Nuclear pore complex composition: A new regulator of tissue-specific and developmental functions

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 687-699

  Raices, Marcela ^a   D'Angelo, Maximiliano A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; HEXOKINASE 1; KARYOPHERIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL TYPE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CYTOPLASM; DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; INNATE IMMUNITY; LOSS OF FUNCTION MUTATION; MISSENSE MUTATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; STOICHIOMETRY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TISSUE SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOPLASM; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS;

EID: 84867786612     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm3461     Document Type: Review

References (187)

1. Oliver, F. W. Makers of British Botany (Cambridge University Press, 1913).
2. Speese, S. D. et al. Nuclear envelope budding enables large ribonucleoprotein particle export during synaptic Wnt signaling. Cell 149, 832-846 (2012).
3. Callan, H. G. & Tomlin, S. G. Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 137, 367-378 (1950).
4. Frenkiel-Krispin, D., Maco, B., Aebi, U. & Medalia, O. Structural analysis of a metazoan nuclear pore complex reveals a fused concentric ring architecture. J. Mol. Biol. 395, 578-586 (2010).
5. Beck, M. et al. Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 306, 1387-1390 (2004). (Pubitemid 39532518)
6. Beck, M., Lucic, V., Forster, F., Baumeister, W. & Medalia, O. Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 449, 611-615 (2007). (Pubitemid 47525150)
7. Maimon, T., Elad, N., Dahan, I. & Medalia, O. The human nuclear pore complex as revealed by cryo-electron tomography. Structure 20, 998-1006 (2012).
8. Fiserova, J., Richards, S. A., Wente, S. R. & Goldberg, M. W. Facilitated transport and diffusion take distinct spatial routes through the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Sci. 123, 2773-2780 (2010).
9. Yamada, J. et al. A bimodal distribution of two distinct categories of intrinsically disordered structures with separate functions in FG nucleoporins. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 9, 2205-2224 (2010).
10. Ma, J., Goryaynov, A., Sarma, A. & Yang, W. Self-regulated viscous channel in the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7326-7331 (2012).
11. Rout, M. P. et al. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148, 635-651 (2000).
12. Cronshaw, J. M., Krutchinsky, A. N., Zhang, W., Chait, B. T. & Matunis, M. J. Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 158, 915-927 (2002). (Pubitemid 35001082)
13. Hoelz, A., Debler, E. W. & Blobel, G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 613-643 (2011).
14. Chadrin, A. et al. Pom33, a novel transmembrane nucleoporin required for proper nuclear pore complex distribution. J. Cell Biol. 189, 795-811 (2010).
15. D'Angelo, M. A. & Hetzer, M. W. Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes. Trends Cell Biol. 18, 456-466 (2008).
16. Alber, F. et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450, 695-701 (2007). (Pubitemid 350207701)
17. Berke, I. C., Boehmer, T., Blobel, G. & Schwartz, T. U. Structural and functional analysis of Nup133 domains reveals modular building blocks of the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 167, 591-597 (2004). (Pubitemid 39565140)
18. Melcak, I., Hoelz, A. & Blobel, G. Structure of Nup58/45 suggests flexible nuclear pore diameter by intermolecular sliding. Science 315, 1729-1732 (2007). (Pubitemid 46515630)
19. Debler, E. W. et al. A fence-like coat for the nuclear pore membrane. Mol. Cell 32, 815-826 (2008).
20. Boehmer, T., Jeudy, S., Berke, I. C. & Schwartz, T. U. Structural and functional studies of Nup107/Nup133 interaction and its implications for the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell 30, 721-731 (2008). (Pubitemid 351815127)
21. Nagy, V. et al. Structure of a trimeric nucleoporin complex reveals alternate oligomerization states. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17693-17698 (2009).
22. Seo, H. S. et al. Structural and functional analysis of Nup120 suggests ring formation of the Nup84 complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14281-14286 (2009).
23. Leksa, N. C., Brohawn, S. G. & Schwartz, T. U. The structure of the scaffold nucleoporin Nup120 reveals a new and unexpected domain architecture. Structure 17, 1082-1091 (2009).
24. Whittle, J. R. & Schwartz, T. U. Architectural nucleoporins Nup157/170 and Nup133 are structurally related and descend from a second ancestral element. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28442-28452 (2009).
