Reading teacher education in the next millennium: What your grandmother's teacher didn't know that your granddaughter's teacher should

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 28-44

  Hoffman, James ^a   Pearson, P David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007267931     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.35.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. ANDERS, P., & RICHARDSON, V. (1991). Research directions: Staff development that empowers teachers' reflection and enhances instruction. Language Arts, 68, 316-321.
2. ANDERSON, L., EVERTSON, C., & BROPHY, J. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. Elementary School Journal, 79, 193-223.
3. ARCHER, D. (1999, March 17). New teachers abandon field at high rate. Education Week, p. 1.
4. ASHTON, P., & CROCKER, L. (1987). Systematic study of planned variations: The essential focus of teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 32-38.
5. AYERS, J.B. (1986). Teacher education program evaluation: A case-study past and future. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 275 669)
6. BOS, C.S., & ANDERS, P.L. (1994). The study in student change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 181-198). New York: Teachers College Press.
7. BROPHY, J.E., & GOOD, T.G. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
8. CHIN, R., & BENNE, E. (1969). General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In W. Bennis, K. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds.), The planning of change (2nd ed., pp. 32-59). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. CLAY, M.M. (1987). Implementing Reading Recovery: Systematic adaptations to an educational innovation. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 35-58.
10. CLAY, M.M. (1990a, April). Reading Recovery in the United States: Its successes and challenges. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
11. CLAY, M.M. (1990b). The Reading Recovery programme, 1984-1988: Coverage, outcomes and Education Board district figures. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 25, 61-70.
12. COCHRAN-SMITH, M., & LYTLE, S.L. (in press). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nudged & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13. COOPER, R., SLAVIN, R., & MADDEN, N.A. (1996). Success for All: Improving the quality of implementation of whole-school change through the use of a national reform network. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 107)
14. CRUICKSHANK, D.R. (1970). Blueprints for teacher education: A review of phase II proposals for the U.S.O.E. comprehensive elementary teacher education program models program. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 013 371)
15. CRUICKSHANK, D.R. (1987). Reflective teaching: The preparation of students of teaching. Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.
16. CRUICKSHANK, D.R., & METCALF, K.K. (1990). Training within teacher I preparation. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook for research in teacher education (pp. 469-497). New York: Macmillan.
17. DARLING-HAMMOND, L. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
18. DEFINO, M., & HOFFMAN, J.V. (1984). A status report and content analysis of state mandated teacher induction programs (Tech. Rep. No. 9057). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
19. DEWEY, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In C.A. McMurray (Ed.), The relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers. The third NSSE yearbook, Part I (pp. 9-30). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. DODL, N., ELFNER, E., BECKER, J., HALSTEAD, J., JUNG, H., NELSON, P., PURINTON, S., & WEGELE, P. (1972). Florida catalog of teacher competencies. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
21. DUFFY, G.G. (1981). Teacher effectiveness research: Implications for the reading profession. In M.L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction. 30th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 113-136). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
22. DUFFY, G.G. (1991). What counts in teacher education? Dilemmas in educating empowered teachers. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction. 40th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1-18). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
23. DUNKIN, M., & BIDDLE, B. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24. EMMER, E.T., EVERTSON, C., & ANDERSON, L. (1980). Effective classroom management at the beginning of the school year. Elementary School Journal, 80, 219-231.
25. EVERTSON, C., HAWLEY, W., & ZLOTNIK, M. (1985). Making a difference in educational quality through teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 2-12.
26. FEIMAN-NEMSER, S. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternatives. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook for research in teacher education (pp. 212-233). New York: Macmillan.
27. FENSTERMACHER, G.D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 37-49). New York: Macmillan.
28. FENSTERMACHER, G.D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 1-54.
29. FERGUSON, R. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28, 465-498.
30. FISHER, C.W., FILBY, N.N., MARLIAVE, R., CAHEN, L.S., DISHAW, M.M., MOORE, J.E., & BERLINER, D.C. (1978). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: Final report of phase III-B, beginning teacher evaluation study. San Francisco: Far West Educational Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
31. FLORIO-RUANE, S. (1994). Future teachers' autobiography club: Preparing educators to support literacy learning in culturally diverse classrooms. English Education, 26(1), 52-66.
32. FULLAN, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
33. GAFFNEY, J., & ANDERSON, R.C. (1991). Two-tiered scaffolding: Congruent processes of teaching and learning. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society: Perspectives, programs, and policies (pp. 184-198). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. GALLAGHER, M., GOUDVIS, A., & PEARSON, P.D. (1988). Principles of organizational change. In S.J. Samuels & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Changing school reading programs (pp. 11-39). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
35. GAVELEK, J.R., & RAPHAEL, T.E. (1996). Changing talk about text: New roles for teachers and students. Language Arts, 73, 182-193.
