A model for a widespread implementation of inquiry-based learning

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 887-899

  Maaß, Katja ^a   Doorman, Michiel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design research; Dissemination activities; Implementation of innovative teaching; Inquiry based learning; Professional development; Scaling up professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887336457     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0505-7     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adler, J., & Jaworksi, B. (2009). Public writing in the field of mathematics teacher education. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics. The 15th ICMI study (pp. 249-254). New York: Springer.
2. Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
3. Artigue, M., & Blomhoej, M. (2013). Conceptualising inquiry based education in mathematics. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6).
4. Baistow, K. (2000). Cross-national research: What can we learn from inter-country comparisons. Social Work in Europe, 7(3), 8-13.
5. Ball, D. L., & Even, R. (2009). Strengthening practice in and research on professional education. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics-the 15th ICMI study (pp. 255-260). New York: Springer.
6. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers' professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV Project. Mathematics teacher education (Vol. 8, pp. 25-48). Berlin: Springer.
7. Brown, S. A., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Dalton, J. H., Elias, M. J., & Wandersman, A. (2007). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities. Belmont: Thomson-Wadsworth.
9. Davis, B., Brown, L., Cedillo, T., Chiocca, C.-M., Dawson, S., Giménez, J., et al. (2009). Development of teaching in and from practice. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics-the 15th ICMI study (pp. 149-166). New York: Springer.
10. Dorier, J., & Garcia, F. J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6).
11. Edelson, D. (2006). What we learn when we engage in design: Implications for assessing design research. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKeeney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 100-106). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
12. Engeln, K., Euler, M, & Maaß, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: A comparative baseline study of teachers' beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6).
13. Even, R. (2005). Integrating knowledge and practice at MANOR in the development of providers of professional development for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(4), 343-357.
14. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learners' perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKeeney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17-51). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
15. Hantrais, L. (1995). Comparative research methods. Social Research Update, 4(13). http://sru. soc. surrey. ac. uk/SRU13. html. Accessed 21 Mar 2013.
16. Hart, L. C. (2002). A four year follow-up study of teachers' beliefs after participating in a teacher enhancement project. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 161-176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Jäger, R. (2001). Von der Beobachtung zur Notengebung-Ein Lehrbuch. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
18. Joubert, M., & Sutherland, R. (2009). A perspective on the literature: CPC for teachers of mathematics. National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics. https://www. ncetm. org. uk/enquiry/9336. Accessed 9 Apr 2013.
19. Kelly, A. (2006). Quality criteria for design research: Evidence and commitments. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKeeney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 107-118). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
20. Krainer, K. (1998). Some considerations on problems and perspectives of mathematics teacher in-service education. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Perez (Eds.), The 8th international congress on mathematical education (ICME 8). Selected lectures (pp. 303-321). Sevilla: S. A. E. M. Thales.
21. Krainer, K. (2012). Education of mathematics teacher educators. Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Heidelberg: Springer.
22. Lipowsky, F. (2004). Was macht Fortbildungen für Lehrkräfte erfolgreich? Befunde der Forschung und mögliche Konsequenzen für die Praxis. Die Deutsche Schule, 96(4), 462-479.
23. Lipowsky, F., & Rzejak, D. (2012). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer als Lerner-Wann gelingt der Rollen-tausch? Merkmale und Wirkungen wirksamer Lehrerfortbildungen. Schulpädagogik heute, 3(5), 1-17.
24. Long, S. (2004). Separating rhetoric from reality: Supporting teachers in negotiating beyond the status quo. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(2), 141-153.
25. Maaß, K. (2004). Mathematisches Modellieren im Unterricht-Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
26. Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.
27. Müller, U. (2003). Weiterbildung der Weiterbildner (Vol. 17). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
28. Müller, F. H., Andreitz, I., Krainer, K., & Mayr, J. (2011). Effects of a research-based learning approach in teacher professional development. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 131-149). New York: Springer.
29. Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction in educational design research (pp. 89-102). Enschede: SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
30. OECD. (1998). Staying ahead: In-service training and teacher professional development. Paris: OECD.
31. Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (1996). Mathematical beliefs and different aspects of their meaning. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 28(4), 101-108.
32. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
33. Robert, A. (2009). Learning in and from practice: Comments and reflections. In R. Even & D. Loewenberg Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 227-230). New York: Springer.
34. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
35. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
36. Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teaching practices. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643-688). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
37. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieven, N. (2006). Introducing educational design. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieven (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 3-7). Oxford: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
38. Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. The role of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127-148). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39. Wood, T., Sullivan, P., Tirosh, D., Krainer, K., & Jaworski, B. (Eds.) (2008). The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vols. 1, 2, 3, 4). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
40. Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher-educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 5-32.