Processing instruction: An update

Language Learning

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 755-803

  VanPatten, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036897495     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00203     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allen, L.Q. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative: An experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 69-84.
2. Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95-127.
3. Benati, A. (in press). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Buck, M. (2000). Procesamiento del lenguaje y adquisición de una segunda lengua. Un estudio de la adquisición de un punto gramatical en inglés por hispanohablantes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
5. Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. Modern Language Journal, 79, 179-193.
6. Carroll, S.E. (1999). Putting "input" in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337-388.
7. Cheng, A. (1995). Grammar instruction and input processing: The acquisition of Spanish ser and estar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
8. Collentine, J. (1998). Processing instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania, 81, 576-587.
9. Collentine, J. (in press). Development of subjunctive and complex-syntactic abilities among FL Spanish learners. In B. Lafford and R. Salaberry (Eds.), Studies in Spanish second language acquisition: The state of the science. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10. DeKeyser, R., & Sokalski, K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613-642.
11. Doughty, C., and Willliams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Ellis, R. (1998). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. Farley, A.P. (2001a). The effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5, 57-94.
14. Farley, A.P. (2001b). Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84, 289-299.
15. Gass, S.M. (1997). Input and interaction in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Jordens, P. (1996). Input and instruction in second language acquisition. In P. Jordens and J. Lalleman (Eds.), Investigating second language acquisition (pp. 407-449). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. MacDonald, J.L., & Heilenman, L.K. (1992). Changes in sentence processing as second language proficiency increases. In R.J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 325-336). New York: Elsevier Science.
19. Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
20. Paulston, C. (1972). Structural pattern drills: A classification. In H.B. Allen & R. Campbell (Eds.), Teaching English as a second language (pp. 129-138). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
22. Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 499-508.
23. Salaberry, M.R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 422-451.
24. Salaberry, M.R. (1998). On input processing, true language competence, and pedagogical bandwagons: A reply to Sanz and VanPatten. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 274-285.
25. Sanz, C. (1998). Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory, and production processes. In W.R. Glass and A.T. Perez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish (Vol. 2, pp. 41-56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
26. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2001). Must computers deliver explicit feedback? An empirical study. Unpublished manuscript.
27. Sanz, C., & VanPatten, B. (1998). On input processing, processing instruction, and the nature of replication tasks: A response to M. Rafael Salaberry. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 263-273.
28. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.
29. Sherwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement and instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
30. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
31. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. VanPatten, B. (1985). Communicative value and information processing in second language acquisition. In E. Judd, P. Nelson, & D. Messerschmitt (Eds.), On TESOL '84: A brave new world (pp. 88-99). Washington, DC: TESOL.
33. VanPatten, B. (1987). Classroom learners' acquisition of ser and estar: Accounting for developmental sequences. In. B. VanPatten, T.R. Dvorak, & J.F. Lee (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 61-75), Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
34. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
35. VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar instruction for the acquisition rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 433-450.
36. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. VanPatten, B. (2000a). Thirty years of input (or intake, the neglected sibling). In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M.E. Anderson, C.A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition (pp. 287-311). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
38. VanPatten, B. (2000b). Processing instruction as form-meaning connections: Issues in theory and research. In J.F. Lee and A. Valdman (Eds.), Form and meaning in language teaching (pp. 43-68). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
39. VanPatten, B. (2002, February). On the role(s) of input and output in making form-meaning connections. Plenary address at the conference on Form-Meaning Connections in SLA, Chicago.
40. VanPatten, B. (in press). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
42. VanPatten, B., & Oikennon, S. (1996). Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
43. VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F.R. Eckman, D. Highland, P.W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R.R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (in press). Processing instruction vs. traditional instruction (again): A replication with the French causative. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Wong, W. (2000). The effects of textual enhancement and simplified input on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.