Developing critical implementations of technology-rich innovations: A cross-case study of the implementation of Quest Atlantis

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 125-153

  Thomas, Michael ^a   Barab, Sasha ^b   Tuzun, Hakan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71049168034     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.41.2.a     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Barab, S., & Luehmann, A. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454-467.
2. Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
3. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Squire, K., & Newell, M. (2004). Critical design ethnography: Designing for change. Anthropology in Education, 35(2) 254-268.
4. Barab, S. A., Thomas, M. K., & Merrill, H. (2001). Online learning: From information dissemination to fostering collaboration. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 12(1), 105-143.
5. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1974). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol.I: A model of educational change (No.R-1589/1-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
6. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1975). Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol.IV: The findings in review (No.R-1589/4-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
7. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol.VIII: Implementing and sustaining innovations (No.R-1589/8-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
8. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
9. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L. Schauble& R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Buechler, M. (1997). Scaling up: The role of national networks in spreading education reform. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
11. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R.,&Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 9-13.
12. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2002). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Available online: http://www.extension. harvard.edu/200203/ programs/cte/ext02drt.pdf Retrieved April 2, 2003.
15. Crandall, D. (1983). The teacher's role in school improvement. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 6-9.
16. Crandall, D. P., Loucks-Horsley, S., Baucher, J. E., Schmidt, W. B., Eiseman, J. W., Cox, P. L., et al. (1982). Peoples, policies, and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement (Vol. 1-10). Andover, MA: The NETWORK.
17. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Crosthwaite, J., MacLeod, N., & Malcolm, B. (1997). Case studies: Theory and practice in natural resource management. A paper submitted for the Proceedings of the Australian Association for Social Research Conference, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga.
20. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Dede, C. (1998). The scaling-up process for technology-based educational innovations. In C. Dede (Ed.), ASCD Year Book 1998: Learning with technology (pp. 199-215). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. Dormant, D. (1999). Implementing human performance technology in organizations. In H. Stolovitch & E. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
25. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26.
26. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
28. Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., Marx, R., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Creating scalable and systemic technology innovations for urban education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
29. Fullan,M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Curriculum and Instruction, 47, 335-397.
31. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
32. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publication Company.
33. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1983). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 195-220). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
34. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
35. Habashi, J. (2005). Freedom speaks. In L. D. Soto & B. B. Swadener (Eds.), Power and voice in research with children (pp. 21-34). New York: Peter Lang.
36. Healy, J. M. (1998). Failure to connect: How computers affect out children's minds and what we can do about it. New York: Touchstone.
37. House, E. (1979). Technology versus craft: A ten year perspective on innovation. Curriculum Studies 11, 1-15.
38. Huberman, M. A., & Miles, M. B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum.
39. Jipson, J., & Jipson, J. (2005). Confidence intervals: Doing research with young children. In L. D. Soto & B. B. Swadener (Eds.), Power and voice in research with children (pp. 35-43). New York: Peter Lang.
40. MacNaughton, G. (2005). Doing Foucault in early childhood studies. London: Routlege & Falmer Press.
41. McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11-16.
42. McLellan, H. (1996). Virtual realities. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Macmillan.
43. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
45. Miles, M. B., & Louis, K. S. (1990). Mustering the will and skill for change: The findings from a four-year study of high schools that are experiencing real improvement offer insights into successful change. Educational Leadership, 47, 57-61.
46. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
47. Randi, J., & Corno, L. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 1163-1221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
48. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
49. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Towards the development of flexibly adaptive instructional design. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 183-213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1996). Roots &Wings Program Design. Retrieved July 1, 2002, from the Success for All Web site: http://www.successforall.net/curriculum/ rwprogdescr.htm
51. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1996). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402-435). New York: Macmillan.
52. Squire, K., MaKinster, J., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. A. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468-489. (Pubitemid 36767650)
53. Stake, R. E. (1983). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 287-310). Boston, MA: Kluwer- Nijhoff.
54. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil. New York: Doubleday.
56. Stoll, C. (1999). High-tech heretic: Reflections of a computer contrarian. New York: Anchor Books.
57. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Stringfield, S., Datnow, A., & Ross, S. M. (1998). Scaling up school restructuring in multicultural contexts: Early observations from Sunland County. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
59. Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 97-114.
60. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.