25. Brohawn, S. G. & Schwartz, T. U. Molecular architecture of the Nup84-Nup145C-Sec13 edge element in the nuclear pore complex lattice. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1173-1177 (2009).
26. Ren, Y., Seo, H. S., Blobel, G. & Hoelz, A. Structural and functional analysis of the interaction between the nucleoporin Nup98 and the mRNA export factor Rae1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10406-10411 (2010).
27. Solmaz, S. R., Chauhan, R., Blobel, G. & Melcak, I. Molecular architecture of the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex. Cell 147, 590-602 (2011).
28. Yoshida, K., Seo, H. S., Debler, E. W., Blobel, G. & Hoelz, A. Structural and functional analysis of an essential nucleoporin heterotrimer on the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16571-16576 (2011).
29. Sampathkumar, P. et al. Atomic structure of the nuclear pore complex targeting domain of a Nup116 homologue from the yeast, Candida glabrata. Proteins 80, 2110-2116 (2012).
30. Rabut, G., Doye, V. & Ellenberg, J. Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 1114-1121 (2004). (Pubitemid 39468013)
31. D'Angelo, M. A., Raices, M., Panowski, S. H. & Hetzer, M. W. Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore complexes causes a loss of nuclear integrity in postmitotic cells. Cell 136, 284-295 (2009).
32. Savas, J. N. et al. Extremely long-lived nuclear pore proteins in the rat brain. Science 335, 942 (2012).
33. Cook, A., Bono, F., Jinek, M. & Conti, E. Structural biology of nucleocytoplasmic transport. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 647-671 (2007).
34. Terry, L. J., Shows, E. B. & Wente, S. R. Crossing the nuclear envelope: hierarchical regulation of nucleocytoplasmic transport. Science 318, 1412-1416 (2007). (Pubitemid 350208921)
35. Wente, S. R. & Rout, M. P. The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 2, a000562 (2010).
36. Grunwald, D., Singer, R. H. & Rout, M. Nuclear export dynamics of RNA-protein complexes. Nature 475, 333-341 (2011).
37. Grunwald, D. & Singer, R. H. Multiscale dynamics in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 100-106 (2012).
38. Grunwald, D. & Singer, R. H. In vivo imaging of labelled endogenous ?-actin mRNA during nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature 467, 604-607 (2010).
39. Ma, J. & Yang, W. Three-dimensional distribution of transient interactions in the nuclear pore complex obtained from single-molecule snapshots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7305-7310 (2010).
40. Kowalczyk, S. W. et al. Single-molecule transport across an individual biomimetic nuclear pore complex. Nature Nanotechnol. 6, 433-438 (2011).
41. Herrmann, M. et al. Near-field optical study of protein transport kinetics at a single nuclear pore. Nano Lett. 9, 3330-3336 (2009).
42. Goryaynov, A., Ma, J. & Yang, W. Single-molecule studies of nucleocytoplasmic transport: from one dimension to three dimensions. Integr. Biol.4, 10-21 (2012).
43. Ribbeck, K. & Gorlich, D. Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J. 20, 1320-1330 (2001). (Pubitemid 32233972)
44. Macara, I. G. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 570-594 (2001).
45. Peters, R. Translocation through the nuclear pore complex: selectivity and speed by reduction-of dimensionality. Traffic 6, 421-427 (2005). (Pubitemid 40542768)
46. Rout, M. P., Aitchison, J. D., Magnasco, M. O. & Chait, B. T. Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 622-628 (2003). (Pubitemid 37415027)
47. Terry, L. J. & Wente, S. R. Nuclear mRNA export requires specific FG nucleoporins for translocation through the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 178, 1121-1132 (2007). (Pubitemid 47480221)
48. Frey, S. & G?rlich, D. A saturated FG repeat hydrogel can reproduce the permeability properties of nuclear pore complexes. Cell 130, 512-523 (2007). (Pubitemid 47208521)
49. Frey, S., Richter, R. P. & G?rlich, D. FG rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties. Science 314, 815-817 (2006). (Pubitemid 44706647)
50. Patel, S. S., Belmont, B. J., Sante, J. M. & Rexach, M. F. Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 129, 83-96 (2007). (Pubitemid 46507580)
51. Strambio-De Castillia, C., Niepel, M. & Rout, M. P. The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 490-501 (2010).
