Unexpected role of nucleoporins in coordination of cell cycle progression

Cell Cycle

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 425-433

  Nakano, Hiroshi ^a   Wang, Wei ^a   Hashizume, Chieko ^a   Funasaka, Tatsuyoshi ^a   Sato, Hiroshi ^a   Wong, Richard W ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; Centrosomes; Kinetochores; Mitotic spindle; NPC

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOPORIN;

ANEUPLOIDY; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; HUMAN; MACROMOLECULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; REVIEW; RNA TRANSPORT; SISTER CHROMATID;

EID: 79851498250     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.3.14721     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Strambio-De-Castillia C, Niepel M, Rout MP. The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:490-501.
2. Webster M, Witkin KL, Cohen-Fix O. Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:1477-86.
3. Blobel G. Three-Dimensional Organization of Chromatids by Nuclear Envelope-Associated Structures. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010.
4. Doucet CM, Hetzer MW. Nuclear pore biogenesis into an intact nuclear envelope. Chromosoma 2010; 119:469-77.
5. Lim RY, Aebi U, Fahrenkrog B. Towards reconciling structure and function in the nuclear pore complex. Histochem Cell Biol 2008; 129:105-16.
6. Callan HG, Tomlin SG. Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1950; 137:367-78.
7. Gall JG. Octagonal nuclear pores. J Cell Biol 1967; 32:391-9.
8. Aaronson RP, Blobel G. On the attachment of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 1974; 62:746-54.
9. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007; 450:695-701. (Pubitemid 350207701)
10. Frenkiel-Krispin D, Maco B, Aebi U, Medalia O. Structural analysis of a metazoan nuclear pore complex reveals a fused concentric ring architecture. J Mol Biol 2010; 395:578-86.
11. Brohawn SG, Schwartz TU. Molecular architecture of the Nup84-Nup145C-Sec13 edge element in the nuclear pore complex lattice. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:1173-7.
12. Hsia KC, Stavropoulos P, Blobel G, Hoelz A. Architecture of a coat for the nuclear pore membrane. Cell 2007; 131:1313-26. (Pubitemid 350297420)
13. Wente SR, Rout MP. The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2:562.
14. Schwartz TU. Modularity within the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15:221-6.
15. Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao Y, Chait BT. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 2000; 148:635-51.
16. Cronshaw JM, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang W, Chait BT, Matunis MJ. Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 2002; 158:915-27. (Pubitemid 35001082)
17. Xu S, Powers MA. Nuclear pore proteins and cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009; 20:620-30.
18. Tran EJ, Wente SR. Dynamic nuclear pore complexes: life on the edge. Cell 2006; 125:1041-53. (Pubitemid 43866205)
19. Hetzer MW. The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2:539.
20. Hetzer MW, Wente SR. Border control at the nucleus: biogenesis and organization of the nuclear membrane and pore complexes. Dev Cell 2009; 17:606-16.
21. Hoelz A, Blobel G. Cell biology: popping out of the nucleus. Nature 2004; 432:815-6. (Pubitemid 40037133)
22. Yasuhara N, Oka M, Yoneda Y. The role of the nuclear transport system in cell differentiation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009; 20:590-9.
23. Cullen BR. Nuclear mRNA export: insights from virology. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28:419-24. (Pubitemid 36976744)
24. Blevins MB, Smith AM, Phillips EM, Powers MA. Complex formation among the RNA export proteins Nup98, Rae1/Gle2 and TAP. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:20979-88. (Pubitemid 36806407)
25. Kohler A, Hurt E. Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:761-73. (Pubitemid 47462133)
26. Stewart M. Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:195-208.
27. Peters R. Translocation through the nuclear pore: Kaps pave the way. Bioessays 2009; 31:466-77.
28. Guttinger S, Laurell E, Kutay U. Orchestrating nuclear envelope disassembly and reassembly during mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:178-91.
