GENERALIZABILITY and AUTOMATICITY of SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING under IMPLICIT, INCIDENTAL, ENHANCED, and INSTRUCTED CONDITIONS

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 223-247

  Robinson, Peter ^a  

^a AOYAMA GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85137633365     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263197002052     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 259-302). University of Hawai?i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Blaxton, T. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-Appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 169-181.
4. Brooks, L. R. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 169-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249-276.
6. Decoo, W. (1996). The induction-deduction opposition: Ambiguities and complexities of the didactic reality. International Review of Applied Linguistics, XXXIV, 95-118.
7. DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
8. DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-222.
9. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
10. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (in press). Pedagogic choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Eckman, F., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1-20.
12. Ellis, N. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289-318.
13. Ellis, N. (1994). Implicit and explicit language learning: An overview. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of language (pp. 1-31). London: Academic Press.
14. Ellis, N. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Chunking, phonological memory, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 95-132.
15. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145-171.
16. Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of language (pp. 79-115). London: Academic Press.
17. Faerch, C. (1986). Rules of thumb and other teacher formulated rules in the foreign language classroom. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Learning, teaching, and communication in the foreign language classroom (pp. 65-79). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
18. Gregg, K. (1984). Krashen?s Monitor and Occam?s razor. Applied Linguistics, 5, 79-100.
19. Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
20. Harrington, M., & Robinson, P. (1997). Computerized instruction and the measurement of on-line processing. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Manuscript submitted.
21. Klapp, S. T., Boches, C. A., Trabert, M. L., & Logan, G. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic II: Are there practice effects after automaticity is acheived? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 196-209.
22. Knowlton, B., & Squire, L. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 79-91.
23. Knowlton, B., & Squire, L. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 169-181.
24. Kramer, A. F., Strayer, D. L., & Buckley, J. (1990). Development and transfer of automatic performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 505-522.
25. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
27. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Pergamon Press.
28. Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.
29. Krashen, S., & Terell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. New York: Pergamon Press.
30. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
31. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
32. Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 217-258). University of Hawai?i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
33. Logan, G. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
34. Logan, G. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1-35.
35. Logan, G. (1992). Shapes of reaction time distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 883-914.
36. Logan, G., & Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned in automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1022-1050.
37. Logan, G., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic problems I: Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 179-195.
38. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-141). New York: Newbury House.
39. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching. In K. de Bot., R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40. Long, M. H. (in press). Task-based language learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 134-156.
42. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (in press). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Mackey, A. (1995). Stepping up the pace: Input, interaction and interlanguage development-An empirical study of questions in ESL. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
44. Master, P. (1994). The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 229-252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Mazurkewich, I., & White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralization. Cognition, 16, 261-283.
46. McAndrews, M. P., & Moscovitch, M. (1985). Rule-based and exemplar-based classification in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 13, 469-475.
47. McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. S. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159-188.
48. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
49. McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135-157.
50. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS/NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-483.
51. Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393-419). London: Academic Press.
52. Perruchet, P. (1994). Defining the knowledge units of a synthetic language: Comment on Vokey and Brooks (1992). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 223-228.
53. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
54. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
57. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58. Robinson, P. (1995a). Aptitude, awareness and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 303-359). University of Hawai?i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
59. Robinson, P. (1995b). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99-140.
60. Robinson, P. (1995c). Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
61. Robinson, P. (1996a). Consciousness, rules, and instructed second language acquisition. New York: Peter Lang.
62. Robinson, P. (1996b). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rulesearch, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
63. Robinson, P. (1996c, August). Task complexity and focus on form: Is there a trade-off? Plenary address given at the symposium on Issues in Second Language Task Design and Assessment, MacQuarie University, Sydney, Australia.
64. Robinson, P. (Ed.). (1996d). Task complexity and second language syllabus design: Data-based studies and speculations. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
65. Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45-99.
66. Robinson, P., & Ha, M. (1993). Instance theory and second language rule learning under explicit conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 413-438.
67. Rothkopf, E. Z., & Dashen, M. L. (1995). Particularization: Inductive speeding of rule-governed decisions by narrow application of experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 469-487.
68. Schachter, J., Rounds, P., Wright, P. L., & Smith, T. (1996). Comparing conditions for learning syntactic patterns: Attentional, nonattentional and aware (Tech. Rep. No. 96-08). Eugene: Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Oregon.
69. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
70. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-387.
71. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
72. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 1-63). University of Hawai?i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
73. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language learning (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
74. Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
75. Schwartz, B. D., & Gubala-Ryzak, M. (1992). Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: Against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research, 8, 1-38.
76. Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 592-608.
77. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
78. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
79. Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-To-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
80. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for task-based approaches to instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 34-59.
81. Smith, E. E., & Sloman, S. A. (1994). Similarity-versus rule-based categorization. Memory & Cognition, 22, 377-386.
82. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.
83. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. (1990). An analysis of memory-based theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1061-1069.
84. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68-93.
85. Swain, M. (1991). French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 91-103). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
86. Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-204.
87. Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
88. Trahey, M., & White. L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-204.
89. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
90. Vokey, J., & Brooks, L. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 328-344.
91. Westney, P. (1994). Rules and pedagogical grammar. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 72-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.
93. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Dorken, M. D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 227-248.
94. Wickens, C. D. (1989). Attention and skilled performance. In D. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 71-105). New York: John Wiley.
95. Wolfe-Quintero, K. (1993). The dative alternation in English. University of Hawai?i Working Papers in ESL, 13, 39-48.
96. Zobl, H. (1995). Converging evidence for the acquisition/learning distinction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 35-57.