The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 323-352

  Winke, Paula M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874195247     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263112000903     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acqusition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
2. Barcroft, J. (2003). Distinctiveness and bidirectional effects in input enhancement for vocabulary learning. Applied Language Learning, 13, 47-73.
3. Bowles, M. A. (2003). The effects of textual input enhancement on language learning: An online/offl ine study of fourth-semester Spanish students. In P. Kempchinsky & C.-E. Piñeros (Eds.), Theory, pratice, and acqusition: Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acqusition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 395-411). Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Press.
4. Bowles, M. A. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. London : Routledge.
5. Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. Modern Language Journal, 79, 179-193.
6. Carrell, P. L. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33, 183-207.
7. Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
8. Combs, C. (2008). Topic familiarity and input enhancement: An empirical investigation. Teachers College, Columbia University, Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 8, 1-51.
9. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. New York : Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/CADRE-EN.asp
10. DeKeyser, R., & Juffs, A. (2005). Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 437-454). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
11. De Santis, P. (2008). Text enhancement and the acquisition of English verbal infl ection-s by L1 Haitian Creole speakers. Applied Language Learning, 18, 27-49.
12. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acqusition (pp. 197-261). New York : Cambridge University Press.
13. Ehrenstein, W. H., Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen, B. E., & Jaschinski, W. (2005). Eye preference within the context of binocular functions. Albrecht von Graæes Archiv für Ophthalmologie, 243, 926-932. (Pubitemid 41386718)
14. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100-121.
15. Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2009). Orthography and the development of reading processes: An eye-movement study of Chinese and English. Child Development, 80, 720-735.
16. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (1999). Visual attention: The active vision perspective. In M. Jenkens & L. Harris (Eds.), Vision and attention (pp. 83-103). New York : Springer Verlag.
17. Gascoigne, C. (2006). Explicit input enhancement: Effects on target and non-target aspects of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 551-564.
18. Gass, S. (1984). A review of interlanguage syntax: Language transfer and language universals. Language Learning, 34 (2), 115-131.
19. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
20. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). London : Routledge.
21. Godfroid, A., Housen, A., & Boers, F. (2010). A procedure for testing the Noticing Hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 169-197). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
22. Hama, M., & Leow, R. P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisted: Extending Williams (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 465-491.
23. Han, Z., Park, E. S., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguisitics, 29, 597-618.
24. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
25. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
26. Izumi, S. (2003). Visual input enhancement as focus on form. Sophia Linguistica, 51, 1-30.
27. Jensen, E. D., & Vinther, T. (2003). Exact repetition as input enhancement in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 53, 373-428. (Pubitemid 37110268)
28. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 183-216). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
29. Kajii, N., Nazir, T. A., & Osaka, N. (2001). Eye movement control in reading unspaced text: The case of the Japanese script. Vision Research, 41, 2503-2510. (Pubitemid 32718650)
30. Kazandjian, S., Cavezian, C., Zivotofsky, A. Z., & Chokron, S. (2010). Bisections in two languages: When number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact. Neuropsychologia, 48, 4031-4037.
31. Kim, Y. (2006). Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 341-373.
32. Kroll, B. (1977). Combining ideas in written and spoken English: A look at subordination and coordination. In E. O. Keenan & T. L. Bennett (Eds.), Discourse across time and space. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 5 (pp. 69-109). Los Angeles : University of Southern California.
33. Lee, S.-K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87-118.
34. Lee, S.-K., & Huang, H.-T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A metaanalytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307-331.
35. Leeman, J., Areagoitia, I., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217-258). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
36. Leow, R. P. (1997 a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467-505.
37. Leow, R. P. (1997 b). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
38. Leow, R. P. (1999). The role of attention in second/foreign language classroom research: Methodological issues. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 60-70). Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Press.
39. Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557-584.
40. Leow, R. P. (2001 a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51, 113-155. (Pubitemid 33281956)
41. Leow, R. P. (2001 b). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offl ine study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496-509.
