Emergence of DNA polymerase ε antimutators that escape error-induced extinction in yeast

Genetics

Volumn 193, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 751-770

  Williams, Lindsey N ^a   Herr, Alan J ^a   Preston, Bradley D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE EPSILON; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; EXONUCLEASE;

ALLELE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; DNA STRAND; DNA SYNTHESIS; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENOTYPE; HAPLOIDY; MISMATCH REPAIR; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATOR GENE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERIZATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DNA MISMATCH REPAIR; DNA POLYMERASE II; DNA REPLICATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION RATE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84876442276     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.146910     Document Type: Article

References (146)

1. Aksenova, A., K. Volkov, J. Maceluch, Z. F. Pursell, I. B. Rogozin et al., 2010 Mismatch repair-independent increase in spontaneous mutagenesis in yeast lacking non-essential subunits of DNA polymerase epsilon. PLoS Genet. 6: e1001209.
2. Albertson, T. M., and B. D. Preston, 2006 DNA replication fidelity: proofreading in trans. Curr. Biol. 16: R209-R211.
3. Albertson, T. M., M. Ogawa, J. M. Bugni, L. E. Hays, Y. Chen et al., 2009 DNA polymerase e and d proofreading suppress discrete mutator and cancer phenotypes in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 17101-17104.
4. Bardwell, A. J., L. Bardwell, A. E. Tomkinson, and E. C. Friedberg, 1994 Specific cleavage of model recombination and repair intermediates by the yeast Rad1-Rad10 DNA endonuclease. Science 265: 2082-2085.
5. Bastin-Shanower, S. A., W. M. Fricke, J. R. Mullen, and S. J. Brill, 2003 The mechanism of Mus81-Mms4 cleavage site selection distinguishes it from the homologous endonuclease Rad1- Rad10. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 3487-3496.
6. Bebenek, K., and T. A. Kunkel, 1995 Analyzing fidelity of DNA polymerases. Methods Enzymol. 262: 217-232.
7. Bernad, A., L. Blanco, J. M. Lazaro, G. Martin, and M. Salas, 1989 A conserved 39/59 exonuclease active site in prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Cell 59: 219-228.
8. Birkeland, S. R., N. Jin, A. C. Ozdemir, R. H. Lyons Jr, L. S. Weisman et al., 2010 Discovery of mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by pooled linkage analysis and whole-genome sequencing. Genetics 186: 1127-1137.
9. Boddy, M. N., P. H. Gaillard, W. H. McDonald, P. Shanahan, J. R. Yates III. et al. 2001 Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase. Cell 107: 537-548.
10. Boeke, J. D., F. LaCroute, and G. R. Fink, 1984 A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-59-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197: 345-346.
11. Brachmann, C. B., A. Davies, G. J. Cost, E. Caputo, J. Li et al., 1998 Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCRmediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115-132.
12. Cannavo, E., G. Marra, J. Sabates-Bellver, M. Menigatti, S. M. Lipkin et al., 2005 Expression of the MutL homologue hMLH3 in human cells and its role in DNA mismatch repair. Cancer Res. 65: 10759-10766.
13. Chao, L., and E. C. Cox, 1983 Competition between high and low mutating strains of Escherichia coli. Evolution 37: 125-134.
14. Chen, P. C., S. Dudley, W. Hagen, D. Dizon, L. Paxton et al., 2005 Contributions by MutL homologues Mlh3 and Pms2 to DNA mismatch repair and tumor suppression in the mouse. Cancer Res. 65: 8662-8670.
15. Chen, X. B., R. Melchionna, C. M. Denis, P. H. Gaillard, A. Blasina et al., 2001 Human Mus81-associated endonuclease cleaves Holliday junctions in vitro. Mol. Cell 8: 1117-1127.
16. Clayton, L. K., M. F. Goodman, E. W. Branscomb, and D. J. Galas, 1979 Error induction and correction by mutant and wild type T4 DNA polymerases. Kinetic error discrimination mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 254: 1902-1912.
