Professional Development and Teacher Education for Reading Instruction

Handbook of Reading Research: Volume IV

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 629-660

  Dillon, Deborah R ^a   O’Brien, David G ^a   Sato, Mistilina ^a   Kelly, Catherine M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871203775     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203840412-31     Document Type: Chapter

References (132)

1. Allen, J. (2006). Becoming a literacy leader: Supporting learning and change. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
2. Allington, R. L., & Johnston, P. H. (2001). What do we know about effective fourth-grade teachers and their classrooms? In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 150-165). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Alvermann, D. E., Rezak, A. T., Mallozzi, C. A., Boatright, M. D., & Jackson, D. F. (2011). Reflective practice in an online literacy course: Lessons learned from attempts to fuse reading and science instruction. Teachers College Record, 113.
4. Anders, P. L., Hoffman, J. V., & Duffy, G. G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shift s, persistent problems, and challenges. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 719-742). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Anderson, L. M., & Holt-Reynolds, D. (1995). Prospective teachers’ beliefs and teacher education pedagogy:Research based on a teacher educator’s practical theory. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University.
6. Atteberry, A., Bryk, A., Walker, L., & Biancarosa, G. (2008). Variations in the amount of coaching in Literacy Collaborative schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
7. Au, K. H. (2002). Communities of practice: Engagement, imagination, and alignment in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 222-227.
8. Au, K. H., & Maaka, M. J. (2001). Teacher education, diversity, and literacy. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 136-149). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Au, K. H., Raphael, T. E., & Mooney, K. C. (2008). What we have learned about teacher education to improve literacy achievement in urban schools. In L. C. Wilkinson, L. M. Morrow, & V. Chou (Eds.), Improving literacy achievement in urban schools: Critical elements in teacher preparation (pp. 159-184). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10. Barton, R., & Lavrakas, J. (2006). Finding gold at the end of the rainbow: Anchorage’s investment in literacy coaching pays big dividends. Northwest Regional Education Laboratory, 12(1), 6-11.
11. Bean, T. W. (1997). Preservice teachers’ selection and use of content area literacy strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 90(3), 154-163.
12. Bean, T. W. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constructivist dimensions. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 629-644). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Bean, R. M. & Carroll, K. E. (2006). The literacy coach as a catalyst for change. In C. Cummins (Ed.), Understanding and implementing Reading First initiatives: The changing role of administrators (pp. 139-152). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. Bean, T. W., & Zulich, J. (1990). Teaching students to learn from text: Preservice content teachers’ changing view of their role through the window of student-professor dialogue journals. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analysis from multiple paradigms: Thirty-ninth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 171-178). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
15. Bean, T. W., & Zulich, J. (1992). A case study of three preservice teachers’ beliefs about content area reading through the window of student professor dialogue journals. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives: Forty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 463-474). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
16. Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A., & Dexter, E. (2008). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
17. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
18. Bickmore, S., Smagorinsky, P., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2005). Tensions between traditions: The role of contexts in learning to teach. English Education, 38(1), 23-52.
19. Birdyshaw, D., Moje, E. B., Jeppsen, A., & Bain, R. (2007). Preservice teachers’ conceptions of disciplines and disciplinary literacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
20. Birdyshaw, D., & Rackley, E. (2008). Preservice teachers’ models of text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
21. Broemmel, A. D., Meller, W. B., & Allington, R. L. (2008). Preparing expert teachers of reading for urban schools: Models and Variations in the literature. In L. C. Wilkinson, L. M. Morrow, & V. Chou (Eds.), Improving literacy achievement in urban schools: Critical elements in teacher preparation (pp. 83-104). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
22. Cantrell, S. C., & Callaway, P. (2008). High and low implementers of content literacy instruction: Portraits of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1739-1750.
23. Casey, K. (2006). Literacy coaching: The essentials. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
24. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Promises and politics: Images of research in the discourse of teaching and teacher education. In J. Worthy, B. Maloch, J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Schallert, & C. M. Fairbanks (Eds.), Fift y-third Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 28-44). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
25. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Conley, M. W. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don’t know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 84-106.
27. Cook, L. Smagorinsky, P., Fry, P., Konopak, B., & Moore, C. (2002). Problems in developing a constructivist approach to teaching: One’ teacher’s transition from teacher preparation to teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 102(5), 389-413.
28. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National StaffDevelopment Council and The School Redesign Network at Stanford University.
30. Dillon, D. R., & Boehm, E. (2010). Minnesota Literacy Teacher Educator’s Symposia Series: Using state reading teacher standards and research to redesign programs at 28 institutions. (Unpublished manuscript). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN.
