The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners

Educational Media International

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 263-275

  Oh, Eunjung ^a   Reeves, Thomas C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design research; Instructional systems design

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959795273     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2010.535326     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32, 21-24.
2. Bannan-Ritland, B., & Baek, J.Y. (2008). Investigating the act of design in design research. In A.E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh, & J.Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 299-319). New York: Routledge.
3. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
4. Branch, R.M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York:Springer.
5. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
6. Burkhardt, H. (2006). From design research to large-scale impact: Engineering research in education. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 121-150). London: Routledge.
7. Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
8. Clark, R.E. (1999). Foreword: Bloodletting, media, and learning. In T.L. Russell (Ed.), The no significant difference phenomenon (pp. i-iv). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Press.
9. Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 455-478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
11. Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin: Springer.
12. Design-Based Research Collective (DBRC). (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
13. Dick, W. (1995). Enhanced ISD: A response to changing environments for learning and performance. In B.B. Seels (Ed.), Instructional design fundamentals: A consideration (pp. 13-20). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
14. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
15. diSessa, A.A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
16. Edelson, D.C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.
17. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations Journal of the Learning Science, 13(1), 43-76.
18. Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L., & Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17-51). London: Routledge.
20. Gustafson, K.L., & Branch, R.M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(3), 73-89.
21. Gustafson, K.L., & Branch, R.M. (2002). What is instructional design? In R.A. Reiser & J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 16-25). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
22. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
23. Jonassen, D.H., Cernusca, D., & Ionas, I.G. (2006). Constructivism and instructional design: The emergence of the learning sciences and design research. In R. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 45-52). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
24. Joseph, D. (2004). The practice of design-based research: Uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 235-242.
25. Kelly, A., Lesh, R., & Baek, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
26. Maxwell, J.A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.
27. McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 67-90). London: Routledge.
28. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., & Kemp, J.E. (2001). Designing effective instruction (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2009). An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: SLO. Retrieved April 16, 2009, from http://www.slo.nl/downloads/2009/ Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf/
29. Reeves, T.C. (2000). Socially responsible educational technology research. Educational Technology, 40(6), 19-28.
30. Reeves, T.C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52- 66). London: Routledge.
31. Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96-115.
32. Reigeluth, C.M. (1983a). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (Vol. 1, pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (1983b). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Reigeluth, C.M., & Frick, T.W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional technology (Vol. 2, pp. 633-651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B.A. (2008). Formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Reiser, R.A. (2002). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R.A. Reiser & J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
37. Richey, R., & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 41(1), 79-91.
39. Russell, T.L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center.
40. Sandoval, W.A. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 213-223.
41. Savenye, W.C., & Robinson, R.S. (2004). Qualitative research issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1045-1071). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, N. Nieveen, R.M. Branch, K.L. Gustafson & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1-14). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
43. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
44. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(4), 5-23.