Believing is seeing: How people's beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour

Medical Education

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1064-1072

  Teunissen, Pim W ^a,b   Bok, Harold G J ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EMOTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT;

BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CULTURE; EMOTIONS; GOALS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PHYSICIANS; SELF CONCEPT; STAFF DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84885439476     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12228     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Artino AR, Dong T, Dezee KJ, Gilliland WR, Waechter DM, Cruess D, Durning SJ. Achievement goal structures and self-regulated learning: relationships and changes in medical school. Acad Med 2012;87 (10):1375-81.
2. Westerman M, Teunissen PW, Fokkema JPI, Siegert CEH, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Scheele F. New consultants mastering the role of on-call supervisor: a longitudinal qualitative study. Med Educ 2013;47:408-16.
3. Dweck CS. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press 1999;5-94.
4. Dweck C, Grant H. Self-theories, goals, and meaning. In: Shah J, Gardner W, eds. Handbook of Motivation Science. New York, NY: Guilford Press 2008;405-16.
5. Button SB, Mathieu IE, Zajac DM. Goal orientation in organisational research: a conceptual and empirical foundation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1996;67:26-48.
6. Dupeyrat C, Mariné C. Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: a test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults. Contemp Educ Psychol 2005;30 (1):43-59.
7. Hong Y, Chiu C, Dweck C, Lin D, Wan W. Implicit theories attributions and coping: a meaning system approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;77 (3):588-99.
8. Blackwell LS, Trzesniewski KH, Dweck CS. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev 2007;78 (1):246-63.
9. Elliott ES, Dweck CS. Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54 (1):5-12.
10. Van Dijk D, Kluger AN. Feedback sign effect on motivation: is it moderated by regulatory focus? Appl Psychol 2004;53 (1):113-35.
11. Midgley C, Kaplan A, Middleton M. Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? J Educ Psychol 2001;93 (1):77-86.
12. VandeWalle D. A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behaviour. Hum Res Manage Rev 2003;13:581-604.
13. VandeWalle D, Cron WL, Slocum JW. The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. J Appl Psychol 2001;86:629-40.
14. Farr JL. Informal performance feedback: seeking and giving. In: Schuler H, Farr JL, Smith M, eds. Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and Organizational Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1993;163-80.
15. Bobko P, Colella A. Employee reactions to performance standards: a review and research propositions. Pers Psychol 1994;47:1-29.
16. VandeWalle D. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educ Psychol Measur 1997;57 (6):995-1015.
17. Vandewalle D. Goal orientation: why wanting to look successful doesn't always lead to success. Organ Dyn 2001;30 (2):162-71.
18. Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE guide no. 63. Med Teach 2012;34 (2):e102-15.
19. Robins RW, Pals JL. Self and identity implicit self-theories in the academic domain: implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self Identity 2002;1:313-36.
20. Grant H, Dweck CS. Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;85:541-53.
21. Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Lifelong learning at work. BMJ 2008;336 (7645):667-9.
22. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT, Veloski JJ, Hodgson CS. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behaviour in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005;353 (25):2673-82.
23. Duffy FD, Holmboe ES. Self-assessment in lifelong learning and improving performance in practice: physician know thyself. JAMA 2006;296 (9):1137-9.
24. Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. How student models of expertise and innovation impact the development of adaptive expertise in medicine. Med Educ 2009;43 (2):127-32.
25. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;79 (10 Suppl):70-81.
26. Mazmanian PE, Davis DA, Page P. Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence. JAMA 2002;288 (9):1057-60.
27. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296 (9):1094-102.
28. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 2005;80 (10 Suppl):46-54.
29. Miller RB, Greene BA, Montalvo GP, Ravindran B, Nichols JD. Engagement in academic work: the role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemp Educ Psychol 1996;21:388-422.
30. Winters D, Latham GP. The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group Organ Manage 1996;21 (2):236-50.
31. Miller RB, Behrens JT, Greene BA, Newman D. Goals and perceived ability: impact on student valuing, self-regulation, and persistence. Contemp Educ Psychol 1993;18:2-14.
32. Harackiewicz JM, Barron KE, Pintrich PR, Elliot AJ, Thrash TM. Revision of achievement goal theory: necessary and illuminating. J Educ Psychol 2002;94 (3):638-45.
