Science learning centres and governmental policy for continuing professional development (CPD) in England

Journal of In-Service Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 85-102

  Bishop, Keith ^a   Denleg, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993982368     PISSN: 13674587     EISSN: 17475082     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674580500479836     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education (ACME). 2002. Continuing professional development for teachers of mathematics, London:Royal Society.
2. Avis, J., 2003. Re-thinking trust in a performative culture:the case of education. Journal of Education Policy, 18(3):315–332.
3. Ball, S., 2001. “ Performativities and fabrications in the education economy:towards the performative society ”. In The performing school, Edited by:Gleeson, D., and Husbands, C., London:RoutledgeFalmer.
4. Bolam, R., 2000. Emerging policy trends:some implications for continuing professional development. Journal of In-service Education, 26(2):267–280.
5. Bottery, M., 2003. The leadership of learning communities in a culture of unhappiness. School Leadership & Management, 23(2):187–207.
6. Bottery, M., and Wright, N., 2000. The directed profession:teachers and the state in the third millennium. Journal of In-service Education, 26(3):475–487.
7. Cochran-Smith, M., 2001. The outcomes question in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5):527–546.
8. Codd, J., 1999. Educational reform, accountability and the culture of distrust. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1):45–53.
9. Council for Science and Technology (CST). 2000. Science teachers:a report on supporting and developing the profession of science teaching in primary and secondary schools, London:CST.
10. Darling-Hammond, L., 2000. Teacher quality and student achievement:a review of state policy evidence Education policy analysis archives. Available online at:http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/ (accessed 14 April 2005)
11. Denley, P., Bishop, K., Oakes, M., and Ingram, M., 2004. An audit of CPD opportunities for science educators Available online at:http://www.bath.ac.uk/projects/wellcometrust (accessed 27 June 2005)
12. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 1998. Teachers:meeting the challenge of change, London:The Stationery Office.
13. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 2001. Learning and teaching:a strategy for professional development, London:DfEE.
14. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2001. Schools:achieving success, London:DfES.
15. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2002a. National network of science learning centres:guidance for applicants, London:DfES.
16. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2002b. A national network of science learning centres Available online at:http://www.dfes.gov.uk/sciencecpd/ (accessed 10 December 2002)
17. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2005. The 14–19 gateway Available online at:http://www.dfes.gov.uk/14-19/index.cfm?sid=4 (accessed 14 April 2005)
18. Eraut, M., 1994. Developing professional knowledge and competence, London:Falmer.
19. Fox, A., 1974. Beyond contract work, power and trust relations, London:Faber & Faber.
20. Fullan, M., 2001. Leading in a culture of change, San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
21. Furlong, J., 2005. New labour and teacher education:the end of an era. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1):119–134.
22. General Teaching Council for England (GTCE). 2004. The GTC statement:the statement of professional values and practice for teachers, London:GTC.
23. Gleeson, D., and Husbands, C., 2003. Modernizing schooling through performance management:a critical appraisal. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5):499–511.
24. Hargreaves, A., 2000. Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching:Theory and Practice, 6(2):151–182.
25. House of Lords. 2001. Select committee on science and technology first report:science in schools, London:House of Lords.
26. Ingvarson, L., 1998. Professional development as the pursuit of professional standards:the standards-based professional development system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1):127–140.
27. Ingvarson, L., 2002. Strengthening the profession:a comparison of recent reforms in the UK and the USA, Melbourne:Australian Council for educational Research.
28. Knight, P., 2002. A systemic approach to professional development:learning as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3):229–241.
29. Leach, J., Holman, J., and Millar, R., 2005. The continuing professional development of science teachers:a discussion paper. School Science Review, 87(318):105–111.
30. Lewicki, R. J., and Bunker, B. B., 1996. “ Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships ”. In Trust in organisations, Edited by:Kramer, R., and Tyler, T., 114–139. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
31. Nixon, J., Martin, J., McKeown, P., and Ranson, S., 1997. Towards a learning profession:changing codes of occupational practice within the new management of education. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 18(1):5–28.
32. Olssen, M., Codd, J., and O’Neill, A., 2004. Education policy:globalization, citizenship and democracy, London:Sage.
33. Patrick, F., Forde, C., and McPhee, A., 2003. Challenging the new professionalism:from managerialism to pedagogy?. Journal of In-service Education, 29(2):237–253.
34. Powell, L. A., 2000. Realising the value of self-assessment:the influence of the business excellence model on teacher professionalism. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1):37–48.
35. Reid, A., Martin, S., Denley, P., Cloke, C., Bishop, K., and Dodsworth, J., 2003. Tomorrow’s world, today’s reality. Science, technology, mathematics:a review of teachers’ perceptions, views and approaches, London:Engineering and Technology Board.
36. Roberts, G., 2002. Set for success:the supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills, London:HM Treasury.
37. Science Education Forum (SEF). 2002. Report:task group report on continuing professional development for teachers of science Available online at:http://www.scienceeducationforum.org.uk (accessed 13 October 2005)
38. Science Enhancement Programme (SEP). 2002. Continuing professional development for science teachers, London:SEP.
39. Sockett, H., 1990. “ Accountability, trust and ethical codes of practice ”. In The moral dimensions of teaching, Edited by:Goodlad, J., Soder, R., and Sirotnik, K., 224–250. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
40. Stoll, L., Fink, D., and Earl, L., 2003. It’s about learning (and it’s about time!), London:RoutledgeFalmer.
41. Teachernet. 2005. Science learning centres Available online at:http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/teachingandlearning/subjects/science/sciencelearningcentres/ (accessed 13 October 2005)
42. Whitty, G., 2000. Teacher professionalism in new times. Journal of In-service Education, 26(2):281–295.