Lesson observation and feedback: The practice of an expert reading coach

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 295-318

  Gibson, Sharan A ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751526934     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388070609558453     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ackland, R. (1991). A review of the peer coaching literature. Journal of Staff Development, 12,22-26.
2. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1985). Evaluating theories of action. In W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds.), The planning of change (pp. 108-117). NY: Holt, Rinehart
3. Altwerger, B., Arya, P., Jin, L., Jordan, N. L., Laster, B., Martens, P., Wilson, G. P., & Wiltz, N. (2004). When research and mandates collide: The challenges and dilemmas of teacher education in the era of NCLB. English Education, 36(2),119-133.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control.NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
5. Bean, R. M. (2004). Promoting effective literacy instruction: The challenge for literacy coaches. The California Reader, 37(3),5863.
6. Bloom, B. (1953). Thought processes in lectures and discussions. Journal of General Education, 7,160-169.
7. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3),271-315.
8. Clay, M. M. (1991). Introducing a new storybook to young readers. The Reading Teacher, 45(4),264-273.
9. Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3),32-44.
11. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading. Goodfirst teaching for all children.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Gibson, S. A. (2002). The Theory of Practice of Literacy Coaches: Describing the Relationship between Coaching Sessions and Kindergarten and First Grade Teachers’ Beliefs and Instructional Behaviors. (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(4).
13. Gibson, S. A. (2005). Developing knowledge of coaching. Issues in Teacher Education, 14(2), pp. 63-74.
14. International Reading Association (2004a). Best practice brief: The reading coach. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15. International Reading Association (2004b). Coaches, controversy, consensus. Reading Today, 21(5), 1 and 18.
16. International Reading Association (2004c). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17. Johnson, J. E. (2002). High-performing, high-poverty, urban elementary schools. In B. M. Taylor & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Teaching reading. Effective schools, accomplished teachers (pp. 89-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Keith, M.J. (1988, November). Stimulated recall and teachers’ thought processes: A critical review of the methodology and an alternative perspective.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY.
19. Kohler, F. W., Ezell, H. K., & Paluselli, M. (1999). Promoting changes in teachers' conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. The Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 154-165.
20. Kohler, F. W., McCullough Crilley, K., & Shearer, D. D. (1997). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(4),240-250.
21. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2002). Transforming professional development: Understanding and organizing learning communities. In W. D. Hawley (Ed.), The keys to effective schools. Educational reform as continuous improvement (pp. 74-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22. Mosenthal, J., Lipson, M., Sortino, S., Russ, B., & Mekkelsen, J. (2002). Literacy in rural Vermont: Lessons from schools where children succeed. In B. M. Taylor & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Teaching reading. Effective schools, accomplished teachers (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3),307-332.
24. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Poglinco, S. M., Bach, A. J., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M., & Supovitz, J. A. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America’s Choice schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy and Research in Education.
26. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?Educational Researcher,29(1), 4-15.
27. Schwartz, R. M. (2005). Decisions, decisions: Responding to primary students during guided reading. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 436-443.
28. Shulman, L. S., & Quinlan, K. M. (1996). The comparative psychology of school subjects. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 399-402). NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research.Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Sturtevant, E.G. (2003). The literacy coach: A key to improving teaching and learning in secondary schools. Washington, D.C.: Alliance for Excellent Education.
31. Valli, L., & Hawley, W. D. (2002). Designing and implementing school-based professional development. In W. D. Hawley (Ed.), The keys to effective schools. Educational reform as continuous improvement (pp. 86-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.