The CIERA school change framework: An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 40-69

  Taylor, Barbara M ^a   Pearson, P David ^b   Peterson, Debra S ^a   Rodriguez, Michael C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15944428607     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.40.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. ALLINGTON, R.L., & JOHNSTON, P.H. (2002). Reading to learn: Lessons from exemplary faurth-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford.
2. BERGMAN, J.L. (1992). SAIL - A way to success and independence for low-achieving readers. The Reading Teacher, 45, 598-602.
3. BLACHOWICZ, C., & OGLE, D. (2001). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. New York: Guilford.
4. BROPHY, J. (1973). Stability of teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 10, 245-252.
5. BROWN, R., PRESSLEY, M., VAN METER, P., & SCHUDER, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
6. BRYK, A.S., & RAUDENBUSH, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.
7. BRYK, A.S., SEBRING, P.B., KERBOW, D., ROLLOW, S., & EASTON, J.Q. (1998). Charting Chicago school reform: Democratic localism as a level for change. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8. CALFEE, R. (2003, May). Reading performance in California's schools. Paper presented at the Conference of the University of California Literacy Consortium, Berkeley.
9. CERVETTI, G.N., JAYNES, C., & PEARSON, P.D. (2002, December). Fluency: Its nature and impact. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
10. CHARLES A. DANA CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN. (1999). Hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high-poverty urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
11. DENO, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
12. DESIGNS FOR CHANGE. (1998). Practices of schools with substantially improved reading achievement. Retrieved June 16, 2004, from http://www. designsforchange.org
13. DUFFY, G.G., ROEHLER, L.R., SIVAN, E., RACKLIFFE, G., BOOK, C., MELOTH, M.S., ET AL. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 347-368.
14. DUNKIN, M., & BIDDLE, B. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15. FLANDERS, N. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. FLOOD, J., LAPP, D., SQUIRE, J.R., & JENSEN, J.M. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. FULLAN, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia: Palmer.
18. FULLAN, M. (2002). Educational reform as continuous improvement. In W.D. Hawley & D.L. Rollie (Eds.), The keys to effective schools: Educational reform as continuous improvement (pp. 1-9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
19. FULLAN, M., & HARGREAVES, A. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school New York: Teachers College Press.
20. GREENWOOD, C.R., CARTA, J.J., KAMPS, D., & DELQUADRI, J. (1995). Ecobehavioral assessment systems software (EBASS) practioner's manual (Version 3.0). Kansas City: Juniper Garden's Children's Project, University of Kansas.
21. HAWLEY, W.D. (Ed.). (2002). The keys to effective schools: Educational reform as continuous improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
22. HUFFMAN, J.V. (1991). Teacher and school effects in learning to read. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 911-950). New York: Longman.
23. KAMIL, M.L., MOSENTHAL, P.B., PEARSON, P.D., & BARR, R. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. KILLION, J. (2002). What works in the elementary school: Results-based staff development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
25. KNAPP, M.S. (Ed.). (1995). Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. KREFT, I., & DELEEUW, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
27. LANGER, J.A. (1999). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well (Rep. No. 12014). Albany, NY: National Council of Teachers of English.
28. LANGER, J.A. (2000). Excellence in English in middle and high school: How teachers' professional lives support student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 397-439.
29. LEE, V.E., & BRYK, A. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of educational achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.
30. LEE, V.E., & SMITH, J.B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205-227.
31. LEIN, L., JOHNSON, J.F., & RAGLAND, M. (1997). Successful Texas schoolwide programs: Research study results. Austin: Charles A. Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin.
32. LIEBERMAN, A., & MILLER, L. (2002). Transforming professional development: Understanding and organizing learning communities. In W.D. Hawley (Ed.), The keys to effective schools: Educational reform as continuous improvement (pp. 74-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin.
33. LOUIS, K.S., & KRUSE, S. (1995). Professionalism and community in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin.
34. MAYER, D.P. (1998). Do new teaching standards undermine performance on old tests? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 53-73.
35. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. (2000). Retort of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications far reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36. NEUMAN, S.B., & DICKINSON, D. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of early literacy research. New York: Guilford.
37. NEWMANN, F.M. (2002). Achieving high-level outcomes for all students: The meaning of staff-shared understanding and commitment. In W.D. Hawley (Ed.), The keys to effective schools: Educational reform as continuous improvement (pp. 28-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin.
38. PRESSLEY, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
39. PRESSLEY, M., WHARTON-MCDONALD, R., ALLINGTON, R.L., BLOCK, C.C., MORROW, L., TRACEY, D., ET AL. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading 5, 35-58.
40. PUMA, M.J., KARWEIT, N., PRICE, C., RICCIUITI, A., THOMPSON, W., & VADEN-KIERNAN, M. (1997). Prospects: Final report on student outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Services.
41. RAUDENBUSH, S.W., & BRYK, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. RAUDENBUSH, S.W., BRYK, A.S., CHEONG, Y.F., & CONG-DON, R. (2000). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (Version 5) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
43. ROSENTHAL, R., & ROSNOW, R.L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. SCANLON, D.M., & GELZHEISER, L.M. (1992). Classroom observation manual Unpublished manuscript, University at Albany, State University of New York, NY.
45. SIMPSON, R.J., RAUDENBUSH, S.W., & EARLS, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
46. SNOW, C., BURNS, S., & GRIFFIN, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. STALLINGS, J., & KASKOWITZ, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation 1972-73 (SRI Project URU-7370). Stanford, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
48. TAYLOR, B.M., & PEARSON, P.D. (2000). The CIERA school change classroom observation scheme. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
49. TAYLOR, B.M., & PEARSON, P.D. (in press). Using study groups and reading assessment data to improve reading instruction within a school. In S. Paris & S. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. TAYLOR, B.M., PEARSON, P.D., CLARK, K., & WALPOLE, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121-166.
51. TAYLOR, B.M., PEARSON, P.D., PETERSON, D.S., & RODRIGUEZ, M.C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104, 3-28.
52. TAYLOR, B.M., PETERSON, D.P., PEARSON, P.D., & RODRIGUEZ, M.C. (2002). Looking inside classrooms: Reflecting on the "how" as well as the "what" in effective reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 56, 270-279.
53. TAYLOR, B.M., PRESSLEY, M., & PEARSON, P.D. (2002). Research-supported characteristics of teachers and schools that promote reading achievement. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
54. VALLI, L., & HAWLEY, W.D. (2002). Designing and implementing school-based professional development. In W.D. Hawley (Ed.), The keys to effective schools: Educational reform as continuous improvement (pp. 86-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
55. VENEZKY, R.L., & WINFIELD, L. (1979). Schools that succeed beyond expectations in teaching reading (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Newark: Department of Educational Studies, University of Delaware.
56. WENGLINSKY, H. (1998). Finance equalization and within-school equity: The relationship between education spending and the social distribution of achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 269-283.
57. WOLF, S.A., BORKO, H., ELLIOTT, R.L., & MCIVER, CM. (2000). "That dog won't hunt!" Exemplary school change efforts within the Kentucky reform. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 349-393.
58. YSSELDYKE, J., & CHRISTENSON, S. (1993-1996). TIES: The instructional environment system - II. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.