Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching

Review of Research in Education

Volumn 31, Issue , 2007, Pages 1-44

  Moje, Elizabeth Birr ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247249402     PISSN: 0091732X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0091732X07300046     Document Type: Review

References (150)

1. Afflerbach, P., & VanSledright, B. (2001). Hath! Doth! Middle graders reading innovative history text. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 696-707.
2. Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (in press). Comparing an inquiry based approach known as the science writing heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: Are there differences? International Journal of Science Education.
3. Alvermann, D. E., & Hagood, M. C. (2000). Fandom and critical media literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 436-446.
4. Alvermann, D. E., Moon, J., & Hagood, M. (1999). Popular culture in the classroom: Teaching and researching critical media literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Reading Conference.
5. Alvermann, D. E., & Moore, D. W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 951-983). New York: Longman.
6. Anderson, J. D. (1986). Secondary school history textbooks and the treatment of Black history. In D. C. Mine (Ed.), The state of Afro-American history: Past, present, and future (pp. 253-274). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
7. Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborne, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 193-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 1-42.
9. Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban education reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Bain, R. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. Seixas, P. Stearns, & S. Wineberg (Eds.), Teaching, learning and knowing history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331-353). New York: New York University Press.
11. Bain, R. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080-2114.
12. Bain, R. B., & Ellenbogen, K. M. (2001). Placing objects within disciplinary perspectives: Examples from history and science. In S. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 153-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Ball, D., & Wilson, S. (1996). Integrity in teaching: Recognizing the fusion in the moral and intellectual. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 155-192.
14. Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899-917.
15. Bass, H. (2006). What is the role of oral and written language in knowledge generation in mathematics? Toward the improvement of secondary school teaching and learning. Integrating language, literacy, and subject matter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Bean, T. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constructivist dimensions. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 629-644). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
18. Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Patrick, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1997). Teaching for understanding. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 819-878). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
19. Borasi, R., & Siegel, M. (2000). Reading counts: Expanding the role of reading in mathematics classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Borasi, R., Siegel, M., Fonzi, J., & Smith, C. (1998). Using transactional reading strategies to support sense-making and discussions in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 275-305.
21. Brandt, D., & Clinton, K. (2002). Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice, Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 337-356.
22. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.
23. Bulgren, J., Deshler, D. D., & Lenz, B. K. (in press). Engaging adolescents with learning disabilities in higher-order thinking about history concepts. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
24. Ciechanowski, K. E. M. (2006). The everyday meets the academic: How bilingual Latino/a third graders use sociocultural resources to learn in science and social studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
25. Civil, M., & Bernier, E. (2006). Exploring images of parental participation in mathematics education: Challenges and participation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 309-330.
26. Coffin, C. (2006) Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London, UK: Continuum.
27. Collatos, A., Morrell, E., Nuno, A., & Lara, R. (2004). Critical sociology in K-16 early intervention: Remaking Latino pathways to higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 164-180.
28. Collins, K. M., Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2005). Science for all: A discursive analysis examining teacher support of student thinking in inclusive classrooms. In R. Yerrick & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 199-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Conley, M. (in press). Content area literacy: Learners in context. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
30. Davis, F. E., & West, M. M. (2000). The impact of the algebra project on mathematics achievement. Cambridge, MA: Lesley College, Program Evaluation & Research Group.
31. Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Pedagogy and power in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
32. Duschl, R. (2005). Foreword. In R. Yerrick & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. ix-xi). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Edwards, L., & Eisenhatt, M. (2002, November). Middle school Latinos studying science: Using valued identities to enhance engagement. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, LA.
34. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 261-295.
35. Elmesky, R. (2001). Struggles of agency and structure as cultural worlds collide as urban African American youth learn physics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
36. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
37. Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Saxton, M. K. (2001). Promoting science literacy with English language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 479-501.
38. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.
39. Gee, J. P. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 19-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Goldman, S. R. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23, 357-398.
41. Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Greene, S. (1994). Students as authors in the study of history. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 137-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Greenleaf, C., Schoenbach, R., Cziko, C., & Mueller, F. L. (2001). Apprenticing adolescent readers to academic literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 71(1), 79-129.
44. Guthrie, J. T., Meter, P. Z., McCann, A., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C., et al. (1996). Growth in literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 305-325.
45. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Gutiérez, K. D. (2005). Rethinking educational policy for English learners. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute Congressional Forum.
47. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Alvarez, H. H. (2001). Literacy as hybridity: Moving beyond bilingualism in urban classrooms. In M. L. Reyes & J. J. Halcon (Eds.), The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for Latino students. Language and literacy series (pp. 122-141). New York: Teacher's College Press.
48. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., Alvarez, H., & Chiu, M. M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 87-93.
49. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
50. Gutiérrez, K. D., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445-471.
51. Gutstein, E. (2006). "The real world as we have seen it": Latino/a parents' voices on teaching mathematics for social justice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 331-358.
52. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1996). Writing science. London: Taylor & Francis.
53. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
54. Hand, B., Hohenshell, L., & Prain, V. (2004). Exploring students' responses to conceptual questions when engaged with planned writing experiences: A study with year 10 science students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 186-210.
55. Hand, B., Pain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035.
56. Hand, B., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2001). Sequential writing tasks' influence on science learning. In P. Tynjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 105-129). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
57. Hand, B., Wallace, C., & Yang, E. (2004). Using the science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 131-149.
58. Hand, B., Yang, O. E. M., & Bruxvoort, C. (in press). Using writing-to-learn science strategies to improve year 11 students' understandings of stoichiometry. International Journal of Science Education.
59. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Herber, H. L. (1970). Teaching reading in the content areas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). School's out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
62. Hynd-Shanahan, C., Holschuh, J. P., & Hubbard, B. P. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students' reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(2), 141-176.
63. Hynd-Shanahan, C., & Shanahan, T. (in press). Content area reading/learning: Flexibility in knowledge acquisition. In K. B. Cartwright (Ed.), Flexibility in literacy processes and instructional practice: Implications of developing representational ability for literacy teaching and learning. New York: Guilford.
64. Johns, A. M., & Swales, J. M. (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: Opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 13-28.
65. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47-68.
67. Ladson-Billings, G. J. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 211-247). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
68. Lee, C. D. (1993). Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation: The pedagogical implications of an African American discourse genre (Vol. NCTE Research Report, No 26). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
69. Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608-630.
70. Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97-141.
71. Lee, C. D. (2005). Reconceptualizing disciplinary literacies and the adolescent struggling reader: Placing culture at the forefront. National Reading Conference.
72. Lee, C. D. (in press). Every good-bye ain't gone: Analyzing the cultural underpinnings of classroom talk. Qualitative Studies in Education.
73. Lee, C. D., & Majors, Y. (2003). Heading up the street: Localized opportunities for shared constructions of knowledge. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 1I(1), 49-68.
74. Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2006). Reading in the disciplines and the challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
75. Lee, O. (1999). Science knowledge, world views, and information sources in social and cultural contexts: Making sense after a natural disaster. American Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 187-219.
76. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 12-21.
77. Lee, S., & Roth, W. M. (2003). Science and the "good citizen": Community-based scientific literacy. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 28(3), 403-424.
78. Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 52-75.
79. Leinhardt, G. (1993). Weaving instructional explanations in history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 46-74.
80. Leinhardt, G. (1994). History: A time to be mindful. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 209-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1984). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247-271.
82. Leinhardt, G., Stainton, C., & Virji, S. M. (1994). A sense of history. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 79-88.
83. Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. C. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441-486.
84. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
85. Lemke, J. L. (2003). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In M. Anderson, A. Saenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger, & V. V. Cifarelli (Eds.), Educational perspective on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 215-234). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Legas.
86. Luke, A. (2001). Foreword. In E. B. Moje & D. G. O'Brien (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. ix-xii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. Mahiri, J. (1998). Shooting for excellence: African American and youth culture in new century schools. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.
88. Mahiri, J. (Ed.). (2003). What they don't learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth. New York: Peter Lang.
89. McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (1994). Making sense of accounts of history: Why young students don't and how they might. In G. Leinhardt, I, L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in history (pp. 1-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 349-371.
91. Moje, E. B. (2000). To be part of the story: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102, 652-690.
92. Moje, E. B. (2006, March). Integrating literacy into the secondary school content areas: An enduring problem in enduring institutions. Toward the improvement of secondary school teaching and learning: Integrating language, literacy, and subject matter. Adolescent Literacy Symposium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
93. Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K. E., Ellis, L. M., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38-71.
94. Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). "Maestro, what is 'quality'?" Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469-496.
95. Moje, E. B., & Hinchman, K. A. (2004). Developing culturally responsive pedagogy for adolescents. In J. Dole & T. Jetton (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 331-350). New York: Guilford.
96. Moje, E. B., Peek-Brown, D., Sutherland, L. M., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Explaining explanations: Developing scientific literacy in middle-school project-based science reforms. In D. Strickland & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Improving literacy learning for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4-12 (pp. 227-251). New York: Carnegie Corporation.
97. Moll, L. C. (1992). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In R. Beach, J. L. Green, M. L. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in literacy research (pp. 211-244). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and National Council of Teachers of English.
98. Moll, L. C., & Gonzalez, N. (1994). Critical issues: Lessons from research with language-minority children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(4), 439-456.
