Dynamics and diverse functions of nuclear pore complex proteins

Nucleus

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Chatel, Guillaume ^a   Fahrenkrog, Birthe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cell migration; Cell signaling; Differentiation; Nuclear pore complex; Nucleoporin; Tissue specific

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC AMP; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1; EXPORTIN 1; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTOR; MESSENGER RNA; NUCLEOPORIN; PROTEIN NUP133; PROTEIN NUP153; PROTEIN NUP155; PROTEIN NUP214; PROTEIN NUP358; PROTEIN NUP50; PROTEIN NUP62; PROTEIN NUP96; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; CYTOKINESIS; DNA REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION;

METAZOA;

EID: 84859534383     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.3.2.19674     Document Type: Review

References (104)

1. Wälde S, Kehlenbach RH. The Part and the Whole: functions of nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Trends Cell Biol 2010; 20:461-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.05.001
2. Wente SR, Rout MP. The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2:a000562; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000562
3. Lim RY, Aebi U, Fahrenkrog B. Towards reconciling structure and function in the nuclear pore complex. Histochem Cell Biol 2008; 129:105-16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00418-007-0371-x
4. Lim RY, Fahrenkrog B. The nuclear pore complex up close. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006; 18:342-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.03.006
5. D'Angelo MA, Hetzer MW. Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes. Trends Cell Biol 2008; 18:456-66; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2008.07.009
6. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007; 450: 695-701; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06405
7. Fiserova J, Kiseleva E, Goldberg MW. Nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex structure and organization in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant J 2009; 59:243-55; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03865.x
8. Fahrenkrog B, Hurt EC, Aebi U, Panté N. Molecular architecture of the yeast nuclear pore complex: localization of Nsp1p subcomplexes. J Cell Biol 1998; 143: 577-88; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.143.3.577
9. Beck M, Förster F, Ecke M, Plitzko JM, Melchior F, Gerisch G, et al. Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 2004; 306:1387-90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1104808
10. Elad N, Maimon T, Frenkiel-Krispin D, Lim RY, Medalia O. Structural analysis of the nuclear pore complex by integrated approaches. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19:226-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.009
11. Yang Q, Rout MP, Akey CW. Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. Mol Cell 1998; 1:223-34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80023-4
12. Frenkiel-Krispin D, Maco B, Aebi U, Medalia O. Structural analysis of a metazoan nuclear pore complex reveals a fused concentric ring architecture. J Mol Biol 2010; 395:578-86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.010
13. Stoffler D, Feja B, Fahrenkrog B, Walz J, Typke D, Aebi U. Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. J Mol Biol 2003; 328:119-30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00266-3
14. Schwartz TU. Modularity within the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15:221-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2005.03.003
15. Devos D, Dokudovskaya S, Williams R, Alber F, Eswar N, Chait BT, et al. Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:2172-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506345103
16. Chatel G, Fahrenkrog B. Nucleoporins: leaving the nuclear pore complex for a successful mitosis. Cell Signal 2011; 23:1555-62; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.05.023
17. Wozniak R, Burke B, Doye V. Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 67:2215-30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0325-7
18. Nakano H, Wang W, Hashizume C, Funasaka T, Sato H, Wong RW. Unexpected role of nucleoporins in coordination of cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:425-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.3.14721
19. Arib G, Akhtar A. Multiple facets of nuclear periphery in gene expression control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011; 23:346-53; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010.12.005
20. Capelson M, Doucet C, Hetzer MW. Nuclear pore complexes: guardians of the nuclear genome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:585-97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.059
21. D'Angelo MA, Raices M, Panowski SH, Hetzer MW. Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore complexes causes a loss of nuclear integrity in postmitotic cells. Cell 2009; 136:284-95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.037