33. Dweck CS, Molden DC. Self-theories. Their impact on competence, motivation, and acquisition. In: Elliot AJ, Dweck CS, eds. Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York, NY: Guilford Press 2005;122-40.
34. Good C, Aronson J, Inzlicht M. Improving adolescents' standardised test performance: an intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. J Appl Dev Psychol 2003;24 (6):645-62.
35. Aronson J, Fried CB, Good C. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. J Exp Soc Psychol 2002;38 (2):113-25.
36. Leach DC, Fletcher SW. Perspectives on continuing education in the health professions: improving health care through lifelong learning. Chest 2008;134 (6):1299-303.
37. Frankford DM, Patterson MA, Konrad TR. Transforming practice organisations to foster lifelong learning and commitment to medical professionalism. Acad Med 2000;75:708-17.
38. Brydges R, Butler D. A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice. Med Educ 2012;46 (1):71-9.
39. Corrigan G. Self-regulated learning in medical education: the next steps. Med Educ 2012;46 (9):920.
40. Tabernero C, Wood RE. Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in self-regulation and performance on a complex task. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1999;78 (2):104-27.
41. El-Alayli A, Baumgardner ANN. If at first you don't succeed, what makes you try, try again? Effects of implicit theories and ability feedback in a performance-oriented climate. Self Identity 2003;2:119-35.
42. Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ 2008;337:1292-4.
43. van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate O. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 2008;42:189-97.
44. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77 (1):81-112.
45. Ashford SJ, Cummings LL. Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies of creating information. Organ Behav Hum Perform 1983;32:370-98.
46. Tuckey M, Brewer N, Williamson P. The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. J Occup Organ Psychol 2002;75 (2):195-216.
47. Anseel F, Lievens F, Levy PE. A self-motives perspective on feedback-seeking behaviour: linking organisational behaviour and social psychology research. Int J Manag Rev 2007;9 (3):221-36.
48. Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D. Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback-seeking behaviour in organisations. J Manag 2003;29:773-99.
49. Klich NR, Feldman DC. The role of approval and achievement needs in feedback-seeking behaviour. J Managerial Issues 1992;4 (4):554-70.
50. Morrison EW, Cummings LL. The impact of feedback diagnosticity and performance expectations on feedback-seeking behaviour. Hum Perform 1992;5 (4):251-64.
51. Tsui AS, Ashford SJ. Adaptive self-regulation: a process view of managerial effectiveness. J Manag 1994;20 (1):93-121.
52. Ashford SJ. Feedback seeking in individual adaptation: a resource perspective. Acad Manag J 1986;29:465-87.
53. Fedor DB, Rensvold RB, Adams SM. An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: a longitudinal field study. Pers Psychol 1992;45:779-805.
54. Newton M, Duda JL. Elite adolescent athletes' achievement goals and beliefs concerning success in tennis. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1993;15 (4):437-48.
55. Janssen O, Prins JT. Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback information. J Occup Organ Psychol 2007;80 (2):235-49.
56. Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behaviour in relation to night shifts. Acad Med 2009;84:910-7.
57. Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, Fokkema JPI, van Beukelen P, Jaarsma DADC, van der Vleuten CPM. Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ 2013;47 (3):282-91.
58. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LKJ, van Tartwijk J. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach 2012;34 (3):205-14.
59. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach 2011;33 (6):478-85.
60. Pelgrim EA, Kramer AW, Mokkink HG, van der Vleuten CP. Quality of written narrative feedback and reflection in a modified mini-clinical evaluation exercise: an observational study. BMC Med Educ 2012;12 (1):97.
61. Govaerts MJB, van de Wiel MWJ, Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM. Workplace-based assessment: raters' performance theories and constructs. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2013;18:375-96.
62. Chiu C, Hong Y, Dweck CS. Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997;73 (I):19-30.
63. Hong Y, Chiu C, Dweck CS, Sacks R. Implicit theories and evaluative processes in person cognition. J Exp Soc Psychol 1997;33:296-323.
64. Heslin PA, VandeWalle D. Managers' implicit assumptions about personnel. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2008;17 (3):219-23.
65. Erdley CA, Dweck CS. Children's implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgements. Child Dev 1993;64 (3):868-78.
66. Gervey BM, Chiu C-Y, Hong Y-Y, Dweck CS. Differential use of person information in decisions about guilt versus innocence: the role of implicit theories. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1999;25 (1):17-27.
67. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R, McNaughton N, Frohna A, Hodges B, Lingard L, Stern D. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med 2000;75 (10 Suppl):6-11.
68. Goldie J. Assessment of professionalism: a consolidation of current thinking. Med Teach 2013;35 (2):e952-6.