17. Datta, A., J. L. Schmeits, N. S. Amin, P. J. Lau, K. Myung et al., 2000 Checkpoint-dependent activation of mutagenic repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae pol3-01 mutants. Mol. Cell 6: 593-603.
18. Desai, M. M., D. S. Fisher, and A. W. Murray, 2007 The speed of evolution and maintenance of variation in asexual populations. Curr. Biol. 17: 385-394.
19. Donlin, M. J., S. S. Patel, and K. A. Johnson, 1991 Kinetic partitioning between the exonuclease and polymerase sites in DNA error correction. Biochemistry 30: 538-546.
20. Drake, J. W., 1993 General antimutators are improbable. J. Mol. Biol. 229: 8-13.
21. Drake, J. W., B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, and J. F. Crow, 1998 Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148: 1667-1686.
22. Dua, R., D. L. Levy, and J. L. Campbell, 1999 Analysis of the essential functions of the C-terminal protein/protein interaction domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol e and its unexpected ability to support growth in the absence of the DNA polymerase domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 22283-22288.
23. Dunham, M. J., 2012 Two flavors of bulk segregant analysis in yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 871: 41-54.
24. Elena, S. F., and R. E. Lenski, 2003 Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 457-469.
25. Estes, S., P. C. Phillips, D. R. Denver, W. K. Thomas, and M. Lynch, 2004 Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 166: 1269-1279.
26. Feng, W., and G. D'Urso, 2001 Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells lacking the amino-terminal catalytic domains of DNA polymerase epsilon are viable but require the DNA damage checkpoint control. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 4495-4504.
27. Fijalkowska, I. J., and R. M. Schaaper, 1995 Effects of Escherichia coli dnaE antimutator alleles in a proofreading-deficient mutD5 strain. J. Bacteriol. 177: 5979-5986.
28. Fijalkowska, I. J., R. L. Dunn, and R. M. Schaaper, 1993 Mutants of Escherichia coli with increased fidelity of DNA replication. Genetics 134: 1023-1030.
29. Flores-Rozas, H., and R. D. Kolodner, 1998 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH3 gene functions in MSH3-dependent suppression of frameshift mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 12404-12409.
30. Fortune, J. M., Y. I. Pavlov, C. M. Welch, E. Johansson, P. M. Burgers et al., 2005 Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase d: high fidelity for base substitutions but lower fidelity for singleand multi-base deletions. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 29980-29987.
31. Fox, E. J., J. J. Salk, and L. A. Loeb, 2009 Cancer genome sequencing: an interim analysis. Cancer Res. 69: 4948-4950.
32. Friedberg, E. C., G. C. Walker, W. Siede, R. D. Wood, R. A. Schultz et al., 2006 DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
33. Funchain, P., A. Yeung, J. L. Stewart, R. Lin, M. M. Slupska et al., 2000 The consequences of growth of a mutator strain of Escherichia coli as measured by loss of function among multiple gene targets and loss of fitness. Genetics 154: 959-970.
34. Garg, P., C. M. Stith, N. Sabouri, E. Johansson, and P. M. Burgers, 2004 Idling by DNA polymerase d maintains a ligatable nick during lagging-strand DNA replication. Genes Dev. 18: 2764-2773.
35. Gietz, R. D., and R. A. Woods, 2002 Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method, pp. 87-96 in Part B: Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular and Cell Biology, edited by C. Guthrie, and G. R. Fink. Academic Press, New York.
36. Giraud, A., I. Matic, O. Tenaillon, A. Clara, M. Radman et al., 2001a Costs and benefits of high mutation rates: adaptive evolution of bacteria in the mouse gut. Science 291: 2606-2608.
37. Giraud, A., M. Radman, I. Matic, and F. Taddei, 2001b The rise and fall of mutator bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4: 582-585.
38. Goldsby, R. E., L. E. Hays, X. Chen, E. A. Olmsted, W. B. Slayton et al., 2002 High incidence of epithelial cancers in mice deficient for DNA polymerase d proofreading. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 15560-15565.
