The effect of different text presentation formats on eye movement metrics in reading

Journal of Eye Movement Research

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Sharmin, Selina ^a   Špakov, Oleg ^a   Räihä, Kari Jouko ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Fixation count; Fixation duration; Reading; Regressions; Text presentation format

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879365477     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19958692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bernard, M., Chaparro, B. S., & Russell, M. C. (2001). Examining automatic text presentation for small screens. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting. Minneapolis, Minnesota, 637-639.
2. Chen, H. C. & Tsoi, K. C. (1988). Factors affecting the readability of moving text on a computer display. Human Factors, 30, 25-33.
3. Chien, Y.-H. & Chen, C.-H. (2007). The use of dynamic display to improve reading comprehension for the small screen of a wrist watch. In: Proceedings of HCI International 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4557. Beijing, China, 814-823.
4. Dillon, A., Richardson, J., & McKnight, C. (1990). The effect of display size and paragraph splitting on reading lengthy text from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 9 (3), 215-227.
5. Juola, J. F., Tiritoglu, A., & Pleunis, J. (1995). Reading text presented on a small display. Applied Ergonomics, 26, 227-229.
6. Juola, J. F., Ward, N. J., & McNamara, T. (1982). Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 208-227.
7. Kang, T. J. & Muter, P. (1989). Reading dynamically displayed text. Behaviour & Information Technology, 8 (1), 33-42.
8. Lin, Y.-C. & Shieh, K.-K. (2006). Reading a dynamic presentation of Chinese text on a single-line display. Displays, 27, 145-152.
9. Masson, M. E. J. (1983). Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory and Cognition, 11, 262-274.
10. Mills, C. B. & Weldon, L. J. (1985). Reading text from computer screens. Center for Automation Research, Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory, University of Maryland.
11. Mills, C. B. & Weldon, L. J. (1987). Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computing Surveys, 19 (4), 329-358.
12. Muter, P. (1996). Interface design and optimization of reading of continuous text. In: H. van Oostendorp and S. de Mul (editors), Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 161- 180.
13. Rahman, T. & Muter, P. (1999). Designing an interface to optimize reading with small display windows. Human Factors. 41(1), 106-117.
14. Rudnicky, A. I. & Kolers, P. A. (1984). Size and case of type as stimuli in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology in Human Perception and Performance, 10, 231-249.
15. Salvucci, D. D. & Goldberg, J. H. (2000). Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium (ETRA 00). Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 71-78.
16. Sanders, D. S. & Stern, J. A. (1980). Effects of text variables on eye movements in reading. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 15, 30-34.
17. Schwartz, E., Beldie, I., & Pastoor, S. (1983). A comparison of paging and scrolling for changing screen contents by inexperienced users. Human Factors, 25 (3), 279-282.
18. Sharmin, S., Špakov, O., Räihä, K.-J., & Jakobsen, A.L. (2008). Effects of time pressure and text complexity on translators' fixations. In: Proceedings of Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium (ETRA 08). Savannah, Georgia, 123-126.
19. Špakov, O. (2008). Gaze-to-Word mapping tool (GWM). Available at http://www.sis.uta.fi/~csolsp/projects.php.
20. Öquist, G. & Lundin, K. (2007). Eye movement study of reading text on a mobile phone using paging, scrolling, leading, and RSVP. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. Oulu, Finland, 176-183.
21. Öquist, G. & Goldstein, M. (2003). Towards an improved readability on mobile devices: Evaluating adaptive rapid serial visual presentation. Interacting with Computers, 15 (4), 539-558.