22. Daigle N, Beaudouin J, Hartnell L, Imreh G, Hallberg E, Lippincott-Schwartz J, et al. Nuclear pore complexes form immobile networks and have a very low turnover in live mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 2001; 154:71-84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200101089
23. Rabut G, Doye V, Ellenberg J. Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:1114-21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1184
24. Ball JR, Ullman KS. Versatility at the nuclear pore complex: lessons learned from the nucleoporin Nup153. Chromosoma 2005; 114:319-30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-005-0019-3
25. Griffis ER, Craige B, Dimaano C, Ullman KS, Powers MA. Distinct functional domains within nucleoporins Nup153 and Nup98 mediate transcription-dependent mobility. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:1991-2002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E03-10-0743
26. Nakielny S, Shaikh S, Burke B, Dreyfuss G. Nup153 is an M9-containing mobile nucleoporin with a novel Ran-binding domain. EMBO J 1999; 18:1982-95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.7.1982
27. Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U. The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4:757-66;
28. Fahrenkrog B, Maco B, Fager AM, Köser J, Sauder U, Ullman KS, et al. Domain-specific antibodies reveal multiple-site topology of Nup153 within the nuclear pore complex. J Struct Biol 2002; 140:254-67; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8477(02)00524-5
29. Walther TC, Fornerod M, Pickersgill H, Goldberg M, Allen TD, Mattaj IW. The nucleoporin Nup153 is required for nuclear pore basket formation, nuclear pore complex anchoring and import of a subset of nuclear proteins. EMBO J 2001; 20:5703-14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.20.5703
30. Panté N, Thomas F, Aebi U, Burke B, Bastos R. Recombinant Nup153 incorporates in vivo into Xenopus oocyte nuclear pore complexes. J Struct Biol 2000; 129:306-12; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.2000.4232
31. Paulillo SM, Phillips EM, Köser J, Sauder U, Ullman KS, Powers MA, et al. Nucleoporin domain topology is linked to the transport status of the nuclear pore complex. J Mol Biol 2005; 351:784-98; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.034
32. Schwarz-Herion K, Maco B, Sauder U, Fahrenkrog B. Domain topology of the p62 complex within the 3-D architecture of the nuclear pore complex. J Mol Biol 2007; 370:796-806; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.030
33. Chatel G, Desai SH, Mattheyses AL, Powers MA, Fahrenkrog B. Domain topology of nucleoporin Nup98 within the nuclear pore complex. J Struct Biol 2012; 177:81-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2011.11.004
34. Paulillo SM, Powers MA, Ullman KS, Fahrenkrog B. Changes in nucleoporin domain topology in response to chemical effectors. J Mol Biol 2006; 363:39-50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.021
35. Lim RY, Fahrenkrog B, Köser J, Schwarz-Herion K, Deng J, Aebi U. Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science 2007; 318:640-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1145980
36. Lindsay ME, Plafker K, Smith AE, Clurman BE, Macara IG. Npap60/Nup50 is a tri-stable switch that stimulates importin-alpha:beta-mediated nuclear protein import. Cell 2002; 110:349-60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00836-X
37. Dilworth DJ, Suprapto A, Padovan JC, Chait BT, Wozniak RW, Rout MP, et al. Nup2p dynamically associates with the distal regions of the yeast nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 2001; 153:1465-78; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.153.7.1465
38. Oka M, Asally M, Yasuda Y, Ogawa Y, Tachibana T, Yoneda Y. The mobile FG nucleoporin Nup98 is a cofactor for Crm1-dependent protein export. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:1885-96; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1041
39. Laurell E, Beck K, Krupina K, Theerthagiri G, Bodenmiller B, Horvath P, et al. Phosphorylation of Nup98 by multiple kinases is crucial for NPC disassembly during mitotic entry. Cell 2011; 144:539-50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.012
40. Kowalczyk SW, Kapinos L, Blosser TR, Magalhães T, van Nies P, Lim RY, et al. Single-molecule transport across an individual biomimetic nuclear pore complex. Nat Nanotechnol 2011; 6:433-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.88
41. Dultz E, Zanin E, Wurzenberger C, Braun M, Rabut G, Sironi L, et al. Systematic kinetic analysis of mitotic dis- and reassembly of the nuclear pore in living cells. J Cell Biol 2008; 180:857-65; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200707026
42. Krull S, Thyberg J, Björkroth B, Rackwitz HR, Cordes VC. Nucleoporins as components of the nuclear pore complex core structure and Tpr as the architectural element of the nuclear basket. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:4261-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-03-0165