39. Greene, C. N., and S. Jinks-Robertson, 1997 Frameshift intermediates in homopolymer runs are removed efficiently by yeast mismatch repair proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 2844-2850.
40. Greene, C. N., and S. Jinks-Robertson, 2001 Spontaneous frameshift mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: accumulation during DNA replication and removal by proofreading and mismatch repair activities. Genetics 159: 65-75.
41. Guldener, U., S. Heck, T. Fielder, J. Beinhauer, and J. H. Hegemann, 1996 A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 2519-2524.
42. Guo, D., X. Wu, D. K. Rajpal, J. S. Taylor, and Z. Wang, 2001 Translesion synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase z from templates containing lesions of ultraviolet radiation and acetylaminofluorene. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 2875-2883.
43. Habraken, Y., P. Sung, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash, 1998 ATPdependent assembly of a ternary complex consisting of a DNA mismatch and the yeast MSH2-MSH6 and MLH1-PMS1 protein complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 9837-9841.
44. Hall, B. M., C. X. Ma, P. Liang, and K. K. Singh, 2009 Fluctuation AnaLysis CalculatOR: a web tool for the determination of mutation rate using Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis. Bioinformatics 25: 1564-1565.
45. Haracska, L., I. Unk, R. E. Johnson, E. Johansson, P. M. Burgers et al., 2001 Roles of yeast DNA polymerases d and z and of Rev1 in the bypass of abasic sites. Genes Dev. 15: 945-954.
46. Harfe, B. D., B. K. Minesinger, and S. Jinks-Robertson, 2000 Discrete in vivo roles for the MutL homologs Mlh2p and Mlh3p in the removal of frameshift intermediates in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 10: 145-148.
47. Harrington, J. M., and R. D. Kolodner, 2007 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh3 acts in repair of base-base mispairs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27: 6546-6554.
48. Herr, A. J., M. Ogawa, N. A. Lawrence, L. N. Williams, J. M. Eggington et al., 2011a Mutator suppression and escape from replication error-induced extinction in yeast. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002282.
49. Herr, A. J., L. N. Williams, and B. D. Preston, 2011b Antimutator variants of DNA polymerases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 46: 548-570.
50. Hombauer, H., C. S. Campbell, C. E. Smith, A. Desai, and R. D. Kolodner, 2011 Visualization of eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair reveals distinct recognition and repair intermediates. Cell 147: 1040-1053.
51. Hsieh, P., and K. Yamane, 2008 DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanism, cancer, and ageing. Mech. Ageing Dev. 129: 391-407.
52. Huang, D., R. Knuuti, H. Palosaari, H. Pospiech, and J. E. Syväoja, 1999 cDNA and structural organization of the gene Pole1 for the mouse DNA polymerase e catalytic subunit. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1445: 363-371.
53. Iyer, R. R., A. Pluciennik, V. Burdett, and P. L. Modrich, 2006 DNA mismatch repair: functions and mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 106: 302-323.
54. Johnson, K. A., 2010 The kinetic and chemical mechanism of high-fidelity DNA polymerases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804: 1041-1048.
55. Johnson, R. E., G. K. Kovvali, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash, 1996 Requirement of the yeast MSH3 and MSH6 genes for MSH2-dependent genomic stability. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 7285-7288.
56. Johnson, R. E., M. T. Washington, L. Haracska, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash, 2000 Eukaryotic polymerases i and z act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature 406: 1015-1019.
57. Johnson, S. J., J. S. Taylor, and L. S. Beese, 2003 Processive DNA synthesis observed in a polymerase crystal suggests a mechanism for the prevention of frameshift mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 3895-3900.
58. Joyce, C. M., and S. J. Benkovic, 2004 DNA polymerase fidelity: kinetics, structure, and checkpoints. Biochemistry 43: 14317-14324.
59. Kadyrov, F. A., L. Dzantiev, N. Constantin, and P. Modrich, 2006 Endonucleolytic function of MutLa in human mismatch repair. Cell 126: 297-308.
