Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 597-618

  Han, Zhaohong ^a   Park, Eun Sung ^a   Combs, Charles ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349087802     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: 1477450X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amn010     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Alanen, R. 1995. 'Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition' in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Second Language Acquisition. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, pp. 259-99.
2. Allwright, D. 1984. 'Why don't learners learn what teachers teach? The Interaction Hypothesis' in D. M. Singleton and D. Little (eds): Language Learning in Formal and Informal Contexts. IRAAL, pp. 3-18.
3. Barcroft, J. 2003. 'Distinctiveness and bidirectional effects in input enhancement for vocabulary learning.' Applied Language Learning 13/2: 133-59.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and D. Reynolds. 1995. The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect,' TESOL Quarterly 2911: 109-31.
5. Barry, S. and A. Lazarte. 1995. 'Embedded clause effects on recall: Does high prior knowledge of content domain overcome syntactic complexity in students of Spanish?' The Modern Language Journal 79/4: 491-504.
6. Berent, G., R. Kelly, S. Aldersley, K. Schmitz, B. Khalsa, and J. Panara. 2007. 'Focus-on-form instructional methods promote deaf college students' improvement in English grammar,' Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 12/1: 8-24.
7. Bowles, M. 2003. 'The effects of textual input enhancement on language learning: An online/offline study of fourth-semester Spanish students' in P. Kempchinski and P. Pineros (eds): Theory, Practice, and Acquisition: Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish & Portuguese. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 359-411.
8. DeKeyser, R. 1994. 'How implicit can adult second language learning be?' AILA Review 11: 83-96.
9. Doughty, C. 1991. 'Second language instruction does make a difference,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431-69.
10. Doughty, C. 1998. 'Acquiring competence in a second language: Form and function' in H. Byrnes (ed.): Learning Foreign and Second Languages. New York: Modern Language Association, pp. 128-56.
11. Doughty, C. 2004. 'Effects of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research' in B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, and M. Overstreet (eds): Form-meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwata, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 181-202.
12. Færch, C. and G. Kasper. 1986. 'The role of comprehensible input in second-language acquisition,' Applied Linguistics 7/3: 257-73.
13. Gass, S. 1988. 'Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies,' Applied Linguistics 9: 198-217.
14. Greenslade, T., L. Bouden, and C. Sanz. 1999. 'Attention to form and content in processing L2 reading texts: A conceptual replication study of VanPatten 1991,' Spanish Applied Linguistics 3: 65-90.
15. Han, Z.-H. 2007. 'On the role of meaning in focus on form' in Z.-H. Han (ed.): Understanding Second Language Process. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 45-79.
16. Han, Z.-H. and S. Peverly. 2007.'Input processing: A study of ab initio learners with multilingual backgrounds.' The International Journal of Multilingualism 4/1: 17-37.
17. Hulstijn, J. 1997. 'Second language acquisition in the laboratory.' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19/2: 131-43.
18. Izumi, S. 2002. 'Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization.' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24/4: 541-77.
19. Jourdenais, R., M. Ota, S. Stauffer, B. Boyson, and C. Doughty. 1995. 'Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis' in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, pp. 182-209.
20. Kim, Y. 2006. 'Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as a foreign language.' TESOL Quarterly 40/2: 341-73.
21. Lee, S. 2007. 'Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form.' Language Learning 57/1: 87-118.
22. Leeman, J., I. Arteagoitia, B. Fridman, and C. Doughty. 1995. 'Integrating attention to form, with meaning: Focus on from in content-based Spanish instruction' in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (Technical Report #9), Honolulu: University of .Hawai'i Press, pp. 217-58.
23. Leeser, M. 2004. 'The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learners' comprehension and focus on form.' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26/4: 587-616.
24. Leow, R. 1997. 'The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition.' Applied Language Learning 82: 151-82.
25. Leow, R. 2001. 'Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2?: An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading.' Hispania 84: 496-509.
