Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 541-577

  Izumi, Shinichi ^a  

^a SOPHIA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85137101105     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263102004023     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawai?i Press.
2. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 77-117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brett, P. (1994). Using text reconstruction software. ELT Journal, 48, 329-336.
4. Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journalof VerbalLearning and VerbalBehavior, 11, 671-684.
5. Doughty, C. (1988). The effect of instruction on the acquisition of relativization in English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
6. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
7. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Farris, M. (1993). Libra: An authoring environment for multimedia lessons on the Macintosh (Version 1.1) [Computer software]. San Marcos, TX: Division of Media Services, Southwest Texas State University.
12. Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In M. Hynes & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL ?81: Selected papers from the 15th annualconference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC: TESOL.
13. Graf, P. (1994). Explicit and implicit memory: A decade of research. Attention and Performance, 15, 681-696.
14. Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible but not necessarily more retrievable. Journalof VerbalLearning and VerbalBehavior, 23, 553-568.
15. Graf, P., & Schacter, D. (1989). Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journalof ExperimentalPsychol ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 930-940.
16. Hyltenstam, K. (1984). The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 39-58). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
17. Izumi, S. (2000). Promoting noticing and SLA: An empiricalstudy of the effects of output and input enhancement on ESL relativization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
18. Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
19. Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.
20. Jourdenais, R. (1998). The effects of textualenhancement on the acquisition of the Spanish preterit and imperfect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
21. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 183-216). Honolulu: University of Hawai?i Press.
22. Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
23. Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303-342.
24. Kramer, S., & Rosenthal, R. (1999). Effect sizes and significance levels in small-sample research. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statisticalstrategies for smallsampl e research (pp. 59-79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
26. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
27. Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers? comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
28. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
30. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
32. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249-308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
35. Nelson, K. (1987). Some observations from the perspective of the rare event cognitive comparison theory of language acquisition. In K. E. Nelson & A. van Kleek (Eds.), Children?s language (Vol. 6, pp. 289-331). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 13, 417-528.
37. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214.
38. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
39. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
40. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
41. Roth, F. (1984). Accelerating language learning in young children. Journalof Child Language, 11, 89-107.
42. Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 274-282.
43. Saxton, M. (1997a). The contrast theory of negative input. Journalof Child Language, 24, 139-161.
44. Saxton, M. (1997b). Negative evidence and negative feedback: Immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. Unpublished manuscript, University of London.
45. Schachter, J. (1998). Recent research in language learning studies: Promises and problems. Language Learning, 48, 557-583.
46. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 206-226.
47. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawai?i Press.
48. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
50. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
51. Shook, D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-To-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
52. Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375-405). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83, 1-22.
54. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
55. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren?t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
56. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seildlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
59. Tavakolian, S. (1981). The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In S. Tavakolian (Ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 167-187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Thornbury, S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote "noticing." ELT Journal, 5, 326-335.
61. Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
62. Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-203.
63. Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14, 103-135.
64. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Westport, CT: Ablex.
65. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners? attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Wickens, C. D. (1989). Attention and skilled performance. In D. H. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 71-105). New York: Wiley and Sons.
67. Williams, J. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1-48