52. Capelson, M., Doucet, C. & Hetzer, M. W. Nuclear pore complexes: guardians of the nuclear genome. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 585-597 (2010).
53. Nakano, H. et al. Unexpected role of nucleoporins in coordination of cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 10, 425-433 (2011).
54. Chatel, G. & Fahrenkrog, B. Dynamics and diverse functions of nuclear pore complex proteins. Nucleus 3, 162-171 (2012).
55. Misteli, T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128, 787-800 (2007). (Pubitemid 46273571)
56. Mateos-Langerak, J. et al. Nuclear architecture: is it important for genome function and can we prove it? J. Cell Biochem. 102, 1067-1075 (2007). (Pubitemid 350220028)
57. Dernburg, A. F. & Misteli, T. Nuclear architecture-an island no more. Dev. Cell 12, 329-334 (2007).
58. Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nature Genet. 42, 53-61 (2010).
59. Meister, P., Mango, S. E. & Gasser, S. M. Locking the genome: nuclear organization and cell fate. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21, 167-174 (2011).
60. Daigle, N. et al. Nuclear pore complexes form immobile networks and have a very low turnover in live mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 154, 71-84 (2001). (Pubitemid 34289279)
61. Brown, C. R., Kennedy, C. J., Delmar, V. A., Forbes, D. J. & Silver, P. A. Global histone acetylation induces functional genomic reorganization at mammalian nuclear pore complexes. Genes Dev. 22, 627-639 (2008). (Pubitemid 351342435)
62. Engelhardt, P. & Pusa, K. Nuclear pore complexes: "press-stud" elements of chromosomes in pairing and control. Nature New Biol. 240, 163-166 (1972).
63. Krull, S. et al. Protein Tpr is required for establishing nuclear pore-associated zones of heterochromatin exclusion. EMBO J. 29, 1659-1673 (2010).
64. Cordes, V. C., Reidenbach, S., Rackwitz, H. R. & Franke, W. W. Identification of protein p270/Tpr as a constitutive component of the nuclear pore complex-attached intranuclear filaments. J. Cell Biol. 136, 515-529 (1997). (Pubitemid 27083755)
65. Ishii, K., Arib, G., Lin, C., Van Houwe, G. & Laemmli, U. K. Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell 109, 551-562 (2002). (Pubitemid 34628719)
66. Hase, M. E. & Cordes, V. C. Direct interaction with nup153 mediates binding of Tpr to the periphery of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1923-1940 (2003). (Pubitemid 36583543)
67. Vaquerizas, J. M. et al. Nuclear pore proteins Nup153 and Megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000846 (2010).
68. Mendjan, S. et al. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 21, 811-823 (2006). (Pubitemid 43376131)
69. Grimaud, C. & Becker, P. B. The dosage compensation complex shapes the conformation of the X chromosome in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 23, 2490-2495 (2009).
70. Casolari, J. M. et al. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117, 427-439 (2004). (Pubitemid 38610229)
71. Brickner, J. H. & Walter, P. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol. 2, e342 (2004).
72. Light, W. H., Brickner, D. G., Brand, V. R. & Brickner, J. H. Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol. Cell 40, 112-125 (2010).
73. Cabal, G. G. et al. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 441, 770-773 (2006). (Pubitemid 43865225)
74. Luthra, R. et al. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 3042-3049 (2007). (Pubitemid 47084310)
75. Dieppois, G., Iglesias, N. & Stutz, F. Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 7858-7870 (2006). (Pubitemid 44630987)
76. Taddei, A. et al. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441, 774-778 (2006). (Pubitemid 43865226)
77. Green, E. M., Jiang, Y., Joyner, R. & Weis, K. A negative feedback loop at the nuclear periphery regulates GAL gene expression. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 1367-1375 (2012).
78. Ahmed, S. et al. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nature Cell Biol. 12, 111-118 (2010).
79. Brickner, D. G. et al. Transcription factor binding to a DNA zip code controls interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. Dev. Cell 22, 1234-1246 (2012).
80. Kohler, A., Schneider, M., Cabal, G. G., Nehrbass, U. & Hurt, E. Yeast Ataxin 7 links histone deubiquitination with gene gating and mRNA export. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 707-715 (2008). (Pubitemid 351772936)
81. Ellisdon, A. M., Jani, D., Kohler, A., Hurt, E. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for the interaction between yeast Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex components Sgf11 and Sus1. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 3850-3856 (2010).
