The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases

Cell Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 148-161

  McCulloch, Scott D ^a   Kunkel, Thomas A ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

B family polymerases; DNA replication; Fidelity; Genome stability; Y family polymerase

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA TEMPLATE; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MUTAGENESIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTAGENESIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TEMPLATES, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 38049125552     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2008.4     Document Type: Review

References (131)

1. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953; 171:737-738.
2. Jiricny J. The multifaceted mismatch-repair system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:335-346.
3. Kunkel TA, Erie DA. DNA mismatch repair. Annu Rev Biochem 2005; 74:681-710.
4. Johnson A, O'Donnell M. Cellular DNA replicases: components and dynamics at the replication fork. Annu Rev Biochem 2005; 74:283-315.
5. Bebenek K, Kunkel TA. Functions of DNA polymerases. Adv Protein Chem 2004; 69:137-165.
6. Forsburg SL. Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2004; 68:109-131.
7. Garg P, Burgers PM. DNA polymerases that propagate the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2005; 40:115-128.
8. Graziewicz MA, Longley MJ, Copeland WC. DNA polymerase γ in mitochondrial DNA replication and repair. Chem Rev 2006; 106:383-405.
9. Falkenberg M, Larsson N-G, Gustafsson CM. DNA replication and transcription in mammalian mitochondria. Annu Rev Biochem 2007; 76:679-699.
10. McCulloch SD, Kokoska RJ, Kunkel TA. Efficiency, fidelity and enzymatic switching during translesion DNA synthesis. Cell Cycle 2004; 3:580-583.
11. Prakash S, Prakash L. Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1872-1883.
12. Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP. Gaps and forks in DNA replication: rediscovering old models. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:1495-1498.
13. Diaz M, Lawrence C. An update on the role of translesion synthesis DNA polymerases in Ig hypermutation. Trends Immunol 2005; 26:215-220.
14. Casali P, Pal Z, Xu Z, Zan H. DNA repair in antibody somatic hypermutation. Trends Immunol 2006; 27:313-321.
15. Kawamoto T, Araki K, Sonoda E, et al. Dual roles for DNA polymerase η in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell 2005; 20:793-799.
16. Ogi T, Lehmann AR. The Y-family DNA polymerase Κ (pol kappa) functions in mammalian nucleotide-excision repair. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:640-642.
17. Prasad R, Bebenek K, Hou E, et al. Localization of the deoxyribose phosphate lyase active site in human DNA polymerase i by controlled proteolysis. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:29649-29654.
18. Haracska L, Prakash S, Prakash L. Yeast Revi protein is a G template-specific DNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:15546- 15551.
19. Nelson JR, Lawrence CW, Hinkle DC. Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein. Nature 1996; 382:729-731.
20. Guo C, Fischhaber PL, Luk-Paszyc MJ, et al. Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J 2003; 22:6621-6630.
21. Lawrence CW, Gibbs PE, Murante RS, et al. Roles of DNA polymerase ζ and Rev1 protein in eukaryotic mutagenesis and translesion replication. ColdSpring Horb Symp Quant Biol 2000; 65:61-69.
22. Einolf HJ, Guengerich FP. Kinetic analysis of nucleotide incorporation by mammalian DNA polymerase δ. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:16316- 16322.
23. Hashimoto K, Shimizu K, Nakashima N, Sugino A. Fidelity of DNA polymerase S holoenzyme from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen decreases its fidelity. Biochemistry 2003; 42:14207-14213.
24. Kunkel TA, Sabatino RD, Bambara RA. Exonucleolytic proof-reading by calf thymus DNA polymerase S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84:4865-4869.
25. Thomas DC, Roberts JD, Sabatino RD, et al. Fidelity of mammalian DNA replication and replicative DNA polymerases. Biochemistry 1991; 30:11751-11759.
26. McElhinny SAN, Stith CM, Burgers PMJ, Kunkel TA. Inefficient proofreading and biased error rates during inaccurate DNA synthesis by a mutant derivative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase δ. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:2324-2332.
27. Niimi A, Limsirichaikul S, Yoshida S, et al. Palm mutants in DNA polymerases α and η alter DNA replication fidelity and translesion activity. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:2734-2746.
28. Pursell ZF, Isoz I, Lundstrom EB, Johansson E, Kunkel TA. Regulation of B family DNA polymerase fidelity by a conserved active site residue: characterization of M644W, M644L and M644F mutants of yeast DNA polymerase ε. Nucl Acids Res 2007; 35:3076-3086.
