Wake, G. (2013). Designing interdisciplinary tasks in an international design community. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (Vol. 1, pp. 369-378). Oxford.
37. Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (2000). Implementing mathematics reform: the challenge within. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 1-34.
38. Matos, J. F., Powell, A., & Sztajn, P. (2009). Mathematics teachers' professional development: processes of learning in and from practice. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 167-184). New York: Springer.
39. McDuffie, A. M., & Mather, M. (2006). Reification of instructional materials as part of the process of developing problem-based practices in mathematics education. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 12, 435-459.
40. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London/New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
41. Minner, D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496.
42. Mischo, C., & Maaß, K. (2013). The effect of teacher beliefs on student competence in mathematical modeling-an intervention study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(1), 19-38.
43. Mousoulides, N. (2013). Facilitating parental engagement in school mathematics and science through inquiry-based learning: an examination of teachers' and parents' beliefs. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
44. Müller, U. (2003). Weiterbildung der Weiterbildner (Vol. 17). Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.
45. Müller, F. H., Andreitz, I., Krainer, K., & Mayr, J. (2011). Effects of a research-based learning approach in teacher professional development. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 131-149). New York: Springer.
46. Nastasi, B. K., Varjas, K., Schensul, S. L., Silva, K. T., Schensul, J. J., & Ratnayake, P. (1998). The participatory intervention model: a framework for conceptualizing and promoting intervention acceptability. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(2), 207-232.
47. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction in educational design research (pp. 89-102). Enschede: SLO, Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
50. OECD. (1998). Staying ahead: In-service training and teacher professional development. Paris: OECD.
51. OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606. pdf. Accessed 25 July 2013.
52. Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In: M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning (pp. 23-54). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Ponte, J. P. (2008). Research and practice: bridging the gap or changing the focus? In M. Menghini, F. Furinghetti, L. Giarcardi, & F. Arzarella (Eds.), The first century of the International Commission on Mathematics Instruction. Reflecting and shaping the world of mathematics education (pp. 1908-2008). Roma: Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana foundata da Giovanni Treccani.
54. Ponte, J. P., Matos, J. F., Guimaraes, H. M., Leal, L. C., & Canavarro, A. P. (1994). Teachers' and students' views and attitudes towards a new mathematics curriculum: a case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 347-365.
55. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teachers' learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
56. Robert, A. (2009). Learning in and from practice: comments and reflections. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 227-230). New York: Springer.
57. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
58. Ross, J. A., McDougall, D., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & LeSage, A. (2003). A survey measuring elementary teachers' implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 344-363.
59. Schaumburg, H., Prasse, D., & Blömeke, S. (2009). Implementation von Innovation in der Schule. In S. Blömeke, T. Bohl, L. Haag, Lang-Wojtasik, & W. Sacher (Eds.), Handbuch Schule. Bad Heilbrunn: Julius Klinkhardt.
60. Schoen, H., Cegulla, K., Finn, K., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228-259.
61. Schoenfeld, A. & Kilpatrick, J. (2013). A U. S. perspective on the implementation of inquiry-based learning in Mathematics. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this volume).
62. Stein, M., Smith, M., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
63. Stillman, G. (2013). Implementation of IBL in Europe from an Australasian perspective. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this volume).
64. Swan, M. (2006). Collaborative learning in mathematics: a challenge to our beliefs and practices. London: National Institute for Advanced and Continuing Education (NIACE) for the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NRDC).
65. Takahashi, A., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Ideas for establishing lesson-study communities. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(9), 436-443.
66. Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2008). Tight but loose: a conceptual framework for scaling up school reforms. In C. Wylie (Ed.), Tight but loose: Scaling up teacher professional development in diverse contexts (pp. 1-44). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
67. Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teaching practices. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643-688). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
68. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introducing educational design. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 3-7). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
69. Wake, G., & Burkhardt, H. (2013). Understanding the European policy landscape and its impact on change in mathematics and science pedagogies. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6) (this issue).
70. Walker, D. (2006). Towards productive design studies. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 8-14). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
71. Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. The role of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127-148). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.
72. Winter, H. (1989). Entdeckendes Lernen im Mathematikunterricht: Einblicke in die Ideengeschichte und ihre Bedeutung für die Pädagogik. Braunschweig: Vieweg.