31. Dillon, D. R., DeLapp, P., Vagle, M., Galda, L., Bigelow, M., Hughes, J., et al. (2004). A higher education partnership to better prepare K-12 literacy preservice teachers. Paper presented as part of a symposium at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
32. Dillon, D. R., & Vagle, M. D. (2006, January). Collaborating through the complexity: Four teacher education programs’ commitment to redesign preservice literacy teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, San Diego, CA.
33. Douglas, E., Moje, E. B., & Bain, R. B. (2008). Preservice teachers’ models of disciplinary subject areas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
34. Duffy, G. G. (2004). Teachers who improve reading achievement: What research says about what they do and how to develop them. In D. Strickland & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Improving reading instruction through professional development (pp. 3-22). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
35. Edwards, J. L., & Newton, R. R. (1995). The effects of cognitive coaching on teacher efficacy and empowerment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
36. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
37. Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7-54). McHenry, IL: Delta Systems.
38. Flint, A. S., Leland, C. H., Patterson, B., Hoffman, J. V., Sailors, M. W., Mast, M. A., et al. (2001). “I’m still figuring out how to do this teaching thing”: A cross-site analysis of reading teacher preparation programs on beginning teachers’ instructional practices and decisions. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 100-118). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
39. Gamston, R., Linder, C., & Whitaker, J. (1993). Reflections on cognitive coaching. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 57-61.
40. García, G. E., Bray, T. M., Mora, R. A., Ricklefs, M. A., Primeaux, J., Engel, L. C., et al. (2006). Working with teachers to change the literacy instruction of Latino students in urban schools. In J. V. Hoffman, D. L., Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), Fift y-fift h Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 155-170). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
41. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
42. Gehsmann, K. M., & Woodside-Jiron, H. W. (2005). Becoming more effective in the age of accountability:A high-poverty school narrows the literacy achievement gap. In B. Maloch, J. V. Hoffman, D. L., Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, & J. Worthy (Eds.), Fift y-fourth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 182-197). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
43. Gibson, S. (2006). Lesson observation and feedback: The practice of an expert reading coach. Reading Research and Instruction, 45(4), 295-318.
44. Grisham, D. L. (2000). Connecting theoretical conceptions of reading to practice: A longitudinal study of elementary school teachers. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 145-170.
45. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
46. Grossman, P. L., Valencia, S. W., Evans, K., Thompson, C., Martin, S., & Place, N. (2000). Transitions into teaching: Learning to teach writing in teacher education and beyond. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(4), 631-662.
47. Grossman, P. L., Valencia, S. W., Thompson, C., Martin, S. D., Place, N., & Evans, K. (2001). Transitions into teaching: Learning to teach writing in teacher education and beyond. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 80-99). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
48. Harmon, J., Hedrick, W., Martinez, M., Fine, J. C., Eldridge, D., Flint, A. S., et al. (2001). Features of excellence of reading teacher preparation programs. In J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Shallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), Fift ieth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 262-274). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
49. Harste, J. C., Leland, C., Schmidt, K., Vasquez, V., & Ociepka, A. (2004, January/February). Practice makes practice, or does it? The relationship between theory and practice in teacher education. Reading Online, 7(4). Retrieved from http://readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=harste/index.html
50. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook for policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Heller, R., & Greenleaf, C. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
52. Hoffman, J. V., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). Reading teacher education in the next millennium: What your grandmother’s teacher didn’t know that your granddaughter’s teacher should. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 28-44.
53. Hoffman, J. V., Roller, C., Maloch, B., Sailors, M., Duffy, G., & Beretvas, S. N., (2005). Teachers’ preparation to teach reading and their expectations and practices in the first three years of teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 267-287.
54. Hoffman, J. V., Sailors, M., Duffy, G., & Beretvas, S. N. (2004). The effective elementary classroom literacy environment: Examining the validity of the TEX-IN3 observation system. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(3), 303-334.
55. Houge, T. T., Geier, C., & Peyton, D. (2008). Targeting adolescents’ literacy skills using one to-one instruction with research-based practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(8), 640-650.
56. Hough, H. J., Bryk, A., Pinnell, G. S., Kerbow, D., Fountas, I., & Scharer, P. (2008). Measuring change in the practice of teachers engaged in literacy collaborative professional development: Preliminary results from a four-year study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
57. Institute of Education Sciences. (2008, November). Reading First impact study: Final report. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Services. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20094038.pdf
58. International Reading Association. (2003). Standards for reading professionals-revised 2003. Newark, DE: Author.
59. International Reading Association. (2004). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States. Newark, DE: Author.
60. International Reading Association. (2006). Standards for middle and high school literacy coaches. Newark, DE: Author.
61. International Reading Association. (2007). Teaching reading well: A synthesis of the International Reading Association’s research on teacher preparation for reading instruction. Newark, DE: Author.
62. Jacobs, V. A. (2008). Adolescent literacy: Putting the crisis in context. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 7-39.
