Shared Leadership and Innovation: The Role of Vertical Leadership and Employee Integrity

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 159-174

  Hoch, Julia E ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antecedents; Innovative behavior; Leadership; Shared leadership; Team management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877770455     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-012-9273-6     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 187-209). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors, perceived, leader support, and subordinate creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32.
4. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External process and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS 5. 0 [Computerprogramm]. Chicago: Smallwaters.
6. Balkin, D. B., Tremblay, M., & Westerman, J. (2001). Workplace innovations in large, unionized Canadian organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 439-448.
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
9. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9, 9-30.
10. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
11. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207-218.
12. Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595-615.
13. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217-1234.
14. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
15. Choi, J. N., & Chang, J. Y. (2009). Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 245-253.
16. Chou, L.-F., Wang, A.-C., Wang, T.-Y., Huang, M.-P., & Cheng, B.-S. (2008). Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human Relations, 61, 1713-1742.
17. Cox, J. F., Pearce, C. L., & Perry, M. (2003). Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process: How shared leadership can enhance new product development team dynamics and effectiveness. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the How's and Whys of leadership (pp. 48-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
19. Cronbach, L., & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
20. Currie, G., & Lockett, A. (2007). A critique of transformational leadership: Moral, professional and contingent dimensions of leadership within public services organizations. Human Relations, 60, 341-370.
21. Currie, G., Lockett, A., & Suhomlinova, O. (2009). The institutionalization of distributed leadership: A 'Catch-22' in English public services. Human Relations, 62, 1735-1761.
22. Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857-880.
23. De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858-866.
24. De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297-311.
25. De Hoogh, A. H. B., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., Thierry, H., van den Berg, P. T., van der Weide, J. G., et al. (2005). Leader motives, charismatic leadership, and subordinates' work attitude in the profit and voluntary sector. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 17-38.
26. Dineen, B. R., Tomlinson, E. C., & Lewicki, R. J. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 622-635.
27. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 350-383.
28. Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217-231.
29. Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A., & Pearce, C. L. (2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resources Management Review, 13, 329-346.
30. Fry, L., & Kriger, M. (2009). Towards a theory of being-centered leadership: Multiple levels of being as context for effective leadership. Human Relations, 62, 1667-1696.
31. Garcia-Mortales, V. J., Matias-Reche, F., & Hurtado-Torres, N. (2008). Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 188-212.
32. Gibb, C. A. (Ed.). (1954). Leadership (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
34. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
36. Hmieleski, K. M., Cole, M. S., & Baron, R. A. (2012). Shared authentic leadership and new venture performance. Journal of Management. doi: 10. 1177/0149206311415419.
37. Hoch, J. E., Pearce, C. L., & Dulebohn, J. (2010a). Shared leadership questionnaire (SLQ): Developing a short scale to measure shared and vertical leadership in teams. SIOP Conference (Visual Presentation), Atlanta, USA.
38. Hoch, J. E., Welzel, L., & Pearce, C. L. (2010b). The most effective team leadership is shared: The impact of shared leadership, diversity, and coordination on team performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 105-116.
39. Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.
40. House, R. J., & Baetz, M. L. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 341-423.
41. Huelsheger, U. R., Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145.
42. Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2011). Leading for innovation: Direct and indirect influences. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 248-263.
43. Illgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, B. T., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-544.
44. wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
45. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
46. Janssen, O., van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and the dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 129-145.
47. Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 949-964.
48. Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525-544.
49. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
50. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681-706.
51. Kenny, D. (1979). Correlation and causation. New York: Wiley.
52. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowering on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face-interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 175-192.
53. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2009). To lead, create a shared vision. Harvard Business Review, 87, 20-21.
54. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley.
55. Liden, R., & Antonakis, J. (2009). Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human Relations, 62, 1587-1605.
56. Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585-600.
57. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. S. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
58. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1991). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 18-35.
59. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031-1056.
60. Mayo, M., Meindl, J. R., & Pastor, J.-C. (2003). Shared leadership in work teams. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: reframing the how's and why's of leadership (pp. 193-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812-825.
62. McClelland, D. C., & Boyatzis, R. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long-term succession management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 737-743.
63. McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (1976). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54, 100-110.
64. McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. (2003). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 81, 117-123.
65. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP). Small Group Research, 22, 128-147.
66. Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232-245.
67. Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36, 5-39.
68. Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 313-351.
69. Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 270-295.
70. Neubert, M. J., & Taggar, S. (2004). Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 175.
71. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Meta-analysis of integrity tests validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-693.
72. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and leadership: Clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25, 171-184.
73. Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 47-57.
74. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (Eds.). (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
75. Pearce, C. L., & Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 130-140.
76. Pearce, C. L., Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (2008). The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 353-359.
77. Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2000). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. Advances in the Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 7, 115-139.
78. Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172-197.
79. Pearce, C. L., Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2004). Leadership, social work and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical versus shared leadership in the nonprofit sector. In R. E. Riggio, S. Smith-Orr, & J. Shakely (Eds.), Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations (pp. 180-204). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
80. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. New York, Washington, DC: Oxford University Press, American Psychological Association.
81. Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327-340.
82. Pillai, R., & Williams, E. A. (2004). Transformational leadership, self-efficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment, and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 144-159.
83. Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 61, 1593-1616.
84. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
85. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703-714.
86. Solansky, S. T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 332-341.
87. Spangler, W. D., & House, R. J. (1991). Presidential effectiveness and the leadership motive profile. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 439-455.
88. Spreitzer, G. M., De Janasz, S. C., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 511-526.
89. Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-54.
90. Stewart, A., & Manz, C. C. (1995). Leadership for self-managing work teams: A typology and integrative model. Human Relations, 48, 747-770.
91. Taggar, S., Hackett, R., & Saha, S. (1999). Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 52, 899-926.
92. van der Vegt, G., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependency and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729-751.
93. van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H. N. (2011). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi: 10. 1037/a0021196.
94. Veroff, J., & Veroff, J. B. (1972). Reconsideration of a measure of power motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 279-291.
95. West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (S. 309-333). Chichester: Wiley.
96. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspective. Social Behavior, 4, 15-30.
97. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press. xix, 373 pp.
98. Winter, D. G. (2007). The role of motivation, responsibility, and integrative complexity in crisis escalation: Comparative studies of war and peace crises. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 920-937.
99. Winter, D. G., & Barenbaum, N. B. (1985). Responsibility and the power motive in women and men. Journal of Personality, 53, 335-355.
100. Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. A., & Mount, M. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 164-169.
101. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffith, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
102. Zhu, W., Chew, I. K. H., & Spangler, W. D. (2005). CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of human-capital-enhancing human resource management. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 39-52.