Giving feedback in clinical settings

BMJ

Volumn 337, Issue 7681, 2008, Pages 1292-1294

  Cantillon, Peter ^a   Sargeant, Joan ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; STUDENT ATTITUDE; TEACHING;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; TEACHING;

EID: 57549108476     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1961     Document Type: Short Survey

References (22)

1. Hesketh EA, Laidlaw JM, Developing the teaching instinct: 1: feedback. Med Teacher 2002;24:245-8.
2. Liberman AS, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teacher 2005;27:470-7.
3. Isaacson JH, Posk LK, Litaker DG, Halperin AK. Resident perception of the evaluation process. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10(suppl 4):S89.
4. Irby DM. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995;70:898-931.
5. Ramaprasad A. On the definition of feedback. Behav Sci 1983;28:4-13.
6. Taras M. Summative and formative assessment - some theoretical reflections. Br J Educ Stud 2005;53:466-78.
7. Menachery EP, Knight AM, Kolodner K, Wright SM. Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:440-6.
8. Rees C, Shepherd M. Students' and assessors' attitudes towards students' self-assessment of their personal and professional behaviours. Med Educ 2005;39:30-9.
9. Thorndike EL. Human learning. New York: Century, 1931.
10. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119:254-84.
11. Ertmer PA, Newby TJ. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Q 1993;6:50-70.
12. Bruning RH, Schraw GJ, Norby MM, Ronning RR. Cognitive psychology and instruction. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
13. Veloski I, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians clinical performance. Med Teacher2006; 28:117-28. (BEME Guide No 7.)
14. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med 2005;80:S84-7.
15. Henderson P, Ferguson-Smith AC, Johnson MH. Developing essential professional skills: a framework for teaching and learning about feedback BMC Med Educ 2005;5:11.
16. Dobbie A, Tysinger JW, Evidence-based strategies that help office-based teachers give effective feedback. Family Med 2005;37:617-9.
17. Hargreaves DH, Southworth GW, Stanley P, Ward SJ. On-the-job training for physicians. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 1997.
18. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250:777-81.
19. Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
20. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008, www.springerlink.com/content/55h76108ru421647.
21. Sargeant J, Mann K, Lockyer J. Facilitated reflection: a strategy for aiding performance feedback acceptance and use. Poster presentation at the Association for Medical Education in Europe, Aug 25-29, 2007, Trondheim, Norway. Abstracts.
22. Silverman J, Draper J, Kurtz SM Silverman J. The Calgary-Cambridge approach to communication skills teaching II: the SET-GO method. Educ Gen Pract 1997:8:16-23.