Design research perspectives on transitioning from individual microgenetic interviews to a whole-class teaching experiment

Educational Researcher

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 233-245

  Lamberg, Teruni D ^a   Middleton, James A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom research; Instructional design and development; Interdisciplinary teaching and research; Mathematics education; Research methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249144589     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09334206     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Berliner, D. (2002). The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
4. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1996). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 6-19). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
5. Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio and proportion. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296-333). New York: Macmillan.
6. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-334). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 9-13.
8. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner & J. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
12. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. New York: Routledge.
13. Davis, G., Hunting, R. P., & Pearn, C. (1993). What might a fraction mean to a child and how would a teacher know? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 63-76.
14. DiSessa, A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
15. Kelly, A. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-4.
16. Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
17. Kelly, E., & Lesh, R. (2002). Understanding and explicating the design experiment methodology. Journal of the ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme Research Capacity Building Network, 3, 1-3.
18. Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. Lesh (Ed.), Number and measurement (pp. 101-150). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.
19. Kieren, T. E. (1993). Rational and fractional numbers: From quotient fields to recursive understanding. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 49-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Lamon, S. (1999). Teaching fractions and rations for understanding. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lemke, J. (1997) Cognition, context and learning. In D. Kirshner & J. A Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition, social, semiotic and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multi-tiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research in science and math education (pp. 197-230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). The development of sociomathematical norms in a first grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 234-266.
26. McLellan, H. (Ed.). (1996). Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
27. Middleton, J. A., de Silva, T., Toluk, Z., & Mitchell, W. (2001), The emergence of quotient understanding in a fifth grade classroom: A classroom teaching experiment. In R. S. Speiser, C. A. Maher, & C. N. Walter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 263-271). Snowbird, UT: Psychology of Mathematics Education, Northern American Chapter.
28. Middleton, J. A., Gorard, S., Taylor, C., & Bannon-Ritland, B. (2008). The "Compleat" design experiment: From soup to nuts. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 21-46). New York: Routledge.
29. Middleton, J. A., & Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1995). The ratio table. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 282-288.
30. Middleton, J. A., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Shew, J. (1998). Using bar representations as a model for connecting concepts of rational number. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 302-312.
31. Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. F. (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
32. National Research Council. (2001). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. Pothier, Y., & Sawada, D. (1983). Partitioning: The emergence of rational number ideas in young children, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 307-317.
34. Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35-59.
35. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Schlager, M., Poirier, C., & Means, B. (1996). Mentors in the classroom: Bringing the world outside. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 243-262). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
37. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-28.
38. Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145.
40. Sloane, F., & Gorard, S. (2003). Exploring modeling aspects of design experiments. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 29-31.
41. Steffe, L., & Thompson, P. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
43. Toluk, Z. (1999). Children's conceptualizations of the quotient subconstruct of rational numbers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
44. Toluk, Z., & Middleton, J. A. (2001). The development of children's understanding of the quotient: A teaching experiment. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Utrecht, Netherlands: Hogrefe.