82. Kurshakova, M. M. et al. SAGA and a novel Drosophila export complex anchor efficient transcription and mRNA export to NPC. EMBO J. 26, 4956-4965 (2007). (Pubitemid 350261274)
83. Rougemaille, M. et al. THO/Sub2p functions to coordinate 3? end processing with gene-nuclear pore association. Cell 135, 308-321 (2008).
84. Baker, S. P. & Grant, P. A. The SAGA continues: expanding the cellular role of a transcriptional co activator complex. Oncogene 26, 5329-5340 (2007). (Pubitemid 47255919)
85. Ellisdon, A. M., Dimitrova, L., Hurt, E. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for the assembly and nucleic acid binding of the TREX 2 transcription-export complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 328-336 (2012).
86. Rodriguez-Navarro, S. et al. Sus1, a functional component of the SAGA histone acetylase complex and the nuclear pore-associated mRNA export machinery. Cell 116, 75-86 (2004). (Pubitemid 38156185)
87. Fischer, T. et al. The mRNA export machinery requires the novel Sac3p-Thp1p complex to dock at the nucleoplasmic entrance of the nuclear pores. EMBO J. 21, 5843-5852 (2002). (Pubitemid 35315282)
88. Garcia-Oliver, E. Garcia-Molinero, V. & Rodriguez-Navarro, S. mRNA export and gene expression: the SAGA-TREX 2 connection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819, 555-565 (2012).
89. Grant, P. A. et al. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 11, 1640-1650 (1997). (Pubitemid 27300590)
90. Li, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, X. & Goodrich, D. W. Human hHpr1/p84/Thoc1 regulates transcriptional elongation and physically links RNA polymerase II and RNA processing factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 4023-4033 (2005). (Pubitemid 40617651)
91. Chavez, S. et al. A protein complex containing Tho2, Hpr1, Mft1 and a novel protein, Thp2, connects transcription elongation with mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19, 5824-5834 (2000).
92. Jimeno, S., Rondon, A. G., Luna, R. & Aguilera, A. The yeast THO complex and mRNA export factors link RNA metabolism with transcription and genome instability. EMBO J. 21, 3526-3535 (2002). (Pubitemid 34760582)
93. Kopytova, D. V. et al. Multifunctional factor ENY2 is associated with the THO complex and promotes its recruitment onto nascent mRNA. Genes Dev. 24, 86-96 (2010).
94. Lu, Q. et al. Arabidopsis homolog of the yeast TREX 2 mRNA export complex: components and anchoring nucleoporin. Plant J 61, 259-270 (2010).
95. Wickramasinghe, V. O., Stewart, M. & Laskey, R. A. GANP enhances the efficiency of mRNA nuclear export in mammalian cells. Nucleus 1, 393-396 (2010).
96. Hampsey, M., Singh, B. N., Ansari, A., Laine, J. P. & Krishnamurthy, S. Control of eukaryotic gene expression: gene loops and transcriptional memory. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 51, 118-125 (2011).
97. Tan-Wong, S. M., Wijayatilake, H. D. & Proudfoot, N. J. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev. 23, 2610-2624 (2009).
98. Laine, J. P., Singh, B. N., Krishnamurthy, S. & Hampsey, M. A physiological role for gene loops in yeast. Genes Dev. 23, 2604-2609 (2009).
99. Capelson, M. et al. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 140, 372-383 (2010).
100. Kalverda, B., Pickersgill, H., Shloma, V. V. & Fornerod, M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140, 360-371 (2010).
101. Kalverda, B. & Fornerod, M. Characterization of genome-nucleoporin interactions in Drosophila links chromatin insulators to the nuclear pore complex. Cell Cycle 9, 4812-4817 (2010).
102. Griffis, E. R., Craige, B., Dimaano, C., Ullman, K. S. & Powers, M. A. Distinct functional domains within nucleoporins Nup153 and Nup98 mediate transcription-dependent mobility. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 1991-2002 (2004). (Pubitemid 38401845)
103. Yasuhara, N., Oka, M. & Yoneda, Y. The role of the nuclear transport system in cell differentiation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 590-599 (2009).
