Exact Repetition as Input Enhancement in Second Language Acquisition

Language Learning

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 373-428

  Jensen, Eva Dam ^a   Vinther, Thora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042379562     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00230     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abraham, R. G., & Van, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two language learners: A case study. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 85-102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Altman, R. (1989). The video connection: Integrating video into language teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
5. Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575-589.
6. Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245-261). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
7. Carroll, J. (1965). The prediction of success in foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training, research and education (pp. 87-136). New York: Wiley.
8. Carroll, J. (1977). Characteristics of successful second language learners. In M. Burt, H. Dulay, & M. Finnochiaro (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language in honor of James E. Alatis (pp. 1-7). New York: Regents.
9. Carroll, S. E. (1999). Putting "input" in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337-388.
10. Cervantes, R. (1983). Say it again, Sam: The effect of repetition on dictation scores. Unpublished term paper, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
11. Chaudron, C. (1985). Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners' processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 1-14.
12. Chaudron, C. (in press). Elicited imitation: Second language & first language applications. University of Hawai'i.
13. Cooper, R., Lavery, M., & Rinvolucri, M. (1991). VIDEO. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Corder, P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-169.
15. Derwing, T. M. (1990). Speech rate is no simple matter. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 303-313.
16. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Eisenstein, M., Bailey, N., & Madden, C. (1982). It takes two: Contrasting tasks and contrasting structures. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 381-393.
18. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19. Færch, C., Haastrup, K., & Phillipson, R. (1984). Learner language and language learning. Copenhagen, Denmark: Gyldendal.
20. Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257-274.
21. Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
22. Gass, S. (1997) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549-581.
24. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
25. Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, England: Erlbaum.
26. Goldman Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.
27. Griffiths, R. T. (1990). Speech rate and NNS comprehension: A preliminary study in time-benefit analysis. Language Learning, 40, 311-336.
28. Griffiths, R. T. (1992). Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 385-390.
29. Grosjean, F., & Deschamps, A. (1972). Analyse des variables temporelles du francais spontané [Analysis of temporal variables in spontaneous French]. Phonetica, 26, 129-156.
30. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401-435). Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.
31. Hatch, E. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
33. Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fernow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.
34. Jensen, E. D. (1998). Video didactics and the acquisition of a foreign language. In D. Albrechtsen, B. Henriksen, I. M. Mees, & E. Poulsen (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign and second language pedagogy (pp. 252-265). Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press.
35. Jensen, E. D., Bønløkke, I., Davidsen-Nielsen, H., & Gámiz, S. (2000). Hundrede danske og spanske informanters dagbøger [The diaries of one hundred Danish and Spanish informants]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Romansk Institut.
36. Jensen, E. D., & Vinther, T. (1985). El Camello, Bog, Hæfte [Video]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Gylendal.
37. Jensen, E. D., & Vinther, T. (2003). Enredos interactivos. Madrid, Spain: Edinumen.
38. Kelch, K. (1985). Modified input as an aid to comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 81-90.
39. Krashen, S. (1980). The input hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (pp. 165-180). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
40. Krashen, S. (1983). Newmark's "ignorance hypothesis" and current second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer and language learning (pp. 135-153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
41. Leow, R. (1997). Attention, awareness and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467-505.
42. Lightbown, P. M. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Long, M. (1980). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
44. Long, M. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 177-193.
45. Long, M. (1996), The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46. Long, M., & Ross, S. (1992). Modifications that preserve language and content. In M. L. Tikoo (Ed.), Anthology Series: Vol. 31. Simplification: Theory and applications (pp. 29-52). Singapore: SAMEO Regional Language Center.
47. Lust, B., Chien, Y., & Flynn, S. (1987). What children know: Methods for the study of first language acquisition. In B. Lust (Ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora (Vol. 2, pp. 271-356). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
48. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
49. Munnich, E., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 227-243). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
50. Naiman, N. (1974.). The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 2, 1-37.
51. Naiman, N., Frölich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). Research in education series: Vol. 7. The good language learner. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
52. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
53. Pienemann, M. (1988). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. AILA Review, 5, 40-72.
54. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 83-113.
55. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the "noticing hypothesis." Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
56. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
57. Ross, S., Long, M. H., & Yano, Y. (1991). Simplification or elaboration? The effects of two types of text modifications on foreign language reading comprehension. University of Hawai'i Working Papers, 10, 1-32.
58. Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 437-442.
59. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
60. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
61. Schweickert, R., & Boruff, B. (1986). Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 419-425.
62. Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension vs. acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7, 239-256.
63. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
64. Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183, 482-488.
65. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
66. Swain, M., & S. Lapkin. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 370-391.
67. Sweet, H. (1899). The practical study of languages: A guide for teachers and learners. London: Dent.
68. VanPatten, B. (1985). Communicative value and information processing in second language acquisition. In E. Judd, P. Nelson, & D. Messerschmitt (Eds.), On TESOL '84: A brave new world (pp. 88-99). Washington, DC: TESOL.
69. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
70. VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755-803.
71. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77, 45-57.
72. Vinther, T. (1999). Algunas características temporales del español: Esbozo pausológico [Some temporal characteristics of Spanish: A pausological outline]. In H. P. Lund (Ed.), La langue, les signes et les êtres: Actes du colloque de l'Institut d'Etudes Romanes de l'Université de Copenhague, le 3 octobre 1998 (pp. 79-88). Copenhagen, Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press.
73. Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 54-73.
74. White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-110.
75. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.
76. Willis, J. (1985). Television English. London: BBC English.
77. Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). Negotiation in context: A review of research. In J. Lantolf & A. Labarca (Eds.), Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom (pp. 213-223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.