42. Leow, R. P. (2007). Input in the L2 classroom: An attentional perspective on receptive practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp. 21-50). New York : Cambridge University Press.
43. Leow, R. P., Egi, T., Nuevo, A. M., & Tsai, Y.-C. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13, 93-108.
44. Leow, R. P., Johnson, E., & Zárate-Sández, G. (2011). Getting a grip on the slippery construct of awareness: Toward a fi ner-grained methodological perpsective. In C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (Eds.), Explicit language learning (pp. 61-72). Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
45. Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 33-55.
46. Long, M. (2000). Acquisition and teaching. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 5-7). London : Routledge.
47. Martínez-Flor, A., & Soler, E. A. (2007). Developing pragmatic awareness of suggestions in the EFL classroom: A focus on instructional effects. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 47-76.
48. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fi xations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
49. Overstreet, M. H. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguisitics, 2, 229-258.
50. Park, E. S. (2004). Constraints of implicit focus on form: Insights from a study of input enhancement. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 1-30.
51. Peters, E. (2007). Manipulating L2 learners' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 11, 36-58.
52. Peters, E., Hulstijn, J. H., Sercu, L., & Lutjeharms, M. (2009). Learning L2 German vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language Learning, 59, 113-151.
53. Pilot detained after siege. (1998, July 30). Daily News, p. 6. Retrieved from http://news. google.com/
54. Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 499-508.
55. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1-56. (Pubitemid 41724346)
56. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422. (Pubitemid 128461792)
57. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
58. Rayner, K., Shen, D., Bai, X., & Yan, G. (Eds.). (2009). Cognitive and cultural infl uences on eye movements. New York : Psychology Press.
59. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411. (Pubitemid 29502249)
60. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
61. Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1-21.
62. Reinders, H., & Cho, M. Y. (2010). Extensive listening practice and input enhancement using mobile phones: Encouraging out-of-class learning with mobile phones. TESL-EJ, 14 (2), 1-7.
63. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
64. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
65. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). Oxford : Blackwell.
66. Robinson, P., Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & Schmidt, R. W. (2012). Attention and awareness in second language acqusition. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). London : Routledge.
67. Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004). Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269-292. (Pubitemid 38808981)
68. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
69. Rott, S. (2007). The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57, 165-199.
70. Sachs, R., & Suh, B.-R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
71. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
72. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
73. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
74. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York : Cambridge University Press.
75. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fl uency. London : Routledge.
76. Selinker, L., Kim, D.-E., & Bandi-Rao, S. (2004). Linguistic structure with processing in second language research: Is a "Unifi ed Theory" possible? Second Language Research, 20, 77-94.
77. Sharmin, S., Špakov, O., & Räihä, K.-J. (2012). The effect of different text presentation formats on eye movement metrics in reading. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5, 1-9.
78. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
79. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acqusition, 15, 165-179.
80. Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input to intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
81. Shrestha, S., & Owens, J. W. (2009, April). Eye movement analysis of text-based web page layouts. Usability News, 11 (1). Retrieved from http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/111/eyetracking.asp
82. Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37, 124-135.
83. Sutton, C. J. (2009). How form is enhanced in the input of introductory Spanish textbooks: The case of ser and estar (Unpublished master's thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
84. Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
85. Truscott, J., & Sharwood Smith, M. (2011). Input, intake, and consciousness: The quest for a theoretical foundation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 497-528.
86. VanPatten, B. (1989). Can learners attend to form and content while processing input? Hispania, 72, 409-417.
87. Vitu, F., Kapoula, Z., Lancelin, D., & Lavigne, F. (2004). Eye movements in reading isolated words: Evidence for strong biases towards the center of the screen. Vision Research, 44, 321-338. (Pubitemid 37464831)
88. Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1-48.
89. Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269-304. (Pubitemid 43308397)
90. Wong, W. (2003). Textual enhancement and simplifi ed input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13, 17-46.
91. Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705-725.