104. Kamei, Y., Yuba, S., Nakayama, T. & Yoneda, Y. Three distinct classes of the ?-subunit of the nuclear pore-targeting complex (importin-?) are differentially expressed in adult mouse tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 47, 363-372 (1999). (Pubitemid 29102667)
105. Kohler, M. et al. Differential expression of classical nuclear transport factors during cellular proliferation and differentiation. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 12, 335-344 (2002).
106. Loveland, K. L., Hogarth, C., Szczepny, A., Prabhu, S. M. & Jans, D. A. Expression of nuclear transport importins ?1 and ?3 is regulated during rodent spermatogenesis. Biol. Reprod. 74, 67-74 (2006). (Pubitemid 43068792)
107. Yasuhara, N. et al. Triggering neural differentiation of ES cells by subtype switching of importin-?. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 72-79 (2007). (Pubitemid 46024199)
108. Hall, M. N., Griffin, C. A., Simionescu, A., Corbett, A. H. & Pavlath, G. K. Distinct roles for classical nuclear import receptors in the growth of multinucleated muscle cells. Dev. Biol. 357, 248-258 (2011).
109. Wang, X. et al. KPNA7, an oocyte-and embryo-specific karyopherin-? subtype, is required for porcine embryo development. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 24, 382-391 (2012).
110. Holt, J. E. et al. Regulation of nuclear import during differentiation; he IMP-? gene family and spermatogenesis. Curr. Genom. 8, 323-334 (2007). (Pubitemid 351210982)
111. van der Giessen, K. & Gallouzi, I. E. Involvement of transportin 2 mediated HuR import in muscle cell differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2619-2629 (2007). (Pubitemid 47025726)
112. Chemnitz, J., Turza, N., Hauber, I., Steinkasserer, A. & Hauber, J. The karyopherin CRM1 is required for dendritic cell maturation. Immunobiology 215, 370-379 (2010).
113. Damelin, M. & Silver, P. A. Mapping interactions between nuclear transport factors in living cells reveals pathways through the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell 5, 133-140 (2000). (Pubitemid 30105442)
114. Pyhtila, B. & Rexach, M. A gradient of affinity for the karyopherin Kap95p along the yeast nuclear pore complex. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 42699-42709 (2003). (Pubitemid 37310545)
115. Strawn, L. A., Shen, T., Shulga, N., Goldfarb, D. S. & Wente, S. R. Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 197-206 (2004). (Pubitemid 38344357)
116. Weis, K. The nuclear pore complex: oily spaghetti or gummy bear? Cell 130, 405-407 (2007). (Pubitemid 47198307)
117. Roth, P. et al. The Drosophila nucleoporin DNup88 localizes DNup214 and CRM1 on the nuclear envelope and attenuates NES-mediated nuclear export. J. Cell Biol. 163, 701-706 (2003). (Pubitemid 37517877)
118. Uv, A. E. et al. members only encodes a Drosophila nucleoporin required for rel protein import and immune response activation. Genes Dev. 14, 1945-1957 (2000). (Pubitemid 30639527)
119. Faria, A. M. et al. The nucleoporin Nup96 is required for proper expression of interferon-regulated proteins and functions. Immunity 24, 295-304 (2006).
120. Chakraborty, P. et al. Nucleoporin levels regulate cell cycle progression and phase-specific gene expression. Dev. Cell 15, 657-667 (2008).
121. Makhnevych, T., Lusk, C. P., Anderson, A. M., Aitchison, J. D. & Wozniak, R. W. Cell cycle regulated transport controlled by alterations in the nuclear pore complex. Cell 115, 813-823 (2003). (Pubitemid 38058494)
122. D'Angelo, M. A., Gomez-Cavazos, J. S., Mei, A., Lackner, D. H. & Hetzer, M. W. A change in nuclear pore complex composition regulates cell differentiation. Dev. Cell 22, 446-458 (2012).
123. Asally, M. et al. Nup358, a nucleoporin, functions as a key determinant of the nuclear pore complex structure remodeling during skeletal myogenesis. FEBS J. 278, 610-621 (2011).
