Cognitive considerations in L2 learning

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 437-454

  DeKeyser, Robert ^a   Juffs, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551639813     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-36     Document Type: Chapter

References (177)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 3-27.
2. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. W. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawai Press.
3. Andrade, J. (Ed.). (2001). Working memory in perspective. New York: Psychology Press.
4. Baddeley, A. (2000). Short-term and working memory. In E. Tulving & F. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 77-92). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Beck, M.-L. (1998). L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20,311-348.
6. Becker, J. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. In R. C. Schank & B. Nash-Webber (Eds.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 38-41). Cambridge, UK: ACL Workshop.
7. Berquist, B. (1997). Individual differences in working memory span and L2 proficiency: Capacity or processing capacity? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the GALA '97 Conference on Language Acquisition, Edinburgh, UK.
8. Bialystok, E. (1979). Explicit and implicit judgements of L2 grammaticality. Language Learning, 29, 81-103.
9. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 161-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Birdsong, D. (2001). Comprehensive nativelikeness in second language acquisition. Unpublished ms., University of Texas-Austin.
11. Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (2002). Working memory and connectionist parsers: A reply. Psychological Review, 109, 66-74.
13. Carpenter, P., Just, M. A., & Reichle, E. D. (2000). Working memory and executive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 195-199.
14. Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
15. Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
16. Celce-Murcia, M. (1997). Direct approaches to L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching? TESOL Quarterly, 31,141-152.
17. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
18. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Cochran, B. P., McDonald, J. L., & Parault, S. J. (1999). Too smart for their own good: The disadvantage of a superior processing capacity for adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 30-58.
20. Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E. B., Porteus, A. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude. Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Crain, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. (1999). An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
22. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19,450-466.
23. Deary, I. J. (2001). Human intelligence differences: Towards a combined experimental-differential approach. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(4), 164-170.
24. de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 249-276.
25. de Groot, A. M. B., & Poot, R. (1997). Word translation at three levels of proficiency: The ubiquitous involvement of conceptual memory. Language Learning, 47,215-264.
26. DeKeyser, R. M. (1990a). From learning to acquisition? Monitoring in the classroom and abroad. Hispania, 73, 238-247.
27. DeKeyser, R. M. (1990b). Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 104-119). Lexington, MA: Heath.
28. DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379-410.
29. DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195-221.
30. DeKeyser, R. M. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499-533.
32. DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. pp. 313-348. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34. DeKeyser, R. M., & Larson-Hall, J. (in press). What does the critical period really mean? In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., & Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task. Psychological Science, 9(1), 1-7.
36. Dornyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. pp. 589-630. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
38. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Duffield, N., & White, L. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of L2 clitic placement. Second Language Research, 15,133-160.
40. Dulany, D., Carlson, R., & Dewey, G. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
41. Ellis, N. C. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289-318.
42. Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in second language acquisition, 18, 91-126.
43. Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188.
44. Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 297-339.
45. Ellis, R. (1990). A response to Gregg. Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 364-383.
46. Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 91-113.
47. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 223-236.
49. Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71-99.
50. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Eubank, L., & Juffs, A. (2000). Recent research on the acquisition of L2 competence: Morphosyntax and argument structure. In L. Cheng & R. Sybesma (Eds.), The first GLOT international state-of-the-art book: The latest in linguistics (pp. 131-170). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
52. Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German wh- questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250-272.
53. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Fodor, J. D. (1998). Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, (29), 1-36.
56. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-323.
57. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 215-247.
58. French, R. M., & Cleeremans, A. (Eds.). (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical, and computational consensus in the making. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
59. Fortkamp, M. B. M. (1999). Working memory capacity and elements of L2 speech production. Communication and Cognition, 32, 259-295.
60. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1983). Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
61. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1992). Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
62. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Gibson, E., & Wexler, K. (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 25 (3), 407-454.
64. Gold, E. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 16, 447-474.
65. Goldowsky, B. N., & Newport, E. L. (1993). Modeling the effects of processing limitations on the acquisition of morphology: The less is more hypothesis. In E. Clark (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 24th Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 124-138). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
66. Green, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168-184.
67. Gregg, K. (1990). The variable competence model of second language acquisition and why it isn't. Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 364-383.
