Quality criteria for design research: Evidence and commitments

Educational Design Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 107-118

  Kelly, Anthony E ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145523540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203088364-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Asch, S. E. (1966). Opinions and social pressure. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, and R. F. Bales (eds), Small Groups: Studies in Social Interaction (pp. 318-24). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
2. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things With Words (second edition) (J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà (eds)). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press..
3. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-4.
4. Barab, S. and Kirshner, D. (2001). Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences [Special issue]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1-2), 5-15.
5. Barab, S. A. and Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Clarifying the terms [Special issue]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1).
6. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-78.
7. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. Lagemann and L. Shulman (eds), Issues in Education Research (pp. 289-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Dietrich, E. and Markman, A. B. (eds) (2000). Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual and Representational Change in Humans and Machines. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. diSessa, A. and Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
12. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., and Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391-450.
13. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., and Krajcik, J. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences.
14. Fuson, K. and Zaritsky, R. A. (2001). Children’s Math Worlds (DVD Multi Audio and Video Tracks, Interactive). Evanston, IL: NSF Grant.
15. Gravemeijer, K. and van den Akker, J. (2003, December). How to review proposals for design research? Working document for the PROO workshop, Amsterdam.
16. Hickey, D. T., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., and Christie, M. A. (2003). Integrating curriculum, instruction, assessment, and evaluation in a technologysupported genetics environment. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 495-538.
17. Holton, G. (1998). Scientific Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Holton, G. and Brush, S. G. (2001). Physics, the Human Adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and Beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Research as design. Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-4.
20. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-28.
21. Kelly, A. E. and Lesh, R. (eds) (2000). Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R., and Baek, J. (eds) (in preparation). Handbook of Design Research Methods in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Lagemann, E. (2002a). An Elusive Science: The Troubling History of Education Research. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
24. Lagemann, E. (2002b). Usable knowledge in education. A memorandum for the Spencer Foundation Board of Directors. www.spencer.org/publications/usable_knowledge_report_ecl_a.htm
25. Lagemann, E. (2003). Aiming for usability. http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/lagemann03202003.html
26. Lemke, J. L. (2001). The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1-2), 17-26.
27. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., and Bell, P. (2003). Internet Environments for Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17-20.
29. Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Russell, E., Gomez, L. M., Reiser, B. J., and Edelson, D. C. (1998). The progress portfolio: Designing reflective tools for a classroom context. In Proceedings of CHI 98 (pp. 627-34). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 295-321.
31. McAdams, D. P. (1999). Personal narratives and the life story. In L. Pervin, and O. John (eds), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (second edition) (pp. 478-500). New York: Guilford Press.
32. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100-22.
33. McCandliss, P. D., Kalchman, M., and Bryant, P. (2003). Design experiments and laboratory approaches to learning: Steps toward collaborative exchange. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 14-16.
34. Mosteller, F. and Boruch. R. (eds) (2002). Evidence Matters: Randomized Trials in Educational Research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., Simon, H. A. (1962). The process of creative thinking. In H. F. Gruber and W. Wertheimer (eds), Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking (pp. 63-119). New York: Atherton Press.
36. NRC (National Research Council) (2002) In Shavelson, R. J. and Towne, L. (eds), Scientific Research in Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
37. NRC (National Research Council) (2004) Committee on Research in Education. In L. Towne, L. L. Wise, and T. M. Winters (eds), Advancing Scientific Research in Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
38. O’Donnell, A. M. (ed.) (2000). Learning with peers: Multiple perspectives on collaboration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1).
39. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
40. Roschelle, J., Kaput, J., and Stroup, W. (2000). SimCalc: Accelerating students’ engagement with the mathematics of change. In M. Jacobson and R. Kozma (eds), Educational Technology and Mathematics and Science for the 21st Century (pp. 47-75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Schickore, J. and Steinle, F. (eds) (2002). Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Preprint 211. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for History of Science.
42. Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
44. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., and Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-8.
45. Sloane, F. C. and Gorard, S. (2003). Exploring modeling aspects of design experiments. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 29-31.
46. Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (eds). (2000), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
47. Wainer, H. and Robinson, D. H. (2003). Shaping up the practice of null hypothesis significance testing. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 22-30.