124. Lupu, F., Alves, A., Anderson, K., Doye, V. & Lacy, E. Nuclear pore composition regulates neural stem/progenitor cell differentiation in the mouse embryo. Dev. Cell 14, 831-842 (2008). (Pubitemid 351757198)
125. Cerveny, K. L. et al. The zebrafish flotte lotte mutant reveals that the local retinal environment promotes the differentiation of proliferating precursors emerging from their stem cell niche. Development 137, 2107-2115 (2010).
126. de Jong-Curtain, T. A. et al. Abnormal nuclear pore formation triggers apoptosis in the intestinal epithelium of elys-deficient zebrafish. Gastroenterology 136, 902-911 (2009).
127. Davuluri, G. et al. Mutation of the zebrafish nucleoporin elys sensitizes tissue progenitors to replication stress. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000240 (2008).
128. Perez-Terzic, C. et al. Structural adaptation of the nuclear pore complex in stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 92, 444-452 (2003). (Pubitemid 36298205)
129. Perez-Terzic, C. et al. Structural plasticity of the cardiac nuclear pore complex in response to regulators of nuclear import. Circ. Res. 84, 1292-1301 (1999). (Pubitemid 29270044)
130. Zhang, X. et al. Mutation in nuclear pore component NUP155 leads to atrial fibrillation and early sudden cardiac death. Cell 135, 1017-1027 (2008).
131. Gigliotti, S. et al. Nup154, a new Drosophila gene essential for male and female gametogenesis is related to the Nup155 vertebrate nucleoporin gene. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1195-1207 (1998). (Pubitemid 28429102)
132. Kiger, A. A., Gigliotti, S. & Fuller, M. T. Developmental genetics of the essential Drosophila nucleoporin nup154: allelic differences due to an outward-directed promoter in the P element 3? end. Genetics 153, 799-812 (1999).
133. Riparbelli, M. G., Gigliotti, S. & Callaini, G. The Drosophila nucleoporin gene nup154 is required for correct microfilament dynamics and cell death during oogenesis. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 64, 590-604 (2007). (Pubitemid 47106164)
134. Grimaldi, M. R. Cozzolino, L., Malva, C., Graziani, F. & Gigliotti, S. nup154 genetically interacts with cup and plays a cell-type-specific function during Drosophila melanogaster egg-chamber development. Genetics 175, 1751-1759 (2007). (Pubitemid 46789960)
135. Colozza, G. et al. Drosophila nucleoporin Nup154 controls cell viability, proliferation and nuclear accumulation of Mad transcription factor. Tissue Cell 43, 254-261 (2011).
136. Senger, S. et al. The nucleoporin Seh1 forms a complex with Mio and serves an essential tissue-specific function in Drosophila oogenesis. Development 138, 2133-2142 (2011).
137. Iida, T. & Lilly, M. A. missing oocyte encodes a highly conserved nuclear protein required for the maintenance of the meiotic cycle and oocyte identity in Drosophila. Development 131, 1029-1039 (2004). (Pubitemid 38380457)
138. Parrott, B. B. et al. Nucleoporin98 96 function is required for transit amplification divisions in the germ line of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 6, e25087 (2011).
139. Fontoura, B. M., Blobel, G. & Matunis, M. J. A conserved biogenesis pathway for nucleoporins: proteolytic processing of a 186 kilodalton precursor generates Nup98 and the novel nucleoporin, Nup96. J. Cell Biol. 144, 1097-1112 (1999). (Pubitemid 29157291)
140. Fung, T. K., Chung, M. I., Liang, R. & Leung, A. Y. Role of a novel zebrafish nup98 during embryonic development. Exp. Hematol. 38, 1014-1021 (2010).
141. Voronina, E. & Seydoux, G. The C. elegans homolog of nucleoporin Nup98 is required for the integrity and function of germline P granules. Development 137, 1441-1450 (2010).
142. Smitherman, M., Lee, K., Swanger, J., Kapur, R. & Clurman, B. E. Characterization and targeted disruption of murine Nup50, a p27Kip1-interacting component of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 5631-5642 (2000). (Pubitemid 30482897)
143. Wu, X. et al. Disruption of the FG nucleoporin NUP98 causes selective changes in nuclear pore complex stoichiometry and function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3191-3196 (2001). (Pubitemid 32220821)
144. Aslanukov, A. et al. RanBP2 modulates Cox11 and hexokinase I activities and haploinsufficiency of RanBP2 causes deficits in glucose metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2, e177 (2006).