60. Kadyrov, F. A., S. F. Holmes, M. E. Arana, O. A. Lukianova, M. O'Donnell et al., 2007 Saccharomyces cerevisiae MutLa is a mismatch repair endonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 37181-37190.
61. Kai, M., and T. S. Wang, 2003 Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev. 17: 64-76.
62. Kaliraman, V., J. R. Mullen, W. M. Fricke, S. A. Bastin-Shanower, and S. J. Brill, 2001 Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev. 15: 2730-2740.
63. Karthikeyan, R., E. J. Vonarx, A. F. Straffon, M. Simon, G. Faye et al., 2000 Evidence from mutational specificity studies that yeast DNA polymerases d and e replicate different DNA strands at an intracellular replication fork. J. Mol. Biol. 299: 405-419.
64. Kesti, T., K. Flick, S. Keranen, J. E. Syväoja, and C. Wittenberg, 1999 DNA polymerase e catalytic domains are dispensable for DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell viability. Mol. Cell 3: 679-685.
65. Kolodner, R. D., and G. T. Marsischky, 1999 Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9: 89-96.
66. Kumar, D., A. L. Abdulovic, J. Viberg, A. K. Nilsson, T. A. Kunkel et al., 2011 Mechanisms of mutagenesis in vivo due to imbalanced dNTP pools. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: 1360-1371.
67. Kunkel, T. A., and P. M. Burgers, 2008 Dividing the workload at a eukaryotic replication fork. Trends Cell Biol. 18: 521-527.
68. Kunkel, T. A., S. S. Patel, and K. A. Johnson, 1994 Error-prone replication of repeated DNA sequences by T7 DNA polymerase in the absence of its processivity subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 6830-6834.
69. Larrea, A. A., S. A. Lujan, S. A. Nick McElhinny, P. A. Mieczkowski, M. A. Resnick et al., 2010 Genome-wide model for the normal eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 17674-17679.
70. Li, L., K. M. Murphy, U. Kanevets, and L. J. Reha-Krantz, 2005 Sensitivity to phosphonoacetic acid: a new phenotype to probe DNA polymerase d in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 170: 569-580.
71. Loeb, L. A., 2011 Human cancers express mutator phenotypes: origin, consequences and targeting. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11: 450-457.
72. Loeb, L. A., C. F. Springgate, and N. Battula, 1974 Errors in DNA replication as a basis of malignant changes. Cancer Res. 34: 2311-2321.
73. Loeb, L. A., J. H. Bielas, and R. A. Beckman, 2008 Cancers exhibit a mutator phenotype: clinical implications. Cancer Res. 68: 3551-3557.
74. Loh, E., J. Choe, and L. A. Loeb, 2007 Highly tolerated amino acid substitutions increase the fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 12201-12209.
75. Mao, E. F., L. Lane, J. Lee, and J. H. Miller, 1997 Proliferation of mutators in a cell population. J. Bacteriol. 179: 417-422.
76. Marsischky, G. T., N. Filosi, M. F. Kane, and R. Kolodner, 1996 Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 10: 407-420.
77. McCulloch, S. D., and T. A. Kunkel, 2008 The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases. Cell Res. 18: 148-161.
78. Morgan, C., and P. D. Lewis, 2006 iMARS-mutation analysis reporting software: an analysis of spontaneous cII mutation spectra. Mutat. Res. 603: 15-26.
79. Morrison, A., and A. Sugino, 1994 The 39/59 exonucleases of both DNA polymerases d and e participate in correcting errors of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 242: 289-296.
80. Morrison, A., J. B. Bell, T. A. Kunkel, and A. Sugino, 1991 Eukaryotic DNA polymerase amino acid sequence required for 39 / 59 exonuclease activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 9473-9477.
81. Morrison, A., A. L. Johnson, L. H. Johnston, and A. Sugino, 1993 Pathway correcting DNA replication errors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 12: 1467-1473.
82. New, L., K. Liu, and G. F. Crouse, 1993 The yeast gene MSH3 defines a new class of eukaryotic MutS homologues. Mol. Gen. Genet. 239: 97-108.