36. GOOD, T., & GROUWS, D. (1977). Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 49-54.
37. GOSWAMI, P., & STILLMAN, P. (1987). Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
38. GRANT, C.A., & SECADA, W.G. (1990). Preparing teachers for diversity. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook for research in teacher education (pp. 403-422). New York: Macmillan.
39. GREEN, T.F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. GREENWALD, R., HEDGES, L., & LANE, R.D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
41. GRIFFIN, G., & BARNES, S. (1986). Using research findings to change school and classroom practices: Results of an experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 572-586.
42. HARGREAVES, A., & FULLAN, M. (1992). Introduction. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1-19). New York: Teachers College Press.
43. HOFFMAN, J.V. (1986). Process-product research on effective teaching: A primer for a paradigm. In J.V. Hoffman (Ed.), Effective teaching of reading: Research and practice (pp. 39-52). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
44. HOFFMAN, J.V. (1998). When bad things happen to good ideas in literacy education: Professional dilemmas, personal decisions, and political traps. The Reading Teacher, 52, 102-113.
45. HOFFMAN, J.V., EDWARDS, S.A., O'NEAL, S.H., BARNES, S., & PAULISSEN, M. (1986). A study of state-mandated beginning teacher programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1), 16-21.
46. HOFFMAN, J.V., ROSER, N., & WORTHY, J. (1998). Challenging the assessment context for literacy instruction in first grade classrooms. In C. Harrison & T. Salinger (Eds.), Assessing reading 1: Theory and practice (pp. 166-181). London: Routledge.
47. HUNTER, M. (1985). What's wrong with Madeline Hunter? Educational Leadership, 42(5), 57-60.
48. HUNTER, M. (1993). Education as a profession. Journal of Staff Development, 14(3), 42-44.
49. JONES, E.M., GOTTFREDSON, G.D., & GOTTFREDSON, D.C. (1997). Success for some: An evaluation of a Success for All program. Evaluation Review, 21, 643-670.
50. JOYCE, B., & SHOWERS, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.
51. LIEBERMAN, A. (1996). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. In M.W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 185-201). New York: Teachers College Press.
52. LITTLE, J.W. (1981, April). The power of organizational setting: School norms and staff development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 221 918)
53. LITTLE, J.W. (1992). Teacher development and educational policy. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 170-193). London: Falmer Press.
54. LYONS, C.A., PINNELL, G.S., & DEFORD, D. (1993). Partners in learning: Teachers and children in Reading Recovery. New York: Teachers College Press.
55. LYTLE, S. (in press). Teacher inquiry and the cultures of teaching. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. LYTLE, S., & COCHRAN-SMITH, M. (1992). Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 447-474.
57. MCVEE, M., & PEARSON, P.D. (1997, December). Exploring alternative assessment in an ESL setting: Researchers, teachers, and students learning to use portfolios. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
58. MOLL, L. (1992). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural context approach. In R. Beach, J. Green. M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 211-244). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
59. MONROE, W. (1952). Teaching-learning theory and teacher education 1890-1950. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
60. MYER, L. (1988). Research on implementation: What seems to work. In S.J. Samuels & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Changing school reading programs: Principles and case studies (pp. 41-57). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
61. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (1995). Pocket projections: Projections of education statistics to 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
62. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (1997). The condition of education, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
63. NELSON, B., & HAMMERMAN, J. (1996). Reconceptualizing teaching: Moving toward the creation of intellectual communities of students, teachers and teacher education. In M. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 3-21). New York: Teachers College Press.
64. NUNNERY, J. (1997). Effects of full and partial implementations of Success for All on student reading achievement in English and Spanish. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 558)
65. PEARSON, P.D., SPALDING, E., & MYERS, M. (1998). Literacy assessment in the New Standards Project. In M. Coles & R. Jenkins (Eds.), Assessing reading 2: Changing practice in classrooms (pp. 54-97). London: Routledge.
66. PLACIER, P., & HAMILTON, M.L. (1994). Schools as contexts: A complex relationship. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case of reading instruction (pp. 135-159). New York: Teachers College Press.
67. PUMA, M.J., KARWEIT, N., PRICE, C., RICCIUITTI, A., THOMPSON, W., & VADEN-KIERNAN, M. (1997). Prospects: Final report on student outcomes. Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluation Service, U.S. Department of Education.
68. REINKING, D. (1995). Reading and writing with computers: Literacy research in a post-typographic world. In K. Hinchman, D. Leu, & C. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice. 44th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 17-33). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
69. RICHARDSON, V., & HAMILTON, M.L. (1994). The practical argument staff development process. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case of reading instruction (pp. 109-134). New York: Teachers College Press.