26. Leow, R., T. Egi, A. Nuevo, and Y. Tsai, 2003. 'The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake,' Applied Language Learning 13/2: 1-16.
27. Lightbown, P. 1991. 'What have we here? Some observations of the influence of instruction on L2 learning' in R. Phillopson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, and M. Swain (eds): Foreign Language Pedagogy Research: A Commemorative Volume for Claus Faerch. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 197-212.
28. Long, M. 1991. 'Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology' in K. de Bot, D. Coste, C. Kramsch, and R. Ginsberg (eds): Foreign Language Research in a Cross-cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 39-52.
29. Long, M. 2007. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 75-118.
30. Long, M. and P. Robinson. 1998. 'Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice' in C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16-41.
31. Lorch, R. 1989. 'Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes,' Educational Psychology Review 1: 209-34.
32. Mackey, A. and J. Goo. 2007. 'Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis' in A. Mackey (ed.): Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Series of Empirical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407-52.
33. Ortega, L. and G. Iberri-Shea. 2005. 'Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions,' Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 26-45.
34. Overstreet, M. 1998, 'Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention,' Spanish Applied Linguistics 2: 229-58.
35. Park, E. S. 2004. 'Constraints of implicit focus on form: Insights from a study of input enhancement,' Teachers College, Columbia University Working papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 42: Retrieved 7 September 2005, from http:// www.tc.edu/tesolalwebjournal/Park.pdf
36. Robinson, P. 1996. 'Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 27-67.
37. Robinson, P. 1997. 'Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 223-47.
38. Robinson, P. 2003. 'Attention and memory during SLA' in C. Doughty and M. Long (eds): The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 630-78.
39. Schmidt, R. 1990. 'The role of consciousness in second, language learning.' Applied Linguistics 11: 129-58.
40. Schmidt, R. 2001. 'Attention' in P. Robinson (ed.): Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-32.
41. Selinker, L. 1972. 'Interlanguage,' International Review of Applied Linguistics 10/2: 209-31.
42. Sharwood Smith, M. 1981. 'Consciousness-raising and second language acquisition theory,' Applied Linguistics 7/3: 239-56.
43. Sharwood Smith, M. 1986. 'Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input,' Applied Linguistics 7/3: 239-56.
44. Sharwood Smith, M. 1991. 'Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner,' Second Language Research 72: 118-32.
45. Sharwood Smith, M. 1993. 'Input enhancement in instructed SLA.' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 165-79.
46. Shook, D. 1994, 'FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon,' Applied Language Learning 52: 57-93.
47. Shook, D. 1999. 'What foreign language reading recalls reveal about the input-to-intake phenomenon,' Applied Language Learning 10/1&2: 39-76.
48. Skehan, P. 1996. 'A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction.' Applied Linguistics 17: 38-62.
49. Truscott, J. 1998. 'Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review.' Second Language Research 14/2: 103-35.
50. VanPatten, B. 1990. 'Attending to form and content in the input.' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 287-310.
51. VanPatten, B. 1991. 'Grammar instruction and input processing'. Paper presented at the The Special Colloquium on the Role of Grammar Instruction in Communicative Language Teaching, Concordia University and McGill University, Montreal.
52. VanPatten, B. 1996. Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53. VanPatten, B. 2004. Processing Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. White, J. 1998. 'Getting the learner's attention' in C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85-113.
55. White, L. 1991. 'Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom,' Second Language Research 72: 133-61.
56. Williams, J. 1999. 'Memory, attention, and inductive learning,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 211: 1-48.
57. Williams, J. and J. Evans. 1998. 'What kind of focus and on which forms?' in C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-55.
58. Wong, W. 2001. 'Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23/3: 345-68.
59. Wong, W. 2003. 'The effects of textual enhancement and simplified input on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form,' Applied Language Learning 14: 109-32.
60. Wong, W. 2005. Input Enhancement: From Theory and Research to the Classroom. San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill (Second Language Professional Series).