29. Venkatesan RN, Hsu JJ, Lawrence NA, Preston BD, Loeb LA. Mutator phenotypes caused by substitution at a conserved motif A residue in eukaryotic DNA polymerase δ. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:4486-4494.
30. Li L, Murphy KM, Kanevets U, Reha-Krantz LJ. Sensitivity to phosphonoacetic acid: a new phenotype to probe DNA polymerase δ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2005; 170:569-580.
31. Venkatesan RN, Treuting PM, Fuller ED, et al. Mutation at the polymerase active site of mouse polymerase δ increases genomic instability and accelerates tumorigenesis. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:7669-7682.
32. Ponamarev MV, Longley MJ, Nguyen D, Kunkel TA, Copeland WC. Active site mutation in DNA polymerase γ associated with progressive external ophthalmoplegia causes error-prone DNA synthesis. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:15225-15228.
33. Graziewicz MA, Bienstock RJ, Copeland WC. The DNA polymerase y γ Y955C disease variant associated with PEO and parkinsonism mediates the incorporation and translesion synthesis opposite 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'- deoxyguanosine. Hum Mol Genet 2007; 16:2729-2739.
34. Kool ET. Active site tightness and substrate fit in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem 2002; 71:191-219.
35. Petruska J, Goodman MF, Boosalis MS, et al. Comparison between DNA melting thermodynamics and DNA polymerase fidelity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:6252-6256.
36. Echols H, Goodman MF. Fidelity mechanisms in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem 1991; 60:477-511.
37. Kunkel TA, Bebenek K. DNA replication fidelity. Annu Rev Biochem 2000; 69:497-529.
38. Goodman MF, Creighton S, Bloom LB, Petruska J. Biochemical basis of DNA replication fidelity. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1993; 28:83-126.
39. Washington MT, Helquist SA, Kool ET, Prakash L, Prakash S. Requirement of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding for DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase η. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:5107-5112.
40. Goodman MF. Hydrogen bonding revisited: geometric selection as a principal determinant of DNA replication fidelity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:10493-10495.
41. Beard WA, Wilson SH. Structural insights into the origins of DNA polymerase fidelity. Structure 2003; 11:489-496.
42. Johnson SJ, Beese LS. Structures of mismatch replication errors observed in a DNA polymerase. Cell 2004; 116:803-816.
43. Rothwell PJ, Waksman G. Structure and mechanism of DNA polymerases. In: John MS, David ADP, eds. Fibrous proteins: Muscle and molecular motors. Advances in Protein Chemistry 2005; 71:401-440.
44. Tsai YC, Johnson KA. A new paradigm for DNA polymerase specificity. Biochemistry 2006; 45:9675-9687.
45. Rothwell PJ, Waksman G. A pre-equilibrium before nucleotide binding limits fingers subdomain closure by Klentaql. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:28884-28892.
46. Streisinger G, Okada Y, Emrich J, et al. Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1966; 31:77-84.
47. Kunkel TA, Soni A. Mutagenesis by transient misalignment. J Biol Chem 1988; 263:14784-14789.
48. Fujii S, Akiyama M, Aoki K, et al. DNA replication errors produced by the replicative apparatus of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 1999; 289:835-850.
49. Kunkel TA. Frameshift mutagenesis by eucaryotic DNA polymerases in vitro. J Biol Chem 1986; 261:13581-13587.
50. Efrati E, Tocco G, Eritja R, Wilson SH, Goodman MF. Abasic translesion synthesis by DNA polymerase β violates the "A-rule". Novel types of nucleotide incorporation by human DNA polymerase β at an abasic lesion in different sequence contexts. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:2559-2569.
51. Garcia-Diaz M, Kunkel TA. Mechanism of a genetic glissando: structural biology of indel mutations. Trends Biochem Sci 2006; 31:206-214.
52. Bebenek K, Garcia-Diaz M, Blanco L, Kunkel TA. The frameshift infidelity of human DNA polymerase λ. Implications for function. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:34685-34690.
53. Foury F, Vanderstraeten S. Yeast mitochondrial DNA mutators with deficient proofreading exonucleolytic activity. EMBO J 1992; 11:2717-2726.
54. Morrison A, Johnson AL, Johnston LH, Sugino A. Pathway correcting DNA replication errors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 1993; 12:1467-1473.
