Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 228-259

  Schoen, Harold L ^a   Cebulla, Kristin J ^b   Finn, Kelly F ^a   Fi, Cos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement; Curriculum; High school, 9 12; Reform in mathematics education; Teachers (characteristics of)

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037986463     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/30034779     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Briars, D., & Resnick, L. (2000). Standards assessments - and what else ? The essential elements of standards-based school improvement. Unpublished manuscript. Available at www.cse.ucla.edu /CREST/Reports/TECH528.pdf
2. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teaching behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
3. Carroll, W. M. (1997). Results of third-grade students in a reform curriculum on the Illinois state mathematics test. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 237-242.
4. Cohen, E. G., (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
5. Coxford, A. F., Fey, J. T., Hirsch, C. R., Schoen, H. L., Burrill, G., Hart, E. W., et al. (1997). Contemporary mathematics in context: A unified approach (Course 1). Columbus, OH: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
6. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 202-235). New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Fan, L., & Kaeley, G. S. (1998, April). Textbook's use and teaching strategies: An empirical study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED419790)
8. Feldt, L. S., Forsyth, R. A., Ansley, T. N., & Alnot, S. D. (1993). Iowa Tests of Educational Development (Forms K & L). Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
9. Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Schram, T. (1997). The recognizing and recording reform in mathematics education project: Insights, issues, and implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph Series No. 8. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
10. Hall, G. E. (1979). The concerns-based approach to facilitating change. Educational Horizons, 57, 202-208.
11. Harris, K., Marcus, R., McLaren, K., & Fey, J. (2001). Curriculum materials supporting problem-based teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 101 (6), 310-318.
12. Henningsen, M. A., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high level mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 524-549.
13. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Hirsch, C. R., Coxford, A. F., Fey, J. T., & Schoen, H. L. (1995). Teaching sensible mathematics in sense-making ways with the CPMP. Mathematics Teacher, 88 (8), 694-700.
15. Huntley, M. A., Rasmussen, C. L., Villarubi, R. S., Sangtong, J., & Fey, J. T. (2000). Effects of Standards-based mathematics education: A study of the Core-Plus Mathematics Project algebra and functions strand. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 328-361.
16. Lambdin, D. V., & Preston, R. V. (1995). Caricatures in innovation: Teacher adaptation to an investigation-oriented middle school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 46, 130-140.
17. Lapan, R. T., Reys, B. J., Barnes, D. E., & Reys, R. E. (1998, April). Standards-based middle grade mathematics curricula: Impact on student achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.
18. Lappan, G. (1997). The challenges of implementation: Supporting teachers. American Journal of Education, 106, 207-239.
19. Mayer, D. P. (1998). Do new teaching standards undermine performance on old tests? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20 (2), 53-73.
20. McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Klein, S. P., Bugliari, D., & Robyn, A. (2001). Interactions among instructional, practices, curriculum, and student achievement: The case of Standards-bused high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 493-517.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
24. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
25. National Research Council. (1990). Reshaping school mathematics: A philosophy and framework for curriculum. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
26. Riordan, J. E., & Noyce, P. E. (2001). The Impact of two standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 368-398.
27. Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 122-183). Chicago: Rand McNally.
28. Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., & Seltzer, M. (1999). Relations between classroom practices and student learning in the domain of fractions. Cognition and Instruction, 17 (1), 1-24.
29. Schoen, H. L., & Hirsch, C. R. (2003). The Core-Plus Mathematics Project: Perspectives and student achievement. In S. L. Senk, & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 311-343). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity, Educational Researcher 31, (1), 3-25.
31. Senk, S. L., Beckmann, C. E., & Thompson, D. R. (1997). Assessment and grading in high school mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 187-215.
32. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21 (1), 1-27.
34. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.
35. Weglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters. Princeton, NJ: Milken Family Foundation and Educational Testing Service.
36. Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., Overstreet, C. M., & Soar, E. H. (2002). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year seven cross-site report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.