83. Nick McElhinny, S. A., Y. I. Pavlov, and T. A. Kunkel, 2006 Evidence for extrinsic exonucleolytic proofreading. Cell Cycle 5: 958-962.
84. Nick McElhinny, S. A., D. A. Gordenin, C. M. Stith, P. M. J. Burgers, and T. A. Kunkel, 2008 Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. Mol. Cell 30: 137-144.
85. Nilsson, A. I., E. Kugelberg, O. G. Berg, and D. I. Andersson, 2004 Experimental adaptation of Salmonella typhimurium to mice. Genetics 168: 1119-1130.
86. Nishant, K. T., A. J. Plys, and E. Alani, 2008 A mutation in the putative MLH3 endonuclease domain confers a defect in both mismatch repair and meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 747-755.
87. Northam, M. R., P. Garg, D. M. Baitin, P. M. Burgers, and P. V. Shcherbakova, 2006 A novel function of DNA polymerase z regulated by PCNA. EMBO J. 25: 4316-4325.
88. Northam, M. R., H. A. Robinson, O. V. Kochenova, and P. V. Shcherbakova, 2010 Participation of DNA polymerase z in replication of undamaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 184: 27-42.
89. Notley-McRobb, L., S. Seeto, and T. Ferenci, 2002 Enrichment and elimination of mutY mutators in Escherichia coli populations. Genetics 162: 1055-1062.
90. Palombo, F., I. Iaccarino, E. Nakajima, M. Ikejima, T. Shimada et al., 1996 hMutSb, a heterodimer of hMSH2 and hMSH3, binds to insertion/deletion loops in DNA. Curr. Biol. 6: 1181-1184.
91. Pavlov, Y. I., and P. V. Shcherbakova, 2010 DNA polymerases at the eukaryotic fork-20 years later. Mutat. Res. 685: 45-53.
92. Pavlov, Y. I., P. V. Shcherbakova, and T. A. Kunkel, 2001 In vivo consequences of putative active site mutations in yeast DNA polymerases a, e, d, and z. Genetics 159: 47-64.
93. Pavlov, Y. I., C. S. Newlon, and T. A. Kunkel, 2002 Yeast origins establish a strand bias for replicational mutagenesis. Mol. Cell 10: 207-213.
94. Pavlov, Y. I., I. M. Mian, and T. A. Kunkel, 2003 Evidence for preferential mismatch repair of lagging strand DNA replication errors in yeast. Curr. Biol. 13: 744-748.
95. Pavlov, Y. I., S. Maki, H. Maki, and T. A. Kunkel, 2004 Evidence for interplay among yeast replicative DNA polymerases alpha, delta and epsilon from studies of exonuclease and polymerase active site mutations. BMC Biol. 2: 11.
96. Pavlov, Y. I., C. Frahm, S. A. McElhinny, A. Niimi, M. Suzuki et al., 2006a Evidence that errors made by DNA polymerase α are corrected by DNA polymerase d. Curr. Biol. 16: 202-207.
97. Pavlov, Y. I., P. V. Shcherbakova, and I. B. Rogozin, 2006b Roles of DNA polymerases in replication, repair, and recombination in eukaryotes. Int. Rev. Cytol. 255: 41-132.
98. Peltomäki, P., 2005 Lynch syndrome genes. Fam. Cancer 4: 227-232.
99. Preston, B. D., T. M. Albertson, and A. J. Herr, 2010 DNA replication fidelity and cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 20: 281-293.
100. Prolla, T. A., D. M. Christie, and R. M. Liskay, 1994 Dual requirement in yeast DNA mismatch repair for MLH1 and PMS1, two homologs of the bacterial mutL gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 407-415.
101. Pursell, Z. F., and T. A. Kunkel, 2008 DNA polymerase e: a polymerase of unusual size (and complexity). Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 82: 101-145.