99. Moll, L. C., & Greenberg, J. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 319-348). New York: Cambridge University Press.
100. Moll, L. C., Veléz-Ibañéz, C., & Greenberg, J. (1989). Year one progress report: Community knowledge and classroom practice: Combining resources for literacy instruction (IARP Subcontract No. L-10, Development Associates). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
101. Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (2001). Situating secondary school literacy research. In E. B. Moje & D. G. O'Brien (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. 3-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
102. Morrell, E. (2002). Toward a critical pedagogy of popular culture: Literacy development among urban youth. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46, 72-77.
103. Morrell, E., & Collates, A. (2003, April). Critical pedagogy in a college access program for students of colar. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
104. Morrell, E., & Duncan-Andrade, J. (2003). What they do learn in school: Hip-hop as a bridge to canonical poetry. In J. Mahiri (Ed.), What they don't learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth (pp. 247-268). New York: Peter Lang.
105. Moses, R., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Boston: Beacon Press.
106. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
107. Nieto, S. (1994). Lessons from students on creating a chance to dream. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 392-426.
108. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2002). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
109. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). The public understanding of science information: Communicating, interpreting, and applying the science of learning. Education Canada, 43(2), 24-27, 43.
110. Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
111. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
112. Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and text-based investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress. (pp. 152-193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
113. Parkinson, J., & Adendorff, R. (2004). The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 379-396.
114. Paxton, R. J. (1999). A deafening silence: History textbooks and the students who read them. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 315-339.
115. Phelps, S. F. (2005). Ten years of research on adolescent literacy, 1994-2004: A review (No. ED-01-CO-0011). Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
116. Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Conant, F. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 1-04.
117. Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2005, April). Rethinking scientific literacy: From science education as propaedeutic to participation in the community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478153)
118. Rumelhart, D. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R. B. Ruddel, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 864-894). Newmark, DE: International Reading Association.
119. Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
120. Saunders, S. (2006). I'm just a Black woman troubling the status quo. In C. A. Stanley (Ed.), Faculty of color teaching in predominantly White colleges and universities (pp. 283-298). Bolton, MA: Anker.
121. Schleppegrell, M. J., & Achugar, M. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21-27.
122. Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 67-93.
123. Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., Cziko, C., & Hurwitz, L. (1999). Reading for understanding: A guide to improving reading in middle and high school classrooms. New York: Jossey-Bass.
124. Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the "standard" direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3(9(9), 1000-1014.
125. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
126. Siegel, M., Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (1998). Supporting students' mathematical inquiries through reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 378-413.
127. Snow, C. B. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
128. Stauffer, R. G. (1965). A language experience approach. In J. A. Kerfoot (Ed.), First grade reading programs, perspectives in reading No. 5. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
129. Street, B. (2005). The hidden dimensions of mathematical language and litearcy. Language and Education, 19(2), 136-141.
130. Sutherland, L. M., Moje, E. B., Cleveland, T. E., & Heitzman, M. (2006, April). Incorporating literacy learning strategies in an urban middle school chemistry curriculum: Teachers' successes and dilemmas. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
131. Valdes, G. (1998). The world outside and inside schools: Language and immigrant children. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 4-18.
132. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
133. VanSledright, B. A., & Kelly, C. (1998). Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. Elementary School Journal, 98, 239-265.
134. Wade, S. E., & Moje, E. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, R. Barr, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), The handbook of research on reading (Vol. 3, pp. 609-627). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
135. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday languages. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1-24.
136. Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Conant, F. (1989). Cheche Konnen: Science and literacy in language minority classrooms (Report No. 7305). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.
137. Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Conant, F. (1994). Discourse and social practice: Learning science in a language minority classroom. In D. Spener (Ed.), Adult biliteracy in the United States (pp. 191-210). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
138. West, M. M., & Davis, F. E. (2004). The Algebra Project at Lanier High School, Jackson, MS: Implementation and student outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Program Evaluation & Research Group, Lesley College.
139. West, M. M., & Davis, F. E. (2005). Research related to the Algebra Project's intervention to improve student learning in mathematics: Report to state of Virginia department of education. Cambridge, MA: Program Evaluation & Research Group, Lesley University.
140. Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525-539.
141. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and the academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495-519.
142. Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319-346.
143. Wineburg, S. S. (2003). Teaching the mind good habits. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B20.
144. Wineburg, S. S., & Martin, D. (2004). Reading and rewriting history. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 62.
145. Wineburg, S. S., & Wilson, S. (1991). Models of wisdom in the teaching of history. History Teacher, 24(4), 395-412.
146. Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Lower track science students' argumentation and open inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 807-838.
147. Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
148. Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Prain, V. (2002). Scientists as writers. Science Education, 10, 672-692.
149. Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy. Empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 291-314.
150. Young, K. M., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing in history. Written Communication, 15(1), 25.