Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 837-849

  Dorier, Jean Luc ^a   García, Francisco Javier ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anthropological theory of the didactics; Didactic transposition; Ecological analysis; Inquiry based learning; Scale of levels of didactic determination

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887330573     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0512-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
2. Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2006). Twenty-five years of the didactic transposition. ICMI Bulletin, 58, 51-63.
3. Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique-Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage (second version revised and augmented published in 1991).
4. Chevallard, Y. (1992a). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique: Perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12(1), 73-112.
5. Chevallard, Y. (1992b). Fundamental concepts in didactics: Perspectives provided by an anthropological approach. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, special issue, 131-167.
6. Chevallard, Y. (2002). Organiser l'étude. 3. Écologie & régulation. In J. L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot, & R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11e école d'été de didactique des mathématiques (pp. 41-56). Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
7. Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 4). http://ermeweb. free. fr/CERME4. Accessed 8 May 2013.
8. Chevallard, Y. (2011). La notion d'ingénierie didactique, un concept à refonder. Questionnement et éléments de réponse à partir de la TAD. In C. Margolinas, M. Abboud-Blanchard, L. Bueno-Ravel, N. Douek, A. Fluckiger, P. Gibel, et al. (Eds.), En amont et en aval des ingénieries didactiques. La Pensée Sauvage: Grenoble.
9. Deters, K. M. (2005). Student opinions regarding inquiry-based labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(8), 1178-1180.
10. Dorier, J.-L., & Maaß, K. (2012). Inquiry-based mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Heidelberg: Springer. http://www. springerreference. com/index/chapterdbid/335725. Accessed 8 May 2013.
11. Engeln, K., Euler, M., & Maass, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: A comparative baseline study of teachers' beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0507-5.
12. Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. C., Stowe, K. A., & Showman, R. (2010). Translating expertise into effective instruction: The impacts of cognitive task analysis (CTA) on lab report quality and student retention in the biological sciences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1165-1185.
13. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., et al. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12-21.
14. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, D. C.: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
15. Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631-645.
16. King, D., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 365-384.
17. Maaß, K., & Doorman, M. (2013). A model for a widespread implementation of inquiry-based learning. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0505-7.
18. Minner, D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474-496.
19. OECD (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606. pdf. Accessed 8 May 2013.
20. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate-General for Research.
21. Wake, G. D., & Burkhardt, H. (2013). Understanding the European policy landscape and its impact on change in mathematics and science pedagogies. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6). doi: 10. 1007/s11858-013-0513-7.