63. Janisch, C., & Akroft, A. (2001). Young readers’ academy: Opportunities for conversations about literacy teaching and learning. In J. V. Hoffman, D. L., Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), Fift ieth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 287-299). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
64. Johnson, C., Stull, M., Bain, R., & Moje, E. B. (2008). Preservice teachers’ models of the student as reader. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
65. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4-10.
66. Kamil, M. L. (2003, November). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC:Alliance for Excellent Education.
67. Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Joseph, T. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy:Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.e: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
68. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177-228.
69. Keehn, S., Martinez, M., Harmon, J., Hedrick, W., Steinmetz, L., & Perez, B. (2003). Teacher preparation in reading: A case study of change in one university-based undergraduate program. In Fift y-second Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 230-244). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
70. Kelly, C. (2009). The transition to teaching reading: Knowledge, beliefs, and identities of novice teachers of reading. (Unpublished manuscript). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN.
71. Kohler, F., & Crilley, K., & Shearer, D. D. (1997). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 90(4), 240-251.
72. Konopak, B. C., Readence, J. E., & Wilson, E. K. (1994). Preservice and inservice secondary teachers orientations toward content area reading. Journal of Educational Research, 87(4), 220-227.
73. Lalik, R., & Potts, A. (2001). Social reconstructionism as a framework for literacy teacher education. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 119-135). Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
74. Lazar, A. M. (2007). It’s not just about teaching kids to read: Helping preservice teachers acquire a mindset for teaching children in urban communities. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 411-443.
75. Levine, A. (2006). Will universities maintain control of teacher education? The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38(4), 36-43.
76. Lenz, B. K., Ehren, B. J., & Deshler, D. D. (2005). The content literacy continuum: A school reform framework for improving adolescent literacy for all students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(6), 60-63.
77. Linek, W. M., Sampson, M. B., Raine, I. L., Klakamp, K., & Smith, B. (2006). Development of literacy beliefs and practices: Preservice teachers with reading specializations in a field-based program. Reading Horizons, 46(3), 183-213.
78. Lyons, C. A., & Pinnell, G. S. (2001). Systems for change in literacy education: A guide to professional development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
79. Maloch, B., Flint, A. S., Eldridge, D., Harmon, J., Loven, R., Fine, J. C., Bryant-Shanklin, M., & Martinez, M. (2003). Understandings, beliefs, and reported decision making of first-year teachers from different reading teacher preparation programs. The Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 431-459.
80. Many, J., Green, J., Wallace, F. H., Graham, M., Dixey, B., Miller, S., et al. (2006). Understanding the impact of a state-wide reading consortium on literacy teacher educators. Reading Research and Instruction, 45(4), 319-352.
81. Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Lockwood, J. R., Martorell F., Gerswin, D., Naftel, S., et al. (2008). Supporting literacy across the Sunshine State: A study of Florida middle school reading coaches (MG-762-CC). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
82. Massey, D. D. (2006). “You teach for me; I’ve had it!" A first-year teacher’s cry for help. Action in Teacher Education, 28(3), 73-85.
83. Moats, L. C. (1999). Teaching reading IS rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers. (Item No. 372).
84. Moats, L. C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of “balanced” reading instruction. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved June 4, 2009, from http://www.edexcellence.net/template/index.cfm
85. Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. In G. J. Kelly, A. Luke, & J. Green (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 31, pp. 1-44). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
86. Moje, E. B., Douglas, E., & Bain, R. (2007). How do we study preservice teacher learning? The challenges and possibilities of tools for assessing and studying teacher learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference. Austin, TX.
87. National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ). (2006). What education schools aren’t teaching about reading and what elementary teachers aren’t learning. Retrieved June 4, 2009, from http://www.nctq.org/nctq/
88. National Education Association (NEA). (2000). Report of the National Education Association’s Task Force on Reading. Washington, DC: Author.
89. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Development. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://www/nationalreadingpanel.org/Publications/publications.htm
90. National StaffDevelopment Council. (2001). NSDC’s Standards for StaffDevelopment. Oxford, Ohio, 2001. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://www.nsdc.org/standards/
91. Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity-promises & practicalities. Washington DC: Aspen Institute Program on Education and Providence, RI: The Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://www.annenberginstitute.org/pdf/Coaching.pdf
92. O’Brien, D. (1988). Secondary preservice teachers resistance to content reading instruction: A proposal for a broader rationale. In J. E. Readence & R. S. Baldwin (Eds.), Dialogues in literacy research: Thirty- seventh Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 237-243). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
93. O’Brien, D. G., & Stewart, R. A. (1990). Preservice teachers’ perspectives on why every teacher is not a teacher of reading: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 101-129.