29. Walczak CE, Heald R. Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly and function. Int Rev Cytol 2008; 265:111-58. (Pubitemid 351215987)
30. Burke B, Ellenberg J. Remodelling the walls of the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:487-97. (Pubitemid 34733430)
31. Maul GG. Nuclear pore complexes. Elimination and reconstruction during mitosis. J Cell Biol 1977; 74:492-500. (Pubitemid 8153984)
32. Maul GG. The nuclear and the cytoplasmic pore complex: structure, dynamics, distribution and evolution. Int Rev Cytol 1977; 75-186.
33. D'Angelo MA, Hetzer MW. Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes. Trends Cell Biol 2008; 18:456-66.
34. Wozniak R, Burke B, Doye V. Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 67:2215-30.
35. Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman PT, Roydasgupta R, Kuo WL, et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell 2006; 10:529-41. (Pubitemid 44854748)
36. Wong RW, Blobel G, Coutavas E. Rae1 interaction with NuMA is required for bipolar spindle formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:19783-7. (Pubitemid 46037508)
37. Faria PA, Chakraborty P, Levay A, Barber GN, Ezelle HJ, Enninga J, et al. VSV disrupts the Rae1/mrnp41 mRNA nuclear export pathway. Mol Cell 2005; 17:93-102. (Pubitemid 40075368)
38. Pritchard CE, Fornerod M, Kasper LH, van Deursen JM. RAE1 is a shuttling mRNA export factor that binds to a GLEBS-like NUP98 motif at the nuclear pore complex through multiple domains. J Cell Biol 1999; 145:237-54.
39. Ren Y, Seo HS, Blobel G, Hoelz A. Structural and functional analysis of the interaction between the nucleoporin Nup98 and the mRNA export factor Rae1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:10406-11.
40. Jeganathan KB, Malureanu L, van Deursen JM. The Rae1-Nup98 complex prevents aneuploidy by inhibiting securin degradation. Nature 2005; 438:1036-9. (Pubitemid 43093978)
41. Kraemer D, Dresbach T, Drenckhahn D. Mrnp41 (Rae 1p) associates with microtubules in HeLa cells and in neurons. Eur J Cell Biol 2001; 80:733-40. (Pubitemid 34092942)
42. Blower MD, Nachury M, Heald R, Weis K. A Rae1-containing ribonucleoprotein complex is required for mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 2005; 121:223-34. (Pubitemid 40546390)
43. Wong RW, Blobel G. Cohesin subunit SMC1 associates with mitotic microtubules at the spindle pole. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:15441-5.
44. Wong RW. Interaction between Rae1 and cohesin subunit SMC1 is required for proper spindle formation. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:198-200.
45. Wong RW. An update on cohesin function as a 'molecular glue' on chromosomes and spindles. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1754-8.
46. Kong X, Ball AR Jr, Sonoda E, Feng J, Takeda S, Fukagawa T, et al. Cohesin associates with spindle poles in a mitosis-specific manner and functions in spindle assembly in vertebrate cells. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:1289-301.
47. Diaz-Martinez LA, Beauchene NA, Furniss K, Esponda P, Gimenez-Abian JF, Clarke DJ. Cohesin is needed for bipolar mitosis in human cells. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1764-73.
48. Diaz-Martinez LA, Clarke DJ. Chromosome cohesion and the spindle checkpoint. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:2733-40.
49. Gimenez-Abian JF, Diaz-Martinez LA, Beauchene NA, Hsu WS, Tsai HJ, Clarke DJ. Determinants of Rad21 localization at the centrosome in human cells. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1759-63.
50. Beauchene NA, Diaz-Martinez LA, Furniss K, Hsu WS, Tsai HJ, Chamberlain C, et al. Rad21 is required for centrosome integrity in human cells independently of its role in chromosome cohesion. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1774-80.
51. Rao CV, Yamada HY, Yao Y, Dai W. Enhanced genomic instabilities caused by deregulated microtubule dynamics and chromosome segregation: a perspective from genetic studies in mice. Carcinogenesis 2009; 30:1469-74.
52. Lee SH, Sterling H, Burlingame A, McCormick F. Tpr directly binds to Mad1 and Mad2 and is important for the Mad1-Mad2-mediated mitotic spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2926-31.
