Design research: What we learn when we engage in design

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 105-121

  Edelson, Daniel C ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036103636     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (2000). Mathematics curriculum development as a scientific endeavor. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research on design in mathematics and science education (pp. 737-760). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The Knowledge integration environment: Theory and design. Proceedings of CSCL 95: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. xx-xx).
3. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
4. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Carroll, J. M. (1995). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley.
6. Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (pp. 455-478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Cognition & Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
9. Confrey, J., & Lachance, A. (2000). Transformative teaching experiments through conjecture-driven research design. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 231-265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992.). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
11. Guthrie, J. T., & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 95-106.
12. Guzdial, M., Turns, J., Rappin, N., & Carlson, D. (1995, October). Collaborative support for learning in complex domains. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 95: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 157-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27, 337-364.
14. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.
15. Jackson, S. L., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1996). Making dynamic modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 233-257.
16. Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Kreitzberg, C. (1996). Managing for usability. In A. F. Alber (Ed.), Multimedia: A management perspective (pp. 65-88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
18. Loh, B., Reiser, B. J., Radinsky, J., Edelson, D. C., Gomez, L. M., & Marshall, S. (2001). Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher, and students. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 279-323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Muller, M. J. (1992). Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique, Proceedings of CHI 92 - Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 455-462). New York: ACM.
20. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
21. Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 125-143.
22. Richey, R. C., & Nelson, W. A. (1996). Developmental research. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1213-1245). New York: Macmillan.
23. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., & Lea, N. S. (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45-71.
24. Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1993/1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 305-346.
25. Schifter, D. (1996). What's happening in math class? New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Schon, D. A. (1990). The design process. In V. A. Howard (Ed.), Varieties of thinking: Essays from Harvard's Philosophy of Education Research Center (pp. 111-141). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27. Sherin, M. G. (1998). Developing teachers' ability to identify student conceptions during instruction. In S. B. Berenson, K. R. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W. N. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood, & L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp- 761-767). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
28. Simon, H. A. (1971). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Sloane, K., Wilson, M., & Samson, S. (1996). Designing an embedded assessment system: From principles to practice (BEAR Report Series, SA-96-1): University of California, Berkeley.
30. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36-47.
31. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research on design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
33. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.