43. Griffis ER, Altan N, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Powers MA. Nup98 is a mobile nucleoporin with transcriptiondependent dynamics. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:1282-97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-11-0538
44. Griffis ER, Xu S, Powers MA. Nup98 localizes to both nuclear and cytoplasmic sides of the nuclear pore and binds to two distinct nucleoporin subcomplexes. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14:600-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E02-09-0582
45. Finlay DR, Meier E, Bradley P, Horecka J, Forbes DJ. A complex of nuclear pore proteins required for pore function. J Cell Biol 1991; 114:169-83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.114.1.169
46. Kita K, Omata S, Horigome T. Purification and characterization of a nuclear pore glycoprotein complex containing p62. J Biochem 1993; 113:377-82;
47. Monette A, Panté N, Mouland AJ. HIV-1 remodels the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:619-31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201008064
48. Hubert T, Van Impe K, Vandekerckhove J, Gettemans J. The actin-capping protein CapG localizes to microtubule-dependent organelles during the cell cycle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 380: 166-70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.064
49. Hubert T, Vandekerckhove J, Gettemans J. Exo70-mediated recruitment of nucleoporin Nup62 at the leading edge of migrating cells is required for cell migration. Traffic 2009; 10:1257-71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00940.x
50. Nakahara J, Kanekura K, Nawa M, Aiso S, Suzuki N. Abnormal expression of TIP30 and arrested nucleocytoplasmic transport within oligodendrocyte precursor cells in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest 2009; 119:169-81;
51. Prodon F, Hanawa K, Nishida H. Actin microfilaments guide the polarized transport of nuclear pore complexes and the cytoplasmic dispersal of Vasa mRNA during GVBD in the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Biol 2009; 330:377-88; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.006
52. Zhou L, Panté N. The nucleoporin Nup153 maintains nuclear envelope architecture and is required for cell migration in tumor cells. FEBS Lett 2010; 584:3013-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.038
53. Wu J, Matunis MJ, Kraemer D, Blobel G, Coutavas E. Nup358, a cytoplasmically exposed nucleoporin with peptide repeats, Ran-GTP binding sites, zinc fingers, a cyclophilin A homologous domain, and a leucine-rich region. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:14209-13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.23.14209
54. Walther TC, Pickersgill HS, Cordes VC, Goldberg MW, Allen TD, Mattaj IW, et al. The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. J Cell Biol 2002; 158:63-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200202088
55. Yokoyama N, Hayashi N, Seki T, Panté N, Ohba T, Nishii K, et al. A giant nucleopore protein that binds Ran/TC4. Nature 1995; 376:184-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/376184a0
56. Hutten S, Flotho A, Melchior F, Kehlenbach RH. The Nup358-RanGAP complex is required for efficient importin alpha/beta-dependent nuclear import. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:2300-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-12-1279
57. Hutten S, Wälde S, Spillner C, Hauber J, Kehlenbach RH. The nuclear pore component Nup358 promotes transportin-dependent nuclear import. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:1100-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.040154
58. Singh BB, Patel HH, Roepman R, Schick D, Ferreira PA. The zinc finger cluster domain of RanBP2 is a specific docking site for the nuclear export factor, exportin-1. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:37370-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.52.37370
59. Hamada M, Haeger A, Jeganathan KB, van Ree JH, Malureanu L, Wälde S, et al. Ran-dependent docking of importin-beta to RanBP2/Nup358 filaments is essential for protein import and cell viability. J Cell Biol 2011; 194:597-612; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201102018
60. Salina D, Enarson P, Rattner JB, Burke B. Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol 2003; 162:991-1001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200304080
61. Arnaoutov A, Azuma Y, Ribbeck K, Joseph J, Boyarchuk Y, Karpova T, et al. Crm1 is a mitotic effector of Ran-GTP in somatic cells. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:626-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1263
62. Joseph J, Liu ST, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ, Dasso M. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule- kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr Biol 2004; 14:611-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.031
63. Pichler A, Gast A, Seeler JS, Dejean A, Melchior F. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 2002; 108:109-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00633-X
64. Dawlaty MM, Malureanu L, Jeganathan KB, Kao E, Sustmann C, Tahk S, et al. Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIalpha. Cell 2008; 133:103-15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.045
