When does teamwork translate into improved team performance? a resource allocation perspective

Small Group Research

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 221-248

  Porter, Christopher O L H ^a   Gogus, Celile Itir ^b   Yu, Race Chien Feng ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Backing up behavior; Legitimacy of need; Performance monitoring; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950197136     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496409356319     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Allen, B.C., Sargent, L.D., & Bradley, L.M. (2003). Differential effects of task and reward interdependence on perceived helping behavior, effort, and group performance. Small Group Research, 34, 716-740.
3. Barnes, C.M., Hollenbeck, J.R., Wagner, D.T., DeRue, D.S., Nahrgang, J.D., & Schwind, K.M. (2008). Harmful help: The costs of backing-up behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 529-539.
4. Bowers, C.A., Braun, C.C., & Morgan, B.B. (1997). Team workload: Its meaning and measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 85-108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relationships among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavior sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. DeChurch, L.A., & Haas, C.D. (2008). Examining team planning through an episodic lens: Effects of deliberate, contingency, and reactive planning on team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 542-568.
8. Dickinson, T.L., & McIntyre, R.M. (1997). A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 19-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Glickman, A.S., Zimmer, S., Montero, R.S., Guerette, P.J., Morgan, B.B., & Salas, E. (1987). The evolution of teamwork skills: An empirical assessment with implications for training (NTSC Tech. Rep. No. TR-87-016). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
10. Hackman, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Hollenbeck, J.R., Moon, H., Ellis, A.P.J., West, B.J., Ilgen, D.R., Sheppard, L.,et al.(2002). Structural contingency theory and individual differences: Examination of external and internal person-team fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 599-606.
12. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P.L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
13. Katz-Navon, T.Y., & Erez, M. (2005). When collective- and self-efficacy affect team performance: The role of task interdependence. Small Group Research, 36, 437-465.
14. Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Bell, B.S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley.
15. Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Ilgen, D.R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Sciences in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
16. Liang, D.W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
17. Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
18. Marks, M.A., & Panzer, F.J. (2004). The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Human Performance, 17, 25-41.
19. Marks, M.A., Sabella, M.J., Burke, C.S., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.
20. Mathieu, J.E., Gilson, L.L., & Ruddy, T.M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 97-108.
21. Mathieu, J.E., Goodwin, G.F., Heffner, T.S., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
22. Mathieu, J.E., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
23. McGrath, J.E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. Krout, & C. C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. McIntyre, R.M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Lessons from complex environments. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations (pp. 9-45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Miller, D.L., Young, P., Kleinman, D., & Serfaty, D. (1998) Distributed dynamic decision-making simulation: Phase I. Release notes and user's manual. Woburn, MA: Aptima.
26. Mittleman, D., & Briggs, R.O. (1999). Communication technologies for traditional and virtual teams. In E. Sundstrom (Ed.), Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance (pp. 246-270). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Moreland, R.L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 117-133.
28. Morgan, B.B., Jr., Salas, E., & Glickman, A.S. (1993). An analysis of team evolution and maturation. Journal of General Psychology, 120, 277-291.
29. Porter, C.O.L.H. (2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 811-818.
30. Porter, C.O.L.H., Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., Ellis, A.P.J., West, B.J., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 391-403.
31. Schwartz, S.H., & Fleishman, J.A. (1978). Personal norms and the mediation of legitimacy effects on helping. Social Psychology, 41, 306-315.
32. Serfaty, D., Entin, E.E., & Johnston, J.H. (1998). Team coordination training. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 221-245). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
34. Tyler, T.R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.