145. Olsson, M., Scheele, S. & Ekblom, P. Limited expression of nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein 210 in cell lines and tissues suggests cell-type specific nuclear pores in metazoans. Exp. Cell Res. 292, 359-370 (2004). (Pubitemid 38018851)
146. Cho, A. R. et al. Tissue-specific expression and subcellular localization of ALADIN, the absence of which causes human triple A syndrome. Exp. Mol. Med. 41, 381-386 (2009).
147. Hu, T. & Gerace, L. cDNA cloning and analysis of the expression of nucleoporin p45. Gene 221, 245-253 (1998). (Pubitemid 29023752)
148. Guan, T. et al. Nup50, a nucleoplasmically oriented nucleoporin with a role in nuclear protein export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 5619-5630 (2000). (Pubitemid 30482896)
149. Zhang, X. et al. Localization of a human nucleoporin 155 gene (NUP155) to the 5p13 region and cloning of its cDNA. Genomics 57, 144-151 (1999). (Pubitemid 29187947)
150. Huebner, A. et al. The triple A syndrome is due to mutations in ALADIN, a novel member of the nuclear pore complex. Endocr. Res. 30, 891-899 (2004). (Pubitemid 40070190)
151. Basel-Vanagaite, L. et al. Mutated nup62 causes autosomal recessive infantile bilateral striatal necrosis. Ann. Neurol. 60, 214-222 (2006). (Pubitemid 44182396)
152. Neilson, D. E. et al. Infection-triggered familial or recurrent cases of acute necrotizing encephalopathy caused by mutations in a component of the nuclear pore, RANBP2. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 84, 44-51 (2009).
153. Cronshaw, J. M. & Matunis, M. J. The nuclear pore complex protein ALADIN is mislocalized in triple A syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5823-5827 (2003). (Pubitemid 36576892)
154. Cho, K. I. et al. Haploinsufficiency of RanBP2 is neuroprotective against light-elicited and age-dependent degeneration of photoreceptor neurons. Cell Death Differ. 16, 287-297 (2009).
155. Lee, J. S., Smith, E. & Shilatifard, A. The language of histone crosstalk. Cell 142, 682-685 (2010).
156. Grosso, A. R. et al. Tissue-specific splicing factor gene expression signatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 4823-4832 (2008).
157. Hallegger, M., Llorian, M. & Smith, C. W. Alternative splicing: global insights. FEBS J. 277, 856-866 (2010).
158. Luco, R. F. & Misteli, T. More than a splicing code: integrating the role of RNA, chromatin and non-coding RNA in alternative splicing regulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21, 366-372 (2011).
159. Kondrashov, N. et al. Ribosome-mediated specificity in Hox mRNA translation and vertebrate tissue patterning. Cell 145, 383-397 (2011).
160. Komili, S., Farny, N. G., Roth, F. P. & Silver, P. A. Functional specificity among ribosomal proteins regulates gene expression. Cell 131, 557-571 (2007). (Pubitemid 350007691)
161. Niepel, M., Strambio-de Castillia, C., Fasolo, J., Chait, B. T. & Rout, M. P. The nuclear pore complex-associated protein, Mlp2p, binds to the yeast spindle pole body and promotes its efficient assembly. J. Cell Biol. 170, 225-235 (2005). (Pubitemid 41043805)
162. Kinoshita, Y., Kalir, T., Dottino, P. & Kohtz, D. S. Nuclear distributions of NUP62 and NUP214 suggest architectural diversity and spatial patterning among nuclear pore complexes. PLoS ONE 7, e36137 (2012).
163. Schirmer, E. C. et al. Nuclear membrane proteins with potential disease links found by subtractive proteomics. Science 301, 1380-1382 (2003). (Pubitemid 37075814)
164. Korfali, N. et al. The leukocyte nuclear envelope proteome varies with cell activation and contains novel transmembrane proteins that affect genome architecture. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 9, 2571-2585 (2010).
165. Chen, I. H., Huber, M., Guan, T., Bubeck, A. & Gerace, L. Nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins (NETs) that are up regulated during myogenesis. BMC Cell Biol. 7, 38 (2006).