94. O’Brien, D. G., Stewart, R. A., & Moje, E. B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 442-463.
95. Paglinco, S., Bach, A., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M., & Supovitz, J. (2003). The heart of the matter:The coaching model in America’s Choice Schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/33/b9/78.pdf
96. Pearson, P. D. (2001). Learning to teach reading: The status of the knowledge base. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 4-19). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
97. Pierce, M., & Pomerantz, F. (2006). From preservice to inservice: The evolution of literacy teaching practices and beliefs in novice teachers. In J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Shallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), 55th yearbook of the National reading Conference (pp. 235-248). Oak Creek, WI:National Reading Conference.
98. Pomerantz, F., & Pierce, M. (2004). From literacy methods classes to the real world: Experiences of preservice teachers. The NERA Journal, 40(2), 55-62.
99. Potts, A., Moore, S., Frye, S., Kile, M., Wojtera, C., Criswell, D. (2000). Evolving partnerships: A framework for creating cultures of teacher learning. In T. Shanahan & F. V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), Fortyninth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 165-177). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
100. Ratekin, N., Simpson, M. L., Alvermann, D. E., & Dishner, E. K. (1985). Why content teachers resist reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 28, 432-437.
101. Reed, B., & Rettig, R. (2006). Side by side: The Idaho Reading First program finds success by offering targeted professional development to its literacy coaches. Northwest Regional Education Laboratory, 12(1), 18-21.
102. Risko, V. J., Roller, C. M., Cummins, C., Bean, R. M., Block, C. C., Anders, P. L., et al. (2008). A critical analysis of research on reading teacher education. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 252-288.
103. Roller, C. M. (Ed.). (2001). Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
104. Sailors, M., Keehn, S., Martinez, M., & Harmon, J. (2005). Early field experiences offered to and valued by preservice teachers at sites of excellence in reading teacher education programs. Teacher Education and Practice, 18(4), 458-470.
105. Santa, C. M., & Hayes, R. (2009). What we do: Support materials: CRISS Cornerstones. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from http://www.projectcriss.com/criss_cornerstones.php
106. Sato, M., Wei, R. C., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Improving teachers’ assessment practices through professional development: The case of National Board Certification. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 669-700.
107. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40-59.
108. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4-10.
109. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
110. Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Moore, C., Jackson, A. Y., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach:Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1) 8-24.
111. Smagorinsky, P., Wright, L., Murphy, A., S., O’Donnell-Allen, C., & Konopak, B. (2007). Student engagement in the teaching and learning of grammar: A case study of an early-career secondary school English teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 76-90.
112. Smartt, S. M., Reschly, D. L. (2007). Barriers to the preparation of highly qualified teachers in reading (TQ Research & Policy Brief). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved June 4, 2009, from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/June2007Brief.pdf
113. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
114. Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
115. Stevens, L. P. (2002). Making the road by walking: The transition from content area literacy to adolescent literacy. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(3), 267-278.
116. Strickland, D. S. (2001). The interface of standards, teacher preparation, and research: Improving the quality of teachers. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 20-31). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
117. Strickland, D. S., & Kamil, M. S. (Eds.). (2004). Improving reading achievement through professional development. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
118. Strickland, D. S., Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., Burns, M. S., & McNamara, P. (2002). Preparing our teachers:Opportunities for better reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
119. Supovitz, J. A. (2001). Translating teaching practice into improved student achievement. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (pp. 81-98). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
120. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.
121. Swan, A. L. (2003). Effective professional development: Tell me and I will hear, show me and I will see, support me and I will evolve. In Celebrating the freedom of literacy: The Twenty-fift h Yearbook of the College Reading Association (pp. 239-250). Commerce: Texas A&M.
122. Taylor, B. M., & Pearson, P. D. (2001). The CIERA School Change Project: Translating research on effective reading instruction and school reform into practice in high-poverty elementary schools. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 180-189). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
123. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The CIERA school change framework:An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 40-69.
124. The Teaching Commission. (2006). Teaching at risk: Progress and potholes. New York City: Author.
125. Toll, C. A. (2005). The literacy coach’s survival guide: Essential questions and practical answers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
126. Vagle, M. D., & Dillon, D. R. (2006). Influencing preservice literacy teacher learning through a multi-institutional collaboration among four teacher education programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
127. Vagle, M. D., Dillon, D. R., Davison-Jenkins, J. LaDuca, B., & Olson, V. (2006). Redesigning literacy preservice education at four institutions: A three-year collaborative project. In Fift y-fift h Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 324-340). Oak Creek, WI: The National Reading Conference.
128. Vaughn, S., & Coleman, M. (2004). The role of mentoring in promoting use of research-based practices in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25(1), 25-38.
129. Walpole, S., & McKenna, M.C. (2004). The literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research-based practice. New York: Guilford.
130. Wilkinson, L. C., Morrow, L. M., & Chou, V. (Eds.). (2008). Improving literacy achievement in urban schools: Critical elements in teacher preparation. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
131. Wilson, S. B., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 173-209). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
132. Zeichner, K. (2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 737-759). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.