70. RICHARDSON, V. & PLACIER, P. (in press). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
71. ROEHLER, L. (1990, May). Embracing the complexities. Paper presented at the University of Maryland Conference on Cognitive Research and Instructional Innovation, College Park, MD.
72. ROSENSHINE, B. (1971). Teaching behaviors and student achievement. Windsor, England: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales.
73. ROSENSHINE, B., & FURST, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R.M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 122-183). Chicago: Rand McNally.
74. ROSENSHINE, B., & STEVENS, R. (1984). Classroom instruction in reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 745-798). New York: Longman.
75. ROTH, R. A. (1976). A study of competency based teacher education: Philosophy, research, issues, models. Lansing, MI: Department of Education, Teacher Preparation and Professional Development Services.
76. RUPLEY, W.H., WISE, B.S., & LOGAN, J.W. (1986). Research in effective teaching: An overview of its development. In J.V. Hoffman (Ed.), Effective teaching of reading: Research and practice (pp. 3-36). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
77. SARROUB, L.K., LYCKE, K., & PEARSON, P.D (1997, December). How new assessments impact student learning, curriculum, and professional development: A case study in a junior high setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
78. SARROUB, L.K., PEARSON, P.D., DYKEMA, C., & LLOYD, R. (1997). When portfolios become part of the grading process: A case study in a junior high setting. In C. Kinzer, K. Hinchman, & D. Leu (Eds.), Inquiries into literacy: Theory and practice. 46th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 101-113). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
79. SARTAIN, H.W. (1974). The modular content of the professional program. In H. Sartain & P. Stanton (Eds.), Modular preparation for teaching reading (pp. 31-59). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
80. SARTAIN, H.W., & STANTON, P.E. (1974). A flexible model for preparing teachers of reading. In H. Sartain & P. Stanton (Eds.), Modular preparation for teaching reading (pp. 3-11). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
81. SCHON, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
82. SCHON, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83. SHANAHAN, T., & BARR, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
84. SHOWERS, J., JOYCE, B., & BENNETT, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 77-87.
85. SHULMAN, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
86. SLAVIN, R.E., MADDEN, N.A., KARWEIT, N.L., DONLAN, L., & WASIK, B. A. (1992). Success for All: A relentless approach to prevention and early intervention in elementary schools. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
87. SLAVIN, R.E., MADDEN, N.A., KARWEIT, N.L., LIVERMON, B.J., & DOLAN, L. (1990). Success for All: First-year outcomes of a comprehensive plan for reforming urban education. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 255-278.
88. SPARKS, D., & LOUCKS-HORSLEY, S. (1990). Models of staff development. In R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 234-250). New York: Macmillan.
89. SPIRO, R., & JENGH J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the linear and nonlinear multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. STALLINGS, J., & KASKOWITZ, D. (1974). Follow-through classroom observation evaluation 1972-1973 (SRI Project URU-7370). Stanford, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
91. STALLINGS, J., NEEDELS, M., & STAYROOK, N. (1979). The teaching of basic reading skills in secondary schools, Phase II and Phase II. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
92. STEVENS, R.J., MADDEN, N.A., SLAVIN, R.E., & FARNISH, A.M. (1987). Cooperative and integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433-454.
93. STRINGFIELD, S., MILLSAP, M.A., & HERMAN, R. (1997). Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children: Findings and policy implications of a longitudinal study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
94. TIERNEY, R., TUCKER, D., GALLAGHER, M., CRISMORE, A., & PEARSON, P.D. (1988). The Metcalf Project: A teacher-researcher collaboration. In S. Samuels & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Changing school reading programs (pp. 207-226). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
95. TOM, A. (1984). Teaching as a moral craft. New York: Longman.
96. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. (1996). A back to school special report: The baby boom echo. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
97. VALDEZ, A. (1992). Changes in teachers' beliefs, understandings, and practices concerning reading comprehension through the use of practical arguments: A follow-up study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, University of Arizona, Tucson.
98. VAN MANEN, M. (1996). Fit for teaching. In W. Hare & J.P. Portelli (Eds.), Philosophy of education: Introductory readings (2nd ed., pp. 29-50). Calgary, AB: Detselig.
99. WHARTON-MACDONALD, R., PRESSLEY, M., & HAMPSTON, J.M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 101-128.
100. ZEICHNER, K. (1989). Preparing teachers for democratic schools. Action in Teacher Education, 11(1), 5-10.
101. ZEICHNER, K., & TABACHNICK, B.R. (1985). The development of teacher perspectives: Social strategies and institutional control in the socialization of beginning teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 11, 1-25.