55. Morrison A, Sugino A. The 3'→5' exonucleases of both DNA polymerases δ and ε participate in correcting errors of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 1994; 242:289-296.
56. Pavlov YI, Maki S, Maki H, Kunkel TA. Evidence for interplay among yeast replicative DNA polymerases α, δ and ε from studies of exonuclease and polymerase active site mutations. BMC Biol 2004; 2:11.
57. Vanderstraeten S, Van den Brule S, Hu J, Foury F. The role of 3'-5' exonucleolytic proofreading and mismatch repair in yeast mitochondrial DNA error avoidance. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:23690-23697.
58. Goldsby RE, Lawrence NA, Hays LE, et al. Defective DNA polymerase-δ proofreading causes cancer susceptibility in mice. Nat Med 2001; 7:638-639.
59. Goldsby RE, Hays LE, Chen X, et al. High incidence of epithelial cancers in mice deficient for DNA polymerase δ proofreading. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:15560-15565.
60. Zhang D, Mott JL, Chang SW, et al. Construction of transgenic mice with tissue-specific acceleration of mitochondrial DNA mutagenesis. Genomics 2000; 69:151-161.
61. Trifunovic A, Wredenberg A, Falkenberg M, et al. Premature ageing in mice expressing defective mitochondrial DNA polymerase. Nature 2004; 429:417-423.
62. Kroutil LC, Register K, Bebenek K, Kunkel TA. Exonucleolytic proofreading during replication of repetitive DNA. Biochemistry 1996; 35:1046-1053.
63. Tran HT, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. The 3′→5′ Exonucleases of DNA polymerases δ and ε and the 3′-→5′ exonuclease Exo1 have major roles in postreplication mutation avoidance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:2000-2007.
64. Pavlov YI, Frahm C, Nick McElhinny SA, et al. Evidence that errors made by DNA polymerase α are corrected by DNApolymerase δ. Curr Biol 2006; 16:202-207.
65. McElhinny SAN, Pavlov YI, Kunkel TA. Evidence for extrinsic exonucleolytic proofreading. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:958-962.
66. Bebenek A, Carver GT, Dressman HK, et al. Dissecting the fidelity of bacteriophage RB69 DNA polymerase: site-specific modulation of fidelity by polymerase accessory proteins. Genetics 2002; 162:1003-1018.
67. Fortune JM, Stith CM, Kissling GE, Burgers PM, Kunkel TA. RPA and PCNA suppress formation of large deletion errors by yeast DNA polymerase δ. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:4335-4341.
68. Tissier A, McDonald JP, Frank EG, Woodgate R pol t, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase. Genes Dev 2000; 14:1642-1650.
69. Bebenek K, Tissier A, Frank EG, et al. 5′-Deoxyribose phosphate lyase activity of human DNA polymerase t in vitro. Science 2001; 291:2156-2159.
70. Ogi T, Kato T Jr, Kato T, Ohmori H. Mutation enhancement by DINB1, a mammalian homologue of the Escherichia coli mutagenesis protein dinB. Genes Cells 1999; 4:607-618.
71. Fuchs RP, Fujii S, Wagner J. Properties and functions of Escherichia coli: Pol IV and Pol V. Adv Protein Chem 2004; 69:229-264.
72. Jarosz DF, Beuning PJ, Cohen SE, Walker GC. Y-family DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol 2007; 15:70-77.
73. Haracska L, Prakash S, Prakash L. Yeast DNA polymerase ζ is an efficient extender of primer ends opposite from 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine and O6-methylguanine. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:1453-1459.
74. Lawrence CW, Hinkle DC. DNA polymerase ζ and the control of DNA damage induced mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Cancer Surv 1996; 28:21-31.
75. Haracska L, Prakash L, Prakash S. Role of human DNA polymerase K as an extender in translesion synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:16000-16005.
76. Zhong X, Garg P, Stith CM, et al. The fidelity of DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase ζ alone and with accessory proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:4731-4742.
77. Minesinger BK, Abdulovic AL, Ou TM, Jinks-Robertson S. The effect of oxidative metabolism on spontaneous Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:226-234.
78. Harfe BD, Jinks-Robertson S. DNA polymerase ζ introduces multiple mutations when bypassing spontaneous DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2000; 6:1491-1499.
79. Arana ME, Takata K, Garcia-Diaz M, Wood RD, Kunkel TA. A unique error signature for human DNA polymerase v. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:213-223.