102. Pursell, Z. F., I. Isoz, E. B. Lundstrom, E. Johansson, and T. A. Kunkel, 2007 Yeast DNA polymerase e participates in leading- strand DNA replication. Science 317: 127-130.
103. Raghuraman, M. K., E. A. Winzeler, D. Collingwood, S. Hunt, L. Wodicka et al., 2001 Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294: 115-121.
104. Reenan, R. A., and R. D. Kolodner, 1992 Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics 132: 975-985.
105. Reha-Krantz, L. J., 1995 Learning about DNA polymerase function by studying antimutator DNA polymerases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 136-140.
106. Reha-Krantz, L. J., 2010 DNA polymerase proofreading: multiple roles maintain genome stability. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804: 1049-1063.
107. Reha-Krantz, L. J., M. S. Siddique, K. Murphy, A. Tam, M. O'Carroll et al., 2011 Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase d reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 189: 1211-1224.
108. Schaaper, R. M., 1996 Suppressors of Escherichia coli mutT: antimutators for DNA replication errors. Mutat. Res. 350: 17-23.
109. Schaaper, R. M., 1998 Antimutator mutants in bacteriophage T4 and Escherichia coli. Genetics 148: 1579-1585.
110. Schaaper, R. M., and R. Cornacchio, 1992 An Escherichia coli dnaE mutation with suppressor activity toward mutator mutD5. J. Bacteriol. 174: 1974-1982.
111. Shcherbakova, P. V., V. N. Noskov, M. R. Pshenichnov, and Y. I. Pavlov, 1996 Base analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine mutagenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by replicative DNA polymerases. Mutat. Res. 369: 33-44.
112. Shcherbakova, P. V., Y. I. Pavlov, O. Chilkova, I. B. Rogozin, E. Johansson et al., 2003 Unique error signature of the four-subunit yeast DNA polymerase e. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 43770-43780.
113. Sherman, F., 2002 Getting started with yeast, pp. 3-41 in Part B: Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular and Cell Biology, edited by C. Guthrie, and G. R. Fink. Academic Press, San Diego.
114. Shimizu, K., K. Hashimoto, J. M. Kirchner, W. Nakai, H. Nishikawa et al., 2002 Fidelity of DNA polymerase e holoenzyme from budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 37422-37429.
115. Sia, E. A., R. J. Kokoska, M. Dominska, P. Greenwell, and T. D. Petes, 1997 Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on repeat unit size and DNA mismatch repair genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 2851-2858.
116. Simhadri, S., P. Kramata, B. Zajc, J. M. Sayer, D. M. Jerina et al., 2002 Benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-deoxyguanosine adducts are accurately bypassed by yeast DNA polymerase z in vitro. Mutat. Res. 508: 137-145.
117. Simon, M., L. Giot, and G. Faye, 1991 The 39 to 59 exonuclease activity located in the DNA polymerase d subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for accurate replication. EMBO J. 10: 2165-2170.
118. Siow, C. C., S. R. Nieduszynska, C. A. Müller, and C. A. Nieduszynski, 2012 OriDB, the DNA replication origin database updated and extended. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: D682-D686.
119. Smith, R. A., L. A. Loeb, and B. D. Preston, 2005 Lethal mutagenesis of HIV. Virus Res. 107: 215-228.
120. Sniegowski, P. D., P. J. Gerrish, and R. E. Lenski, 1997 Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature 387: 703-705.
121. Strand, M., T. A. Prolla, R. M. Liskay, and T. D. Petes, 1993 Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. Nature 365: 274-276.
122. Stulemeijer, I. J., B. L. Pike, A. W. Faber, K. F. Verzijlbergen, T. van Welsem et al., 2011 Dot1 binding induces chromatin rearrangements by histone methylation-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Epigenetics Chromatin 4: 2-15.
123. Swan, M. K., R. E. Johnson, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, and A. K. Aggarwal, 2009 Structural basis of high-fidelity DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase d. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16: 979-986.
124. Taddei, F., M. Radman, J. Maynard-Smith, B. Toupance, P. H. Gouyon et al., 1997 Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature 387: 700-702.