65. Klein UR, Haindl M, Nigg EA, Muller S. RanBP2 and SENP3 function in a mitotic SUMO2/3 conjugationdeconjugation cycle on Borealin. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:410-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-05-0511
66. Kirsh O, Seeler JS, Pichler A, Gast A, Müller S, Miska E, et al. The SUMO E3 ligase RanBP2 promotes modification of the HDAC4 deacetylase. EMBO J 2002; 21:2682-91; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.11.2682
67. Splinter D, Tanenbaum ME, Lindqvist A, Jaarsma D, Flotho A, Yu KL, et al. Bicaudal D2, dynein, and kinesin-1 associate with nuclear pore complexes and regulate centrosome and nuclear positioning during mitotic entry. PLoS Biol 2010; 8:e1000350; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000350
68. Cai Y, Singh BB, Aslanukov A, Zhao H, Ferreira PA. The docking of kinesins, KIF5B and KIF5C, to Ranbinding protein 2 (RanBP2) is mediated via a novel RanBP2 domain. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:41594-602; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M104514200
69. Mavlyutov TA, Cai Y, Ferreira PA. Identification of RanBP2- and kinesin-mediated transport pathways with restricted neuronal and subcellular localization. Traffic 2002; 3:630-40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30905.x
70. Cho KI, Yi H, Tserentsoodol N, Searle K, Ferreira PA. Neuroprotection resulting from insufficiency of RANBP2 is associated with the modulation of protein and lipid homeostasis of functionally diverse but linked pathways in response to oxidative stress. Dis Model Mech 2010; 3:595-604; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.004648
71. Cho KI, Yi H, Yeh A, Tserentsoodol N, Cuadrado L, Searle K, et al. Haploinsufficiency of RanBP2 is neuroprotective against light-elicited and age-dependent degeneration of photoreceptor neurons. Cell Death Differ 2009; 16:287-97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.153
72. Asally M, Yasuda Y, Oka M, Otsuka S, Yoshimura SH, Takeyasu K, et al. Nup358, a nucleoporin, functions as a key determinant of the nuclear pore complex structure remodeling during skeletal myogenesis. FEBS J 2011; 278:610-21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07982.x
73. Joseph J, Dasso M. The nucleoporin Nup358 associates with and regulates interphase microtubules. FEBS Lett 2008; 582:190-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.087
74. Murawala P, Tripathi MM, Vyas P, Salunke A, Joseph J. Nup358 interacts with APC and plays a role in cell polarization. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:3113-22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.037523
75. Collin L, Schlessinger K, Hall A. APC nuclear membrane association and microtubule polarity. Biol Cell 2008; 100:243-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BC20070123
76. Moustakas A, Heldin CH. The regulation of TGFbeta signal transduction. Development 2009; 136:3699-714; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.030338
77. Zhang X, Yang H, Yu J, Chen C, Zhang G, Bao J, et al. Genomic organization, transcript variants and comparative analysis of the human nucleoporin 155 (NUP155) gene. Gene 2002; 288:9-18; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00470-5
78. Grimaldi MR, Cozzolino L, Malva C, Graziani F, Gigliotti S. nup154 genetically interacts with cup and plays a cell-type-specific function during Drosophila melanogaster egg-chamber development. Genetics 2007; 175:1751-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.062844
79. Gigliotti S, Callaini G, Andone S, Riparbelli MG, Pernas-Alonso R, Hoffmann G, et al. Nup154, a new Drosophila gene essential for male and female gametogenesis is related to the nup155 vertebrate nucleoporin gene. J Cell Biol 1998; 142:1195-207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.142.5.1195
80. Colozza G, Montembault E, Quénerch'du E, Riparbelli MG, D'Avino PP, Callaini G. Drosophila nucleoporin Nup154 controls cell viability, proliferation and nuclear accumulation of Mad transcription factor. Tissue Cell 2011; 43:254-61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2011.05.001
81. Chen X, Xu L. Specific nucleoporin requirement for Smad nuclear translocation. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:4022-34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00124-10
82. Xu L, Yao X, Chen X, Lu P, Zhang B, Ip YT. Msk is required for nuclear import of TGF-beta/BMPactivated Smads. J Cell Biol 2007; 178:981-94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200703106
83. Yao X, Chen X, Cottonham C, Xu L. Preferential utilization of Imp7/8 in nuclear import of Smads. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:22867-74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801320200
84. Xu L, Kang Y, Cöl S, Massagué J. Smad2 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by nucleoporins CAN/Nup214 and Nup153 feeds TGFbeta signaling complexes in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Mol Cell 2002; 10:271-82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00586-5
