Conducting design experiments to support teachers' learning: A reflection from the field

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 165-199

  Cobb, Paul ^a   Zhao, Qing ^a   Dean, Chrystal ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449348205     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400902797933     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Community, diversity, and conflict among schoolteachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-106). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
3. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8.
4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Barab, S. A., Schatz, S., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11, 25-47.
6. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 103-141.
7. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35, 149-164.
8. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspectives and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
10. Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878-898.
11. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
13. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40-57.
14. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15. Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Diversity, equity, and access to mathematical ideas (pp. 105-117). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17(2), 5-12.
17. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
18. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical learning: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-44.
19. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. W. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 258-277.
20. Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In A. E. Kelly (Ed.), Handbook of design research (pp. 68-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2001). An approach for supporting teachers' learning in social context. In F. L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 207-232). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
22. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2006). The collective mediation of a high stakes accountability program: Communities and networks of practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 80-100.
23. Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1-78.
24. Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers' instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and school district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13-24.
25. Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2008). The challenge of scale: Designing schools and districtsas learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol.3. Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 231-254). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
26. Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 83-94.
27. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-164. (Pubitemid 33252286)
28. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-190.
29. Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., Gresalfi, M., & Visnovska, J. (2007). A revised learning trajectory for a group of mathematics teachers. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
30. Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145-170.
31. Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19, 476-509.
32. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102, 294-343.
33. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15-42.
34. Confrey, J., & Lachance, A. (2000). Transformative teaching experiments through conjecture-driven research design. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 231-266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 66-86.
36. Dean, C. O. (2005). An analysis of the emergence and concurrent learning of a professional teaching community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
37. diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 77-103.
38. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 105-121.
39. Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
40. Elmore, R. F. (2006, June). Leadership as the practice of improvement. Paper presented at the OECD International Conference on Perspectives on Leadership for Systemic Improvement, London, England.
41. Elmore, R. F., Peterson, P. L., & McCarthey, S. J. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Engestrom, Y. (1998). Reorganizing the motivational sphere of classroom culture: An activity-theoretical analysis of planning in a teacher team. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 76-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94-118.
44. Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Floden, R. E. (2007). Educational policy research and mathematics education. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 1247-1279). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
45. Fishman, B. J., & Krajcik, J. S. (2003). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? A commentary. Science Education, 87, 564-573.
46. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Besta, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional developmentin systemic reform.Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643-658.
47. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 43-76.
48. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 67-80.
49. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers'generative change: A follow-up study of teachers'professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689. (Pubitemid 33666004)
50. Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001a). Learning to teach mathematics: Developing a focus on students' mathematical thinking. Theory Into Practice, 40, 102-109.
51. Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001b). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B. C. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy in elementary mathematics: The nature of facilitative teaching(pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Shih, J., Biagetti, S., & Battey, D. (2005). Changing teachers' professional work in mathematics: One school's journey. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 209-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Gamoran, A., Anderson, C. W., Quiroz, P. A., Secada, W. G., Williams, T., & Ashman, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Gamoran, A., Secada, W. G., & Marrett, C. B. (2000). The organizational context of teaching and learning: Changing theoretical perspectives. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of sociology of education (pp. 37-63). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
55. Glennan, T. K., Jr., & Resnick, L. B. (2004). School districts as learning organizations: A strategy for scaling educational reform. In J. T. K. Glennan, S. J. Bodilly, J. Galegher, & K. Kerr (Eds.), Expanding the reach of education reforms: Collected essays by leaders in the scale-up of educational interventions (pp. 517-564). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
56. Gravemeijer, K. (1994a). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-ß Press.
57. Gravemeijer, K. (1994b). Educational development and developmental research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443-471.
58. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942-1012.
59. Gutiérrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs, and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influences on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 495-530.
60. Gutstein, E. (2007). "So one question leads to another": Using mathematics to develop a pedagogy of questioning. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 51-68). New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Hiebert, J. I., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
62. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers'mathematical knowledge on teaching for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406.
63. Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 207-236.
64. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-225.
65. Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 115-128.
66. King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (1999, April). School capacity as a goal for professional development: Mapping the terrain in low income schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
67. Krainer, K. (2003). Editorial: Teams, communities, and networks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 93-105.
68. Lamberg, T. (2005, April). The affordances that emerged as district leaders and researchers became part of a professional teaching community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
69. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
70. Lehrer, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). Mathematical learning. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 357-391). New York: Wiley.
71. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 635-679.
72. Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.
73. Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 509-536.
74. Little, J. W. (1999, April). Teachers' professional development in the context of secondary school reform: Findings from a three-year study of restructuring school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
75. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917-946.
76. Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
77. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understandings of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. McClain, K. (2002). Teacher's and students' understanding: The role of tool use in communication. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 217-249.
79. McDermott, M. (1976). Kidmake sense: An ethnographic account of the intereactional management of success and failure in one first-grade classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stamford University.
80. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81. Nelson, B. S. (1997). Learning about teacher change in the context of mathematics education reform: Where have we come from? In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 3-19). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. Nelson, B. S., & Sassi, A. (2005). The effective principal: Instructional leadership for high-quality learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
83. Newman, F. M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
84. Nickerson, S. D., & Moriarty, G. (2005). Professional communities in the context of teacher' professional lives: A case of mathematics specialists. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 113-140.
85. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
86. Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211-246.
87. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 93, 352-388.
88. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teacher's workplace. New York: Longman.
89. Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 353-389). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
90. Schifter, D. (1995). Teachers' changing conceptions of the nature of mathematics: Enactment in the classroom. In B. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry and the development of teaching: Issues in the transformation of mathematics teaching (pp. 17-25). Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching, Education Development Center.
91. Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers' seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 55-87.
92. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Design experiments. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. B. Ellmore, & A. Skukauskaite (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 193-206). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
93. Secada, W. G., & Adajian, L. B. (1997). Mathematics teachers' change in the context of their professional communities. In E. Fennema & B. Scott Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 193-219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
95. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145.
96. Simon, M. A. (2000). Research on the development of mathematics teachers: The teacher development experiment. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 335-359). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher's perspective from the researchers' perspective: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers' practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 252-264.
98. Smith, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387-402.
99. Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policy-makers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179.
100. Spillane, J. P. (2005a). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
101. Spillane, J. P. (2005b). Primary school leadership practice: How the subject matters. School Leadership and Management, 25, 383-397.
102. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (1999, April). Distributed leadership: Towards a theory of school leadership practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
103. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Towards a theory of leadership practice: Implications of a distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-30.
104. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
105. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
106. Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context: Integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. Scott Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155-192). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2006, April). The role of mathematics curriculum in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
108. Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 50-80.
109. Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 423-448.
110. Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 17-52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
111. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
112. Stein, M. K., & Spillane, J. P. (2005). Research on teaching and research on educational administration: Building a bridge. In B. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), Developing an agenda for research on educational leadership (pp. 28-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Stephan, M., Bowers, J., & Cobb, P. (Eds.). (2003). Supporting students' development of measuring conceptions: Analyzing students' learning in social context (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 12). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
114. Stokes, L. (2001). Lessons from an inquiring school: Forms of inquiry and conditions for teacher learning. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 141-158). New York: Teachers College Press.
115. Talbert,J. E. (1995). Boundaries of teachers'professional communities in U.S. high schools: Power and precariousness of the subject department. In L. S. Siskin & J. W. Little (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp. 68-94). New York: Teachers College Press.
116. Talbert, J. E., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1999). Assessing the school environment: Embedded contexts and bottom-up research strategy. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span (pp. 197-226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
117. Ueno, N. (2000). Ecologies of inscription: Technologies of making the social organization of work and the mass production of machine parts visible in collaborative activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 59-80.
118. Visnovska, J. (2009). Supporting mathematics teachers' learning: Building on current instructional practices to achieve a professional development agenda. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vander-bilt University, Nashville, TN.
119. Visnovska, J., Zhao, Q., & Gresalfi, M. (2007, April). Situating teaching in histories of participation: Two contrasting visions of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
120. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers, students, and science in linguistic minority classrooms. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajion (Eds.), New directions in equity for mathematics education (pp. 298-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
122. Westheimer, J. (1998). Among school teachers: Community, autonomy, and ideology in teachers'work. New York: Teachers College Press.
123. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 173-209). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
124. Witziers, B., Sleegers, P., & Imants, J. (1999). Departments as teams: Functioning, variations and alternatives. School Leadership & Management, 19, 293-304.
125. Zhao, Q., & Cobb, P. (2007, April). Towards a conceptualization of teachers' learning across the setting of professional development and the classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.