125. Thompson, D. A., M. M. Desai, and A. W. Murray, 2006 Ploidy controls the success of mutators and nature of mutations during budding yeast evolution. Curr. Biol. 16: 1581-1590.
126. Tong, A. H. Y., and C. Boone, 2007 High-throughput strain construction and systematic synthetic lethal screening in Saccaromyces cerevisiae, pp. 369-386 and 706-707 in Methods in Microbiology, edited by I. Stansfield, and M. J. R. Stark. Academic Press, New York.
127. Tran, H. T., D. A. Gordenin, and M. A. Resnick, 1999 The 39/59 exonucleases of DNA polymerases d and e and the 59/39 exonuclease Exo1 have major roles in postreplication mutation avoidance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 2000-2007.
128. Tröbner, W., and R. Piechocki, 1984 Selection against hypermutability in Escherichia coli during long term evolution. Mol. Gen. Genet. 198: 177-178.
129. Trujillo, K. M., and P. Sung, 2001 DNA structure-specific nuclease activities in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50_Mre11 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 35458-35464.
130. Tsaponina, O., E. Barsoum, S. U. Astrom, and A. Chabes, 2011 Ixr1 is required for the expression of the ribonucleotide reductase Rnr1 and maintenance of dNTP pools. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002061.
131. Unk, I., L. Haracska, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash, 2001 39- Phosphodiesterase and 3 / 5 exonuclease activities of yeast Apn2 protein and requirement of these activities for repair of oxidative DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 1656-1661.
132. Viguera, E., D. Canceill, and S. D. Ehrlich, 2001 Replication slippage involves DNA polymerase pausing and dissociation. EMBO J. 20: 2587-2595.
133. Wang, J., A. K. Sattar, C. C. Wang, J. D. Karam, W. H. Konigsberg et al., 1997 Crystal structure of a pol a family replication DNA polymerase from bacteriophage RB69. Cell 89: 1087-1099.
134. Wang, T. S.-F., S. W. Wong, and D. Korn, 1989 Human DNA polymerase a: predicted functional domains and relationships with viral DNA polymerases. FASEB J. 3: 14-21.
135. Wang, W., and B. A. Malcolm, 1999 Two-stage PCR protocol allowing introduction of multiple mutations, deletions and insertions using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Biotechniques 26: 680-682.
136. Waters, L. S., B. K. Minesinger, M. E. Wiltrout, S. D'Souza, R. V. Woodruff et al., 2009 Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73: 134-154.
137. Wei, K., R. Kucherlapati, and W. Edelmann, 2002 Mouse models for human DNA mismatch-repair gene defects. Trends Mol. Med. 8: 346-353.
138. Wenger, J. W., K. Schwartz, and G. Sherlock, 2010 Bulk segregant analysis by high-throughput sequencing reveals a novel xylose utilization gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 6: e1000942.
139. Williamson, M. S., J. C. Game, and S. Fogel, 1985 Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2. Genetics 110: 609-646.
140. Wloch, D. M., K. Szafraniec, R. H. Borts, and R. Korona, 2001 Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159: 441-452.
141. Yabuki, N., H. Terashima, and K. Kitada, 2002 Mapping of early firing origins on a replication profile of budding yeast. Genes Cells 7: 781-789.
142. Yang, Y., R. Karthikeyan, S. E. Mack, E. J. Vonarx, and B. A. Kunz, 1999 Analysis of yeast pms1, msh2, and mlh1 mutators points to differences in mismatch correction efficiencies between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261: 777-787.
143. Yu, L., L. Pena Castillo, S. Mnaimneh, T. R. Hughes, and G. W. Brown, 2006 A survey of essential gene function in the yeast cell division cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell 17: 4736-4747.
144. Zeyl, C., and J. A. G. M. de Visser, 2001 Estimates of the rate and distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157: 53-61.
145. Zhao, X., and R. Rothstein, 2002 The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 3746-3751.
146. Zhou, Z., and S. J. Elledge, 1993 DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell 75: 1119-1127.