85. Xu L, Alarcón C, Cöl S, Massagué J. Distinct domain utilization by Smad3 and Smad4 for nucleoporin interaction and nuclear import. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:42569-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307601200
86. Gloerich M, Vliem MJ, Prummel E, Meijer LA, Rensen MG, Rehmann H, et al. The nucleoporin RanBP2 tethers the cAMP effector Epac1 and inhibits its catalytic activity. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:1009-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011126
87. Gloerich M, Bos JL. Epac: defining a new mechanism for cAMP action. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2010; 50:355-75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105714
88. Mackay DR, Elgort SW, Ullman KS. The nucleoporin Nup153 has separable roles in both early mitotic progression and the resolution of mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:1652-60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-08-0883
89. Wälde S, Thakar K, Hutten S, Spillner C, Nath A, Rothbauer U, et al. The nucleoporin Nup358/RanBP2 promotes nuclear import in a cargo- and transport receptor-specific manner. Traffic 2012; 13:218-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01302.x
90. Moudry P, Lukas C, Macurek L, Neumann B, Heriche JK, Pepperkok R, et al. Nucleoporin NUP153 guards genome integrity by promoting nuclear import of 53BP1. Cell Death Differ 2011; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2011.150
91. Lemaître C, Fischer B, Kalousi A, Hoffbeck AS, Guirouilh-Barbat J, Shahar OD, et al. The nucleoporin 153, a novel factor in double-strand break repair and DNA damage response. Oncogene 2012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.638
92. Lupu F, Alves A, Anderson K, Doye V, Lacy E. Nuclear pore composition regulates neural stem/progenitor cell differentiation in the mouse embryo. Dev Cell 2008; 14:831-42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.011
93. Olsson M, Schéele S, Ekblom P. Limited expression of nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein 210 in cell lines and tissues suggests cell-type specific nuclear pores in metazoans. Exp Cell Res 2004; 292:359-70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.09.014
94. Ferreira PA, Nakayama TA, Pak WL, Travis GH. Cyclophilin-related protein RanBP2 acts as chaperone for red/green opsin. Nature 1996; 383:637-40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/383637a0
95. Ferreira PA, Nakayama TA, Travis GH. Interconversion of red opsin isoforms by the cyclophilinrelated chaperone protein Ran-binding protein 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:1556-61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.4.1556
96. Aslanukov A, Bhowmick R, Guruju M, Oswald J, Raz D, Bush RA, et al. RanBP2 modulates Cox11 and hexokinase I activities and haploinsufficiency of RanBP2 causes deficits in glucose metabolism. PLoS Genet 2006; 2:e177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020177
97. Cho KI, Cai Y, Yi H, Yeh A, Aslanukov A, Ferreira PA. Association of the kinesin-binding domain of RanBP2 to KIF5B and KIF5C determines mitochondria localization and function. Traffic 2007; 8:1722-35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00647.x
98. Cho KI, Yi H, Desai R, Hand AR, Haas AL, Ferreira PA. RANBP2 is an allosteric activator of the conventional kinesin-1 motor protein, KIF5B, in a minimal cell-free system. EMBO Rep 2009; 10:480-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.29
99. Riparbelli MG, Gigliotti S, Callaini G. The Drosophila nucleoporin gene nup154 is required for correct microfilament dynamics and cell death during oogenesis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2007; 64:590-604; PMID:17410542; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cm.20206
100. Zhang X, Chen S, Yoo S, Chakrabarti S, Zhang T, Ke T, et al. Mutation in nuclear pore component NUP155 leads to atrial fibrillation and early sudden cardiac death. Cell 2008; 135:1017-27; PMID: 19070573; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.022
101. Kehat I, Accornero F, Aronow BJ, Molkentin JD. Modulation of chromatin position and gene expression by HDAC4 interaction with nucleoporins. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:21-9; PMID:21464227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201101046
102. Faria AM, Levay A, Wang Y, Kamphorst AO, Rosa ML, Nussenzveig DR, et al. The nucleoporin Nup96 is required for proper expression of interferonregulated proteins and functions. Immunity 2006; 24:295-304; PMID:16546098; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2006.01.014
103. Von Kobbe C, van Deursen JM, Rodrigues JP, Sitterlin D, Bachi A, Wu X, et al. Vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein inhibits host cell gene expression by targeting the nucleoporin Nup98. Mol Cell 2000; 6:1243-52; PMID:11106761; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00120-9
104. Enninga J, Levy DE, Blobel G, Fontoura BM. Role of nucleoporin induction in releasing an mRNA nuclear export block. Science 2002; 295:1523-5; PMID: 11809937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1067861