80. Takata K, Shimizu T, Iwai S, Wood RD. Human DNA polymerase N (POLN) is a low fidelity enzyme capable of error-free bypass of 5S-thymine glycol. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:23445-23455.
81. Seki M, Marini F, Wood RD. POLQ (Pol θ), a DNA polymerase and DNA-dependent ATPase in human cells. Nucl Acids Res 2003; 31:6117-6126.
82. Seki M, Wood RD. DNA polymerase θ (POLQ) can extend from mismatches and from bases opposite a (6-4) photoproduct. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008; 7:119-127.
83. Goodman MF. Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem 2002; 71:17-50.
84. Shcherbakova PV, Bebenek K, Kunkel TA. Functions of eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ 2003; 2003:RE3.
85. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 2005; 74:317-353.
86. Strauss BS. The "A" rule revisited: polymerases as determinants of mutational specificity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2002; 1:125-135.
87. Kokoska RJ, McCulloch SD, Kunkel TA. The efficiency and specificity of apurinic/apyrimidinic site bypass by human DNA polymerase η and Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:50537-50545.
88. Ling H, Boudsocq F, Woodgate R, Yang W. Snapshots of replication through an abasic lesion; structural basis for base substitutions and frameshifts. Mol Cell 2004; 13:751-762.
89. Hogg M, Wallace SS, Doublie S. Crystallographic snapshots of a replicative DNA polymerase encountering an abasic site. EMBO J 2004; 23:1483-1493.
90. Washington MT, Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S. Accuracy of lesion bypass by yeast and human DNA polymerase η. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:8355-8360.
91. McCulloch SD, Kokoska RJ, Masutani C, et al. Preferential cissyn thymine dimer bypass by DNA polymerase η occurs with biased fidelity. Nature 2004; 428:97-100.
92. McCulloch SD, Wood A, Garg P, Burgers PM, Kunkel TA. Effects of accessory proteins on the bypass of a cis-syn thyminethymine dimer by Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase η. Biochemistry 2007; 46:8888-8896.
93. Ling H, Boudsocq F, Plosky BS, Woodgate R, Yang W. Replication of a cis-syn thymine dimer at atomic resolution. Nature 2003; 424:1083-1087.
94. Lipscomb LA, Peek ME, Morningstar ML, et al. X-ray structure of a DNA decamer containing 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:719-723.
95. McAuley-Hecht KE, Leonard GA, Gibson NJ, et al. Crystal structure of a DNA duplex containing 8-hydroxydeoxyguanineadenine base pairs. Biochemistry 1994; 33:10266-10270.
96. Einolf HJ, Guengerich FP. Fidelity of nucleotide insertion at 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine by mammalian DNA polymerase δ. Steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:3764- 3771.
97. Brieba LG, Eichman BF, Kokoska RJ, et al. Structural basis for the dual coding potential of 8-oxoguanosine by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase. EMBO J 2004; 23:3452-3461.
98. Grollman AP, Moriya M. Mutagenesis by 8-oxoguanine: an enemy within. Trends Genet 1993; 9:246-249.
99. Boiteux S, Gellon L, Guibourt N. Repair of 8-oxoguanine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: interplay of DNA repair and replication mechanisms. Free Radical Biol Med 2002; 32:1244-1253.
100. Masutani C, Kusumoto R, YamadaA, et al. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η. Nature 1999; 399:700-704.
101. Lin Q, Clark AB, McCulloch SD, et al. Increased susceptibility to UV-induced skin carcinogenesis in polymerase η-deficient mice. Cancer Res 2006; 66:87-94.
102. Dumstorf CA, Clark AB, Lin Q, et al. Participation of mouse DNA polymerase t in strand-biased mutagenic bypass of UV photoproducts and suppression of skin cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:18083-18088.
103. de Feraudy S, Limoli CL, Giedzinski E, et al. Pol η is required for DNA replication during nucleotide deprivation by hydroxyurea. Oncogene 2007; 26:5713-5721.
104. Wang Y, Woodgate R, McManus TP, et al. Evidence that in Xeroderma Pigmentosum variant cells, which lack DNA polymerase η, DNA polymerase t causes the very high frequency and unique spectrum of UV-induced mutations. Cancer Res 2007; 67:3018-3026.
105. Wang M, Devereux TR, Vikis HG, et al. Pol i is a candidate for the mouse pulmonary adenoma resistance 2 locus, a major modifier of chemically induced lung neoplasia. Cancer Res 2004; 64:1924-1931.
