Non-native speakers' production of modified comprehensible output and second language learning

Language Learning

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 627-675

  Shehadeh, Ali ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033269349     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.00104     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aston, G. (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128-143.
2. Brock, C., Crookes, G., Day, R., & Long M. (1986). The differential effects of corrective feedback in native speaker-nonnative speaker conversation. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 229-236). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
3. Chiang, C., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 345-374.
4. Chun, A., Day, R., Chenoweth, N., & Luppescu, S. (1982). Types of errors corrected in native-nonnative conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 537-548.
5. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (Eds.). (1993a). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
6. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (Eds.). (1993b). Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
7. Crookes, G., & Rulon, K. (1988). Topic and feedback in native speaker/nonnative speaker conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 675-681.
8. Day, R., Chenoweth, N., Chun, A., & Luppescu, S. (1984). Corrective feedback in native-nonnative discourse. Language Learning, 34, 19-45.
9. Deen, J. (1995). Dealing with problems in intercultural communication: A study of negotiation of meaning in native / nonnative speaker interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
10. Dekeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Doughty, C. (1992). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-470.
12. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 147-181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
14. Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). On identifying communication strategies in interlanguage production. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 210-238). London: Longman.
15. Gaskill, W. (1980). Correction in native speaker-nonnative speaker conversation. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 125-137). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
16. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
17. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 327-352). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
18. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
19. Harley, B. (1998). The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 156-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21. Hatch, E., Flashner, V., & Hunt, L. (1986). The experience model and language teaching. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 5-22). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
22. Hawkins, B. (1985). Is an "appropriate response" always so appropriate? In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 162-178). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
23. Holliday, L. (1995). NS syntactic modifications in NS-NNS negotiations as input data for second language acquisition of syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
24. Kasper, G. (1985). Repair in foreign language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 200-215.
25. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
26. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
27. Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.
28. Long, M. (1983a). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
29. Long, M. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL '82: Pacific perspectives on language learning and teaching (pp. 207-225). Washington, DC: TESOL.
30. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. J. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303-323.
33. Lynch, A. J. (1988). Grading foreign language listening comprehension materials: The use of naturally modified interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
34. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
35. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
36. Pica, T. (1982). Second language acquisition in different language contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
37. Pica, T. (1988). Interlanguage adjustments as an outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 28, 45-73.
38. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
39. Pica, T., Doughty, C., & Young, R. (1986). Making input comprehensible: Do interactional modifications help? I.T.L. Review of Applied Linguistics, 72, 1-25.
40. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D., & Newman, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-376.
41. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
42. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
43. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59-84.
44. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
45. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 23-45). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
46. Schegloff, E. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 261-286). New York: Academic Press.
47. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
48. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
49. Schwartz, J. (1980). The negotiation of meaning: Repair in conversations between second language learners of English. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 138-153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
50. Shehadeh, A. (1991). Comprehension and performance in second language acquisition: A study of second language learners' production of modified comprehensible output. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Durham, England.
51. Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT. Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney, Australia: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
52. Swain, M. (1984). A review of immersion education in Canada: Research and evaluation studies. ELT Documents, 119, 35-51.
53. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
54. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
55. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
58. Tarone, E., & Liu, G. Q. (1995). Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition theory. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 107-124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Van den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
60. Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
61. Wright, R. (1996). A study of the acquisition of verbs of motion by grade 4/5 early French immersion students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 257-280.