166. Dauer, W. T. & Worman, H. J. The nuclear envelope as a signaling node in development and disease. Dev. Cell 17, 626-638 (2009).
167. Mejat, A. & Misteli, T. LINC complexes in health and disease. Nucleus 1, 40-52 (2010).
168. Fiserova, J., Kiseleva, E. & Goldberg, M. W. Nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex structure and organization in tobacco BY 2 cells. Plant J. 59, 243-255 (2009).
169. Tamura, K., Fukao, Y., Iwamoto, M., Haraguchi, T. & Hara-Nishimura, I. Identification and characterization of nuclear pore complex components in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22, 4084-4097 (2010).
170. Stavru, F. et al. NDC1: a crucial membrane-integral nucleoporin of metazoan nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Biol. 173, 509-519 (2006). (Pubitemid 43765198)
171. Boruc, J., Zhou, X. & Meier, I. Dynamics of the plant nuclear envelope and nuclear pore. Plant Physiol. 158, 78-86 (2012).
172. Meier, I. & Brkljacic, J. The Arabidopsis nuclear pore and nuclear envelope. Arabidopsis Book 8, e0139 (2010).
173. Parry, G., Ward, S., Cernac, A., Dharmasiri, S. & Estelle, M. The Arabidopsis SUPPRESSOR OF AUXIN RESISTANCE proteins are nucleoporins with an important role in hormone signaling and development. Plant Cell 18, 1590-1603 (2006). (Pubitemid 44025545)
174. Dong, C. H. et al. A putative Arabidopsis nucleoporin, AtNUP160, is critical for RNA export and required for plant tolerance to cold stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 9533-9543 (2006).
175. Jacob, Y., Mongkolsiriwatana, C., Veley, K. M., Kim, S. Y. & Michaels, S. D. The nuclear pore protein AtTPR is required for RNA homeostasis,
176. Xu, X. M., Rose, A. & Meier, I. NUA activities at the plant nuclear pore. Plant Signal. Behav. 2, 553-555 (2007).
177. Lee, H. et al. The Arabidopsis HOS1 gene negatively regulates cold signal transduction and encodes a RING finger protein that displays cold-regulated nucleo- cytoplasmic partitioning. Genes Dev. 15, 912-924 (2001). (Pubitemid 32295071)
178. Saito, K. et al. NUCLEOPORIN85 is required for calcium spiking, fungal and bacterial symbioses, and seed production in Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell 19, 610-624 (2007). (Pubitemid 46941682)
179. Cheng, Y. T. et al. Nuclear pore complex component MOS7/Nup88 is required for innate immunity and nuclear accumulation of defense regulators in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2503-2516 (2009).
180. Zhang, Y. & Li, X. A putative nucleoporin 96 is required for both basal defense and constitutive resistance responses mediated by suppressor of npr1 1, constitutive 1. Plant Cell 17, 1306-1316 (2005). (Pubitemid 43142144)
181. Kanamori, N. et al. A nucleoporin is required for induction of Ca2+ spiking in legume nodule development and essential for rhizobial and fungal symbiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 359-364 (2006). (Pubitemid 43122405)
182. Cernac, A., Lincoln, C., Lammer, D. & Estelle, M. The SAR1 gene of Arabidopsis acts downstream of the AXR1 gene in auxin response. Development 124, 1583-1591 (1997). (Pubitemid 27223173)
183. Wiermer, M. et al. Putative members of the Arabidopsis Nup107 160 nuclear pore sub-complex contribute to pathogen defense. Plant J. 70, 796-808 (2012).
184. Roth, C. & Wiermer, M. Nucleoporins Nup160 and Seh1 are required for disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 7, 1212-1214 (2012).
185. Dong, C. H., Agarwal, M., Zhang, Y., Xie, Q. & Zhu, J. K. The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8281-8286 (2006). (Pubitemid 43801089)
186. Groth, M. et al. NENA, a Lotus japonicus homolog of Sec13, is required for rhizodermal infection by arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and rhizobia but dispensable for cortical endosymbiotic development. Plant Cell 22, 2509-2526 (2010).
187. Olsson, M. Ekblom, M., Fecker, L., Kurkinen, M. & Ekblom, P. cDNA cloning and embryonic expression of mouse nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein 210 mRNA. Kidney Int. 56, 827-838 (1999). (Pubitemid 29411711)