68. Gregg, K. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 50-84). New York: Academic Press.
69. Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 251-266.
70. Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (2002). Why aggregated learning follows the power law of practice when individual learning does not: Comment on Rickard (1997, 1999), Delaney et al. (1998), and Palmeri (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 392-406.
71. Hakuta, K. (2001). A critical period for second language acquisition? In D. Bailey, J. Bruer, F. Symons, & J. Lichtman (Eds.), Critical thinking about critical periods (pp. 193-205). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
72. Hall, C. (1995). Formal linguistics and mental representation: Psycholinguistic contributions to the identification and explanation of morphological and syntactic competence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10,169-187.
73. Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(3), 379-400.
74. Harley, B., & Hart, D. (2002). Age, aptitude, and second language learning on a bilingual exchange. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 301-330). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
75. Harrington, M. W. (1987). Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 351-377.
76. Harrington, M. W., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skills. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 25-38.
77. Harrington, M. W. (2001). Sentence processing. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction(pp. 91-124). New York: Cambridge University Press.
78. Hawkins, R. (2001). The theoretical significance of universal grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 21, 345-367.
79. Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The 'failed functional features in hypothesis' [sic]. Second Language Research, 13,187-227.
80. Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of meta-linguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(3), 347-386.
81. Hulstijn, J., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23-43.
82. Hunt, E. (1999). Intelligence and human resources: Past, present, and future. In P. Ackerman, P. Kyllonen, & R. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences. Process, trait, and content determinants. (pp. 3-30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83. Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in second language acquisition. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539-588). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
84. Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
85. Jackendoff, R. S. (2002). Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
86. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-99.
87. Juffs, A. (1996). Learnability and the lexicon: Theories and second language acquisition research. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
88. Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb s.v. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48,107-147.
89. Juffs, A. (2000, March 11-14). Working memory and L1 influences in ambiguity resolution in L2 English sentence processing. American Association of Applied Linguistics Annual Meeting.
90. Juffs, A. (2001). Formal linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 87-103). New York: Oxford University Press.
91. Juffs, A. (2002, April 6-9). Working memory as a variable in accounting for individual differences in second language performance. American Association of Applied Linguistics Annual Meeting.
92. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. W. (1995). Parsing effects in L2 sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh- extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483-516.
93. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. W. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing research. Language Learning, 46, 286-324.
94. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P., & Keller, T. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. The Psychological Review, 103, 773-780.
95. Just, M. A., & Varma, S. (2002). A hybrid architecture for working memory: Reply to MacDonald and Christianson 2002. Psychological Review, 109, 55-65.
96. Kellerman, E., & Perdue, C. (Eds) (1992). Special issue in crosslinguistic influence. Second Language Research, 8(3).
97. Kellerman, E., & Sharwood-Smith, M. (Eds.). (1986). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.
98. Kersten, A. W., & Earles, J. L. (2001). Less really is more for adults learning a miniature artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 44,250-273.
99. Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K.-M., & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388,171-174.
100. Kinder, A., & Assmann, A. (2000). Learning artificial grammars: No evidence for the acquisition of rules. Memory and cognition, 28(8), 1321-1332.
101. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
102. Krashen, S. D. (1999). Seeking a role for grammar: A review of some recent studies. Foreign Language Annals, 32(2), 245-257.
103. Krashen, S. D., & Pon, P. (1975). An error analysis of an advanced ESL learner. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 7,125-129.
104. Kroll, J., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18,137-171.
105. Leow, R. P. (1998). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) fine-grained analysis of attention. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 133-159.
106. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
107. Macrory, G., & Stone, V. (2000). Pupil progress in the acquisition of the perfect tense in French: The relationship between knowledge and use. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 55-82.
108. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter 1992 and Waters and Caplan 1996. Psychological Review, 109, 35-54.
109. Mackey, A., Philip, J., Egi, T., Fuji, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
110. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the competition model. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 113-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
111. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
112. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83-108
113. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Mechanisms of working memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
114. Montrul, S. (1999). Causative errors with unaccusative verbs in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, (15), 191-219.
115. Montrul, S. (2001). First language constrained variability in argument structure changing morphology with causative verbs. Second Language Research, 17,144-194.
116. Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 48, 323-364.
117. Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 49-80.
118. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
119. Newman, A. J., Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Jezzard, P., & Neville, H. J. (2002). A critical period for right hemisphere recruitment in American Sign Language processing. Nature Neuroscience, 5(1), 76-80.
120. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
121. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51 (Supplement 1), 157-213.
122. O'Grady, W. (1999). Toward a new nativism. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 621-633.
123. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 109-148.
124. Palmeri, T. J. (1999). Theories of automaticity and the power law of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 543-551.
125. Paulston, C. B., & Bruder, M. N. (1976). Teaching English as a second language: Techniques and procedures. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
126. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(3), 264-275.
127. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
128. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
129. Ranta, L. (2002). The role of learners' language-analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 159-179). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
130. Reber, A. (1976). Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 88-94.
131. Reber, A., Kassin, S., Lewis, S., & Cantor, G. (1980). On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 492-502.
132. Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 123-138.
133. Reed, J. M., & Johnson, P. J. (1998). Implicit learning. Methodological issues and evidence of unique characteristics. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 261-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
134. Renou, J. M. (2000). Learner accuracy and learner performance: The quest for a link. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 168-180.
135. Rickard, T. C. (1997). Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(3), 288-311.
136. Rickard, T. C. (1999). A CMPL alternative account of practice effects in numerosity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 532-542.
137. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 27-67.
138. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 223-247.
139. Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2002a). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
140. Robinson, P. (2002b). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes, and SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 113-133). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
141. Robinson, P. (2002c). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude, and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield, and Hernstadt (1991). In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211-265). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
142. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J., Nosellt, T., & Munte, T. (2002). Brain potential and functional fRMI evidence for how two languages handle one brain. Nature, 415(February), 1026-1029.
143. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511-556.
144. Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319-353). New York: Cambridge University Press.
145. Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a proposed universal. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 73-88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
146. Schachter, J., & Yip, V. (1990). Grammaticality judgments: Why does anyone object to subject extraction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 379-392.
147. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
148. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
149. Schwartz, B. (1999). Lefis make up your mind: Special 'nativist' perspectives on language, modularity of mind, and non-native language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 635-656.
150. Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1994). Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317-368). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
151. Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (2000). When syntactic theories evolve: Consequences for L2 acquisition research. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156-186). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
152. Scott, V. M. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 14-22.
153. Scott, V. M. (1990). Explicit and implicit grammar teaching strategies: New empirical data. The French Review, 63(5), 779-789.
154. Segalowitz, N. (1997). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism. Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 85-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
155. Shanks, D. R., Johnstone, T., & Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(1), 216-252.
156. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
157. Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69-93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
158. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211.
159. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120.
160. Sorace, A. (2000). Syntactic optionality in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research,16, 93-102.
161. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73-87.
162. Tarone, E. E. (1990). On variation in interlanguage: A response to Gregg. Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 392-400.
163. Tarone, E. E. (2002). Frequency effects, noticing, and creativity: Factors in a variationist interlanguage framework. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 287-296.
164. Tulving, E., & Craik, F. (Eds.). (2000). The Oxford handbook of memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
165. Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4,105-122.
166. von Elek, T., & Oskarsson, M. (1973). A replication study in teaching foreign language grammar to adults (Research Bulletin No. 16). Gothenburg School of Education.
167. Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Schriefers, H., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic parsing and working memory: The effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 65-103.
168. Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences. Memory and Cognition, (24), 342-355.
169. Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1999). Functional neural subsystems are differentially affected by delays in second language immersion: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilinguals. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 23-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
170. Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8,231-256.
171. Wesche, M. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learner problems. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119-154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
172. Williams, J. N., Mobius, P., & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh- questions: parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics,22, 509-540.
173. Wood, D. (2001). In search of fluency: What is it and how can we teach it? Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 573-589.
174. Wolfe-Quintero, K. (1996). Nativism does not equal universal grammar. Second Language Research, 12(4), 335-373.
175. Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication, 20,1-28.
176. Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Robbins, M., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Effects of word class differences on L2 pronunciation accuracy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 283-299.
177. Young-Scholten, M., & Archibald, J. (2000). Second language syllable structure. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 64-102). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.