106. Bemark M, Khamlichi AA, Davies SL, Neuberger MS. Disruption of mouse polymerase zeta (Rev3) leads to embryonic lethality and impairs blastocyst development in vitro. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1213-1216.
107. Esposito G, Godindagger I, Klein U, et al. Disruption of the Rev31-encoded catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta in mice results in early embryonic lethality. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1221-1224.
108. Wittschieben J, Shivji MK, Lalani E, et al. Disruption of the developmentally regulated Rev31 gene causes embryonic lethality. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1217-1220.
109. Wittschieben JP, Reshmi SC, Gollin SM, Wood RD. Loss of DNA polymerase ζ causes chromosomal instability in mammalian cells. Cancer Res 2006; 66:134-142.
110. Haracska L, Acharya N, Unk I, et al. A single domain in human DNA polymerase t mediates interaction with PCNA: implications for translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:1183-1190.
111. Haracska L, Johnson RE, Unk I, et al. Physical and functional interactions of human DNA polymerase η with PCNA. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:7199-7206.
112. Haracska L, Unk I, Johnson RE, et al. Stimulation of DNA synthesis activity of human DNA polymerase K by PCNA. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:784-791.
113. Kannouche PL, Lehmann AR. Ubiquitination of PCNA and the polymerase switch in human cells. Cell Cycle 2004; 3:1011-1013.
114. Masuda Y, Kamiya K. Role of single-stranded DNA in targeting REVl to primer termini. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:24314-24321.
115. Loeb LA. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1991; 51:3075-3079.
116. Zheng L, Dai H, Zhou M, et al. Fen1 mutations result in autoimmunity, chronic inflammation and cancers. Nat Med 2007; 13:812-819.
117. Bohr VA, Ottersen OP, Tonjum T. Genome instability and DNA repair in brain, ageing and neurological disease. Neuroscience 2007; 145:1183-1186.
118. DePamphilis ML. DNA replication and human disease. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2006.
119. Doublie S, Tabor S, Long AM, Richardson CC, Ellenberger T. Crystal structure of a bacteriophage T7 DNA replication complex at 2.2 Å resolution. Nature 1998; 391:251-258.
120. Pursell ZF, Isoz I, Lundstrom E-B, Johansson E, Kunkel TA. Yeast DNA polymerase ε participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science 2007; 317:127-130.
121. Garg P, Stith CM, Sabouri N, Johansson E, Burgers PM. Idling by DNA polymerase δ maintains a ligatable nick during laggingstrand DNA replication. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2764-2773.
122. Jin YH, Obert R, Burgers PM, et al. The 3′→5′ exonuclease of DNA polymerase δ can substitute for the 5′ flap endonuclease Rad27/Fen1 in processing Okazaki fragments and preventing genome instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:5122-5127.
123. Jin YH, Ayyagari R, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA, Burgers PM. Okazaki fragment maturation in yeast. II. Cooperation between the polymerase and 3′→5′-exonuclease activities of pol δ in the creation of a ligatable nick. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:1626-1633.
124. Ling H, Boudsocq F, Woodgate R, Yang W. Crystal structure of a Y-family DNA polymerase in action: a mechanism for error-prone and lesion-bypass replication. Cell 2001; 107:91-102.
125. Bebenek K, Kunkel TA. Analyzing fidelity of DNA polymerases. Methods Enzymol 1995; 262:217-232.
126. Longley MJ, Nguyen D, Kunkel TA, Copeland WC. The fidelity of human DNA polymerase y with and without exonucleolytic proofreading and the p55 accessory subunit. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:38555-38562.
127. Kunkel TA, Hamatake RK, Motto-Fox J, Fitzgerald MP, Sugino A. Fidelity of DNA polymerase I and the DNA polymerase I-DNA primase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1989; 9:4447-4458.
128. Shcherbakova PV, Pavlov YI, Chilkova O, et al. Unique error signature of the four-subunit yeast DNA polymerase ε. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:43770-43780.
129. Fortune JM, Pavlov YI, Welch CM, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase δ: high fidelity for base substitutions but lower fidelity for single- and multi-base deletions. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:29980-29987.
130. Matsuda T, Bebenek K, Masutani C, et al. Errorrate and specificity of human and murine DNA polymerase η. J Mol Biol 2001; 312:335-346.
131. Ohashi E, Bebenek K, Matsuda T, et al. Fidelity and processivity of DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase κ, the product of the human DINB1 gene. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:39678-39684.