53. Lince-Faria M, Maffini S, Orr B, Ding Y, Claudia F, Sunkel CE, et al. Spatiotemporal control of mitosis by the conserved spindle matrix protein Megator. J Cell Biol 2009; 184:647-57.
54. Nakano H, Funasaka T, Hashizume C, Wong RW. Nucleoporin translocated promoter region (Tpr) associates with dynein complex, preventing chromosome lagging formation during mitosis. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:10841-9.
55. Peschard P, Park M. From Tpr-Met to Met, tumorigenesis and tubes. Oncogene 2007; 26:1276-85. (Pubitemid 46328462)
56. Belgareh N, Rabut G, Bai SW, van Overbeek M, Beaudouin J, Daigle N, et al. An evolutionarily conserved NPC subcomplex, which redistributes in part to kinetochores in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 2001; 154:1147-60. (Pubitemid 34286193)
57. Loiodice I, Alves A, Rabut G, Van Overbeek M, Ellenberg J, Sibarita JB, et al. The entire Nup107-160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:3333-44. (Pubitemid 38850127)
58. Resendes KK, Rasala BA, Forbes DJ. Centrin 2 localizes to the vertebrate nuclear pore and plays a role in mRNA and protein export. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:1755-69.
59. Glavy JS, Krutchinsky AN, Cristea IM, Berke IC, Boehmer T, Blobel G, et al. Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of the nuclear pore Nup107-160 subcomplex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:3811-6. (Pubitemid 47181536)
60. Zuccolo M, Alves A, Galy V, Bolhy S, Formstecher E, Racine V, et al. The human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J 2007; 26:1853-64. (Pubitemid 46624053)
61. Rasala BA, Ramos C, Harel A, Forbes DJ. Capture of AT-rich chromatin by ELYS recruits POM121 and NDC1 to initiate nuclear pore assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:3982-96.
62. Platani M, Santarella-Mellwig R, Posch M, Walczak R, Swedlow JR, Mattaj IW. The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex promotes mitotic events via control of the localization state of the chromosome passenger complex. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:5260-75.
63. Mishra RK, Chakraborty P, Arnaoutov A, Fontoura BM, Dasso M. The Nup107-160 complex and gamma-TuRC regulate microtubule polymerization at kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:164-9.
64. Matunis MJ, Pickart CM. Beginning at the end with SUMO. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12:565-6. (Pubitemid 40980802)
65. Wu J, Matunis MJ, Kraemer D, Blobel G, Coutavas E. Nup358, a cytoplasmically exposed nucleoporin with peptide repeats, Ran-GTP binding sites, zinc fingers, a cyclophilin A homologous domain and a leucine-rich region. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:14209-13.
66. Joseph J, Tan SH, Karpova TS, McNally JG, Dasso M. SUMO-1 targets RanGAP1 to kinetochores and mitotic spindles. J Cell Biol 2002; 156:595-602. (Pubitemid 34839875)
67. Joseph J, Liu ST, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ, Dasso M. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr Biol 2004; 14:611-7. (Pubitemid 38458952)
68. Arnaoutov A, Azuma Y, Ribbeck K, Joseph J, Boyarchuk Y, Karpova T, et al. Crm1 is a mitotic effector of Ran-GTP in somatic cells. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:626-32. (Pubitemid 40796986)
69. Salina D, Enarson P, Rattner JB, Burke B. Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol 2003; 162:991-1001. (Pubitemid 37174183)
70. Dawlaty MM, Malureanu L, Jeganathan KB, Kao E, Sustmann C, Tahk S, et al. Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIalpha. Cell 2008; 133:103-15. (Pubitemid 351442988)
71. Hashizume C, Nakano H, Yoshida K, Wong RW. Characterization of the role of the tumor marker Nup88 in mitosis. Mol Cancer 2010; 9:119.
72. Mackay DR, Elgort SW, Ullman KS. The nucleoporin Nup153 has separable roles in both early mitotic progression and the resolution of mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:1652-60.
73. Lussi Y, Shumaker D, Shimi T, Fahrenkrog B. The nucleoporin Nup153 affects spindle checkpoint activity due to an association with Mad1. Nucleus 2010; 1:71-84.
74. Mackay DR, Makise M, Ullman KS. Defects in nuclear pore assembly lead to activation of an Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2010; 191:923-31.